| tkamppeter | Hi, I have uploaded HPLIP-3.15.2 to Vivid which depends on python3-reportlab. python3-reportlab (binary package) is in Universe whereas its source, python-reportlab is in Main. Do I need to report a MIR bug or is it not neede as the source is already in Main? | 01:01 |
|---|---|---|
| === Guest81467 is now known as rcj | ||
| ypwong | starting from yesterday's ubuntu kylin 14.04.2 image, light-themes was removed. Does anyone know any recent changes in trusty that caused this? | 06:50 |
| ypwong | we reported the bug in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1418351 | 06:50 |
| ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1418351 in Ubuntu Kylin "Window displays abnormal in the login screen, light-themes removed (14.04.2)" [Critical,Confirmed] | 06:50 |
| jibel | infinity, the release of 14.04.2 won't be this week, right? | 08:51 |
| darkxst | jibel, no | 08:54 |
| darkxst | jibel, seems the infinity bot forgot to tell any of the flavours ;) | 08:55 |
| darkxst | maybe ubuntu as well? | 08:55 |
| jibel | darkxst, yes, it seems so even for Ubuntu. | 08:55 |
| infinity | jibel: Oh jey, just the man I wanted to talk to. | 08:55 |
| infinity | s/jey/hey/ | 08:55 |
| infinity | jibel: So, I intend to delay it for a week, but before I set a date, I wanted to ask you how much lead time you and your team need for your testing. | 08:56 |
| infinity | jibel: ie: to release next Thursday, when do you need RC images? | 08:56 |
| jibel | infinity, I won't have resources next week, we have another release to deal with. But to release on a Thursday we'd need images on Tuesday morning to give us 2 full days of testing and time for a possible respin | 08:58 |
| infinity | jibel: Err, oh. Uhm. Another release to deal with? | 08:58 |
| jibel | infinity, there is a release of the phone every 2 weeks, and next milestone is next week | 08:59 |
| elfy | the week after that - flavours will be dealing with beta 1 | 09:00 |
| elfy | just mentioning that | 09:00 |
| infinity | jibel: So, we've never talked to phone people about aligning with a once-every-two-week cadence. Ever. What would happen if we'd collided? | 09:00 |
| tjaalton | if a package is listed as "valid candidate" on update_excuses, what's holding it back from migrating to vivid? | 09:06 |
| cjwatson | tjaalton: check update_output; update_excuses is only the first stage. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration | 09:31 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| tjaalton | cjwatson: ah, I see.. | 11:23 |
| tjaalton | right, kwin got built against the old libinput, meh | 11:52 |
| === slangase` is now known as slangasek | ||
| wxl | infinity: did we make a decision on 14.04.2? | 17:33 |
| wxl | elfy: did you have people testing trusty daily before we started trusting the official point release? | 17:57 |
| elfy | wxl afaik next week for .2 | 17:57 |
| wxl | elfy: yeah i saw | 17:58 |
| elfy | no - they started once I'd seen it was available and pinged our testers | 17:58 |
| wxl | dang that sucks | 17:58 |
| wxl | i think with the 2 day window we're going to have to do a bigger lead up in dailies | 17:58 |
| elfy | we're not testing anything but vivid dailes - I assume you mean trusty milestones | 17:59 |
| wxl | yeah | 17:59 |
| wxl | that's the same boat we're in | 17:59 |
| wxl | and now i'm thinking we should do otherwise | 18:00 |
| elfy | nto sure what you mean | 18:00 |
| elfy | I guess I get half a day on you being UTC=more or less my time of the day :) | 18:01 |
| wxl | elfy: focus more effort on testing lts dailies | 18:01 |
| elfy | I won't | 18:01 |
| wxl | no? | 18:01 |
| elfy | it's an uphill struggle though treacle to get people to test the dev daily | 18:02 |
| wxl | yeah well i understand that | 18:02 |
| wxl | but you can at least have dreams :) | 18:02 |
| elfy | we'll test LTS when there's a milestone | 18:02 |
| elfy | wxl: ha ha ha | 18:02 |
| bdmurray | tjaalton: ready? | 18:05 |
| tjaalton | bdmurray: yup | 18:13 |
| wxl | elfy: one other thing. do we have any idea how to actually fix the problem? | 18:45 |
| elfy | I don't | 18:47 |
| elfy | I know if I remove ibus which has turned up it want's to then install some gnome-blah-centre - which purging removes all the qt5 stuff we've got | 18:48 |
| elfy | pretty sure there's a dependency change causing it - but I've not got the first idea where to look - someone else is :) | 18:49 |
| wxl | let's rephase, elfy: what causes it/ :) | 18:49 |
| elfy | no idea :) | 18:49 |
| w-flo | so 14.04.2 is probably postponed (though I can't find an announcement for that), but I wonder if the various xorg packages and mesa backports can move to trusty-updates soonish, i.e. before 14.04.2 release? | 21:10 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: hey, what seeds generated http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/trusty/daily/current/? | 23:18 |
| wxl | packing issues, jdstrand ? | 23:19 |
| jdstrand | no | 23:19 |
| wxl | well then it's just the rest of us having them then ;) | 23:20 |
| jdstrand | I see ubuntu-core.utopic and ubuntu-core.vivid seeds in bzr, but I don't know what generated trusty and lower | 23:20 |
| wxl | ah curious | 23:20 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: also, where are the seeds for snappy for ubuntu core? | 23:44 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: also, I noticed that ubuntu-core.vivid is still using 'include platform.utopic'. I'm not sure if that should be 'include platform.vivid' | 23:45 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: I guess the answer for trusty is the standard seed from ubuntu.trusty | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!