/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/02/06/#ubuntu-mir.txt

alan_gracarr: I think I know what I missed. Working on a quick fix. (But it opens up a whole load of simplifications to qtmir that I'm trying to resist for now.)09:18
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== pete-woods is now known as pete-woods|afk
alan_gracarr: I've not had time to test and have a hospital appointment - but I've pushed what I think is a fix to port-to-msh-Shell09:48
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk
alf_racarr: How is the 0.11 release going? Asking because I need 0.11 to be released so I can release some Mesa fixes/changes.10:10
alf_racarr: (Good morning!)10:10
=== pete-woods|afk is now known as pete-woods
=== sturmflut_ is now known as sturmflut
alf_racarr: duflu: @mir abi broken, we knew about this and since mir_connection_platform_operation was not (and couldn't have been) in use, we chose to ignore it. What changed?14:01
duflualf_: I lost track... ask racarr14:03
racarralf_: It was a series of confusions because we had a crash moving a client from .10 to .11 so it was like14:18
racarroh ABI must be broken14:18
racarrso then we ran compliance checker and its like14:18
racarrok yeah ABI broken14:18
racarrthen at the end of the day we realized it wasn't in use ( I was mistakingly imaginging the mesa EGL platform using it forgetting the fds were preauthed)14:18
alf_racarr: yes, all external code (i.e. XMir) still uses the mesa_connection_drm_* functions14:19
alf_racarr: and mesa doesn't use mir public client functions at all directly14:20

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!