[01:48] <robru> bfiller: vivid 9
[01:49] <bfiller> robru: thanks
[01:49] <robru> bfiller: you're welcome
[01:50] <bfiller> robru: vivid 13 is ready to be published, for some reason dash thinks it's still building
[01:51] <robru> bfiller: that looks like some spreadsheet bs
[01:51] <robru> bfiller: what spreadsheet row corresponds to vivid 13? the spreadsheet looks super wrong
[01:51] <bfiller> robru: row 53
[01:52] <robru> bfiller: heh, did you do something? looks like it just fixed itself
[01:52] <bfiller> robru: nope, weird
[01:52] <bfiller> magic
[01:52] <bfiller> guess it was thinking
[01:52] <robru> bfiller: k, publishing
[01:54] <robru> kenvandine: around for a packaging ack? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-013-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_address-book-app_0.2+15.04.20150210.2-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/ some new deps here
[05:20] <imgbot> [05:20] <imgbot> [06:50] <imgbot> [06:57] <Mirv> hmm, that's a quite late image building..
[08:08] <ogra_> imgbot, status 97
[08:08] <imgbot> Error: There does not seem to be any build with the number 97
[08:08] <ogra_> pfft
[08:28] <ogra_> imgbot, status vivid 97
[08:28] <imgbot> Error: There does not seem to be any build with the number vivid
[08:29] <ogra_> hmm, strange
[08:29] <ogra_> imgbot, status vivid 96
[08:29] <imgbot> Error: There does not seem to be any build with the number vivid
[08:29] <ogra_> imgbot, status 97 vivid
[08:29] <imgbot> Error: There does not seem to be any build with the number 97
[08:29] <ogra_> imgbot, status 96 vivid
[08:29] <imgbot> Status: succeeded, Started: 2015-02-12 03:53:07 UTC, Finished: 2015-02-12 04:48:05 UTC
[08:29] <imgbot> Build URL: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-touch/+build/19739
[08:29] <imgbot> Changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/96.changes
[08:29] <ogra_> aha
[09:19] <Mirv> ogra_: why did that #97 start anyway, having #96 finished 1.5h earlier?
[09:20] <ogra_> we had a lot of failed builds and the x86 seems to have been very slow tonight too
[09:20] <ogra_> not sure what happened there
[09:20]  * ogra_ will do forencis after the meeting :)
[09:33] <sil2100> ogra_: ping!
[09:34] <ogra_> on my way ... gimme a sec
[09:57] <sil2100> Qt 5.4 banzai \o/
[10:01] <seb128> sil2100, banzai?
[10:02] <Mirv> he's just excited of the possibility of it arriving soon :)
[11:17] <davmor2> sil2100: yeap old app on rtm mako
[11:17] <davmor2> sil2100: ref terminal
[11:44] <sil2100> davmor2: thanks for double confirming, will update it
[11:48] <Mirv> Saviq: hmm, I wonder why unity8 is removing the changelog entry for 8.02+15.04.20150205-0ubuntu1 - a possible problem
[11:48] <Mirv> it's a recent build, yes, and trunk is up-to-date
[11:49] <Mirv> Saviq: can you check the full diff that it thankfully available that it makes sense? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/197324216/unity8_8.02%2B15.04.20150205-0ubuntu1_8.02%2B15.04.20150211-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
[11:50] <Mirv> ie is it reverting the 20150205 release or somehow "only" the changelog entry
[11:51] <sil2100> CI Train bug? Or something else?
[11:52] <sil2100> This is strange
[11:52] <Mirv> yeah, my thoughts too
[11:53] <Mirv> taking the bug #1363400 fix MP as an example of the previous release, it wouldn't look it would revert anything codewise
[11:53] <Saviq> Mirv, looking
[11:54] <Mirv> Saviq: if you conclude too that it doesn't look it's reverting anything, we might just publish it and fix trunk manually to include the previous entry, but this might be a new CI Train bug
[11:55] <Saviq> Mirv, indeed it looks like changelog got borked - the last entry is replaced with the new one
[11:57] <sil2100> hmmm
[11:57] <sil2100> Saviq: just to be super sure - did any of your merges touch debian/changelog?
[11:58] <Mirv> yeah I checked the other 20150205 bug too, the diff itself seems ok, no reverts
[11:58] <Saviq> sil2100, don't think so, checking
[11:58] <Saviq> sil2100, it did for unity-api, that might be relevant
[11:58] <Saviq> i.e. https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity-api/launcher-onlyPinned/+merge/249096
[11:59] <sil2100> Need to check the code now, but I suppose robru didn't yet put his new build job in production
[11:59] <sil2100> So it should be the same as before
[11:59] <Saviq> sil2100, nothing for unity8 touched changelog
[11:59] <Mirv> Saviq: the unity-api shouldn't be relevant
[11:59] <Mirv> sil2100: can I publish that or do you want to keep it on hold?
[12:00] <Saviq> Mirv, I'd *think* so... actually especially since those were built in separate build jobs
[12:00] <sil2100> Mirv: wait with it for a moment still
[12:00] <Mirv> ok
[12:03] <sil2100> Saviq: btw. only slightly related but... are you sure the silo is in a coherent state? Since the last few build runs failed
[12:05] <Saviq> sil2100, ???
[12:05] <Saviq> sil2100, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-1-build/
[12:05] <sil2100> Mirv: hah, actually, the diff you pasted seems a bit irrelevant ;)
[12:05] <sil2100> Saviq: aah, sorry! My bad,
[12:06] <sil2100> Ignore taht
[12:06] <Saviq> sil2100, the diff comes from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-004/+sourcepub/4771688/+listing-archive-extra
[12:06] <Saviq> sil2100, and I checked the tarball, it's wrong indeed
[12:06] <Saviq> see https://launchpadlibrarian.net/197324105/unity8_8.02%2B15.04.20150211-0ubuntu1.diff.gz - the changelog does not include the 20150205 entry (that's currently in vivid)
[12:07]  * Saviq tries to reproduce the branch to compare
[12:09] <Saviq> sil2100, Mirv, I just replayed the build job's merge queue and the only thing that's not the same are changelog and .po files that got updated in trunk in the mean time
[12:09] <Saviq> so the silo is coherent, with the exception of changelog
[12:09] <Mirv> Saviq: thanks for proper validation!
[12:10] <sil2100> This is really bizarre
[12:12] <sil2100> hmmm
[12:18] <sil2100> Still trying to bisect which of the steps cause this strange behavior
[12:33] <rsalveti> morning
[12:34] <rsalveti> ogra_: once https://code.launchpad.net/~mir-team/mir/server-doesnt-depend-on-drivers/+merge/249449 gets released we might be able to drop a ton of mesa specific packages
[12:34] <rsalveti> at least we don't need update-alternatives anymore
[12:35] <ogra_> rsalveti, yeah, i saw you droipped it
[12:35] <Mirv> morning, the-person-who-I-spam-a-lot :)
[12:36] <rsalveti> Mirv: haha, all good :-)
[12:36] <rsalveti> have to go to the dentist now but will check the qt packages when back
[12:36] <rsalveti> you're messages are really useful
[13:34] <Mirv> sil2100: how about publishing the silo, or are you still debugging?
[13:34] <sil2100> Mirv: still looking ;p
[13:38] <sil2100> Mirv: anyway, I guess you publish the package, I'll continue on debugging
[13:42] <Mirv> sil2100: ok, thanks
[13:45] <sil2100> I suppose this had to be some really really broken situation, as dch would never remove an already existent version in the changelog
[13:45] <sil2100> And the source tree is completely fine, with the debian/changelog untouched before the release commit has been made
[14:05] <Mirv> ricmm: ^
[14:10] <Mirv> pstolowski: no MP link
[14:13] <pstolowski> Mirv, sorry.. fixed
[14:13]  * Mirv assigns
[14:22] <sil2100> davmor2, jibel: how's testing going so far?
[14:22] <jibel> sil2100, it's going
[14:22] <davmor2> sil2100: oh were we meant to start that already?
[14:23]  * sil2100 starts choking davmor2 
[14:23] <sil2100> ;)
[14:24] <davmor2> sil2100: sorry davmor2 can not reply he is being choked, please leave a message after the tone, beeeeeeep
[17:18] <robru> bfiller: ^ silo 9 really ready? it doesn't say so in the spreadsheet or dashbaord. not sure how the bot got that status...
[17:18] <bfiller> robru: it's not ready yet, I marked it ready but then remembered I needed another MR
[17:18] <robru> bfiller: ok no worries
[17:18] <bfiller> robru: I changed it back
[17:18] <robru> good thing I checked ;-)
[17:19] <bfiller> indeed
[17:29] <bfiller> robru: mind reconfiguring ubuntu silo 9
[17:30] <robru> bfiller: one sec
[19:38] <bzoltan_> trainguards: may i ask for a reconf of the rtm silo 14 please?
[19:40] <robru> bzoltan_: done
[19:40] <bzoltan_> robru: thank you
[19:40] <robru> bzoltan_: your'e welcome
[19:48] <robru> alexabreu: https://code.launchpad.net/~abreu-alexandre/ubuntu-html5-theme/rtm-fix-webkit-launch/+merge/249553 can I get you to set the commit message here? then we can try your build again
[19:48] <alexabreu> robru, ah ! thx
[19:48] <robru> alexabreu: and you get to be the guinea pig for the first production run of some new train code (but don't worry, 80+ successful runs in staging, should be fine)
[19:49] <alexabreu> robru, oh! /me lucky
[19:49] <alexabreu> robru, I updated the commit msg, I'll rebuild
[19:49] <robru> alexabreu: thanks
[19:53] <robru> alexabreu: hmmmm
[19:54] <robru> alexabreu: looks like there's a creds issue, not sure how that happened, i didn't touch those...
[19:54] <robru> digging...
[20:03] <bzoltan_> robru:  sorry, I have mised that whole adb hustle ... so what is the way to get adb working with a stock RTM image?
[20:05] <robru> bzoltan_: don't look at me ;-)
[20:05] <robru> bzoltan_: I guess ogra knows that? I haven't been paying attention to adb changes.
[20:06] <bzoltan_> robru:  I do not blame :) you... I just wonder how I suppose to test the _STOCK_ image ... the one what goes out :D
[20:20] <robru> bzoltan_: not sure, sorry.
[20:24] <robru> alexabreu: ok sorry about that, fixed the creds issue. https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-015-1-build/69/console looks to be building!
[20:25] <alexabreu> robru, ok thx, ...
[21:06] <kgunn_> robru: i was kinda tryiing to build a few pkgs in silo 0...but then i saw you did this ^
[21:06] <robru> kgunn_: bzoltan_ sorry about that, there was a hiccup with your build jobs. I fixed it and reran them
[21:06] <kgunn_> robru: ack...is all clear ?
[21:06] <robru> kgunn_: it should all be good now, but if you check the logs, the build you started wasn't actually running.
[21:07] <kgunn_> werid
[21:07] <robru> kgunn_: my fault, the creds got corrupted earlier today when I did a production rollout, took me a bit of time to fix that and restart people's jobs
[21:10] <robru> bzoltan_: hmmmmm
[21:14] <robru> bzoltan_: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-014-1-build/66/console do you have any idea what's going on in this log? it says unsatisfiable dependencies but then it builds anyway and then fails on a missing gpg signature.
[21:15] <bzoltan_> robru:  no idea
[21:15] <robru> bzoltan_: does that dependency mean anything to you?
[21:17] <bzoltan_> robru:  that seems to be a problem with the qtbase5-gles-dev packae
[21:17] <bzoltan_> robru:  do not mind it, I will fix it with Mirv tomorrow
[21:18] <robru> bzoltan_: the thing is, I just rolled out a huge citrain change, so I need to poke at this a bit to rule out the possibility that I've horribly broken the train
[21:31] <robru> bzoltan_: lol @ https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/cyphermox-test/606/console i dun goofed
[21:32] <robru> bzoltan_: no, wait!
[21:33] <robru> bzoltan_: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/rtm-landing-1202-gles/revision/43 why does your MP have '.dsc' in the changelog? that looks super wrong and weird to me
[21:34] <robru> bzoltan_: yeah please try s/.dsc// out of here: https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/rtm-landing-1202-gles/+merge/249560 and try it again. that might be screwing things up.
[21:38] <bfiller> robru: silo 9 is ready for realease but train seems to think the build failed
[21:39] <robru> bfiller: ok I see what happened there, just doing a WATCH_ONLY to clean that up
[21:40] <robru> bfiller: you must have clicked build mid-rollout, sorry about that ;-) it looks like it ran with new code but the old jenkins job. no worries though.
[21:49] <robru> bfiller: lots of packaging changes in there, did you get a core dev ack yet?
[21:50] <bfiller> robru: let me ask kenvandine
[21:50] <kenvandine> sure
[21:50] <bfiller> kenvandine: you mind reviewing silo 9?
[21:50] <robru> bfiller: kenvandine: diff is at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-009-1-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-ui-extras_0.2+15.04.20150212.3-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/
[21:50] <bfiller> it's what we've discussed already
[21:51] <kenvandine> bfiller, and your seeding it right?
[21:51] <bfiller> kenvandine: yes, I have a seperate MR for that - will file once this lands
[21:53] <kenvandine> robru, ok, i looked at the diff for all 4 of those packages, they have have packaging changes
[21:53] <kenvandine> +1 from me
[21:53] <robru> kenvandine: great, thanks.
[21:54] <kenvandine> bfiller, thx for updating all the depends :)
[21:54] <kenvandine> bfiller, just don't forget the seed too
[21:54] <robru> bfiller: will publish in a sec, just double-checking some train stuff
[21:54] <bfiller> kenvandine: let me do that now
[21:55] <kenvandine> having the depends will get dtrt, but i don't want to forget it and have another mess like the connectivity module :-p
[21:55] <kenvandine> which i know i've bitched about enough
[21:57] <bfiller> rsalveti: any chance you can upload new meta package from this seed MR: https://code.launchpad.net/~bfiller/ubuntu-seeds/add-ui-extras/+merge/249575
[21:57] <bfiller> kenvandine: ^^^^
[21:57] <rsalveti> bfiller: sure
[21:58] <robru> bfiller: just need some merges approved ;-) https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-009-2-publish/82/console
[21:59] <bfiller> robru: done
[22:30] <rsalveti> bfiller: there is no extras0.2 in the archive
[22:30] <bfiller> rsalveti: silo 9 just landing now and it has it
[22:31] <bfiller> rsalveti: was migrating last I checked
[22:31] <rsalveti> oh, it just got migrated
[22:43] <robru> charles: please use spaces to separate your MPs, not commas.
[22:43] <charles> robru, ack
[22:43] <robru> charles: ok, silo 4
[22:44] <robru> cyphermox: you around to look after landings for a bit? I'm taking a late lunch.
[22:46] <robru> bfiller: got you silo 9 but note the keyboard conflict in silo 0
[22:47] <bfiller> robru: ack
[22:57] <bfiller> robru: are my sync commands correct on row 87 and 88? wasn't sure if I needed commas or not
[22:57] <robru> bfiller: yeah looks right. comma between ubuntu,vivid but space between package names
[22:58] <bfiller> robru: thanks
[22:58] <robru> bfiller: i've never heard of 'presage' package though, but assuming that's a package name that's right
[22:58] <bfiller> robru: yeah, it's the word prediction library
[22:58] <robru> bfiller: ah k
[22:59] <robru> brb
[23:01] <robru> in a meeting, ping me if you need anything
[23:51] <bfiller> robru: need a reconfigure on rtm silo 17 when you have a chance