/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/02/13/#launchpad.txt

=== drkokandy_ is now known as drkokandy
=== elmo_ is now known as elmo
=== JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose
dsmythiesHi launchpad people. I have an issue. 14 hours ago I pushed revisions to the Ubuntu Officical documentation that ends up on help.ubuntu.com. I never got an e-mail (the team normally does), and I still am unable to open http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ubuntu-docs/help.ubuntu.com/revision/176 . Note that I have done large revisions before, but I do not think ever one this big. The page I end up on says if the problem persists 16:03
dobeydsmythies: looks like it is timing out. do you get an OOPS-ID in the page? if so, you can file a bug and include that OOPS-ID value in the report.16:12
cjwatsonis it important that it be viewable in the web UI?16:13
cjwatsonit seems to at least have been scanned by Launchpad itself, so you should be able to branch it normally etc.16:13
dsmythiesThere is no OOPs-ID. The page start with "Uh Oh" and says there is a "Technically, the load balancer took too long to connect to an application server."16:16
dsmythiesIf it worked, and completed properly, then I should have got an e-mail and this morning help.ubuntu.com should have been updated. Neither occured.16:16
cjwatsonit's not clear that codebrowse problems are related to that though16:17
cjwatsonlooking into logs16:17
dsmythiescjwatson: I recall you saying one time that you were heading over to launchpad (I don't recall the context of the exchange).16:20
cjwatsonindeed16:21
cjwatsonthis isn't an area I know well yet, though16:23
cjwatsondo you know how the help.ubuntu.com update is triggered?16:24
dobeywell, if the branch history is significantly large as a result of the changes in the commit, it can cause issues with pulling the branch as well (i've had issues pulling very large branches before)16:24
cjwatsonthe REVISIONS_ADDED_MAIL job for this branch OOPSed16:24
cjwatsonso that explains the lack of mail16:24
cjwatsonOOPS-a063e5292d781f083e06db3c2cf8c7df but it's not on oops.c.c16:25
ubot5https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-a063e5292d781f083e06db3c2cf8c7df16:25
dsmythiesCorrection: I think help.ubunut.com actually did update.16:25
dsmythies... still checking.16:25
dsmythiesYes, help.ubuntu.com did update.16:26
cjwatsonThat makes sense.  So you just didn't get mail because the job oopsed, probably because it tried to get the revision history and timed out.16:26
cjwatsonOr similar.16:26
dsmythiesO.K. so it seems I'll never be able to open the revision page because it is too huge. the e-mail also failed for the same reason. But the update itself is O.K.16:28
cjwatsonI think so.  Bazaar has some scaling limitations ...16:29
dsmythiesGunnarHj: I made a mistake in my e-mail, it did update, I was looking for relative addresses, which of course on the real help.ubuntu.com are the same as the old absolute address. Duh.16:30
dsmythiesThanks all.16:30
GunnarHjdsmythies: I just started "bzr pull". Let's see what happens.16:33
dsmythiesGunnarHj: It is big.16:34
GunnarHjdsmythies: I know. :)16:34
GunnarHjdsmythies: Can we move to #ubuntu-doc?16:38
dsmythiescjwatson: Imissed your "how the help.ubuntu.com update is triggered?" earlier: All I know is that if the push is done by about 2 to 3 hours ago (5 to 7 A.M. my time) it will get picked up and hlep.ubuntu.com will be updated. I believe the pickup is once every 24 (ish) hours.16:41
cjwatsondsmythies: It's probably just a cron job, then.16:41
dsmythiesI would assume, yes.16:41
dsmythiesGunnarHj: I will join #ubuntu-doc16:42
dsmythiesdobey: Re: "large commit can cause issues with pulling the branch as well": GunnarHj's pull was O.K.16:56
dobeydsmythies: sure, i was just pointing out that branches can become too large for bzr to be able to check out on some machines.17:06
GunnarHjdobey, dsmythies: Actually I got the message ""Connection Timeout: disconnecting client after 300.0 seconds", but it still continued and finalized successfully.17:09
=== wedgwood is now known as Guest68861
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
sergio-br22I'm having problem with gcc 4.8,  gcc-4.8: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fstack-protector-strong’20:39
sergio-br22any idea?20:39
cjwatsonyes, gcc-4.8 didn't have that option, so don't use it with it.20:40
sergio-br22ubuntu 14.1020:40
cjwatsonif you're explicitly using gcc-4.8 for some reason in a build, you may need to override the default hardening flags emitted by dpkg-buildflags20:40
=== JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose
sergio-br22hum, any tip to override them?20:40
sergio-br22dpkg-buildflags=xxxxx, something like this?20:41
cjwatsonsee dpkg-buildflags(1)20:41
darkxsthmm, how did some of my launchpad (api) cache get owned by root?20:41
cjwatsonsimplest way is probably, in debian/rules: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS := hardening=-stackprotectorstrong20:41
sergio-br22hum, let me see20:42
sergio-br22great, it works20:43
mark06is there a bug to track deleted ppas being listed in profile? e.g. https://launchpad.net/~renatosilva/+related-packages21:37
dobeymark06: how many PPAs do you see there?21:44
mark066, you? http://i.imgur.com/ZpbHPUM.png21:46
dobey121:50
dobeydeleted PPAs are visible to the owner in case they wish to restore, i guess21:50
* mark06 hates artificial deletion21:51
mark06I see no restore option21:53
mark06sounds like a bug21:53
mark06restoring not mentioned in docs either https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA?action=show&redirect=PPA#Deleting_a_PPA21:55
mark06anyone knows an existing bug to handle this?21:55
dobeyif you want to file a bug, just file one21:56
dobeylp developers are all gone for the weekend21:56
* mark06 filed bug 142185322:11
ubot5bug 1421853 in Launchpad itself "Deleted PPAs displayed in profile when logged in" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142185322:11
belakThis may be random, but I was looking at this: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/21855122:12
belakWhat does launchpad actually send, header wise?22:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!