[20:03] <blr> wgrant: regarding turnip configuration, do we want to be running turnip with twistd and a tac?
[20:45] <lifeless> turnip ?
[21:00] <jelmer> lifeless: some sort of root vegetable :P
[21:03] <blr> deploying on vegetables is more sustainable.
[21:10] <lifeless> but nowhere near as healthy :)
[22:22] <wgrant> blr: Most of our other Twisted services do that. twistd can be a little limiting at times, but I don't envisage problems in this case.
[22:23] <wgrant> I suspect/hope twistd will die out as sensible init systems become universal.
[22:23] <wgrant> But for now it's probably a good idea.
[22:25] <blr> wgrant: cool, will do that then.
[22:25] <blr> wgrant: good weekend?
[22:26] <wgrant> blr: The aircon died, but otherwise pretty good :)
[22:26] <wgrant> You?
[22:28] <blr> ugh, imagine that's not much fun. Got the winter vegetables in, alas, no turnips.
[22:28] <wgrant> Heh
[22:30] <blr> wgrant: hoping to have a chat with pitti today about his experiences with nova-compute-lxc - thomi mentioned he posted to canonical-tech last year while working on the uci-engine.
[22:30] <blr> well, this evening more likely, given timezones.
[22:31] <wgrant> blr: If you're wanting to test deployment on OpenStack, I'd get creds to our bootstack and use the real thing.
[22:31] <wgrant> The standard for sensible juju work nowadays is local provider for most development and testing, then real OpenStack when you want to do more.
[22:33] <blr> wgrant: okay, just thought it sounded appealing provisioning the entire stack locally - although at a guess, it would be painful.
[22:36] <wgrant> blr: Oh yeah, it's certainly appealing. But I'm not sure it's worth the pain.
[22:40] <wgrant> Ah, found the buildd-manager double-upload bug.
[22:40] <wgrant> Yay
[22:44] <wgrant> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1422199
[22:44] <mup> Bug #1422199: buildd-manager can repeatedly upload builds if handleStatus fails in the wrong place <buildd-manager> <buildfarm> <oops> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1422199>
[22:48] <xnox> wgrant: good morning =) how is monday looking so far?
[22:50] <wgrant> xnox: Rather good.
[22:50] <wgrant> xnox: Well done on the launchpadlib py3k port.
[22:50] <xnox> wgrant: tah. Well, pitti only found half a dozen bugs in it, when he tried to port apport.
[22:51] <xnox> mostly around marshalling binary data around.
[22:51] <wgrant> Heh, of course.
[22:51]  * xnox can't run full test-suite, as i didn't port _all_ the testsuite deps - which is like the rest of lazr.*
[22:51] <wgrant> Yeah. Would be nice if it could run against an external lazr.restful.
[22:51] <xnox> plus i'm not sure test-suites would have helped here. Cause i had to port them to str/bytes world view as well.
[22:52] <xnox> yeah, but too crazy for me to implement =)
[22:52] <xnox> i find pitti to be a better testsuite.
[22:52]  * xnox hides