[19:10]  * balloons awaits to pounce on veebers :-)
[19:12] <thomi> anything I can help with?
[19:14] <balloons> thomi, just curious about the autopilot release.
[19:16] <balloons> Also, I assume https://code.launchpad.net/~acerisara/autopilot/move-to-object/+merge/247524 can be top-approved?
[19:22]  * balloons pounces
[19:23] <balloons> good morning veebers. Once you've had ample time to awaken and sort yourself, ping me
[19:23] <veebers> balloons: sure, I'll ping you after the standup meeting that happening soon :-)
[19:30] <thomi> balloons: sorry, got distracted
[19:31] <thomi> balloons: veebers: I'm disturbed by the deletion of the docstring in that MP
[19:31] <thomi> but... it's veebers's baby now, so I'll let him decide
[19:32] <veebers> thomi: I'm not sure which docstring you're talking about
[19:32] <thomi> in https://code.launchpad.net/~acerisara/autopilot/move-to-object/+merge/247524
[19:32] <balloons> thomi, ohh right, the see blah
[19:32] <balloons> is there a more elegant way to do it, while still avoiding double documentation?
[19:33] <thomi> are te two methods identical?
[19:33] <balloons> mm.. I suppose it should actually have a docstring.. a unique one
[19:33] <balloons> meh
[19:33] <thomi> yeah
[19:33] <thomi> and make that function public, and give it a docstring too
[19:33] <balloons> I was thinking it was a duplication, but it's not purely one
[19:34] <thomi> that way the docstring can say "moves the cursor to the center point of the object. See `autopilot.input.get_center_point` for  details on how the center point is calculated'
[20:15] <veebers> thomi: can I get your opinion on this bug please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/autopilot/+bug/1422797
[20:16] <thomi> looking
[20:16] <veebers> I'm pretty sure it's not an autopilot issue (we haven't changed anything recently)
[20:16] <veebers> balloons: hey, what's the haps?
[20:17] <balloons> veebers, hey.. just wondering how the autopilot release was progressing
[20:17] <thomi> veebers: well, it might not be an issue in the autopilot _code_ :D
[20:17] <thomi> but it's still an issue with autopilot
[20:17] <veebers> balloons: currently it's not. Are you blocked on it not being released?
[20:17] <thomi> veebers: elopio's suggestion sounds plausible - I'd recommend following that up (make sure it's the case), and then maybe talk to the mir team about it
[20:18] <balloons> veebers, the apdocs re-work is blocked on it persay, but it would be nice
[20:18] <thomi> if elopio is correct, then this will affect users as well
[20:18] <veebers> thomi: ack, thanks
[20:18] <veebers> balloons: is or isn't?
[20:18] <thomi> balloons: <pedant>"per se"</pedant> :P
[20:18] <thomi> <-- studied latin
[20:18] <veebers> balloons: can it wait until next week?
[20:19] <balloons> veebers, wow, my sentence. No it is not blocked. The task to get the docs autoupdating is
[20:19] <balloons> and yes, as mhall is heading to scale for the rest of the week, it matters not this week :-)
[20:19] <veebers> balloons: right, ok :-) The blocked task, is that something that I'm blocking or elsewhere?
[20:20] <veebers> thomi: did balloons make a bit of a 'fox paz' ;-)
[20:20] <thomi> haha
[20:20] <balloons> thomi, yes.. wow, I don't usually type persay
[20:21] <balloons> odd thing that
[20:21] <thomi> you can butcher French all you like :D
[20:21] <balloons> more fun with sentences ^^
[20:21] <veebers> (balloons this is where you say you did it on purpose to annoy thomi :-))
[20:21] <veebers> balloons: Autopilot release is on the backlog for the sprint starting next week. So early next week we'll have a release
[20:21] <veebers> sorry again for the delay
[20:24] <balloons> veebers, I'm pretty sure the IOU balance is still in your favor.
[20:24]  * balloons debits 1 IOU from veebers account
[20:25] <balloons> and yes, messing with thomi is good fun. It's especially good fun now that he is on CI, and thus his ability to hit me back is lessened :-)
[20:25] <thomi> *cough*
[20:26] <thomi> you like having your CI jobs turned off for inexplicable reasons, do you? :P
[20:32] <veebers> heh, 'why are my CI jobs failing with the error 'Incorrect use of latin words' all of a sudden
[21:22] <veebers> elopio: hey, if you get time this week can you confirm if fixtures.Timeout will do what want for this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/autopilot/+bug/1408374