[11:20] wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/db-git-no-target-implies-owner/+merge/250114 per discussion last night [11:22] We should be able to do that hot (and I don't think we currently have the ability to do cold ones). [11:27] Because wildcherry/aurora? [11:27] Right. [11:29] Shall I just ask a webop to sort that out after landing? [11:29] That or stub. [11:30] Hm, is step 11 of the procedure in https://dev.launchpad.net/PolicyAndProcess/DatabaseSchemaChangesProcess still valid? [11:31] cjwatson: I'm not too fussed. This won't break any tests. [11:33] fdt should still be working, although I should probably be there for the next one. [11:34] dropping a contraint on an unused table is no problem live. [11:35] wgrant, cjwatson : Run that now? [11:37] I'm being called away, let me know. [11:49] stub: Please do. [12:46] cjwatson: done [12:48] stub: Thanks. Any reason I shouldn't merge it into devel once db-stable updates? [12:48] Well, staging [12:49] stub: Did you update LaunchpadDatabaseRevision? [12:49] cjwatson: It should be merged everywhere it isn't sooner rather than later. Yes, LaunchpadDatabaseRevision was updated. [12:50] Right, I'll get it into devel [13:06] stub: It's on devel now. === anthonyf is now known as Guest75096 [20:25] wgrant: what's this mail header about, do you know? "X-Katie: Launchpad actually" [20:27] thomi: It's for compatibility with mail filtering designed for Debian's dak archive management software, formerly called "katie". [20:28] huh - what is 'dak'? [20:28] Debian's archive management software [20:28] ahh., ok [20:28] Sort of a distant spiritual ancestor of Soyuz [20:28] thanks :D [20:52] cjwatson: there are config knobs for virtinfo_endpoint and authentication_endpoint in the turnip charm now. [21:03] Ah cool, will give that a try tomorrow thanks! [21:04] Also want to spend some of tomorrow on the non-LP work of finishing getting proposed-migration set up for SRUs [21:04] cjwatson: won't work until the turnip config branch has been merged however. [21:06] That shouldn't take too long to fix up, I guess [21:07] yep, just let me know if there's anything particularly egregious :) [21:10] Just the things in the diff comments on my review. It looked pretty good for the most part. [21:15] cjwatson: oh I missed that, apologies. [21:15] Ah, I thought your reply was brief :) [21:15] Yeah, can be a little easy to miss in the mail if you're not looking out for it