| imgbot | === IMAGE 103 building (started: 20150218-02:05) === | 02:05 |
|---|---|---|
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 239 building (started: 20150218-03:05) === | 03:05 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 103 DONE (finished: 20150218-03:30) === | 03:30 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/103.changes === | 03:30 |
| tedg | trainguards, Can I get a silo for line 51? | 03:40 |
| robru | tedg: ha! you just caught me on the way out for dinner. silo 11. | 03:41 |
| tedg | robru, Awesome, thanks! :-) | 03:43 |
| robru | tedg: you're welcome | 03:45 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 239 DONE (finished: 20150218-04:20) === | 04:20 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/239.changes === | 04:20 |
| ToyKeeper | Hmm, that answers that question. | 04:23 |
| Mirv | morning | 05:41 |
| Mirv | hmm, wtf happened to my qtdeclarative line on spreadsheet, and how does it seem bzoltan's line 40 has kind of assimilated it | 05:47 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: could you look at line 40 and and least make it like you'd like it to be? the MP is about phablet-tools, yet the bug is about qtdeclarative and it has qtdeclarative as manually uploaded package | 05:49 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: geez... not again a CI sheet conflict | 05:49 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: I haven't seen that, but is it something like not everything is shown to everyone, then they add a line, and they somehow get mixed up? | 05:51 |
| Mirv | I can see sil2100 "reconfigured" my silo adding phablet-tools to it.. https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/prepare-silo/4142/console | 05:51 |
| Mirv | but the bug link isn't from my line even | 05:51 |
| Mirv | yes it's qtdeclarative but not the bug my landing in silo 012 was supposed to be about :S | 05:51 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: I do not know. I deleted the crap | 05:52 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: I have not added those junk text there :) | 05:52 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: this make me very trusting that the rest of the spreadsheet has not gone completely mixed :) | 05:53 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: ok, you've your silo now reconfigured to have your actual landing, and I readded my own line | 05:54 |
| robru | Mirv: bzoltan_ I've been seeing a lot of mixups like this lately, whenever it happens to you, please reload the sheet. Sometimes it goes away. | 05:55 |
| Mirv | robru: it can't go away if a silo has already been reconfigured to have two landings mixed :) | 05:56 |
| robru | Mirv: true | 05:56 |
| Mirv | go Google! | 05:56 |
| robru | Mirv: yeah i dunno how this is getting worse, replacing the spreadsheet is top priority | 05:57 |
| oSoMoN | ogra_, hey, if/when you’re around, I need a packaging ack for https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-025-2-publish/17/artifact/packaging_changes_webbrowser-app_0.23+15.04.20150217.1-0ubuntu1.diff | 06:52 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: good morning! I need a binary copy of oxide-qt 1.5.3-0ubuntu1 from https://launchpad.net/~phablet-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages to silo 3 | 06:54 |
| robru | Mirv: can you grab that? I'm afk | 06:55 |
| Mirv | robru: sure | 06:58 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: sure | 06:58 |
| * Mirv is very sure | 06:58 | |
| robru | Mirv: thanks ;-) | 06:58 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: I tried also on #ubuntu-devel but maybe we need ogra if no-one else volunteers | 06:58 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: we got it from mitya57 | 07:01 |
| === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
| oSoMoN | Mirv, thanks! | 07:04 |
| Mirv | now all I'd need is an archive admin to approve compiz-mate binary package addition, no luck yesterday or today so far | 07:04 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: was the rtm image 237 ditched or what? | 07:17 |
| robru | Mirv: Hmmmmmmm silo 3 diff is empty, that's suspect. | 07:29 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: I'm not sure, you mean in terms of verification? I think signoffing and landing is still ongoing today. | 07:31 |
| Mirv | robru: maybe because it needs to diff around 2.5GB against another 2.5GB, something runs out? | 07:31 |
| Mirv | robru: luckily not disk space though :) | 07:32 |
| robru | Mirv: I should hope that debdiff tool doesn't explode just because the filesize | 07:33 |
| Mirv | robru: no, it's not that, I've debdiffed oxide locally just fine | 07:33 |
| robru | Mirv: I'm poking at it now... | 07:33 |
| robru | Mirv: oh I see... one sec | 07:35 |
| * ToyKeeper wonders when bfiller gets up... probably not for several more hours | 07:38 | |
| robru | ToyKeeper: gets up? hah! he probably just went to bed recently. it's not even midnight us west coast | 07:39 |
| ToyKeeper | Probably need to confirm if a silo can land even though the bugfix has an unfortunate side effect. | 07:39 |
| ToyKeeper | (in rtm-017, one of the bug fixes eliminates an accidental feature which allowed it to produce higher-quality photos) | 07:39 |
| robru | Mirv: oh btw, what I told you before about needing FORCE_REBUILD and WATCH_ONLY to regenerate diffs is no longer true. WATCH_ONLY now regenerates diffs by itself, that seemed more sensible to me. | 07:41 |
| Mirv | robru: right, that's great! | 07:44 |
| Mirv | ToyKeeper: the usual default is indeed that flash is used for focusing if when flash itself is turned off | 07:44 |
| ToyKeeper | Mirv: But it no longer uses the flash for focusing after applying this bugfix. | 07:45 |
| Mirv | ToyKeeper: yes, I just mean that indeed that's wrong, the default should be flash used for focusing even if there wouldn't be a setting for controlling it | 07:46 |
| Mirv | or well, I have seen also phones that do this same thing. | 07:47 |
| ToyKeeper | Ah, okay. So it sounds like this is less a grey matter and more of a fail. | 07:47 |
| Mirv | yes it's a rather grey matter. some people prefer that they can actually make the phone not to use the flash (for example it's banned to use flash in museums) | 07:47 |
| ToyKeeper | Oh, it definitely is better to have the option rather than letting the phone be too smart for its own good. :) | 07:48 |
| ToyKeeper | But I feel that way about pretty much any attempt at software being clever. | 07:49 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: I mean that the RTM #237 is not listed here -> http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/ But it was the latest proposed when I validated the UITK landing... and it brought a broken gallery what made my testing invalid. Not nice ... | 07:56 |
| robru | Mirv: hah: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-003-1-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/full_oxide-qt.diff/*view*/ 366MB diff, got it working at least. | 08:01 |
| Mirv | robru: now we just need to review it properly! | 08:08 |
| Mirv | but yes, working = good | 08:08 |
| robru | Mirv: good luck ;-) | 08:08 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: that's probably just ogra's scripts not running or something, as it's missing 237+238 | 08:09 |
| ogra_ | well, there were most likely device tarball or custom tarball changes ... if there are no rootfs changes -> no changelog | 08:09 |
| Mirv | oh right, there were those | 08:10 |
| seb128 | is anyone looking at u1 accounts being lost on rtm > 234 updates? | 08:10 |
| ogra_ | seb128, it is most likely due to the server wanting to refresh the token ... | 08:10 |
| ogra_ | your token gets invalid on the phone when that happens | 08:11 |
| ogra_ | we need better user feedback for this | 08:11 |
| seb128 | why is that happening only after an update? | 08:11 |
| seb128 | ogra_, dbarth is saying something else on -touch | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | dunno ... before the old account stayed around and people were wondering why app updates stopped workin | 08:12 |
| seb128 | <dbarth> seb128: apparently because the apparmor extension is missing, and the u1 lib now expects it to be there | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | how could that lib land without this in place ? | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | this needs to be a dependency then | 08:13 |
| seb128 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/signon/+bug/1392380/comments/17 | 08:14 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1392380 in signon (Ubuntu RTM) "OA gives out all tokens to any app" [Undecided,In progress] | 08:14 |
| seb128 | so yeah | 08:14 |
| seb128 | bug, not token from server issue | 08:14 |
| bzoltan_ | ogra_: Mirv: anyhow, there must be a gallery app change between 236-237 what introduced failing tests | 08:15 |
| ogra_ | seb128, well, 239 has the fix then | 08:16 |
| seb128 | my u1 account is not back though | 08:17 |
| seb128 | dbarth, ^ do we need to add the account again anyway? | 08:18 |
| bzoltan_ | ogra_: Mirv: can you guys confirm this gallery change? | 08:20 |
| ogra_ | bzoltan_, i can confirm that no rootfs changes happened :) | 08:21 |
| ogra_ | nothing else | 08:21 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: ogra_: no, gallery is 2.9.1.1136 from end of January | 08:21 |
| bzoltan_ | ogra_: so you say that the 236 and 237 are identical? Because I did capture a gallery test regressions. | 08:22 |
| ogra_ | no, i say that the rootfs hasnt changed | 08:22 |
| ogra_ | iirc 237 had some fixed for factory mode or so ... | 08:22 |
| ogra_ | *fixes | 08:23 |
| ogra_ | in the device tarball | 08:23 |
| ogra_ | and 238 was a new custom tarball ... no idea what changed there | 08:23 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: Ok, the gallery did not change. What about the gallery tests? | 08:24 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: the RTM branch of gallery is untouched | 08:24 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: but, maybe the phablet-click-test-setup checks out trunk instead? | 08:25 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: something caused the gallery test failures from 236 to 237 | 08:25 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: oSoMoN fixed gallery-app test failures in _trunk_ 19 hours ago https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/gallery-app/trunk | 08:25 |
| Mirv | if phablet-click-test-setup checks out trunk AP:s instead of rtm AP:s, that would explain it | 08:25 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: Yeps... that was it. 19 hours ... that is exactly between my reference and silo testing | 08:26 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: so it's not tests failing, it's wrong tests | 08:26 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: but nothing in rootfs really changed in 237 and 238 | 08:27 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: Clear. | 08:27 |
| === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: ubuntu-rtm landing gates now closed | ||
| bzoltan_ | brendand: jibel: Guys, I have marked the silo1 tested and pasted the test results to the usual cell in the sheet. The silo validation for UITK takes ages, like 12-14 hours a round. You do not need to run the test plan. All the tests are done. If you have questions please ping me _and_ kalikiana. I hope that this UITK fix can make it to the the w9 freeze. | 08:41 |
| Mirv | bzoltan_: we'll have a hangout in 45mins, after that we'll know more | 08:43 |
| bzoltan_ | Mirv: Cool :) please push the UITK :) | 08:44 |
| jibel | bzoltan_, that'll be short for this milestone. There are still huge updates in the queue, like calendar and camera | 08:45 |
| jibel | bzoltan_, but we'll do our best | 08:45 |
| bzoltan_ | jibel: it is up to you guys. The cursors issue this UITK fixes seemed to be rather important | 08:49 |
| seb128 | dbarth, so, should I add back my u1 account manually, or keep it in that state in case somebody wants to fix it and need a system to verify the fix on? | 08:49 |
| brendand | Mirv, any idea why QLibrary.load() would fail? | 08:56 |
| brendand | Mirv, the error looks like this - http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10287481/ | 08:58 |
| Mirv | brendand: at least out of context that doesn't tell me anything.. it'd sound like it doesn't find a library or something? | 09:00 |
| brendand | Mirv, yeah. i'm not really sure where it looks | 09:01 |
| brendand | Mirv, the location is on both QT_PLUGIN_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH | 09:02 |
| dbarth | seb128: you can add it back, we have a way to reproduce in a bug report | 09:15 |
| seb128 | dbarth, thanks | 09:15 |
| dbarth | seb128: mardy is looking into this right now | 09:15 |
| seb128 | great | 09:15 |
| popey | sil2100: jibel if we add calendar to dashboard, won't that need calendar to already be in the image? | 09:52 |
| sil2100 | seb128: hey! Do you know if there's any progress made on the failing ubuntu-system-settings AP tests? | 09:52 |
| davmor2 | popey: it will be in the next image unless things go very wrong | 09:52 |
| jibel | popey, it should be on next image | 09:53 |
| popey | ok | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | popey: as they mentioned, it should be in the next image so we should be safe to add it now | 09:53 |
| popey | ok | 09:53 |
| jibel | and if it is not and it fails, we'll know why :) | 09:53 |
| popey | hah | 09:53 |
| seb128 | sil2100, no, we have no clue what's the issue, we can't reproduce on devices and the issue on the ci run seems in qtfeedback | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | seb128: the changes that are causing almost all tests to fail also landed on ubuntu-rtm yesterday and we would need those fixed before we can get an image promoted | 09:53 |
| seb128 | that's what I understood from what Ken said the other day | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | oh | 09:53 |
| popey | cihelp Hello! Can we please get calendar app autopilot tests added to the dashboards? (it was removed a while ago, but we're adding it back to the image) | 09:54 |
| bzoltan_ | sil2100: jibel: I saw that we have time until 2pm UTC. Who to bribe to pull the UITK up in prioroty? It has a fix what effect _ALL_ text input in _ALL_ apps. | 10:08 |
| sil2100 | bzoltan_: no worries, QA will sign-off your silo after silo 11 and calendar | 10:08 |
| bzoltan_ | sil2100: Okey...now all I need is an IBAN number and a sum :D | 10:09 |
| === iahmad__ is now known as iahmad | ||
| jibel | sil2100, +1 for gallery app | 10:32 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 10:33 |
| sil2100 | Publishing | 10:33 |
| jibel | sil2100, you upload to the store as well? | 10:35 |
| sil2100 | jibel: and what about the qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras0.2 package in the end? | 10:35 |
| jibel | sil2100, it is wrong in vivid too. You have a click app that depends on an external lib that is not part of the framework but added manually to the seed | 10:35 |
| sil2100 | jibel: hm, but I don't see it in ubuntu-rtm right now - will we need to land the camera-app silo first? | 10:36 |
| sil2100 | rmadison says it's only in vivid currently | 10:36 |
| jibel | sil2100, it's in 17, bfiller said "No because gallery-app click package does not need ui-extras0.2 yet and we are not installing the gallery-app deb which has this dependency" | 10:37 |
| jibel | sil2100, I don't quite understand why the click package wouldn't need this lib | 10:38 |
| jibel | sil2100, the lib is not embedded in the click package, so if it is not installed on the system it'll use the wrong version | 10:39 |
| sil2100 | Ah, hm | 10:39 |
| sil2100 | Ok | 10:39 |
| jibel | sil2100, I don't know what in gallery app uses this lib and if it detects which version is available at runtime | 10:39 |
| jibel | sil2100, I think it's safer to wait for silo 17 to land too | 10:40 |
| sil2100 | Not sure what to do in this case, as even though the .deb packages are basically just dummy ones, but this will mean I'll push a broken-dep package to the archive | 10:40 |
| sil2100 | jibel: yeah | 10:40 |
| sil2100 | Ok, let's just wait then :) | 10:40 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! | 10:40 |
| jibel | sil2100, but IMO this lib should be a dependency of an ubuntu-sdk-lib-extras which would be a suggest of ubuntu-sdk-lib and -extras would be added to the seed. and if the version of the lib changes you bump the version of the framework | 10:41 |
| jibel | sil2100, probably cleaner than adding that lib manually to the seed. You cannot even track which click package depends on it, and that'll probably break stuff next time it's updated to a major version | 10:43 |
| === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
| psivaa_ | popey: I've added your request to our 'To do' lane | 10:54 |
| psivaa_ | Doing this should not take that long but it could be a little while for us to get there | 10:54 |
| psivaa_ | s/there/to it | 10:54 |
| popey | thanks psivaa_ | 10:54 |
| psivaa_ | np | 10:54 |
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| jibel | cihelp: on http://rtm-dashboard.ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/krillin/239:20150218:20150216-fe747ac/332/ 3 tests are failing because system-settle failed (abook, dialer and calc) Where do I find info why it failed? There is not much info in top-before and top-after log files | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | jibel: ogra_ had a nice script to parse it for useful information | 11:29 |
| jibel | ogra_, ^ do you mind sharing your script? | 11:30 |
| ogra_ | paste.ubuntu.com/10289122/ | 11:30 |
| ogra_ | i havent used it in ages, not sure it still works | 11:31 |
| jibel | ogra_, I'll try, thanks! | 11:31 |
| vila | jibel: pas mieux | 11:32 |
| jibel | sil2100, ogra_ I don't see anything interesting in topafter but it's likely the scoperunner crash that generated the load | 11:34 |
| jibel | davmor2, did you notice any crash while testing the custom tarball? | 11:35 |
| davmor2 | jibel: nope | 11:36 |
| sil2100 | I go prepare lunch | 11:42 |
| rvr | popey: Calendar app: text: "W"+ root.startDay.weekNumber() | 11:45 |
| rvr | popey: "W" must be localized | 11:45 |
| rvr | popey: Also, pot file needs update, "All Day" is not available in Launchpad for translations. | 11:46 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| Mirv | sil2100: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-005-1-build/112/console ... | 12:24 |
| Mirv | sil2100: I once ran build with watch_only quite quickly after uploading the final version, now it's like that.. | 12:24 |
| sil2100 | huh? | 12:25 |
| Mirv | sil2100: I guess just another way CI Train may "save" some wrong information and not clear that out | 12:25 |
| Mirv | sil2100: note how it checks two versions of the same package | 12:25 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: yeah, probably try doing a normal non-watch_only build | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | But I guess it's a bug indeed | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | watch_only should not use any saved state for source packages | 12:26 |
| Mirv | sil2100: normal build same problem it seems https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-005-1-build/113/console | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | huh | 12:27 |
| sil2100 | Ok, now that's broken then | 12:27 |
| sil2100 | Let me take a look in-between frying | 12:27 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| sil2100 | hm | 12:33 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: from the CI Train side everything looks ok, I wonder what the new build job does | 12:34 |
| Mirv | sil2100: the old version is not even shown at https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu-rtm/landing-005/+delete-packages anymore | 12:35 |
| popey | rvr: can you file a bug pls? | 12:37 |
| Mirv | sil2100: maybe it's still something that will sort itself by time, ie. the LP query will return different results at some point. | 12:38 |
| rvr | popey: Yes, we can | 12:38 |
| popey | thanks | 12:39 |
| rvr | popey: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1423160 | 12:43 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1423160 in Ubuntu Calendar App ""All day" and "W" (for week) not translatable" [Undecided,New] | 12:43 |
| popey | thanks rvr | 12:43 |
| Mirv | sil2100: ok, it still failed I now did _both_ prepare-silo reconfig + tagged force_rebuild of both packages (even though they are manual uploads and not MP:s). either of them finally cleared the wrong info out. | 12:57 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: geh, ok... | 13:00 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| boiko | trainguards: question: the silo request on row 56 does not change existing code, just remove some toos that were not being used for quite some time on history-service, do I need to put QA signoff as Required still? | 13:18 |
| sil2100 | boiko: I would say it shouldn't require sign-off, since the diff indeed looks sane | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | boiko: but shouldn't you also remove history-service-tools from debian/control? | 13:28 |
| boiko | sil2100: well, that's the thing: on vivid we added new tools, I just don't want to backport them right now | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | boiko: ok, yeah, but in ubuntu-rtm it would mean that we'll have an empty package basically, right? | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | Not a super bad thing though | 13:40 |
| boiko | sil2100: yep, at least until we backport the new tools (they help testing, as they populate the history database, etc) | 13:41 |
| pete-woods | trainguards: hi, could I get vivid silo 011 reconfigured please? thanks! | 13:54 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: sure | 13:56 |
| sil2100 | pete-woods: done | 13:56 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: ^ | 13:56 |
| Mirv | sil2100: hehe :) | 13:57 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: and thanks for the fix already in advance! | 13:57 |
| sil2100 | boiko: ok, assigned the silo, but QA might want to re-discuss the requirement of sign-off | 13:57 |
| boiko | sil2100: that's fine, I was just trying to leverage their work :) | 13:58 |
| bfiller | jibel, sil2100: gallery-app click package does not depend on ui-extras0.2 yet so that is not needed technically | 14:00 |
| bfiller | it will need it in the future but doesn't right now | 14:00 |
| pete-woods | Mirv: well, importantly this won't be truly fixed until the apps are updated to stop doing their own translations for infographics (see MR for music-app https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/music-app/infographics-translations/+merge/248251) | 14:00 |
| bfiller | sil2100: kenvandine can ack the packaging changes in silo 18, he's aware of the situation | 14:02 |
| kenvandine | hey bfiller | 14:02 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: ok... if a core-dev acks that then it's fine, but basically right now the deb will be uninstallable on ubuntu-rtm | 14:02 |
| sil2100 | I know we don't use the .deb basically | 14:02 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, have you seen anything like this? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10290989/ | 14:02 |
| sil2100 | But if something lands in the archive it should have archive-sufficient quality | 14:03 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| bfiller | sil2100: yes that is true, but we don't use the deb at all. it's only there for convergence to install on desktop | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: I'll let kenvandine as the core-dev to decide ;) | 14:03 |
| bfiller | sil2100: so lets sync ui-extras then from vivid at the same time | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: yeah, it's in another silo which seems to have some problems currently | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | Otherwise I would just sign-off and land both | 14:04 |
| bfiller | sil2100: we can move that into it's own silo so it can land independently | 14:04 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: no worries, let's wait a bit on how things resolve and decide then if we need to hack around it | 14:04 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, i'm fine acking that for rtm | 14:04 |
| kenvandine | we aren't running desktops from rtm anyway | 14:05 |
| bfiller | sil2100, kenvandine : ok thanks guys | 14:05 |
| sil2100 | Ok then, let me publish it :) | 14:05 |
| kenvandine | thanks | 14:05 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, and look at that pastebin when you get a chance :) | 14:05 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ok, looking now | 14:05 |
| jibel | bfiller, there is a fix for the camera, so it should land later today, and ui-extras0.2 too | 14:05 |
| kenvandine | that's what we're getting from smoke tests | 14:05 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, which i've reproduced on my krillin running vivid locally | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: hm, now that's something I never saw before | 14:06 |
| kenvandine | also... | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: it started happening after the u-s-s silo landed... was there anything risky in it? | 14:06 |
| kenvandine | this started happening between image 96 and 98 | 14:06 |
| kenvandine | which had a massive mir landing | 14:06 |
| bfiller | jibel: ok cool, thanks | 14:06 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, there was also a mir landing | 14:07 |
| kenvandine | there was nothing risky in the silo | 14:07 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, in fact... the only change in that silo was adding some UI that is hidden | 14:07 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: but not in ubuntu-rtm - and we see the same failures in rtm with the latest image | 14:07 |
| kenvandine | wait... same thing in rtm? | 14:07 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: http://rtm-dashboard.ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/krillin/239:20150218:20150216-fe747ac/332/ <- this is the latest result in rtm after landing of the u-s-s silo, no failures seen before this | 14:08 |
| sil2100 | http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/ubuntu-rtm/239.commitlog | 14:08 |
| sil2100 | These are the changes | 14:08 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, so the same change landed in rtm, and the UI isn't hidden there | 14:08 |
| sil2100 | This is why I started thinking that it's this landing that's responsible | 14:09 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, what image did it start happening in for rtm? | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | WIth this one | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | 239 | 14:09 |
| kenvandine | that is the latest right? | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | http://rtm-dashboard.ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/ <- all others have normal failure counts | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | Yes :) | 14:09 |
| kenvandine | well wtf@ | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | We would really like to have this resolved as it's blocking our promotion | 14:09 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, the change we landed in 239 also landed yesterday in vivid | 14:10 |
| sil2100 | Since releasing OTA-1 with so many failures is really bad ;p | 14:10 |
| kenvandine | this has been happening for over a week in vivid | 14:10 |
| sil2100 | hmm | 14:10 |
| sil2100 | Interesting | 14:10 |
| bfiller | sil2100: I will push the gallery-app click to the store now, is that ok? | 14:10 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, and... the only change in the image that this was introduced in with vivid had landed in rtm a week before it landed in vivid | 14:11 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, hey, getting anywhere with the u-s-s test issue? | 14:12 |
| kenvandine | #15 0xaf0763ce in QFeedbackHapticsEffect::QFeedbackHapticsEffect(QObject*) () from /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libQt5Feedback.so.5 | 14:12 |
| kenvandine | same damn thing | 14:12 |
| kenvandine | seb128, that's what sil2100 and i are talking about | 14:13 |
| kenvandine | seb128, it just started happening in rtm smoke testing | 14:13 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, weird | 14:13 |
| kenvandine | in image 239 | 14:13 |
| sil2100 | brb | 14:13 |
| kenvandine | seb128, and there are strange logs | 14:13 |
| kenvandine | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10290989/ | 14:14 |
| kenvandine | seb128, ^^ thoughts? | 14:14 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, not really, does it have to do with screencasting? | 14:14 |
| seb128 | how is the screencasting working? | 14:15 |
| kenvandine | oh i wonder if that is what's causing that log | 14:15 |
| kenvandine | i don't know | 14:15 |
| seb128 | can we enable it locally to see if we hit the same issue? | 14:15 |
| kenvandine | i have reproduced it locally | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | on my krillin with vivid | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | oh | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | that can't be screencasting | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | i get that same log output locally | 14:16 |
| seb128 | k | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | [1424235205.472568] <ERROR> mircommon: Caught exception at Mir/EGL driver boundary (in setSwapInterval): /build/buildd/mir-0.11.0+15.04.20150209.1/src/client/buffer_stream.cpp(283): Throw in function virtual void mir::client::BufferStream::request_and_wait_for_configure(MirSurfaceAttrib, int) | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | Dynamic exception type: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorISt11logic_errorEEEE | 14:16 |
| kenvandine | that part anyway | 14:17 |
| seb128 | did mir change in rtm?! | 14:17 |
| kenvandine | seb128, and at the same time, there's a seg fault from uss that seems to be triggered by haptic feedback | 14:17 |
| kenvandine | seb128, i don't think so | 14:17 |
| kenvandine | not in image 239 | 14:17 |
| seb128 | weird | 14:17 |
| kenvandine | seb128, but... there was a mir landing in the first vivid image that had this problem | 14:18 |
| seb128 | doesn't explain why rtm get the same issue without a mir landing | 14:18 |
| kenvandine | qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-plugin changed in image 236 | 14:18 |
| kenvandine | seb128, the good news is this crash really happens at the very beginning of the test | 14:20 |
| kenvandine | everytime | 14:20 |
| kenvandine | and we aren't seeing this crash manually testing | 14:20 |
| kenvandine | so it must be something to do with the autopilot tests | 14:21 |
| kenvandine | and i've ruled out infrastructure by testing locally | 14:21 |
| kenvandine | i wonder if we're the only ones seeing this because we don't use upstart-app-launch | 14:22 |
| kenvandine | seb128, https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/b4ceece27f0ccfe9753e940695015237461b3908 | 14:35 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, not very useful, why isn't retracing working? | 14:35 |
| bfiller | popey: can your review/ack new gallery I just uploaded to store? | 14:36 |
| kenvandine | seb128, that's what i was going to ask you :) | 14:36 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, ^ can you help there? | 14:36 |
| popey | bfiller: done | 14:37 |
| kenvandine | also... all 3 instances of it where run by autopilot | 14:38 |
| kenvandine | seb128, https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/f1aceaefc06bcc522f22df201625eb2d111929fb | 14:39 |
| kenvandine | that one has a retrace | 14:39 |
| sil2100 | Publishing o/ | 14:40 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, right, who is working on the feedback plugin? | 14:40 |
| kenvandine | that's from qt | 14:40 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: anyway, can you please upload the new gallery-app to the store? :) | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | seb128, i'd think that would affect all kinds of stuff | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | we don't do anything directly there | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | just the uitk | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | seb128, i created bug 1423205 | 14:42 |
| ubot5 | bug 1423205 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "/usr/bin/system-settings:6:__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler:__cxxabiv1::__terminate:std::terminate:__cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw:core::dbus::Bus::Bus" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423205 | 14:42 |
| bfiller | sil2100: done, popey just approved it | 14:43 |
| sil2100 | Excellent | 14:43 |
| bfiller | sil2100: can I get a silo for line 58 on vivid, it's the camera-app fix need to land it in vivid first then will sync to rtm | 14:44 |
| sil2100 | Sure, on it | 14:44 |
| bfiller | jibel: ^^^ the camera-app is fixed, just doing the vivid landing first then will update the rm silo | 14:44 |
| bfiller | rtm silo | 14:44 |
| om26er | kenvandine, Hi! | 14:46 |
| om26er | kenvandine, I am trying out silo 14. If the device does not discover the bluetooth name of the headset, it shows its MAC address, is it supposed to keep showing that until I connect to the headset ? | 14:47 |
| kenvandine | as long as it doesn't detect a name | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | it should | 14:48 |
| jibel | bfiller, OK, rhuddie ^ can you reverify the camera after silo 3? | 14:48 |
| om26er | kenvandine, how long does it take to detect the name generally ? | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | om26er, it might never | 14:48 |
| jibel | rhuddie, when it's in the silo of course :) | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | that was part of the problem | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | it would display an empty name | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | s/part// | 14:48 |
| rhuddie | jibel, sure. i just finished silo 3. | 14:49 |
| om26er | kenvandine, I think we need to add a testcase to the testplan for this bug fix. | 14:49 |
| kenvandine | om26er, so you have a device that doesn't get a name? | 14:49 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: I'll ping you soon when it's in the rtm silo | 14:49 |
| om26er | kenvandine, it showed its MAC address | 14:49 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, thanks. | 14:49 |
| kenvandine | om26er, to properly test this specific case, the tester needs a device that wouldn't show a name | 14:49 |
| om26er | hmmm, don't have that. | 14:50 |
| kenvandine | om26er, i don't have a device that doesn't show a name | 14:50 |
| om26er | kenvandine, let me clear there are three cases ? 1. where name is shown. 2. only MAC address, 3. No nothing and in that case we want to show "..." ? | 14:51 |
| kenvandine | om26er, for case 3 we want to show the address | 14:51 |
| kenvandine | om26er, it should only show the address when there is no name detected | 14:52 |
| kenvandine | om26er, i don't have any devices that don't show a name | 14:52 |
| kenvandine | for example | 14:52 |
| kenvandine | om26er, so showing the address shouldn't be common, i'd hope | 14:53 |
| om26er | I tried it in my car it showed the MAC address, the name only appeared when I connected to it. | 14:53 |
| kenvandine | om26er, cool, i think that's what we want | 14:53 |
| kenvandine | om26er, but there are some devices that'll never get a name | 14:53 |
| kenvandine | so we'll keep showing the address | 14:54 |
| kenvandine | om26er, but to test that you need a device that doesn't get the name | 14:54 |
| kenvandine | not sure we want to require everyone that tests this to have such a device | 14:54 |
| om26er | heh, I'll just approve it after some more testing. | 14:55 |
| kenvandine | om26er, thx... not sure how to test it | 14:56 |
| kenvandine | we tested it for regressions | 14:56 |
| kenvandine | well, pmcgowan did, not sure if he had a device that didn't detect the name or not | 14:56 |
| kenvandine | i tested it in vivid, all my devices still show the name | 14:57 |
| pmcgowan | kenvandine, om26er my device initially shows the address, then when connnected switches to the name | 14:58 |
| kenvandine | pmcgowan, and is that the same behavior as before? | 14:59 |
| pmcgowan | kenvandine, before the field was blank the the first page, now it shows the address | 14:59 |
| kenvandine | pmcgowan, perfect! | 15:00 |
| === plars changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping plars | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: ubuntu-rtm landing gates now closed | ||
| kenvandine | so you have a device that reproduced the bug :) | 15:00 |
| kenvandine | pmcgowan, i tried everything in my house that has bluetooth... they all show a name before connecting | 15:00 |
| pmcgowan | yeah my headset showed the issue, whereas my car showed the name | 15:01 |
| pmcgowan | probably a bt version thingy | 15:01 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, jibel any chance we will get all the queued silos landed? | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: yes, although we might still be blocked on the failing autopilot tests for ubuntu-system-settings anyway | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: since currently we have almost all u-s-s tests failing | 15:03 |
| om26er | kenvandine, looking at the diff, previously if device was not paired you appended "..." now you are doing that for the opposite. Intentional ? | 15:03 |
| jibel | pmcgowan, all the critical fixes will land (9, 14, calendar and camera are under verification) | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine is looking into that | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: btw. did you hear anything about us not to include calendar-app? | 15:03 |
| ogra_ | hmm | 15:04 |
| * ogra_ wonders why rmadison gives him 503 errors | 15:04 | |
| jibel | pmcgowan, we'll maybe have time to land silo 1, depending how it goes with silos under testing. | 15:04 |
| pmcgowan | jibel, silo 0 is also a customer report fix | 15:05 |
| pmcgowan | and silo 20 just looks like great fixes | 15:05 |
| pmcgowan | but gotta stop sometime | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: but 0 doesn't seem to look ready | 15:06 |
| jibel | pmcgowan, but it is not ready for QA. last comment from rsalveti is "Not yet to be validated, WIP (had tested as yes by accident)." | 15:06 |
| pmcgowan | ok | 15:06 |
| rsalveti | pmcgowan: jibel: yeah, we found one issue with silo 0, working on the fix | 15:06 |
| rsalveti | so not completely ready yet | 15:06 |
| kenvandine | om26er, indeed that does look opposite... cyphermox ^^ | 15:07 |
| kenvandine | om26er, good eye... | 15:07 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, I did not hear anything about calendar app | 15:08 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: since I was wondering how to include it and cwayne mentioned something about Joe saying not to add it yet | 15:08 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, before you only appended "..." if it wasn't paired, now you're only appending it if it is paired | 15:08 |
| sil2100 | But I wonder what that means | 15:08 |
| pmcgowan | let me check | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | kenvandine: indeed, it's a logic error | 15:09 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, can you fix that up quickly? | 15:09 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, last email I have on this joe just says keep him posted | 15:09 |
| kenvandine | we really want to land that today | 15:09 |
| kenvandine | om26er, i'll rebuild that silo as soon as cyphermox fixes that | 15:10 |
| kenvandine | om26er, thanks for catching that! | 15:10 |
| om26er | kenvandine, ok sure ;-) | 15:10 |
| cyphermox | kenvandine: pushed | 15:10 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, thx! | 15:10 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, i'll fix it for trunk | 15:11 |
| cyphermox | k | 15:11 |
| jibel | pmcgowan, this is what we found with the calendar app so far: bug 1423185, bug 1423191, bug 1423209, bug 1362781, bug 1347836 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1423185 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Calendar app crash" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423185 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1423191 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Spinner displayed above "No future events" in Agenda" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423191 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1418992 in Ubuntu Calendar App "duplicate for #1423209 Calendar events slow to appear or never appear on app startup" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1418992 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1362781 in qtorganizer5-eds (Ubuntu RTM) "After date recurrence end is not functioning." [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1362781 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1347836 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Events saved to birthdays calendar don't appear in timeline" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1347836 | 15:11 |
| cwayne | pmcgowan: sil2100: just got a hard -1 on adding calendar | 15:11 |
| pmcgowan | cwayne, ok | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | cwayne: oh? What's up? | 15:11 |
| pmcgowan | all those bugs | 15:11 |
| pmcgowan | jibel, thanks | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | jibel: thanks! | 15:12 |
| jibel | pmcgowan, I don't see it in the list but event syncs doesn't work reliably | 15:12 |
| pmcgowan | jibel, how so? | 15:13 |
| jibel | pmcgowan, someone in the team reported that this morning during our standup, I'll find the bug | 15:13 |
| alan_g | plars: Are there problems on mir-mediumtests-runner-mako? Just had this twice "Rebooting the phone will take approximately 30 seconds to settle/Build timed out (after 60 minutes). Marking the build as failed." | 15:16 |
| plars | alan_g: not that I've heard of, but I'm just coming on. Can you point me at the job? | 15:16 |
| alan_g | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-mediumtests-runner-mako/4328/console (and 4389) | 15:17 |
| cwayne | sil2100: it's a bit too risky to add a new app this late in the game | 15:17 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, mind an ack? https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/ubuntu-system-settings/address-not-name-rtm-logic-error/+merge/250152 | 15:19 |
| plars | alan_g: on a standup right now, give me just a bit and I'll take a look | 15:19 |
| jibel | bfiller, any ETA for the update of the camera app in RTM? | 15:19 |
| alan_g | plars: ok | 15:19 |
| cyphermox | kenvandine: thar. | 15:19 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, thx | 15:20 |
| bfiller | jibel: within 30 minutes, landing in vivid currently | 15:20 |
| jibel | bfiller, thanks | 15:20 |
| bfiller | sil2100: mind publishing ubuntu silo 27 for camera-app | 15:29 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, Hi! | 15:30 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, I can't select text in unity' searchbar with silo1, the actionbox takes over the selector. | 15:31 |
| om26er | more like the handlers hide | 15:32 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, can I get a silo for line 59 please | 15:35 |
| om26er | kalikiana, ^ | 15:37 |
| bdmurray | seb128, kenvandine: this is the log file portition for the retrace attempt - https://pastebin.canonical.com/125821/ | 15:40 |
| bdmurray | pitti might have more information about why retraces fail like that | 15:41 |
| kenvandine | bdmurray, thx for looking | 15:41 |
| kenvandine | i found a retrace | 15:41 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, thanks | 15:42 |
| bdmurray | kenvandine: where? | 15:42 |
| kenvandine | https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/f1aceaefc06bcc522f22df201625eb2d111929fb | 15:42 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, can I get a silo for line 59 please? | 15:44 |
| cyphermox | jhodapp: sure | 15:45 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, looks like i jsut got on, thanks anyway | 15:45 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, thanks man! | 15:45 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: here is the update click to test for silo 17: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-click-builder-vivid-armhf/342/artifact/output/com.ubuntu.camera_3.0.0.514_armhf.click | 15:45 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, jibel, thanks. I'll start testing | 15:46 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, you can rest easier... the always awesome jgdx has a fix for the smoke test failures! | 15:47 |
| kenvandine | and it's just in the autopilot tests | 15:47 |
| kenvandine | nothing wrong with settings itself | 15:47 |
| sil2100 | Oh OOH! | 15:47 |
| sil2100 | :D | 15:47 |
| kenvandine | it actually removes one test :/ | 15:48 |
| kenvandine | but that one test blows the entire suite | 15:48 |
| kenvandine | we're not 100% sure why yet... but something to do with the session bus | 15:49 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, we're still investigating a proper fix that wouldn't make us remove that test | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | jibel: ^ | 15:54 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: what test needs removing to fix the suite? | 15:54 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, it's the ConnectivityMixin class that's causing the problems, which is needed by test_sim_unlock | 15:58 |
| sil2100 | jibel: ^ do you it is acceptable to temporarily get rid of the test for this release to make all the other tests working again? | 15:59 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, jibel: and the problem with the test has nothing to do with a feature regression... | 15:59 |
| kenvandine | it's just problems with the session bus | 15:59 |
| kenvandine | and the uitk using the session bus to get the vibrate settings | 16:00 |
| kenvandine | om26er, silo 14 is built again | 16:01 |
| om26er | kenvandine, thanks, will test that in a bit | 16:01 |
| kenvandine | - if (device->isPaired()) | 16:01 |
| kenvandine | 9+ if (!device->isPaired()) | 16:01 |
| kenvandine | om26er, the only diff | 16:01 |
| om26er | yeah I saw that. | 16:01 |
| kenvandine | om26er, thx | 16:01 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: anyway, I'd like QA to decide if we can go with that, but seeing how things are going I suppose that's our only choice | 16:02 |
| om26er | kenvandine, approved. | 16:02 |
| sil2100 | If we intend to get an image ready by the end of the UTC day | 16:02 |
| kenvandine | om26er, thx! | 16:02 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ouch... | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: I can't publish silo 14 as there was a release in the meantime | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | So we might need to rebuild the silo ;/ | 16:06 |
| kenvandine | what? | 16:06 |
| kenvandine | i just rebuilt it | 16:06 |
| kenvandine | oh | 16:06 |
| kenvandine | i already published it :) | 16:06 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, sorry... that broke you :) | 16:07 |
| sil2100 | Ahah | 16:07 |
| sil2100 | :D | 16:07 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, i'll prepare a silo dropping that test, in case we want to land that | 16:07 |
| sil2100 | Right, I always forget you publish your own silos :D | 16:07 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: yes, please | 16:07 |
| kgunn | sil2100: hey so your mail, are you saying gate is closed even for things that were ready tues morning...but in the qa test queue ? | 16:08 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: if you have any problems or question related to the silo1, please feel free to reach out :) | 16:09 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: the gates are closed for new things, but not all silos prepared before the deadline will make it as it depends on QA capabilities ;) | 16:09 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, I did already :) | 16:09 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: the highest priority are silos with critical or factory fixes | 16:10 |
| kgunn | got it... | 16:10 |
| sil2100 | Others will land if QA is able to sign-off | 16:10 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, I can't select text in unity' searchbar with silo1, the actionbox takes over the selector. | 16:10 |
| kgunn | ours is under qa test atm | 16:10 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, http://i.imgur.com/xse3evb.png | 16:10 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, we're going to hold off proposing that for trunk though, so vivid smoke testing will remain broken for now | 16:12 |
| kenvandine | while we find a proper fix | 16:12 |
| kenvandine | that way we don't forget to fix it :) | 16:12 |
| jibel | kenvandine, sil2100 do we know exactly why the tests are failing? | 16:13 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: hm, ok, makes sense, even though I think it would be best if this gets fixed ASAP anyway since for quality we need to make sure that all automated tests work as they should | 16:13 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, yes... jgdx is working on it now | 16:15 |
| kenvandine | jibel, a test in our security panel starts a session bus | 16:16 |
| kenvandine | jibel, but now the uitk is needing the session bus so it gets started already | 16:16 |
| kenvandine | we're getting conflicting session buses | 16:16 |
| kenvandine | we think | 16:16 |
| kenvandine | jibel, so removing that ConnectivityMixin class we have, prevents that from happening | 16:16 |
| kenvandine | jibel, once it blew up, everything after it fails | 16:17 |
| kenvandine | we only need to remove it from the one test | 16:17 |
| jibel | kenvandine, OK, can you update the silo? | 16:17 |
| kenvandine | jibel, i just created a silo with it | 16:18 |
| kenvandine | jibel, we're leaving it broken in vivid for now | 16:18 |
| kenvandine | to keep the pressure on a proper fix | 16:18 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: remember that we first need the other u-s-s silo to merge-and-clean fully | 16:18 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, yes... | 16:18 |
| kenvandine | not building until then | 16:18 |
| bzoltan_ | kalikiana: ping | 16:18 |
| sil2100 | Excellent :) | 16:18 |
| jibel | kenvandine, fine, it's better than being completely blind | 16:18 |
| kalikiana | bzoltan_: pong | 16:19 |
| kenvandine | jibel, right... we know it isn't a real failure, just causing all hell to blow up in the test :) | 16:19 |
| bzoltan_ | kalikiana: om26er sees this http://i.imgur.com/xse3evb.png | 16:19 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: what version of the UITK you have on the device? | 16:19 |
| kalikiana | bzoltan_: hmmm the handlers are missing? | 16:20 |
| bzoltan_ | kalikiana: yes indeed | 16:20 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, 1.1.1298+15.04.20150218~rtm-0ubuntu1 | 16:20 |
| kalikiana | om26er: how did you select that text? | 16:20 |
| om26er | kalikiana, double tap | 16:21 |
| bfiller | kenvandine: any way to speed up landing camera-app which is in proposed? http://people.canonical.com/~platform/citrain_dashboard/#?distro=ubuntu&q=camera | 16:25 |
| bfiller | itching to rebuild sync silo | 16:25 |
| kalikiana | om26er: hmm can repro. and it's indeed the change to blame… no idea, though, what is happening, never seen that | 16:25 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, no... i don't think so | 16:25 |
| bfiller | kenvandine: like watching paint dry | 16:26 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, it usually takes about an hour | 16:26 |
| kenvandine | yeah | 16:26 |
| bfiller | ok | 16:26 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, why aren't you on the slopes? | 16:27 |
| kenvandine | if it's because of camera-app, i can help :) | 16:27 |
| bfiller | kenvandine: going this afternoon :) | 16:27 |
| plars | alan_g: Looks like it was a weird fluke with that device, but the device seems fine now. I've restarted the job and I'll continue to monitor it | 16:28 |
| alan_g | plars: thanks | 16:30 |
| kalikiana | om26er: bzoltan_ I'll need to look into what unity is doing there. it has a custom clear button for some reason, but that doesn't easily explain this funny bug. | 16:30 |
| om26er | kalikiana, ok, i'll fail the silo for now. | 16:31 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: please hold a bit | 16:33 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, ok, moved back. | 16:35 |
| sil2100 | davmor2: you signing-off location-service? | 16:37 |
| sil2100 | Are we ok with getting a risky component like that in this milestone? | 16:38 |
| jibel | sil2100, it's in OTA1 priorities | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | It was? hmmm | 16:40 |
| davmor2 | sil2100: factory bug for battery drain aiui jibel okayed it | 16:40 |
| sil2100 | I missed it completely | 16:40 |
| sil2100 | jibel, davmor2: hm, the spreadsheet doesn't mention it as being reported by BQ/CKT | 16:41 |
| davmor2 | sil2100: the battery drain general bug is though and this is a sub branch from that | 16:42 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, is there an update required on the rtm silo for the camera-app fix? | 16:55 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: we should rebuild the camera-app deb once it lands in vivid but stuck in proposed | 16:56 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, not sure what happened here, any insight? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-028-1-build/23/console | 16:56 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: since we don't use the deb it can probably land as is if all the testing done | 16:56 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: I just need to upload the click you tested to the store | 16:57 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, actually nevermind, the more detailed logs for each ARCH point out what's wrong | 16:57 |
| sil2100 | jhodapp: it seems the packages failed to build in the PPA | 16:57 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, yeah, missing build dep | 16:58 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, this click is giving me a problem loading the app | 16:58 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: I pull off that MR from the landing silo and leave the oneliner to fix the other bug. If you culd wait a half an hour | 16:58 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: what do you mean? | 16:58 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, sure thing. | 16:59 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, well, I've installed it with the silo updates, when I launch it, I see the camera screen load briefly and then it disappears | 16:59 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: at least we ship two bugfixes with this round | 16:59 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: I'm not seeing that, anything in the log? ~/.cache/upstart/application-click-com.ubuntu.camera_<version>.log | 17:00 |
| plars | alan_g: it's looking like my retry is going to suffer the same fate - I think it could be your change that's killing it | 17:01 |
| plars | alan_g: it's on a different device this time, and it was fine after the base install, but not after installing your update and rebooting | 17:02 |
| alan_g | plars: I'll take another look at it | 17:02 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, i feel your pain, i'm watching paint dry too.. with settings | 17:04 |
| * kenvandine twiddles thumbs | 17:04 | |
| bfiller | rhuddie: I'm seeing the issue, checking the problem | 17:04 |
| rhuddie | bfiller, this is my log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10293406/ | 17:05 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: the click for camera-app that was built by jenkins has some issues, getting undefined symbols | 17:09 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: see rhuddie log above, I'm seeing the same | 17:09 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: did something change in qtubuntu-camera in vivid that is needed now in RTM? | 17:10 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, dunno of that, but we changed only one line since you last built a click | 17:31 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, checking | 17:31 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: I just rebuilt the click, trying that now. | 17:31 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, it looks nothing like any change that may have been made to any of the code | 17:32 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, it looks more like something in the build env that has changed | 17:32 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, it's the first time we actually use the camera click pkg produced by jenkins no? | 17:33 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, usually we build it ourselves IIRC | 17:33 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, both for testing and publishing | 17:33 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: we always use jenkins, ok here is a new one I built with jenkins seems to work http://people.canonical.com/~bfiller/com.ubuntu.camera_3.0.0.515_armhf.click | 17:34 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: please verify to make sure that has nerochiaro's change and that it's working correctly | 17:34 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, you built that one *with* jenkins? | 17:35 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: yes, but did it manually and didn't take the one jenkins built via CI | 17:35 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, I see | 17:35 |
| bfiller | not sure what the difference is but the app launches now :) | 17:35 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: http://people.canonical.com/~bfiller/com.ubuntu.camera_3.0.0.515_armhf.click | 17:35 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, ok | 17:35 |
| mzanetti | trainguards: can someone please rebuild qtsystems in silo0 for me? | 17:38 |
| robru | mzanetti: do you not have permission? | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | robru: afaik I can't no, because it's not added via the spreadsheet but uploaded manually | 17:39 |
| robru | mzanetti: oh, hrm. | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | I might be wrong... | 17:39 |
| robru | mzanetti: so what, you need a no-change rebuild? you don't have a change to apply to it? | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | I pushed to the branch | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | oh, I see | 17:40 |
| mzanetti | one sec :) | 17:40 |
| mzanetti | robru: lp:~mzanetti/ubuntu/vivid/qtsystems-opensource-src/inputinfo | 17:40 |
| robru | mzanetti: oh ok, yeah I can upload that, one sec. | 17:41 |
| mzanetti | thanks | 17:41 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: the silo1 is ready .. I ripped off the cursor "fix" | 17:41 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, thanks for that, I'll repick it after a few minutes. In a meeting right now. | 17:42 |
| nerochiaro | bfiller: Kaleo: i tested the image you linked and it seems to have my change and be working ok | 17:42 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: OK, thanks for your patinece | 17:42 |
| Kaleo | nerochiaro, by image you mean click? | 17:43 |
| nerochiaro | Kaleo: sorry yes | 17:43 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, nerochiaro: I have tested the manually built click 515 and it works too | 17:43 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, is there an excuses page for rtm? | 17:44 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, it's taking unusually long for settings to make it to release | 17:44 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: yeah, one moment | 17:44 |
| sil2100 | ugh | 17:44 |
| sil2100 | Wait, wtf, it's gone | 17:44 |
| robru | mzanetti: what do you want in the changelog? eg what did you change? | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | aaaha | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | nvm | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/ubuntu-rtm/14.09_update_excuses.html | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | hmm | 17:45 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, hmmm settings isn't on that | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | it's outdated | 17:45 |
| kenvandine | oh... indeed | 17:45 |
| kenvandine | is something not running? | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: are there any known problems with 14.09 migration right now? | 17:46 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: ^ ? | 17:46 |
| robru | mzanetti: nm, got your commit message | 17:47 |
| slangasek | sil2100: I've just committed a merge of some changes from cjwatson to proposed-migration, could be related | 17:48 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: Heh, somebody merged my branches but one of them was deployed slightly differently live, so conflict | 17:48 |
| cjwatson | I'll fix | 17:48 |
| slangasek | oops | 17:48 |
| kenvandine | :) | 17:48 |
| slangasek | "deployed slightly differently live"? | 17:48 |
| kenvandine | cjwatson, thanks! | 17:48 |
| cjwatson | I deployed an earlier version of the output-prefix stuff because it was urgent for 14.09-factory | 17:48 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, i've been anxiously watching it so i could build that silo for you :) | 17:48 |
| robru | mzanetti: ok, new upload building, should be good to go | 17:49 |
| * cjwatson replaces with the committed version | 17:49 | |
| cjwatson | sil2100: should work next time, thanks | 17:49 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: thanks for the merges | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ;) | 17:50 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: sure thing | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | Thanks for fixing! | 17:50 |
| cjwatson | I guess I'd better run them by hand to catch up | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: we'll spin a new image as soon as the current u-s-s migration finishes | 17:50 |
| kenvandine | cjwatson, that would be appreciated | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: we can include the autopilot fixes later | 17:50 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, sure | 17:51 |
| sil2100 | (as those don't require testing by QA anyway) | 17:51 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, ah... can you change that on the spreadsheet then? | 17:51 |
| kenvandine | i put required | 17:51 |
| sil2100 | Sure | 17:52 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, thx | 17:52 |
| cjwatson | eek, this is crashing hard | 17:52 |
| * cjwatson disables archive-reports while he debugs | 17:52 | |
| rhuddie | bfiller, Kaleo, thanks. confirm this version is now working and I get video thumbnail. One bug I've noticed is that the new photo-roll Edit option is enabled for videos, as well as photos | 17:52 |
| bfiller | rhuddie: that is indeed a bug | 17:54 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, shall we disable editing? :) | 17:54 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: if we don't seed qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras0.2 then it will be disabled | 17:54 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, right | 17:54 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, is it seeded in vivid? | 17:55 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, it's not seeded anywhere atm right? | 17:55 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: it's seeded in vivid but not in rtm | 17:55 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, so we need to fix the bug regardless | 17:55 |
| bfiller | Kaleo: lets just fix it, should be simple | 17:56 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, ugo said it's prob easy | 17:56 |
| bfiller | we do the same already in gallery-app | 17:56 |
| Kaleo | bfiller, good, was gonna asxk | 17:56 |
| cjwatson | sil2100,kenvandine: should be happier now | 17:56 |
| Kaleo | -x | 17:56 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, fixing now, should be a one liner :) | 17:57 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: yaay, thanks ;) | 17:57 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| cjwatson | sil2100: note it's now http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/update_excuses.html, sorry for the rearrangements - I'll put symlinks or redirects or something in place in a bit | 17:57 |
| cjwatson | another reason I want to do a couple of runs by hand | 17:57 |
| rhuddie | Kaleo, thanks. I'm going to be eod soon, so somebody else will pick this one up again | 17:58 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, understood, thanks | 17:58 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, do you know who? | 17:58 |
| rhuddie | Kaleo, not yet. I'll update the card on the trello board with status. depends on how soon the next regression run starts. | 18:01 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, any idea when that might be? | 18:01 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, I mean, are we talking minutes hours or days? | 18:01 |
| rhuddie | Kaleo, well i believe new build should be within 2 hours | 18:02 |
| Kaleo | rhuddie, ah ok | 18:02 |
| === boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
| kenvandine | cjwatson, thanks | 18:06 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, settings is in release now and i started building silo 11 for the test fix | 18:07 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, how can i verify fix for #1395118 ? | 18:18 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: there is a demo code in the bug report | 18:19 |
| om26er | bzoltan_, if i put that into a .qml how can i launch it ? | 18:20 |
| bzoltan_ | om26er: just open the Ubuntu SDK, create a simple UI template app and copy that code over the main.qml | 18:21 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: thanks! | 18:30 |
| sil2100 | Ok, let me check proposed and build a new image | 18:30 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ok, so we have gallery-app stuck in -proposed because of missing qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras0.2 , but we have a click for that anyway | 18:31 |
| kenvandine | yeah | 18:31 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 240 building (started: 20150218-18:50) === | 18:50 |
| pmcgowan | boiko, sil2100 are we able to land silo 15? that has the last critical fixes | 18:58 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: too late | 18:58 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, those are factory fixes, so maybe not | 18:58 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: the silo is still not set as ready... | 18:59 |
| boiko | pmcgowan: testing it | 18:59 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: and we really need time to test the image, I already kicked off the first promotion candidate | 18:59 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, I understand but won't matter if factory doesnt accept it | 19:00 |
| pmcgowan | john-mcaleely, ^^ what do you think | 19:00 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, we can start testing then consider poking that one silo in | 19:00 |
| sil2100 | hm, we can get a new one re-spinned later I guess | 19:00 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, remember that was our plan to consider factory fixes late | 19:01 |
| john-mcaleely | sil2100, delay gets my vote, or land it late after QA with some retesting of that area? | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | I'm a bit worried with the tight timeline, but yeah | 19:01 |
| john-mcaleely | pmcgowan, ^ as we discussed, I htink | 19:02 |
| pmcgowan | agreed, lets get it ready for QA then decide | 19:02 |
| john-mcaleely | yeah, nothing to be done until that state is reached | 19:02 |
| sil2100 | Since it's ofono-related then I would actually wait with testing until it lands | 19:02 |
| sil2100 | As it would require retesting a lot of things anyway | 19:03 |
| john-mcaleely | makes sense | 19:04 |
| pmcgowan | right agreed | 19:04 |
| sil2100 | boiko: how does it look so far? You think it will be ready for sign-off in the nearest hours? | 19:04 |
| sil2100 | I'll have to disconnect in a few, but I'll get back in around 2 hours in case an image needs to be built | 19:05 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: hey! Just so you know, if you see silo 15 as ready for sign-off please take care of it with priority ;) | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | robru: ^ and if you could publish it with priority as well | 19:07 |
| robru | sil2100: sure thing | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | Thanks :) | 19:07 |
| ToyKeeper | sil2100: Does that mean 240 isn't the promotion candidate, but 241 is? | 19:07 |
| boiko | sil2100: yep, it is looking good so far, should be ready for signoff pretty soon | 19:08 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: yeah, basically 241 will be the image we'd like to release | 19:08 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ^ looks like your u-s-s autopilot fixes will still land in the promotion candidate ;) | 19:09 |
| rsalveti | triggering a new vivid for the new pulseaudio | 19:13 |
| kenvandine | Ran 121 tests in 1441.927s | 19:13 |
| kenvandine | OK | 19:13 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, ^^ | 19:13 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 19:14 |
| sil2100 | Ok, need to drop off now, see you in a few hours | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, should i publish that? | 19:15 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: hm, not sure if the rootfs for 240 already finished | 19:15 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 104 building (started: 20150218-19:15) === | 19:15 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: maybe wait a few and then publish ;) | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, a "few" | 19:15 |
| robru | kenvandine: rtm 11 doesn't need qa? | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | how long is that? | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | robru, no... autopilot only | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | fixes the smoke tests | 19:16 |
| robru | kenvandine: cool | 19:16 |
| sil2100 | robru: no, it's just an autopilot change, but kenvandine will publish it if anything | 19:16 |
| robru | sil2100: k | 19:16 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: maybe in like 30 mins or so? | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | sure | 19:16 |
| sil2100 | Thanks guys ;) | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, how can i tell if it's safe? | 19:17 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, have a good one! | 19:17 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: hmm... there's a way of checking if the rootfs built but I never remember the links for that ;p | 19:17 |
| sil2100 | See you in a bit o/ | 19:17 |
| ToyKeeper | D'oh, too late. | 19:22 |
| ToyKeeper | robru, boiko: I can't test silo rtm-015. The plan is to use 240 as the candidate and take rtm-015 a little slower. | 19:24 |
| ToyKeeper | It kinda requires specific test lab hardware and 4G, neither of which is available on this continent. | 19:25 |
| robru | ToyKeeper: hmmm | 19:25 |
| robru | ToyKeeper: ok well do what you can. if you can only test 240 then so be it. when the europeans wake up they can test 241 then. | 19:26 |
| === plars changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: ubuntu-rtm landing gates now closed | ||
| === fginther changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping fginther | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: ubuntu-rtm landing gates now closed | ||
| boiko | ToyKeeper: so, bug 1421177 is marked as duplicate of another bug by john-mcaleely | 19:58 |
| ubot5 | Error: Launchpad bug 1421177 could not be found | 19:58 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: can you confirm it is really just a duplicate? | 19:59 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, looking | 20:00 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, I went on the basis of the commenst in #18 & 19 on that bug | 20:02 |
| john-mcaleely | it seems that several bugs have poor repros (we lack the equipment), and an engineering call that they may have related fixes | 20:02 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: the bug description is very confusing, but re-reading it I think it is correct, unless the reporter says it is not | 20:03 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, so my biggest concern would be regressions, rather than confirming those branches fix things | 20:03 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, we will not hear from the reporter - they were onsite for one day, and will not go back | 20:04 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: so, the branch really fixes 1416292 | 20:04 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, again, we've never well reproduced that, so it's a judgement call, I think | 20:05 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: the chances of regressions are very low | 20:05 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 240 DONE (finished: 20150218-20:05) === | 20:05 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/240.changes === | 20:05 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, then I prefer to say we tried to fix it, and did make an improvement | 20:05 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: and as I said before, 1416292 is really fixed | 20:05 |
| john-mcaleely | and therefore land '15 | 20:05 |
| john-mcaleely | excellent | 20:05 |
| boiko | john-mcaleely: also, with the stuff that already landed on silo 11, call accepting/hanging up handling was improved a lot | 20:06 |
| john-mcaleely | boiko, sounds good | 20:06 |
| boiko | ToyKeeper: so, I think testing the other bugs is enough in this case | 20:07 |
| john-mcaleely | I think that is the best we can do | 20:08 |
| boiko | ToyKeeper: also, 1422401 was partially fixed with a fix in ofono that was landed on silo 11, so if you try to reproduce the problem without silo 15, you might not succeed, the telephony-service side of the fix just cover extra failure possibilities | 20:08 |
| * john-mcaleely eod | 20:09 | |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| robru | ToyKeeper: well there's that ^ | 20:18 |
| ToyKeeper | Hmm, silo rtm-11 didn't actually land in image 240 though, no? | 20:31 |
| ToyKeeper | It was approved after 240 started building. | 20:31 |
| kenvandine | ToyKeeper, no it didn't | 20:31 |
| kenvandine | ToyKeeper, sil2100 wanted it to go in 241 | 20:32 |
| ToyKeeper | Okay. I'll try to avoid telephony tests on 240, since they'll be obsoleted by 241 anyway. | 20:32 |
| kenvandine | telephony? rtm 11 was settings autopilot fixes | 20:33 |
| ToyKeeper | Okay, looks like there were two different silo 11s then. :) | 20:33 |
| kenvandine | ah :) | 20:33 |
| kenvandine | rtm 11 with settings fixes the smoke test failures | 20:33 |
| kenvandine | autopilot test changes only | 20:33 |
| ToyKeeper | Regardless, image 241 should have some new telephony fixes. | 20:33 |
| kenvandine | ToyKeeper, so then the previous silo 11 should be in 240 | 20:34 |
| boiko | ToyKeeper: flashing 240 here, I can tell if the fixes are there in a minute | 20:44 |
| ToyKeeper | boiko: I just had two silo 11s mixed up; wasn't aware there were two. | 20:44 |
| boiko | ToyKeeper: ah ok :) | 20:45 |
| plars | popey: so did I hear correctly that calendar is back? | 20:48 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 104 DONE (finished: 20150218-20:50) === | 20:50 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/104.changes === | 20:50 |
| kgunn | trainguard i can give up vivid silo 13 | 21:32 |
| kgunn | trainguards i can give up vivid silo 13 | 21:32 |
| robru | kgunn: sure | 21:32 |
| robru | cihelp s-jenkins is having some trouble: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/cu2d-choo-choo-autolanding/146/console seems intermittent, I've had some success with retries, but not always | 22:33 |
| fginther | robru, looking | 22:34 |
| === fginther changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: ubuntu-rtm landing gates now closed | ||
| robru | fginther: thanks | 22:34 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 22:36 |
| sil2100 | Hey, did silo 15 land? | 22:36 |
| robru | sil2100: no, apparently ToyKeeper isn't equipped to qa it. | 22:37 |
| sil2100 | Oh shit | 22:37 |
| robru | fginther: http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/cu2d-choo-choo-ci/ this is the one where the retry worked. the -autolanding one seems just dead | 22:37 |
| ToyKeeper | sil2100: Even so, I was asked not to, so people in .eu can do it in the morning. | 22:38 |
| robru | fginther: same traceback as far as i can tell | 22:38 |
| fginther | robru, there's an issue with a subset of the builder nodes, trying to track it down | 22:38 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: oh, who asked that? | 22:38 |
| robru | ToyKeeper: whoa whoa, I didn't ask you not to, I just suggested that .eu people could if you couldn't. | 22:38 |
| ToyKeeper | sil2100: One of the bugs in 15 can only be tested in the test lab, too. | 22:38 |
| ToyKeeper | Oh, jibel asked me not to. | 22:38 |
| sil2100 | If that's the overall decision then ok, but now I'm really worried about time | 22:38 |
| robru | ToyKeeper: oh ok cool ;-) | 22:38 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: ok, then I trust that jibel knows best what resources QA has | 22:39 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: I suppose you could do sanity testing on #240 at least for krillin | 22:39 |
| ToyKeeper | Already doing that, and then on to regression testing for it... just not the telephony parts. | 22:40 |
| sil2100 | This way at least we'll know if images aren't completely broken | 22:40 |
| sil2100 | Excellent | 22:40 |
| sil2100 | Ok then, so it means I won't be needed | 22:41 |
| sil2100 | See you tomorrow everyone o/ | 22:41 |
| robru | fginther: ah, it merged now, thanks | 23:03 |
| fginther | robru, I found a corrupted project that appears to be the culprit. I'm now looking for the same problem on other nodes. | 23:06 |
| robru | fginther: good work! | 23:06 |
| fginther | robru, but things should be working for those jobs now | 23:06 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
