=== swordsmanz is now known as hugbot === hugbot is now known as swordsmanz === swordsmanz is now known as hugbot [08:16] jdesfossez, Possibly those messages are not of high enough level. You could try dmesg -n (level -> eg. warn|notice|info). [16:20] apw, the rebuild DEP-8 test. that's going to get run all the time now for all kernel packages. is that really what we want? [16:21] apw, i know why that test exists, i'm just wondering why it's in the kernel. if it's to ensure that new toolchain packages properly build the kernel why isn't there a test in the toolchain packages for it rather than the kernel? [16:24] bjf, it is in there because it is the kernel test one wants to run when any of the packages we depend on, changes [16:24] bjf, unfortuanatly there is no way to know you are testing for "me" rather than a "dependancy" [16:25] bjf, which is what we would really want ... [16:25] apw, yeah [16:25] bjf, i think there was a proposed way to tell, which would let one work it out [16:26] apw, so it's adding multiple hrs. to the testing and when we start running these on multiple archs is going to get worse [16:28] apw, i guess if it is a problem maybe someone will fix it so it only runs when we want rather than all the time [16:28] bjf, yeah i cannot deny it is stupid, just asking pitti ritht now if there is a way [16:31] bjf, is this in britney testing or in "bjf" testing btw [16:32] apw, new britney testing that CI is adding [16:32] bjf, ok so official, not runnig somewhere where we get to help out [16:32] to say UNIT_TESTING_FOR_KERNEL and let that short circuit it [16:32] apw, correct. [16:34] bjf, i am getting the "it doesn't know, and it is all very hard" but i do struggle to say why it doesn't know myself [16:44] apw: DEP-8 doesn't know why a test was triggered, just that you decided to run some tests. The fix belongs one layer above that, I suspect. [16:44] apw: ie: we should only run the test under certain circumstances, but the test itself can't know that, it's the framework calling it (adt-britney, whatever) that needs to be smarter. [16:45] infinity, well likley, though it is odd it isn't parameterised with why it is being run [16:45] apw: That implies more intelligence than DEP-8 is meant to have. It should be entirely framework agnostic. [16:45] apw: You can run tests by hand, you can write infra that runs all your tests in a loop, you can trigger them for $reasons, none of that matters to the tests. [16:46] yeah, and i'd be cool with the reason it ran being "run by hand" or "none" [17:01] jsalisbury: hey, just curious if you had found anything about bug 1359689 [17:01] bug 1359689 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "cryptsetup password prompt not shown" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1359689 [17:03] cyphermox, yes, I backported commits abd69c55d and 144ecb97c. I should post a link in the bug with a test kernel shortly. [17:03] ok [17:03] thanks :) [17:05] cyphermox, my test kernel build failed, so I just need to fix up my backports a bit.