[00:03] <elopio> veebers: um, yes. Sure it will work.
[00:04] <elopio> we set a timeout high enough for all tests, and then use the fixture timeout to put a smaller limit to smaller tests.
[00:20] <alesage> elopio I don't like that this flight mode test is taking so long to land
[00:20] <alesage> elopio I
[00:20] <alesage> 'm afraid that I'll find several new things to fix in the next revision
[00:21] <alesage> elopio, some of this criticism could've come with the first review, no?
[00:22] <alesage> elopio these tests should be *easy* to write, it should take twenty minutes IMO
[00:32] <elopio> alesage: I haven't reviewed it because it's not in the review column
[00:36] <elopio> alesage: In case you missed my ping: if it is ready for review, you should put it in the review column.
[00:36] <alesage> elopio it's not ready for review
[00:38] <elopio> alesage: then I'm not getting your message.
[00:38] <elopio> it's taking long because there are things worth fixing?
[00:39] <elopio> I agree that it would be better if all the things to fix come in the first review. But if for some reason that doesn't happen, and a late review has a good comment in it, I think it's good to take the time to fix it.
[00:41] <elopio> if I'm not getting it, please bring it to tomorrow's stand up.
[00:41]  * elopio goes to the gym.
[04:26] <pitti> dobey: yes, dpkg-dev is really heavy; it pulls in gcc, binutils, libc6-dev, perl, and whatnot
[04:26] <pitti> elopio, dobey: hence I think just globbing for the lib that you need is so much faster
[04:33] <elopio> pitti: yeah, /usr/lib/*/oxide-qt/chromedriver
[04:33] <elopio> I actually don't know why they started using dpkg-architecture. It seems to be one of those things one person uses, and then we copy paste everywhere.
[04:34] <elopio> we'll start removing it.
[08:17] <ki7mt> Is this the right place to discuss an issue with the ISO QA Tracker ?
[08:39] <Noskcaj> ki7mt, yes
[08:47] <ki7mt> Hi Noskcaj somehow I've managed to orphan two tests in the in progress state and can't find a way to cancel them. Here's the link: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/332/builds/89337/testcases/1301/results
[08:49] <ki7mt> I submitted the pass results, but it didn't clean the original in-progress test, and added another. I probably did something wrong, but am not sure how to correct it.
[08:49] <Noskcaj> You should be fine to leave them as is
[08:49] <ki7mt> OK thanks.
[08:49] <Noskcaj> Talk to balloons when he comes online, since it's been over a year since i've put my iso-tracker admin hat on
[08:50] <ki7mt> I got a responce just now from the lubuntu-qa list, Dohhh All I needed to do is click the Pencil Icon and delete it !!
[14:20] <elopio> jibel: can we schedule the sprint delivery for tomorrow, ten minutes for now?
[14:22] <jibel> elopio, yeah, if I'm still alive. It's hard to stay on my chair right now :(
[14:23] <elopio> jibel: you can appoint somebody else to attend the meeting. You should rest, we can't live without you :)
[14:23] <jibel> elopio, the best person would be brendand but you don't want to move him back to our team.
[14:24] <elopio> jibel: no, we don't.
[14:25] <brendand> jibel, you can saw me in half
[14:25] <brendand> it's a risky procedure
[14:25] <brendand> there's a good chance of death
[14:25] <jibel> right, that's a problem with human body
[14:31] <davmor2> brendand: I know a man who has a box for cutting people in two and putting them back together again after it'll be fine ;)
[14:42] <elopio> brendand: can you please make reviews? once you eod will be harder to land things.
[14:44] <brendand> elopio, i am
[14:44] <elopio> thanks.
[14:45] <elopio> ok, I'm done.
[14:46] <elopio> brendand: which branch are you using to try the camera?
[14:46] <brendand> elopio, veebers put one up
[14:56] <elopio> fgimenez: we have some branches ready for review. Can you take a look?
[14:57] <fgimenez> elopio: sure, on it
[14:59] <elopio> fgimenez: and about the "more than one device card", I'm not sure where that one came from. Wasn't that story finished?
[15:01] <fgimenez> elopio: i'm not sure, i've seen the card still on top an unasigned
[15:01] <fgimenez> elopio: is it finished?
[15:02] <fgimenez> elopio: it was unasigned here https://canonical.leankit.com/Boards/View/109656104#workflow-view
[15:04] <elopio> fgimenez: yes, I think it is done. The last piece was fixed by brendan here: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~canonical-platform-qa/ubuntu-sanity-tests/trunk/revision/76
[15:06] <fgimenez> elopio: ok, then the cards to pick are the todo ones from here https://canonical.leankit.com/Boards/View/112198880#workflow-view ?
[15:06] <elopio> fgimenez: yes.
[15:06] <elopio> you will see that they are linked to the other board with the parent relation.
[15:07] <fgimenez> elopio: ok thanks
[15:07] <elopio> and on the one for usb, it says that 14 out of 14 tasks were done.
[15:07] <elopio> I'll move it to donee.
[15:08] <elopio> fgimenez: how are you running the xx-test branch?
[15:08] <elopio> I'll try to reproduce your error.
[15:08] <fgimenez> elopio: i'm following the readme
[15:09] <elopio> fgimenez: the readme has three methods to run it.
[15:09] <fgimenez> elopio: the same adt-run command described for qemu
[15:10] <elopio> ack
[15:10] <fgimenez> elopio: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10291843/
[15:30] <elopio> brendand: this is different from the rest of apps
[15:30] <elopio> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/trunk/view/head:/cameraapplication.cpp#L52
[15:32] <elopio> hum, but it's the same that unity does. How can unity succeed and this one fail?
[16:23] <elopio> alesage: https://code.launchpad.net/~paulliu/unity8/notification_helper/+merge/249211
[16:23] <elopio> it's still needs fixing from you. Can you please review it again?
[16:24] <alesage> elopio, ok will do now
[16:40] <paulliu> alesage, elopio: I'm on vacation now. It is Chinese new year period. But I'll fix the branch by review comments everyday. Just don't want to block anyone.
[16:41] <elopio> paulliu: alesage approved it too. You can top-approve.
[16:41] <alesage> paulliu, enjoy your holiday--I think we're both approving now :)
[16:41] <elopio> oh, albert already did.
[16:41] <paulliu> alesage: thanks.
[16:41] <alesage> paulliu sorry for the delay, happy new year :)
[16:41] <elopio> enjoy paulliu.
[16:47] <elfy> balloons: so ... first time this cycle - who'd be the best person to help us debug 32bit failing in vbox - any idea?
[16:55] <balloons> elfy, 32 bit failing?
[16:55] <elfy> in vbox
[16:56] <elfy> at least, hardware works - 64 bit works anywhere
[16:56] <elfy> odd
[17:03] <balloons> are you saying 32bit builds of xubuntu don't work in vbox on your machine?
[17:04] <elfy> yes - and confirmed
[17:05] <elfy> funnily enough slickymasterWork told me yesterday, but we had other issues going on - waited to check today
[17:06] <slickymasterWork> told you what elfy?
[17:07] <balloons> elfy, so this is a problem in the image or xubuntu
[17:07] <balloons> or vbox?
[17:07] <slickymasterWork> hey balloons
[17:07] <balloons> hey slickymasterWork
[17:08] <elfy> balloons: I guess image - 64 bit works, ubuntu 32/lubuntu32 all work fine
[17:09] <balloons> ahh.. well then.. I'm not quite sure. If it works on real hw, then ?. I'm curious is an earlier build worked or not
[17:09] <elopio> brendand: as a workaround, we can install qttestability-autopilot while the partition is rw.
[17:09] <elopio> I'm still digging, trying to compare what unity does with what the camera does.
[17:09] <brendand> elopio, we might have to
[17:10] <elfy> balloons: assume so - not heard anything causing problems previously
[17:10] <elfy> and I would have ;)
[17:31] <balloons> elfy, so it's probably something with the image then. So I guess looking within ubuntu is a good place to start? what happens when you boot it? does it boot on your real hw?
[17:39] <elfy> balloons: yep, works fine in hardware, and if rather than hang about waiting for the choice dialogue you choose at the beginning menu - it boots to desktop
[18:50] <elfy> wxl: you got any idea how many PPC installs there actually are?
[18:50] <wxl> elfy: no
[18:51] <elfy> mind you - don't suppose anyone has much idea of how many of any there are :)
[18:51] <elfy> just seems like a lot of pain for you each and everytime
[18:51] <wxl> not usually
[18:52] <wxl> we're now lts only
[18:52] <elfy> lubuntu is LTS only? or just PPC
[18:52] <wxl> and we've trained most of the users that there ARE going to problems with video
[18:52] <wxl> just ppc
[18:52] <elfy> k
[19:45] <alesage> fgimenez, projects-team, here's a relevant branch for bluetooth https://code.launchpad.net/~ueqa-projects-team/ubuntu-sanity-tests/bluetooth-discovery/+merge/243849
[20:06] <elopio> ping ubuntu-qa: where is the pictures scope now? When I flash my phone, I only have apps, music and videos.
[20:07] <davmor2> elopio: you on vivid?
[20:07] <elopio> davmor2: yes.
[20:07] <davmor2> elopio: it's a krillin rtm scope
[20:11] <elopio> brendand: what was the add contact test missing?
[20:12] <elopio> ah, moving the helpers out of the test case.
[20:12] <brendand> elopio, some helpers, and it doesn't work when run within the suite because of a conflict with the system settings test
[20:12] <brendand> elopio, in the object cache
[20:13] <alesage> projects-team I'm out of diet pepsi >:(
[20:14] <alesage> (trying to be more expressive here)
[20:14] <veebers> alesage: lol, sorry I'm a little far away to gt you any more :-P
[20:24] <brendand> veebers, elopio - any reviews needed before i go eat my dinner?
[20:25] <elopio> brendand: no, you can go.
[20:25] <brendand> elopio, it's not quite ready so don't be shy
[20:27] <elopio> brendand: I'm not shy, I just ran out of branches :)
[20:28] <elopio> but if you want to do something, I would find the launch fixture useful ;)
[20:28] <veebers> brendand: heh, nothing from me either
[20:32] <Letozaf_> elopio, balloons dobey hi
[20:32] <elopio> hello Letozaf_.
[20:32] <dobey> hi
[20:33] <Letozaf_> elopio, dobey have you guys got new for the SDCard tests :-P
[20:33] <Letozaf_> nes
[20:33] <Letozaf_> news
[20:33] <Letozaf_> sorry :(
[20:33] <dobey> i'm not on the qa team. i was just spouting off ideas :)
[20:34] <elopio> Letozaf_: I'm not on the qa team either ;)
[20:34] <Letozaf_> dobey, well if they are good spout them out :)
[20:34] <Letozaf_> elopio, oh! ok so must I ask balloons ?
[20:34] <elopio> Letozaf_: we can't work on that yet, we have our hands full. But I'd suggest you to file a bug asking for an sdcard fake.
[20:35] <Letozaf_> elopio, ok thanks, I will
[20:38] <Letozaf_> elopio, buy the way what should I file the bug against ?
[20:43] <balloons> hey Letozaf_
[20:44] <Letozaf_> balloons, hi :)
[20:44] <Letozaf_> balloons, as elopio suggested I reported this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-filemanager-app/+bug/1406988
[20:45] <balloons> Letozaf_, I see elopio and dobey have been having fun with you :-) As elopio said, sadly there is no known solution, so any solution would have to be worked on by you. The good news is you can help others out if you solve it :-)
[20:45] <Letozaf_> Oo  :)
[20:46] <Letozaf_> elopio, dobey : naught boys :-P
[20:46] <Letozaf_> naughty
[20:47] <balloons> I would keep working the bug, pitti did leave some ideas
[20:47] <elfy> hey Letozaf_ :)
[20:47] <Letozaf_> elfy, o/
[20:47] <Letozaf_> balloons, ok I can try
[20:53] <dobey> i was just stating that the stuff i said yesterday about the sd card, were ideas. they're not something i could work on :)
[20:54] <Letozaf_> dobey, don't worry I am also joking :P
[21:24] <veebers> elopio: where you able to get the apt caching working for you on your device?
[21:25] <elopio> veebers: haven't tried.
[21:25] <elopio> I got it working on my laptop and desktop. Next step, the phone.
[21:26] <veebers> elopio: nice, let me know how it goes, I'll probably want to do the same :-)
[21:48] <infinity> elfy: Yeah, that's the one.  I tried -qa and -testing :P
[21:48] <elfy> yea -qa would be all sorts of fun for me and my English only lol
[21:49] <infinity> If any bored testers get done with their own ISOs and are looking for ways to be nice/helpful, it looks like studio and myth could use some boot/install/reboot smoketesting to make sure they don't seem entirely broken.
[21:50] <infinity> (For the trusty point release, that is)
[21:50] <elfy> I can take studio entire's for them
[21:50] <elfy> I'll also mail their list
[21:50] <wxl> and if anyone wants to help with lubuntu i won't complain
[21:51] <wxl> since we have ye olde late rebuild :)
[21:51] <wxl> if someone wants to jump in, focus on the desktop images
[21:51] <wxl> i have people already confirming alternate will fail.. ;)
[21:54] <elfy> mmm
[21:54] <elfy> mind you I've just realised that I got no 32 bit tests of my own done ...
[21:54] <wxl> hahahah
[22:16] <veebers> elopio: Reviewed this branch, NF: https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-platform-qa/ubuntu-sanity-tests/workaround1423359-screenshot/+merge/250221
[23:38] <alesage> elopio you mentioned the "import" update being necessary--why does this happen?  I find myself blocked by it now
[23:43]  * alesage is mystified
[23:48] <veebers> alesage: what's the issue that you're seeing?
[23:49] <alesage> veebers, I'm blocked by the 'tests' dir being unimportable
[23:51] <veebers> alesage: can you tell why it's not importable? Perhaps adding -s to the adt-run so you get a shell at failure and trying to run:
[23:51] <veebers> python -c "import ubuntu_sanity_tests.tests" to see the output,
[23:52] <veebers> I suspect something like "Cannot import blah, not found"
[23:52] <alesage> veebers hmpf will try
[23:54] <veebers> alesage: we see the error "...has no module tests...' or '...cant import...' when something else is causing an import or syntax error in the module.
[23:54] <veebers> for instance recently the edges_demo was changed and renamed which broke us
[23:55] <alesage> veebers, understood; I'm seeing in a branch/device which is unchanged :(
[23:56] <veebers> alesage: right, there could be a change in the packages that we're pulling in (i.e. the edges_demo was a change in unity8-autopilot)
[23:56] <alesage> veebers, aha