[00:42] next Xubuntu at article drafted here http://xubuntu.org/?p=2965 [00:42] we need to find more orgs using Xubuntu, I've run out [00:45] ochosi, ali1234: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/0.2.0-0ubuntu2 [00:46] pleia2: that looks good :) [00:48] great, it's shorter than some of the others, but very direct [00:50] nothing wrong with that [00:50] I'll publish on Monday or so [00:53] ochosi, darkxst did the work for me, so we now have http://phillw.net/ubuntu-gnome/Xvivid410.html [01:02] It will probably be renamed to http://phillw.net/ubuntu-gnome/Xvivid412.html [09:17] hello :-) [09:17] morning [09:19] elfy: you wrote " nice little disk space usage bar turned up in thunar" which version is it? [09:20] 1.6.5 [09:21] ahhh, thanks [09:22] so, its a deb package in vivid? [09:30] yep an update in vivid [09:33] thanks, wasn't an good idea todo a bling update in trusty :-P [09:33] blind [09:36] Well, maybe a backport to trusty is possible. I'll look on depencies and changelog. i have the bzr trunk already :-) [09:45] Akusari, https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/xfce-4.12 [09:49] brainvvash thanks, sounds good [09:53] hmmm, i don't see all thunar plugins shipped with this ppa. Maybe there are package collection changes. I'll test it on my dev vbox :-) [09:54] btw: if xfce 4.12 is out finaly, do you plan a trusty backport ? [12:07] for you xfce peeps - https://wiki.xfce.org/contribute points to xfce users mailing list [12:07] that gets a 404 [12:07] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce [12:58] elfy: lol [13:00] bluesabre: I was just looking at your blog re 4.12 [13:00] so followed the trail ;) [13:01] just realised I can report that :p [13:02] :D [13:02] reported it up the chain [13:03] elfy: its fixed [13:04] thanks for your bug report :D [13:04] :D [13:05] that's funny - let me mark it fixed resolved [13:05] I really should hang about in xfce-dev I guess [13:06] bluesabre: anyway - so if xfce wants people to test this stuff - I assume as vanilla xfce, which is best done where? [13:06] and how on earth can you grab a bug list without specifying anything but date and not fixed? [13:07] elfy: its easiest to test in vivid, we have everything there [13:07] the bug list is tricky, you have to modify the url [13:07] just as xfce session? [13:07] xubuntu session should be fine actually [13:08] I hate bug lists - if I can't find something easily - report it, someone somewhere will facepalm and mark as dupe :D [13:08] bluesabre: oh ok - so doing that anyway then :p [13:08] but you can modify the url and drop all the extra fluff until you have product and resolution, like so [13:08] https://bugzilla.xfce.org/buglist.cgi?product=Exo&resolution=--- [13:09] elfy: yup, xubuntu team is pretty invaluable for xfce testing since we always ship the latest [13:09] ok - might add trawling through xfce bugs to my plan [13:09] that and arch [13:09] yep === AgAu is now known as Emperor`AgAu [15:18] what I mean by lost any clue is I've lost the will to live when people "lightlocker 14.04" in any combination === brainvvash_ is now known as brainvvash [15:33] Unit193, others: yay for lowering the translation percentage - the german docs translation will make it into vivid now =) [15:33] * dkessel will continue translating the remaining parts nevertheless :) [15:34] if any of you want to steal my PPA recipe for the docs and add it to staging or something, that's fine with me too [15:35] ^ don't know who to ping ;) [15:36] neither do I :) [15:53] I noticed that ppa xfec-4.12 includes xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin version 1.43. The official xubuntu-backports ppa for trusty is shipped with version 1.40 only. Version 1.43 includes only bugfixes and no functional change compared to 1.40. Suggestion: Copy version 1.43 to xubuntu-backports for all users :-) [15:54] i'm using version 1.43 with trusty for a week now without any problems so far [18:54] dkessel: Sure thing, doc. [18:54] "The official xubuntu-backports ppa for trusty"? [19:06] Nah [19:06] Unit193: https://launchpad.net/~dkessel/+archive/ubuntu/xubuntu-docs-daily [19:07] Nah, someone else's comment after yours. [19:12] D'oh === benonsoftware is now known as Guest33721 [22:08] pleia2, ochosi: either of you around? [22:12] * bluesabre is [22:12] 00:03 knome: oh wow [22:12] 00:03 knome: our theme has been up for like 4 days [22:12] i'm about to make it public soonish [22:12] i need yes to check it once that's done [22:13] sounds exciting :D [22:13] yes!! [22:16] ok, done [22:16] please look around [22:17] looking [22:17] no hand-drawn computers? [22:17] not yet [22:18] knome: 14.10 release announcement points to the beta announcement [22:18] heh. [22:18] fixed [22:19] damn caching :) [22:20] * bluesabre wants to standardize the screenshot size for http://xubuntu.org/screenshots/ [22:20] hmm? [22:21] oh, heh, image aspect ratio? [22:21] it also shows images in a weird order [22:21] :) [22:21] if you have a $bunch of shots for 14.04 and/or 14.10, put them somewhere and i'll grab an push them [22:22] I'll try to get a bunch of same aspect ratio in the next few days [22:22] http://xubuntu.org/blog/ is kinda left-heavy [22:22] wfm [22:22] or cooperate with slickymaster [22:22] oh, of course [22:22] need to fix that next [22:23] http://xubuntu.org/donations/ is pretty [22:23] mhm [22:23] many pages arẹ.. [22:24] http://i.imgur.com/HMUq8RD.png [22:24] i know i know [22:24] just didn't get to that yet [22:24] :D [22:25] should be better already [22:26] search widget still looks crappy, so not showing it [22:26] knome: very nice [22:26] no other appearance issues [22:26] this is all so nice [22:26] thanks! [22:26] i also tweeted about it, you might want to RT [22:26] indeed [22:27] done [22:27] * knome bows [22:34] knome: actually, why no 14.04 screenshots at all? [22:34] because old stuff [22:34] we are doing things in the new way (tm) now... [22:34] i guess i could move the 14.04 screenshots to the screenshots page [22:35] its a lot prettier than the releases preceding it [22:35] heh, i would hope every release is [22:36] so, what do we want the standard screenshot resolution to be? [22:38] i guess we want it to be in widescreen, most people use that now [22:38] also, http://xubuntu.org/screenshots/oneiric_01/ (is the panel missing because that was the one with the seemingly innappropriate date)? [22:38] i have no idea... [22:39] i personally would dump all the old screenshots for now. [22:39] yeah [22:39] we can reupload them if we need/want to [22:39] probably to an archive page or sth [22:39] the thing is, [22:39] the screenshots page used to be the archive page [22:39] because we had the recent screenshots on the front page [22:40] ah, right [22:40] 1280×720 maybe? [22:41] preferably >1400 in width [22:41] or, tbe, 1400 or more [22:41] that's the max width specified for the site [22:41] but if they aren't, then no big deal [22:41] because they should always be centered anyway [22:41] ..i guess [22:42] :) [22:46] not sure > 1400 is a good idea with the recent burst in 1366×768 laptops [22:46] heh [22:46] well... [22:46] do 1366 then [22:46] but it doesn't really matter much [22:49] http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp [22:50] well i mean website-technically [22:52] yeah [22:52] just give me two numbers and I'll get on it [22:52] :P [22:52] and leave the VMs on my system in case we need to change [22:52] well any regular widescreen aspect ration, with the width being 1400 or larger is ideal [22:53] but if that's hard to do, 1366 or 1280 works as well [22:55] k [22:55] * bluesabre will work on 1440x900 [22:55] nice, thanks [22:56] * knome goes improve the download page [23:04] * knome fixed the release announcement posts with images [23:04] http://xubuntu.org/news/14-10-release/ [23:04] looks nice and in line with the overall stuff now [23:50] knome: trusty https://www.dropbox.com/s/77fdiettxe6xcov/trusty.tar.gz?dl=0 [23:50] ta [23:50] processing [23:52] I'll do a similar set for precise, and ~2-3 for utopic [23:53] mhm [23:53] fwiw, we currently have no way to order the images as we wish [23:53] oh? [23:53] should probably think the right way (tm) to do that for 2.0 [23:53] yeah, currently it just orders based on time, newest first [23:54] we can use touch on the screenshots to order them before upload [23:54] i believe it's upload time, not file creation time [23:54] but that's an interesting idea. [23:55] not sure how ugly the upload time in the wp db is [23:55] or just bulk upload in order when we get all screens [23:55] yes [23:55] something like that [23:57] It'll take a while for the others, but should have them for you by morning [23:58] http://xubuntu.org/screenshots/ [23:58] okay. [23:58] i have no idea why they turned up like that [23:58] and in multiples. [23:58] lol