[02:18] <pleia2> copying things over now, I'll do editorial review of my own tomorrow (have to leave for a concert soon, oops)
[02:38] <pleia2> Unit193: link check? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue405
[02:38] <pleia2> and sending to editors
[02:40] <Unit193> Juuust the normally broken ones, all good.
[02:40] <pleia2> thanks :)
=== Guest33721 is now known as benonsoftware
=== benonsoftware is now known as Guest48867
=== Guest48867 is now known as benonsoftware
[16:36] <PaulW2U> Editorial Review underway, trying apply the style guidelines to all summaries.
[16:37] <PaulW2U> I agree with imnichol, Canonical summaries are the most difficult to write (and correct)
[16:38] <imnichol> I guess that makes me a thought leader ;)
[16:38] <imnichol> PaulW2U, anything I can do to help?
[16:39] <PaulW2U> pleia2: Please wave your magic wand over Canonical's articles and make the summaries good :)
[16:41] <PaulW2U> imnichol: Just reviewing what we've done, reviewing the wiki summaries, tidying up ready for publication.
[16:51] <PaulW2U> imnichol: If you feel you can improve any of the Cloud or Canonical summaries then please do so.
[16:51] <PaulW2U> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue405
[16:52] <imnichol> No promises ;)
[16:52] <PaulW2U> I'm not liking the way some of the second/third sentences of the summaries start.
[16:56] <imnichol> Is that under section 10?
[16:56] <imnichol> Or under the Cloud News section?
[16:57] <PaulW2U> Both
[17:13] <pleia2> PaulW2U: thanks, I'll have a look soon (just waking up now :))
[17:23] <PaulW2U> Only waking up? Some of us have just finished a day's work! If only the word were flat :)
[17:23] <pleia2> haha
[17:23] <PaulW2U> s/word/world/
[17:23] <pleia2> 9:23AM here :)
[17:25] <PaulW2U> 17:23, cooking my evening meal :)
[17:26]  * pleia2 sips coffee
[21:23] <PaulW2U> Added Xubuntu article to the wiki. Review done.
[21:23] <pleia2> PaulW2U: hm, that was published today
[21:24] <pleia2> we typically only include through Sunday
[21:24] <PaulW2U> It's dated 22nd at 0042 ???
[21:24] <pleia2> ah, the date on it is the 22nd, weird!
[21:24] <pleia2> I think that's when I made the draft
[21:24] <pleia2> goofy thing, oh well, you're right then :)
[21:24] <pleia2> thanks
[21:25] <pleia2> I have a dr appointment soon, will review+publish after I get home
[21:27] <PaulW2U> Ok. By the way, spelling/grammar error line 6 :(
[21:29] <pleia2> line 6?
[21:30] <PaulW2U> Of the article -- where should be were
[21:31] <pleia2> ah, gotcha, thanks :)