=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [18:12] Will AMD release a new Catalyst driver with support for Xserver 1.17? [18:12] eventually.. [18:12] we've had 1.17 in the ppa for ages.. [18:12] Will Vivid get Xserver 1.17 or are we stuck with 1.16? [18:13] oh cool [18:13] https://launchpad.net/~canonical-x/+archive/ubuntu/x-staging [18:13] but without fglrx.. [18:17] thanks [18:17] AMD pisses me off [18:18] I won't buy any of their products, but I still get punished with old software because of them [18:19] why not use the free software drivers? [18:20] I haven't used the blob in ages on radeon, no need to [18:32] I guess for gamers Catalyst is still needed maybe [18:33] I haven't used fglrx for ages either [18:33] I use free software drivers, I only use free software drivers, I use Intel [18:33] but even when I use Intel, I am held back with old version of X thanks to AMD dragging their feet [18:34] and its the same thing every new X release [18:44] mlankhorst, any idea when 1.17 will be put into vivid repo? [19:15] when we get fglrx.. [19:59] I see [20:00] is there any estimate of when AMD will give fglrx? [20:04] any dates are under nda, so no [20:27] imho, ubuntu should switch to 1.17 asap and recommend intel and nvidia and give amd the finger [20:48] that wouldn't solve a thing [20:51] well, it would pressure them to stop dragging their feet [20:51] and it would get us non-amd users the latest xorg faster [20:51] now we're all getting punished by amd whether we buy amd or not [21:31] it would just punish fglrx users that's all [21:40] well, it would unpunish intel and nvidia users [22:02] smallfoot-: actually, it would unpunish AMD users too [22:02] (those who use the open source driver) [22:05] OTOH, Ubuntu got permission to use a pre-release fglrx in the past, and I suppose they don't want to blow up that relationship prematurely [22:08] JanC, indeed