| valorie | what a pleasant person | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| icefactory | i kno rite | 00:38 |
| hggdh | icefactory: please leave the channel | 00:40 |
| icefactory | no | 00:40 |
| rww | IdleOne-, cprofitt: plz to identify to NickServ when you get a chance | 00:47 |
| rww | and I suspect the other message I was about to send is about to become redundant | 00:48 |
| phunyguy | thanks hggdh | 00:49 |
| hggdh | I hate having to do this :-( | 00:49 |
| phunyguy | heh | 00:49 |
| phunyguy | "this" being the ban, or? | 00:49 |
| hggdh | 'this' being banning someone | 00:51 |
| phunyguy | ahh. | 00:51 |
| phunyguy | yeah, but warranted in this case. At least for a couple days anyway. | 00:51 |
| ubottu | cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk) | 02:54 |
| ubottu | cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk porn spam) | 02:56 |
| ubottu | slooblack called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk porn spam) | 02:57 |
| elky | not sure where the spam bit was, but they're klined anyway | 03:03 |
| rww | I'm not sure why cfhowlett thinks calling ops multiple times is going to work any better than calling it once. | 03:12 |
| elky | maybe he was tapping his heels together while calling it | 03:20 |
| tonyyarusso | I'm amused by two things with the guy with the offensive nicks earlier: 1) I didn't actually ban them from #u-o - it was just a remove. 2) It took them a grand total of 11 seconds to join this channel after the remove. Obviously they were planning on it. | 03:42 |
| elky | they usually are | 03:44 |
| elky | not specific to that particular troll | 03:45 |
| tonyyarusso | Well, the ones like this yes. There are a lot of removes in #u-o that actually end up pleasantly. | 03:45 |
| whac-a-retro | Hey | 05:41 |
| whac-a-retro | I'm banned again? | 05:41 |
| whac-a-retro | I wasn't when I woke up this morning before school | 05:41 |
| whac-a-retro | I've been at school all day, so how could I have done anything wrong? | 05:43 |
| Tm_T | whac-a-retro: hi, which channel we are talking about? | 05:43 |
| whac-a-retro | #ubuntu-offtopic | 05:43 |
| rww | @btlogin | 05:45 |
| elky | what nick were you in under this morning? | 05:45 |
| whac-a-retro | Same as I was now | 05:45 |
| * rww ponders for a second, then sighs and just pulls up all -ot bans | 05:46 | |
| rww | whac-a-retro21:08:34* <-- | whac-a-retro (76d07d87@gateway/web/freenode/ip.118.208.125.135) has quit (Quit: Page closed) | 05:46 |
| rww | 21:10:34 -- | Mode #ubuntu-offtopic [+b-o *!76d07d87@gateway/* phunyguy] by phunyguy | 05:46 |
| rww | so that would be why. | 05:46 |
| whac-a-retro | Why did phunyguy do that? | 05:47 |
| rww | because there was another ban set on you that you were (presumably/hopefully accidentally) evading | 05:47 |
| whac-a-retro | No. I wasn't evading anything! | 05:47 |
| rww | specifically, the one set against the non-webchat version of your hostname | 05:48 |
| elky | it's not like you didn't literally promise to do so | 05:48 |
| whac-a-retro | I'm in webchat.freenode.net | 05:48 |
| rww | We know. | 05:48 |
| * whac-a-retro is confused | 05:48 | |
| rww | You got banned while not on webchat. You came back on webchat. You left on webchat. phunyguy noticed and banned you on webchat too. | 05:49 |
| whac-a-retro | =/ | 05:49 |
| rww | or the more general form: | 05:49 |
| rww | You got banned. You came back with a different hostname. We noticed. We banned that one too. | 05:49 |
| whac-a-retro | Can I be unbanned? | 05:49 |
| rww | Not by me. You're free to see if anyone else wants to. | 05:49 |
| rww | (note for other ops: 66371 is the first ban, 66397 is the webchat ban, 66401 is the subsequent IP ban that covers both webchat and non-webchat) | 05:51 |
| rww | (see also: 66330, 66143, 66142, 65940, 65938, 65903, 65711, 65435, 65362, 65361) | 05:55 |
| elky | whoa that's a lot | 05:55 |
| rww | hence my point of view on the matter | 05:56 |
| whac-a-retro | elky can you unban me | 05:59 |
| elky | whac-a-retro: no. | 05:59 |
| whac-a-retro | elky: would the answer change if I waited a few days? | 06:00 |
| elky | whac-a-retro: we've been trying to coach you to behave appropriately. we've outlined the problems with your nick changing more often than your socks. you have completely failed to learn. | 06:01 |
| whac-a-retro | I'm willing to learn now | 06:02 |
| elky | i doubt it. by the way, are you connected from your phone internet? | 06:02 |
| whac-a-retro | No. I wouldn't try and evade a ban with phone internet, cause I know I'd just be banned from Freenode too | 06:03 |
| elky | freenode_#ubuntu-ops_20150224.log:[10:15:06] <StevenTheHorse> I think I'm going to resort to using my phone with my phone's dynamic IP | 06:03 |
| whac-a-retro | Yes, I said that. I didn't mean it. I'm a smart ass sometimes, but I'm not stupid. | 06:04 |
| elky | then why did you join with webchat instead of your regular client? | 06:04 |
| rww | log readers: this is the bit where you spam #freenode saying elky thinks webchat users are stupid | 06:04 |
| whac-a-retro | Because I reinstalled OS X and hadn't downloaded Colloquy yet | 06:05 |
| whac-a-retro | Welcome back Pici! Where'd you go? | 06:07 |
| rww | his connection had a blip, hence the ping timeout right before it | 06:08 |
| whac-a-retro | Okay. Thanks rww. | 06:08 |
| === jared is now known as head_victim | ||
| === head_victim is now known as jared | ||
| k1l_ | running irc as root and the "but it works on mint" phrases. well, that is not the qualification for proper support advices | 11:38 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu-offtopic, SK|SonikkuUSA said: !mate is MATE is "the continuation of GNOME 2," a lightweight desktop environment that preserves the GNOME 2 desktop metaphor. See http://mate-desktop.org/ for more. For the official Ubuntu flavor with MATE, see !ubuntu-mate | 18:50 |
| genii | !mate | 18:50 |
| genii | Hm. | 18:50 |
| Pici | Is ubuntu-mate official now? | 18:50 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu-offtopic, SK|SonikkuUSA said: !ubuntu-mate is Ubuntu MATE is a !flavor of Ubuntu that features the !MATE desktop environment. For more info or to download, see http://ubuntu-mate.org . This flavor supports the PowerPC architecture. | 18:50 |
| k1l_ | they plan for 15.04 and i saw some alpha isos, iirc | 18:51 |
| IdleOne | Pici: not afaik ^^ | 18:51 |
| k1l_ | they missed it very closely for 14.10 so imho 15.04 should be good. but popey was in the mate team afaik | 18:51 |
| popey | its already being built on canonical infra | 18:52 |
| popey | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/daily-live/current/ | 18:52 |
| popey | which is about as official as it gets :) | 18:52 |
| k1l_ | :) | 18:52 |
| k1l_ | we have a confirmation (and congrats to the team) | 18:52 |
| IdleOne | so not official | 18:52 |
| popey | well 15.04 hasn't been released yet... | 18:53 |
| IdleOne | right | 18:53 |
| whac-a-retro | I want to be unbanned from #ubuntu-ot now please | 19:10 |
| IdleOne | no. | 19:10 |
| whac-a-retro | That's fine too. I'll ask somene else like rww said | 19:11 |
| IdleOne | Why did you get banned anyway? | 19:12 |
| whac-a-retro | Apparently "changing nicks" even though I've been on this one for days now... | 19:12 |
| IdleOne | yeah, I don't think that was the only reason | 19:13 |
| IdleOne | I think it would be best if you found yourself a different channel to go chat in | 19:14 |
| genii | @btlogin | 19:17 |
| popey | k1l_: IdleOne https://ubuntu-mate.org/blog/ubuntu-mate-vivid-beta1/ :) | 19:21 |
| IdleOne | popey: yes, but Ubuntu doesn't release beta1 versions | 19:23 |
| IdleOne | so why would a ubuntu-mate beta1 be official | 19:24 |
| popey | oh jeez | 19:24 |
| popey | forget it | 19:24 |
| IdleOne | hehe | 19:24 |
| popey | I'm not going to argue with you about this. | 19:24 |
| IdleOne | I'm being pedantic I know | 19:24 |
| popey | thats one word for it | 19:24 |
| IdleOne | well that is the nice word for this channel. | 19:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!