[00:38] what a pleasant person [00:38] i kno rite [00:40] icefactory: please leave the channel [00:40] no [00:47] IdleOne-, cprofitt: plz to identify to NickServ when you get a chance [00:48] and I suspect the other message I was about to send is about to become redundant [00:49] thanks hggdh [00:49] I hate having to do this :-( [00:49] heh [00:49] "this" being the ban, or? [00:51] 'this' being banning someone [00:51] ahh. [00:51] yeah, but warranted in this case. At least for a couple days anyway. [02:54] cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk) [02:56] cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk porn spam) [02:57] slooblack called the ops in #ubuntu (ddrk porn spam) [03:03] not sure where the spam bit was, but they're klined anyway [03:12] I'm not sure why cfhowlett thinks calling ops multiple times is going to work any better than calling it once. [03:20] maybe he was tapping his heels together while calling it [03:42] I'm amused by two things with the guy with the offensive nicks earlier: 1) I didn't actually ban them from #u-o - it was just a remove. 2) It took them a grand total of 11 seconds to join this channel after the remove. Obviously they were planning on it. [03:44] they usually are [03:45] not specific to that particular troll [03:45] Well, the ones like this yes. There are a lot of removes in #u-o that actually end up pleasantly. [05:41] Hey [05:41] I'm banned again? [05:41] I wasn't when I woke up this morning before school [05:43] I've been at school all day, so how could I have done anything wrong? [05:43] whac-a-retro: hi, which channel we are talking about? [05:43] #ubuntu-offtopic [05:45] @btlogin [05:45] what nick were you in under this morning? [05:45] Same as I was now [05:46] * rww ponders for a second, then sighs and just pulls up all -ot bans [05:46] whac-a-retro21:08:34* <-- | whac-a-retro (76d07d87@gateway/web/freenode/ip.118.208.125.135) has quit (Quit: Page closed) [05:46] 21:10:34 -- | Mode #ubuntu-offtopic [+b-o *!76d07d87@gateway/* phunyguy] by phunyguy [05:46] so that would be why. [05:47] Why did phunyguy do that? [05:47] because there was another ban set on you that you were (presumably/hopefully accidentally) evading [05:47] No. I wasn't evading anything! [05:48] specifically, the one set against the non-webchat version of your hostname [05:48] it's not like you didn't literally promise to do so [05:48] I'm in webchat.freenode.net [05:48] We know. [05:48] * whac-a-retro is confused [05:49] You got banned while not on webchat. You came back on webchat. You left on webchat. phunyguy noticed and banned you on webchat too. [05:49] =/ [05:49] or the more general form: [05:49] You got banned. You came back with a different hostname. We noticed. We banned that one too. [05:49] Can I be unbanned? [05:49] Not by me. You're free to see if anyone else wants to. [05:51] (note for other ops: 66371 is the first ban, 66397 is the webchat ban, 66401 is the subsequent IP ban that covers both webchat and non-webchat) [05:55] (see also: 66330, 66143, 66142, 65940, 65938, 65903, 65711, 65435, 65362, 65361) [05:55] whoa that's a lot [05:56] hence my point of view on the matter [05:59] elky can you unban me [05:59] whac-a-retro: no. [06:00] elky: would the answer change if I waited a few days? [06:01] whac-a-retro: we've been trying to coach you to behave appropriately. we've outlined the problems with your nick changing more often than your socks. you have completely failed to learn. [06:02] I'm willing to learn now [06:02] i doubt it. by the way, are you connected from your phone internet? [06:03] No. I wouldn't try and evade a ban with phone internet, cause I know I'd just be banned from Freenode too [06:03] freenode_#ubuntu-ops_20150224.log:[10:15:06] I think I'm going to resort to using my phone with my phone's dynamic IP [06:04] Yes, I said that. I didn't mean it. I'm a smart ass sometimes, but I'm not stupid. [06:04] then why did you join with webchat instead of your regular client? [06:04] log readers: this is the bit where you spam #freenode saying elky thinks webchat users are stupid [06:05] Because I reinstalled OS X and hadn't downloaded Colloquy yet [06:07] Welcome back Pici! Where'd you go? [06:08] his connection had a blip, hence the ping timeout right before it [06:08] Okay. Thanks rww. === jared is now known as head_victim === head_victim is now known as jared [11:38] running irc as root and the "but it works on mint" phrases. well, that is not the qualification for proper support advices [18:50] In #ubuntu-offtopic, SK|SonikkuUSA said: !mate is MATE is "the continuation of GNOME 2," a lightweight desktop environment that preserves the GNOME 2 desktop metaphor. See http://mate-desktop.org/ for more. For the official Ubuntu flavor with MATE, see !ubuntu-mate [18:50] !mate [18:50] Hm. [18:50] Is ubuntu-mate official now? [18:50] In #ubuntu-offtopic, SK|SonikkuUSA said: !ubuntu-mate is Ubuntu MATE is a !flavor of Ubuntu that features the !MATE desktop environment. For more info or to download, see http://ubuntu-mate.org . This flavor supports the PowerPC architecture. [18:51] they plan for 15.04 and i saw some alpha isos, iirc [18:51] Pici: not afaik ^^ [18:51] they missed it very closely for 14.10 so imho 15.04 should be good. but popey was in the mate team afaik [18:52] its already being built on canonical infra [18:52] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/daily-live/current/ [18:52] which is about as official as it gets :) [18:52] :) [18:52] we have a confirmation (and congrats to the team) [18:52] so not official [18:53] well 15.04 hasn't been released yet... [18:53] right [19:10] I want to be unbanned from #ubuntu-ot now please [19:10] no. [19:11] That's fine too. I'll ask somene else like rww said [19:12] Why did you get banned anyway? [19:12] Apparently "changing nicks" even though I've been on this one for days now... [19:13] yeah, I don't think that was the only reason [19:14] I think it would be best if you found yourself a different channel to go chat in [19:17] @btlogin [19:21] k1l_: IdleOne https://ubuntu-mate.org/blog/ubuntu-mate-vivid-beta1/ :) [19:23] popey: yes, but Ubuntu doesn't release beta1 versions [19:24] so why would a ubuntu-mate beta1 be official [19:24] oh jeez [19:24] forget it [19:24] hehe [19:24] I'm not going to argue with you about this. [19:24] I'm being pedantic I know [19:24] thats one word for it [19:24] well that is the nice word for this channel.