[00:38] <valorie> what a pleasant person
[00:38] <icefactory> i kno rite
[00:40] <hggdh> icefactory: please leave the channel
[00:40] <icefactory> no
[00:47] <rww> IdleOne-, cprofitt: plz to identify to NickServ when you get a chance
[00:48] <rww> and I suspect the other message I was about to send is about to become redundant
[00:49] <phunyguy> thanks hggdh
[00:49] <hggdh> I hate having to do this :-(
[00:49] <phunyguy> heh
[00:49] <phunyguy> "this" being the ban, or?
[00:51] <hggdh> 'this' being banning someone
[00:51] <phunyguy> ahh.
[00:51] <phunyguy> yeah, but warranted in this case.  At least for a couple days anyway.
[03:03] <elky> not sure where the spam bit was, but they're klined anyway
[03:12] <rww> I'm not sure why cfhowlett thinks calling ops multiple times is going to work any better than calling it once.
[03:20] <elky> maybe he was tapping his heels together while calling it
[03:42] <tonyyarusso> I'm amused by two things with the guy with the offensive nicks earlier:  1) I didn't actually ban them from #u-o - it was just a remove.  2) It took them a grand total of 11 seconds to join this channel after the remove.  Obviously they were planning on it.
[03:44] <elky> they usually are
[03:45] <elky> not specific to that particular troll
[03:45] <tonyyarusso> Well, the ones like this yes.  There are a lot of removes in #u-o that actually end up pleasantly.
[05:41] <whac-a-retro> Hey
[05:41] <whac-a-retro> I'm banned again?
[05:41] <whac-a-retro> I wasn't when I woke up this morning before school
[05:43] <whac-a-retro> I've been at school all day, so how could I have done anything wrong?
[05:43] <Tm_T> whac-a-retro: hi, which channel we are talking about?
[05:43] <whac-a-retro> #ubuntu-offtopic
[05:45] <rww> @btlogin
[05:45] <elky> what nick were you in under this morning?
[05:45] <whac-a-retro> Same as I was now
[05:46]  * rww ponders for a second, then sighs and just pulls up all -ot bans
[05:46] <rww> whac-a-retro21:08:34*                <-- | whac-a-retro (76d07d87@gateway/web/freenode/ip.118.208.125.135) has quit (Quit: Page closed)
[05:46] <rww> 21:10:34                  -- | Mode #ubuntu-offtopic [+b-o *!76d07d87@gateway/* phunyguy] by phunyguy
[05:46] <rww> so that would be why.
[05:47] <whac-a-retro> Why did phunyguy do that?
[05:47] <rww> because there was another ban set on you that you were (presumably/hopefully accidentally) evading
[05:47] <whac-a-retro> No. I wasn't evading anything!
[05:48] <rww> specifically, the one set against the non-webchat version of your hostname
[05:48] <elky> it's not like you didn't literally promise to do so
[05:48] <whac-a-retro> I'm in webchat.freenode.net
[05:48] <rww> We know.
[05:48]  * whac-a-retro is confused
[05:49] <rww> You got banned while not on webchat. You came back on webchat. You left on webchat. phunyguy noticed and banned you on webchat too.
[05:49] <whac-a-retro> =/
[05:49] <rww> or the more general form:
[05:49] <rww> You got banned. You came back with a different hostname. We noticed. We banned that one too.
[05:49] <whac-a-retro> Can I be unbanned?
[05:49] <rww> Not by me. You're free to see if anyone else wants to.
[05:51] <rww> (note for other ops: 66371 is the first ban, 66397 is the webchat ban, 66401 is the subsequent IP ban that covers both webchat and non-webchat)
[05:55] <rww> (see also: 66330, 66143, 66142, 65940, 65938, 65903, 65711, 65435, 65362, 65361)
[05:55] <elky> whoa that's a lot
[05:56] <rww> hence my point of view on the matter
[05:59] <whac-a-retro> elky can you unban me
[05:59] <elky> whac-a-retro: no.
[06:00] <whac-a-retro> elky: would the answer change if I waited a few days?
[06:01] <elky> whac-a-retro: we've been trying to coach you to behave appropriately. we've outlined the problems with your nick changing more often than your socks. you have completely failed to learn.
[06:02] <whac-a-retro> I'm willing to learn now
[06:02] <elky> i doubt it. by the way, are you connected from your phone internet?
[06:03] <whac-a-retro> No. I wouldn't try and evade a ban with phone internet, cause I know I'd just be banned from Freenode too
[06:03] <elky> freenode_#ubuntu-ops_20150224.log:[10:15:06] <StevenTheHorse> I think I'm going to resort to using my phone with my phone's dynamic IP
[06:04] <whac-a-retro> Yes, I said that. I didn't mean it. I'm a smart ass sometimes, but I'm not stupid.
[06:04] <elky> then why did you join with webchat instead of your regular client?
[06:04] <rww> log readers: this is the bit where you spam #freenode saying elky thinks webchat users are stupid
[06:05] <whac-a-retro> Because I reinstalled OS X and hadn't downloaded Colloquy yet
[06:07] <whac-a-retro> Welcome back Pici! Where'd you go?
[06:08] <rww> his connection had a blip, hence the ping timeout right before it
[06:08] <whac-a-retro> Okay. Thanks rww.
[11:38] <k1l_> running irc as root and the "but it works on mint" phrases. well, that is not the qualification for proper support advices
[18:50] <genii> !mate
[18:50] <genii> Hm.
[18:50] <Pici> Is ubuntu-mate official now?
[18:51] <k1l_> they plan for 15.04 and i saw some alpha isos, iirc
[18:51] <IdleOne> Pici: not afaik ^^
[18:51] <k1l_> they missed it very closely for 14.10 so imho 15.04 should be good. but popey was in the mate team afaik
[18:52] <popey> its already being built on canonical infra
[18:52] <popey> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/daily-live/current/
[18:52] <popey> which is about as official as it gets :)
[18:52] <k1l_> :)
[18:52] <k1l_> we have a confirmation (and congrats to the team)
[18:52] <IdleOne> so not official
[18:53] <popey> well 15.04 hasn't been released yet...
[18:53] <IdleOne> right
[19:10] <whac-a-retro> I want to be unbanned from #ubuntu-ot now please
[19:10] <IdleOne> no.
[19:11] <whac-a-retro> That's fine too. I'll ask somene else like rww said
[19:12] <IdleOne> Why did you get banned anyway?
[19:12] <whac-a-retro> Apparently "changing nicks" even though I've been on this one for days now...
[19:13] <IdleOne> yeah, I don't think that was the only reason
[19:14] <IdleOne> I think it would be best if you found yourself a different channel to go chat in
[19:17] <genii> @btlogin
[19:21] <popey> k1l_: IdleOne https://ubuntu-mate.org/blog/ubuntu-mate-vivid-beta1/ :)
[19:23] <IdleOne> popey: yes, but Ubuntu doesn't release beta1 versions
[19:24] <IdleOne> so why would a ubuntu-mate beta1 be official
[19:24] <popey> oh jeez
[19:24] <popey> forget it
[19:24] <IdleOne> hehe
[19:24] <popey> I'm not going to argue with you about this.
[19:24] <IdleOne> I'm being pedantic I know
[19:24] <popey> thats one word for it
[19:24] <IdleOne> well that is the nice word for this channel.