| Zhenech | will vivid be shipped with 3.18 or 3.19 kernel? | 11:14 |
|---|---|---|
| Rhonda | linux | 3.19.0-7.7 | ubuntu/vivid-proposed | source | 13:05 |
| Rhonda | Ah, but in vivid itself there is 3.18. | 13:06 |
| Rhonda | I didn't say anything. ;) | 13:06 |
| Zhenech | Rhonda, :x | 13:07 |
| ESphynx | geser: I imagine I will need a new changelog entry as well for 0.44.11+repack? | 13:43 |
| ESphynx | ah or that should be 0.44.11-2 ? | 13:43 |
| Fantu | hi, cinnamon package in ubuntu needs 2 small changes still missed, I prepared new build with it and uploaded in my launchpad for now: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/198985684/cinnamon_2.2.16-5_2.2.16-5ubuntu1.diff.gz | 13:46 |
| Fantu | https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages | 13:46 |
| ESphynx | oh cinnamon is finally available from Ubuntu repos? :) | 13:46 |
| Fantu | 2.2 seems works and I prepared also 2.4, maxy now will review it and upload to debian experimental | 13:48 |
| Fantu | *works->good | 13:48 |
| Fantu | I'm intering to give small help also with ubuntu cinnamon packages if possible | 13:49 |
| Fantu | *interesting | 13:50 |
| Fantu | the cinnamon build above can be good for ubuntu upload or other changes are needed? | 13:56 |
| Fantu | thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english | 13:57 |
| ESphynx | geser: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/1424418 -- I uploaded the new tarball/dsc with +repack version | 15:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1424418 in ecere-sdk (Ubuntu) "Work area files mistakenly included in orig tarball" [Undecided,New] | 15:24 |
| Fantu | sry for probably stupid question, even if I'm in uploader field of packages taken from debian I can't upload ubuntu specific build, is correct? | 17:48 |
| Fantu | what I must do to make this build with ubuntu specific changes considered for upload? | 17:49 |
| Fantu | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/198985684/cinnamon_2.2.16-5_2.2.16-5ubuntu1.diff.gz | 17:49 |
| Fantu | https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages | 17:49 |
| tumbleweed | Fantu: debian developers / DMs can get upload rights in Ubuntu pretty easily, but until you get them, you need to use the sponsorship queue | 20:13 |
| Fantu | thanks for reply, from a fast look seems that for it I must open a bug report for the package and attach the debdiff, is it correct? | 20:17 |
| tumbleweed | yes, and subscribe the sponsors team | 20:18 |
| Fantu | done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1426762 | 20:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1426762 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "Cinnamon package require 2 small ubuntu specific changes" [Undecided,New] | 20:45 |
| Fantu | there a strange thing, the package built in launchpad some hours ago is still pending (https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages) even if is not a problem since I have already tested the changes time ago | 20:45 |
| teward | Fantu: you might poke #launchpad on that | 20:46 |
| teward | (especially if its not publishing_ | 20:49 |
| Fantu | backports cinnamon and related software to trusty is possible (in trusty-backports)? I already did it in launchpad, tested the packages (installed also in notebook I use for works in latest months) and found needed important changes for trusty. if is possible what I must do? | 20:54 |
| ScottK | !backports | Fantu | 21:30 |
| ubottu | Fantu: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | 21:30 |
| Fantu | thanks for reply | 21:34 |
| Fantu | !backports | 21:52 |
| ubottu | If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | 21:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!