[11:14] <Zhenech> will vivid be shipped with 3.18 or 3.19 kernel?
[13:05] <Rhonda> linux | 3.19.0-7.7              | ubuntu/vivid-proposed            | source
[13:06] <Rhonda> Ah, but in vivid itself there is 3.18.
[13:06] <Rhonda> I didn't say anything. ;)
[13:07] <Zhenech> Rhonda, :x
[13:43] <ESphynx> geser: I imagine I will need a new changelog entry as well for 0.44.11+repack?
[13:43] <ESphynx> ah or that should be 0.44.11-2 ?
[13:46] <Fantu> hi, cinnamon package in ubuntu needs 2 small changes still missed, I prepared new build with it and uploaded in my launchpad for now: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/198985684/cinnamon_2.2.16-5_2.2.16-5ubuntu1.diff.gz
[13:46] <Fantu> https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages
[13:46] <ESphynx> oh cinnamon is finally available from Ubuntu repos? :)
[13:48] <Fantu> 2.2 seems works and I prepared also 2.4, maxy now will review it and upload to debian experimental
[13:48] <Fantu> *works->good
[13:49] <Fantu> I'm intering to give small help also with ubuntu cinnamon packages if possible
[13:50] <Fantu> *interesting
[13:56] <Fantu> the cinnamon build above can be good for ubuntu upload or other changes are needed?
[13:57] <Fantu> thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english
[15:24] <ESphynx> geser: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/1424418 -- I uploaded the new tarball/dsc with +repack version
[15:24] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1424418 in ecere-sdk (Ubuntu) "Work area files mistakenly included in orig tarball" [Undecided,New]
[17:48] <Fantu> sry for probably stupid question, even if I'm in uploader field of packages taken from debian I can't upload ubuntu specific build, is correct?
[17:49] <Fantu> what I must do to make this build with ubuntu specific changes considered for upload?
[17:49] <Fantu> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/198985684/cinnamon_2.2.16-5_2.2.16-5ubuntu1.diff.gz
[17:49] <Fantu> https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages
[20:13] <tumbleweed> Fantu: debian developers / DMs can get upload rights in Ubuntu pretty easily, but until you get them, you need to use the sponsorship queue
[20:17] <Fantu> thanks for reply, from a fast look seems that for it I must open a bug report for the package and attach the debdiff, is it correct?
[20:18] <tumbleweed> yes, and subscribe the sponsors team
[20:45] <Fantu> done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1426762
[20:45] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1426762 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "Cinnamon package require 2 small ubuntu specific changes" [Undecided,New]
[20:45] <Fantu> there a strange thing, the package built in launchpad some hours ago is still pending (https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/+packages) even if is not a problem since I have already tested the changes time ago
[20:46] <teward> Fantu: you might poke #launchpad on that
[20:49] <teward> (especially if its not publishing_
[20:54] <Fantu> backports cinnamon and related software to trusty is possible (in trusty-backports)? I already did it in launchpad, tested the packages (installed also in notebook I use for works in latest months) and found needed important changes for trusty. if is possible what I must do?
[21:30] <ScottK> !backports | Fantu
[21:30] <ubottu> Fantu: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging
[21:34] <Fantu> thanks for reply
[21:52] <Fantu> !backports
[21:52] <ubottu> If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging