Rosco2 | Bug 364238 Bug 568239 Bug 778208 Bug 812279 Bug 830831 | 17:07 |
---|---|---|
ubot5 | bug 364238 in Ubuntu "If initially turned off, blueman-applet doesn't turn back on properly and doesn't connect to Headset service after X restart." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/364238 | 17:07 |
ubot5 | bug 568239 in Furius ISO Mount "Table 'Mounted images' is not scrollable: problems when path is long" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/568239 | 17:07 |
ubot5 | bug 778208 in Ubuntu "Fetch news from Readers Digest" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/778208 | 17:07 |
ubot5 | bug 812279 in Ubuntu "twistd scripts don't work when installed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812279 | 17:07 |
ubot5 | bug 830831 in SchoolTool "Asian characters don't render in PDF reports" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/830831 | 17:07 |
Rosco2 | These all have Ubuntu tasks that could be deleted | 17:07 |
teward | Rosco2: justification? | 17:10 |
Rosco2 | They all have other tasks that have a resolution | 17:10 |
Rosco2 | I think a relevant project was added | 17:11 |
Rosco2 | instead of changing Ubuntu to the other project | 17:11 |
Rosco2 | They come up in list of bugs with unassigned packages | 17:12 |
Rosco2 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.importance%3Alist=UNDECIDED&assignee_option=none&field.has_no_package=on | 17:13 |
teward | okay, well, i have a question then - if this bug i'm linking were assigned to just Ubuntu and no package, but then was assigned to just the NGINX project, what would you do? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1403283 | 17:13 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1403283 in Nginx "[Security] BREACH vulnerability is not mitigated in default configuration" [Medium,Confirmed] | 17:13 |
teward | now, note, I already know the answer | 17:13 |
teward | considering it's my bug and I'm kinda the unofficial nginx triager | 17:14 |
teward | but just consider, if that bug were filed against just the Ubuntu project and no package | 17:14 |
teward | and had the NGINX project assigned | 17:14 |
teward | would you remove the Ubuntu task? | 17:14 |
teward | (if you could) | 17:15 |
penguin42 | teward: 1) Leave security bugs to the security teams | 17:15 |
teward | penguin42: i know that | 17:15 |
teward | penguin42: i'm not asking that | 17:15 |
teward | penguin42: i think this needs to be defined in policy regardless: | 17:15 |
teward | does the Ubuntu bug task ever get removed? | 17:15 |
teward | or does it only get Invalid if the package is not in Ubuntu | 17:15 |
teward | s/package/program/ | 17:15 |
penguin42 | teward: Why shouldn't it be an ubuntu task? | 17:16 |
teward | penguin42: ask Rosco2 and look at their list of bugs they posted | 17:16 |
teward | penguin42: they posted 5 (old) bugs. | 17:16 |
teward | penguin42: they say "remove the Ubuntu tasks" by saying: [2015-03-01 12:07:34] <Rosco2> These all have Ubuntu tasks that could be deleted | 17:16 |
teward | penguin42: my question was "waht's the justification" | 17:16 |
penguin42 | teward: Sorry yes, I agree | 17:16 |
teward | penguin42: as an example, we would not remove the Ubuntu task for a security bug or otherwise just because it has 'upstream project assigned and resolution' | 17:17 |
Rosco2 | teward: Your nginx bug looks fine to me | 17:17 |
teward | penguin42: i already know that bug's a security bug and under the sec team purview... actually it's under my radar | 17:17 |
teward | penguin42: but the point was a hypothetical question for Rosco2 | 17:17 |
penguin42 | Rosco2: It all looks perfectly reasonable; it's a bug that needs fixing in the upstream package and when they do it needs fixing in Ubuntu - so it should have both tasks | 17:17 |
Rosco2 | okay - we should assign the task to the Ubuntu package rather than delete? | 17:18 |
teward | Rosco2: no, we should find the corresponding package and assign it to that | 17:19 |
teward | rather than remove the Ubuntu task overall | 17:19 |
Rosco2 | thanks - that what I meant | 17:19 |
teward | Rosco2: if the package doesn't exist in Ubuntu that's one thing, but if it does (and I know for a fact blueman does), that's different | 17:19 |
Rosco2 | I will try on the 5 bugs and see how they look | 17:19 |
penguin42 | they're also old bugs, so the question having found the right ubuntu package would be to ask the reporter to check if it's still there; or if you fancy chase down the upstream package version that got the fix to see if it's in | 17:20 |
Rosco2 | Thanks guys - understood | 17:23 |
=== wgrant_ is now known as wgrant |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!