[07:44] <Mirv> all remaining vivid touch silos set to require QA signoff, as per plan
[08:48] <sil2100> Mirv: thanks for changing the silos to sign-off required :)
[08:56] <Mirv> sil2100: :)
[11:18] <sil2100> rsalveti: ping
[11:49] <rsalveti> sil2100: pong
[11:50] <sil2100> rsalveti: hey! I wanted to get some info on bug a really old bug on vivid: LP: #1391230
[11:50] <sil2100> rsalveti: is this still in progress, is it fixed? Or maybe it's not present on vivid?
[11:52] <rsalveti> sil2100: just not yet available in vivid
[11:52] <sil2100> ACK
[13:15] <kdub> robru, cjwatson Mirv thanks for helping out with mir
[13:16] <cjwatson> kdub: np
[13:42] <Mirv> kdub: np!
[14:11] <Mirv> ogra_: if around for a small Recommends packaginga ack for bregma, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-017-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_compiz_1%3A0.9.12.1+15.04.20150227-0ubuntu1.diff
[14:12] <bregma> bitte
[14:13] <seb128> Mirv, +1
[14:13] <sil2100> \o/
[14:14] <Mirv> ogra_: unping
[14:14] <Mirv> seb128: thanks!
[14:14] <seb128> yw!
[14:14] <ogra_> :)
[14:28] <oSoMoN> Mirv, sil2100: do you have a status update regarding the FFE requirement for oxide 1.5 ? do we need someone from the release team to clarify the situation? (note that I have filed an FFE bug but it hasn’t received any update)
[14:31] <Mirv> oSoMoN: sil2100 pinged about in on #ubuntu-release two hours ago but no reply
[14:33] <sil2100> oSoMoN: it seems the release team is busy, I'll re-poke them soon
[14:33] <oSoMoN> ok, thanks!
[15:04] <Saviq> Mirv, looks like \n isn't parsed well in "sources" column when assigning silo: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/citrain_dashboard/#?distro=ubuntu&q=landing-006
[15:04] <Saviq> can you reconf please
[15:05] <sil2100> hm, I thought it was
[15:05] <sil2100> Oh, I think robru only double-checked the merges field
[15:05] <sil2100> Saviq: let me reconf
[15:05] <Saviq> tx
[15:07] <sil2100> Saviq: should be better now
[15:07] <Saviq> sil2100, yup, thankyou
[15:15] <sil2100> Saviq: ok, I fixed the spreadsheet scripts, newlines are now properly handled
[15:15] <Saviq> sil2100, tx
[15:17] <sil2100> jibel: do you think LP: #1425737 is a blocker for vivid->rtm ?
[15:17] <sil2100> jibel: it's what mterry pointed to as per the blank page in the wizard
[15:19] <Saviq> sil2100, FWIW, *we* think it is, we're marking bugs to be fixed for vivid with "vivid-stab-candidate" tag
[15:19] <sil2100> hah, I like that name ;)
[15:20] <jibel> sil2100, yes it's a blocker. I got it once but couldn't reproduce
[15:28] <sil2100> jibel: ok, thanks guys
[15:51] <sil2100> charles: hey, regarding the rtm silo request
[15:51] <charles> sil2100, ya
[15:51] <sil2100> charles: I don't see the bug being milestoned by the product team, and the bug only having high priority
[15:51] <sil2100> charles: do you know if this is reported by BQ?
[15:53] <charles> sil2100, hm, I think you're right. let's table it for now
[15:54] <sil2100> charles: since currently we only try to land things in vivid and accept criticals/factory fixes to ubuntu-rtm only
[15:54] <sil2100> Since we don't want to waste resources on an old distro
[16:08] <jdstrand> sil2100: it seems there is some confusion surrounding oxide (esp surrounding oxide 1.5). how may I be of help clarifying the matter?
[16:09] <sil2100> jdstrand: hey! We need the FFe reviewed by some release team
[16:09] <sil2100> member
[16:10] <sil2100> So far no one commented on it, so we're trying to get some eyeballs on it
[16:12] <jdstrand> sil2100: ok, I'll talk to someone about it. note, oxide was created with the expressed purpose to provide new chromium content api releases for security updates
[16:48] <charles> sil2100, should I just wipe line 54 from the spreadsheet?
[16:49] <charles> I've not backed a row out before; not sure whether or not it's that easy :)
[16:50] <ogra_> sil2100, i'm having another meeting, wont make the LT
[16:51] <sil2100> ogra_: ok, no worries
[16:51] <sil2100> charles: let me remove it
[16:51] <charles> sil2100, thanks
[16:52] <robru> sil2100: hey, I'm not feeling great.  I won't make the meeting, but I'll be up in an hour or two. Just need a bit extra sleep.
[16:53] <sil2100> robru: hey, sure, I know what you mean... I'm pretty sickened-up as well, we seem to have some flu-epidemic here
[16:55] <sil2100> robru: I might skip the later meeting if anything, since I plan on going to rest around my normal EOD
[17:41] <robru> charles: why doesn't silo 7 need qa?
[17:42] <charles> robru, oop, today's the day isn't it. no, silo 7 isn't a special case
[17:42] <robru> charles: yes it's today! thanks for clarifying ;-)
[17:42] <charles> :P :D
[18:15] <jdstrand> sil2100: fyi, I pasted the conversation from #ubuntu-release into the bug. hopefully this is enough documentation to avoid FFe for oxide in the future?
[18:20] <sil2100> jdstrand: sure :)
[18:20] <sil2100> Publishing it!
[18:20] <sil2100> ...or wait, this needs QA sign-off
[18:21] <sil2100> jibel: hey, you want to sign-off the oxide silo before publishing? Considering it was ready to release last week already
[18:22] <jibel> sil2100, we started gating today. I'd say anything proposed before the rule changed can land
[18:22] <sil2100> (just blocked on FFe-related maddness)
[18:29] <sil2100> jibel: ACK
[18:31] <sil2100> jdstrand: hey, did you by any chance sign-off the packaging changes in the new oxide?
[18:43] <sil2100> ogra_: vivid #118 is a tarball upload image?
[18:43] <sil2100> Since I don't see a changes file generated for it ;)
[18:44] <ogra_> imgbot, status 118 vivid
[18:44] <imgbot> Status: succeeded, Started: 2015-03-02 02:02:09 UTC, Finished: 2015-03-02 02:55:21 UTC
[18:44] <imgbot> Build URL: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-touch/+build/21611
[18:44] <imgbot> Changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/118.changes
[18:44] <ogra_> oops
[18:44] <ogra_> link is missing
[18:46] <ogra_> fixed
[18:49] <sil2100> ogra_: thanks!
[18:50] <jdstrand> sil2100: I did not. I thought oSoMoN was core-dev but it looks not. I also thought chrisccoulson had ppu rights
[18:50] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: do you have ppu rights for oxide?
[18:51] <sil2100> jdstrand: oh, maybe he does, I only checked that chrisccoulson is not a core-dev, but a MOTU
[18:51] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, I don't
[18:51] <sil2100> While oxide is in main
[18:51] <jdstrand> ok, let me look at the changes
[18:51] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: you may want to pursue those :)
[18:51] <sil2100> jdstrand: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-003-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_oxide-qt_1.5.3-0ubuntu2.diff
[18:51] <sil2100> A link to the changes ;)
[18:51] <jdstrand> thanks!
[18:57] <jdstrand> sil2100 (and chrisccoulson): I ACK the changes
[18:58] <jdstrand> sil2100: since I wasn't the one doing the landing, is it sufficient for me to tell you or should I document that somewhere else?
[19:01] <sil2100> jdstrand: no, all ok :)
[19:01] <jdstrand> ok, thanks :)
[19:02] <sil2100> I'll mark you as the person signing it off and publish it now, thanks!
[19:02] <jdstrand> great
[19:02] <sil2100> Ok, migrating now o/
[19:02] <sil2100> Thanks and see you tomorrow everyone o/
[19:44] <robru> and with oxide landing freed, ci train disk usage decreases by 75%.
[20:25] <rvr> ogra_: Testing silo 1 (adb), adb pull/push with locked screen fails in krillin vivid-proposed 129.
[21:09] <robru> brb
[21:35] <robru> well I feel sorry for whoever just qa'd rtm 13.
[22:14] <rvr> robru: That was om26er
[22:15] <robru> rvr: total waste of time, that silo needs to be rebuilt and retested from scratch.
[22:19] <rvr> robru: I see :(
[22:20] <rvr> I left a comment on the card, so he knows
[22:21] <robru> rvr: thanks. Train needs to identify this scenario before qa spends time verifying silos
[22:22] <robru> rvr: the worst part is that the conflict is from 3 weeks ago... This silo could have been rebuilt at any point since then but wasn't.
[22:24] <rvr> robru: Timo commented on that card, saying it wasn't ready. But then on Friday, he said silo was updated and tested.
[22:27] <robru> rvr: yeah that package in the PPA was built feb 18th, it's very old. conflicting package uploaded feb 23rd. it definitely needs to be rebuilt.
[22:27] <robru> rvr: it looks like dbarth ran a build job but it was WATCH_ONLY set which is effectively a no-op.
[22:28] <rvr> :P
[22:34] <bregma> trainguards, I need a reconfigure for line 38 (I added an MP from another project) if you all would be so kind
[22:34] <robru> bregma: on it
[22:35] <robru> bregma: alright, good to go
[22:35] <bregma> robru, ta
[22:35] <robru> bregma: yw