/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/03/03/#ubuntu-release.txt

bluesabreScottK: would you mind ack'ing the extra released components in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1424887 ? at the least, the updated garcon and libxfce4util provide updated libraries with the xfce-4.12 release01:38
ubot93Launchpad bug 1424887 in xfce4-settings (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Xfce 4.12 for Vivid" [Undecided,Triaged]01:38
=== beisner- is now known as beisner
=== rcj is now known as Guest41677
jamespagemorning - I have a couple of FFe's that I'd like to get reviewed if there is a release team member around - bug 1423601 and bug 142676109:39
ubot93bug 1423601 in ceph (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ceph 0.93 -> hammer release" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142360109:39
ubot93bug 1426761 in pacemaker (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Upgrade pacemaker to 1.1.12" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142676109:39
jamespagepretty please09:39
jamespage:=)09:39
=== doko_ is now known as doko
sil2100Hello release team! We would like to get opinion on whether or not we will need to fill in a FFe for the new UITK release that's being prepared11:25
sil2100It's a big release and the developers mentioned that there might be features changed, but only to fix long-standing bugs11:27
sil2100https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/uitk12_final_vivid_landing/+merge/25157811:27
sil2100Will we have to pressure for an FFe in this case11:27
tumbleweedit sounds like it'd require an FFe. New features require FFes. Bug fixes only don't.11:29
dokotumbleweed, no, there are exceptions for stuff like firefox, openjdk, etc ...11:32
tumbleweedand uitk isn't in that list11:33
bzoltan_tumbleweed:  no application is using the UITK on desktop other than the SDK IDE what we maintain.11:44
tumbleweedthen the FFe should be easy to grant11:45
Laneywebbrowser-app11:45
bzoltan_tumbleweed:  tbh the FFe in our case would be a pure administrative overhead ... the UITK is pretty much on rolling release to the RTM11:46
tumbleweedthen it presumably shouldn't be getting new features after FF11:46
bzoltan_tumbleweed: it does not11:49
tumbleweedthen it doesn't need an FFe. The rules are pretty simple. Bugfixes that don't break other things, and don't introduce new features don't require an FFe11:51
bzoltan_tumbleweed:  I am the lander, I do not want to do FFe, because I think it is a pointless administrative overhead. So my opinion os not exactly objective :) So I am looking for somebody who's opinion counts in this case. I can answer questions about this landing.11:54
tumbleweedbzoltan_: I don't understand what you want. If your upload fits within the FF rules, there isn't a problem. You seem to say that it does, but you also seem to want someone else to approve it, sight unseen.11:56
bzoltan_tumbleweed:  I am only looking for second opinion :)11:58
tumbleweedand that's less work than an FFe?11:58
ScottKNot at the rate we're going.12:18
ScottKbzoltan_: Needs FFe.12:21
ScottK(I did look at the diff)12:21
tumbleweedgenerally rule of thumb: "Don't know if this needs an ffe" => it does12:22
ScottKI was pretty sure by line 8 of a 20K line diff.12:30
bzoltan_ScottK: tumbleweed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/142766212:46
ubot93Launchpad bug 1427662 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Release UITK 1.2" [Undecided,New]12:46
ScottKbzoltan_: Approved.12:52
bzoltan_ScottK: Thank you12:58
=== Guest41677 is now known as rcj
=== rcj is now known as Guest72440
zulcan i get an ack for python-eventlet 0.7.0 FFE please (#1424639)15:54
=== beisner- is now known as beisner
=== Guest72440 is now known as rcj
=== hobgoblin is now known as elfy
cyphermoxcould someone please take a look at console-setup-freebsd, removing it so that console-setup can complete its transition to -release?19:50
infinitycyphermox: Yeahp.19:57
cyphermoxinfinity: thanks. good morning :)19:59
infinitycyphermox: FWIW, changing the Depends lines seems like unnecessary delta.20:00
infinitycyphermox: "Depends: foo | bar" when only foo is in Ubuntu is fine, after all.20:00
infinitycyphermox: Also, you didn't drop the freebsd udebs...20:01
cyphermoxinfinity: I'd like to make all of it unnecessary, will propose debian to make console-setup-freebsd Arch: kfreebsd-any.20:01
cyphermoxinfinity: the freebsd udebs are fine, really20:01
infinitycyphermox: Why the deb, but not the udebs?20:01
cyphermoxdeb is uninstallable due to vidcontrol, kbdcontrol being uninstallable.20:01
cyphermoxthe udebs people could use if they really wanted to, I guess20:02
cyphermoxI mean, really, really wanted to20:02
infinityFair enough.20:02
infinityShould sort itself on the next britnification.20:03
cyphermoxthanks20:03
ari-tczewcould someone take a loon on package osm-gps-map/1.0.2-2 what's wrong with that in -proposed? It contains RC bug fix.22:47
infinityTrying easy from autohinter: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-2 gnuais/0.3.2-122:49
infinityleading: osm-gps-map,gnuais22:49
infinitystart: 158+0: a-48:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-2222:49
infinityorig: 158+0: a-48:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-2222:49
infinityeasy: 159+0: a-49:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-2222:49
infinity    * amd64: gpxviewer22:49
infinityFAILED22:49
infinityari-tczew: You could read update_output.txt as well as I can to sort out what that means, I suspect.22:49
infinityari-tczew: (That's saying that updating those packages breaks gpxviewer)22:50
ari-tczewinfinity: right, I forgot about proposed-migration22:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!