bluesabre | ScottK: would you mind ack'ing the extra released components in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1424887 ? at the least, the updated garcon and libxfce4util provide updated libraries with the xfce-4.12 release | 01:38 |
---|---|---|
ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1424887 in xfce4-settings (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Xfce 4.12 for Vivid" [Undecided,Triaged] | 01:38 |
=== beisner- is now known as beisner | ||
=== rcj is now known as Guest41677 | ||
jamespage | morning - I have a couple of FFe's that I'd like to get reviewed if there is a release team member around - bug 1423601 and bug 1426761 | 09:39 |
ubot93 | bug 1423601 in ceph (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ceph 0.93 -> hammer release" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423601 | 09:39 |
ubot93 | bug 1426761 in pacemaker (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Upgrade pacemaker to 1.1.12" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1426761 | 09:39 |
jamespage | pretty please | 09:39 |
jamespage | :=) | 09:39 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
sil2100 | Hello release team! We would like to get opinion on whether or not we will need to fill in a FFe for the new UITK release that's being prepared | 11:25 |
sil2100 | It's a big release and the developers mentioned that there might be features changed, but only to fix long-standing bugs | 11:27 |
sil2100 | https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/uitk12_final_vivid_landing/+merge/251578 | 11:27 |
sil2100 | Will we have to pressure for an FFe in this case | 11:27 |
tumbleweed | it sounds like it'd require an FFe. New features require FFes. Bug fixes only don't. | 11:29 |
doko | tumbleweed, no, there are exceptions for stuff like firefox, openjdk, etc ... | 11:32 |
tumbleweed | and uitk isn't in that list | 11:33 |
bzoltan_ | tumbleweed: no application is using the UITK on desktop other than the SDK IDE what we maintain. | 11:44 |
tumbleweed | then the FFe should be easy to grant | 11:45 |
Laney | webbrowser-app | 11:45 |
bzoltan_ | tumbleweed: tbh the FFe in our case would be a pure administrative overhead ... the UITK is pretty much on rolling release to the RTM | 11:46 |
tumbleweed | then it presumably shouldn't be getting new features after FF | 11:46 |
bzoltan_ | tumbleweed: it does not | 11:49 |
tumbleweed | then it doesn't need an FFe. The rules are pretty simple. Bugfixes that don't break other things, and don't introduce new features don't require an FFe | 11:51 |
bzoltan_ | tumbleweed: I am the lander, I do not want to do FFe, because I think it is a pointless administrative overhead. So my opinion os not exactly objective :) So I am looking for somebody who's opinion counts in this case. I can answer questions about this landing. | 11:54 |
tumbleweed | bzoltan_: I don't understand what you want. If your upload fits within the FF rules, there isn't a problem. You seem to say that it does, but you also seem to want someone else to approve it, sight unseen. | 11:56 |
bzoltan_ | tumbleweed: I am only looking for second opinion :) | 11:58 |
tumbleweed | and that's less work than an FFe? | 11:58 |
ScottK | Not at the rate we're going. | 12:18 |
ScottK | bzoltan_: Needs FFe. | 12:21 |
ScottK | (I did look at the diff) | 12:21 |
tumbleweed | generally rule of thumb: "Don't know if this needs an ffe" => it does | 12:22 |
ScottK | I was pretty sure by line 8 of a 20K line diff. | 12:30 |
bzoltan_ | ScottK: tumbleweed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1427662 | 12:46 |
ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1427662 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Release UITK 1.2" [Undecided,New] | 12:46 |
ScottK | bzoltan_: Approved. | 12:52 |
bzoltan_ | ScottK: Thank you | 12:58 |
=== Guest41677 is now known as rcj | ||
=== rcj is now known as Guest72440 | ||
zul | can i get an ack for python-eventlet 0.7.0 FFE please (#1424639) | 15:54 |
=== beisner- is now known as beisner | ||
=== Guest72440 is now known as rcj | ||
=== hobgoblin is now known as elfy | ||
cyphermox | could someone please take a look at console-setup-freebsd, removing it so that console-setup can complete its transition to -release? | 19:50 |
infinity | cyphermox: Yeahp. | 19:57 |
cyphermox | infinity: thanks. good morning :) | 19:59 |
infinity | cyphermox: FWIW, changing the Depends lines seems like unnecessary delta. | 20:00 |
infinity | cyphermox: "Depends: foo | bar" when only foo is in Ubuntu is fine, after all. | 20:00 |
infinity | cyphermox: Also, you didn't drop the freebsd udebs... | 20:01 |
cyphermox | infinity: I'd like to make all of it unnecessary, will propose debian to make console-setup-freebsd Arch: kfreebsd-any. | 20:01 |
cyphermox | infinity: the freebsd udebs are fine, really | 20:01 |
infinity | cyphermox: Why the deb, but not the udebs? | 20:01 |
cyphermox | deb is uninstallable due to vidcontrol, kbdcontrol being uninstallable. | 20:01 |
cyphermox | the udebs people could use if they really wanted to, I guess | 20:02 |
cyphermox | I mean, really, really wanted to | 20:02 |
infinity | Fair enough. | 20:02 |
infinity | Should sort itself on the next britnification. | 20:03 |
cyphermox | thanks | 20:03 |
ari-tczew | could someone take a loon on package osm-gps-map/1.0.2-2 what's wrong with that in -proposed? It contains RC bug fix. | 22:47 |
infinity | Trying easy from autohinter: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-2 gnuais/0.3.2-1 | 22:49 |
infinity | leading: osm-gps-map,gnuais | 22:49 |
infinity | start: 158+0: a-48:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-22 | 22:49 |
infinity | orig: 158+0: a-48:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-22 | 22:49 |
infinity | easy: 159+0: a-49:a-22:a-23:i-22:p-21:p-22 | 22:49 |
infinity | * amd64: gpxviewer | 22:49 |
infinity | FAILED | 22:49 |
infinity | ari-tczew: You could read update_output.txt as well as I can to sort out what that means, I suspect. | 22:49 |
infinity | ari-tczew: (That's saying that updating those packages breaks gpxviewer) | 22:50 |
ari-tczew | infinity: right, I forgot about proposed-migration | 22:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!