| doko | infinity, please could you have a look at the creduce SRU for trusty? | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| infinity | doko: So, normally I'd say "WTF, why the backport?", but the diff looks pretty small when you remove all the autotools cruft. Can you snag an upstream commit log from 2.2~pre1 to 2.2.1 to show us what's fixed and why the backport makes more sense than fixing what's in trusty | 00:04 |
| infinity | ? | 00:04 |
| doko | well, it works for me without creduce segfaulting anymore since utopic ... | 00:05 |
| infinity | doko: Sure, that's also a good reason. I'd just like to see a commit log to get a better feel for it, rather than trying to audit code I don't know. | 00:05 |
| doko | and honestly, who cares? | 00:05 |
| infinity | doko: FWIW, that's not me pushing back, that's me saying "yes, this sounds sane, just show me the logs please". :P | 00:06 |
| doko | well, then don't push back | 00:07 |
| doko | infinity, please see https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/4814961/+listing-archive-extra | 00:36 |
| infinity | doko: How does pointing me at a PPA build give me the thing I asked for? | 00:37 |
| doko | you asked for logs | 00:38 |
| doko | infinity, afk now. if you want something different, please tell | 00:44 |
| infinity | doko: I asked for upstream commit logs. | 00:45 |
| infinity | doko: Twice. | 00:45 |
| doko | infinity, so you don't have an utility to remove generated files from a diff? | 00:46 |
| infinity | doko: No, I want an explanation of the changes, is that so much to ask for for an SRU? | 00:46 |
| doko | infinity, yes, it's to much for the case of creduce | 00:46 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| doko | hmm, why is python-click rejected? | 11:18 |
| doko | cjwatson, infinity: ^^^ any idea about python-click? | 11:20 |
| cjwatson | doko: I set a message when I rejected it. You should have mail. | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | doko: I already removed the same version from Ubuntu previously. Its binaries conflict with those from click, and so it can't be accepted into Ubuntu. | 11:24 |
| doko | I see | 11:24 |
| doko | same module name even? | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | Don't know, don't care | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | Overlapping binary package names | 11:25 |
| doko | yes, and same module name :-/ | 11:30 |
| cjwatson | Nothing we can really do. IME Mark doesn't care about name conflicts with other bits of free software. | 11:36 |
| bluesabre | in my excitement to get a working exo, I forgot to make it auto-close bug 1424887 | 12:11 |
| ubot93 | bug 1424887 in xfce4-settings (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Xfce 4.12 for Vivid" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424887 | 12:11 |
| doko | cjwatson, ok, renamed the binary package names. can I keep the source name? easier to follow-up with Debian | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | doko: Sure | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | I'll let some other archive admin look though; I didn't do any actual review, just noticed the conflicts in binary NEW some time back | 12:37 |
| coreycb | arges, hi, would you be able to publish python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today? bug 1423675 | 12:38 |
| ubot93 | bug 1423675 in python-eventlet (Ubuntu) "[SRU] python-eventlet fall back to old behavior if SSLContext is not available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423675 | 12:38 |
| apw | coreycb, i am not sure arges will be about at all today | 14:46 |
| coreycb | apw, ah, right.. | 14:46 |
| coreycb | bdmurray, would you be able to publish python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today? | 14:49 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: done | 15:11 |
| coreycb | bdmurray, thanks | 15:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!