[00:00] <doko> infinity, please could you have a look at the creduce SRU for trusty?
[00:04] <infinity> doko: So, normally I'd say "WTF, why the backport?", but the diff looks pretty small when you remove all the autotools cruft.  Can you snag an upstream commit log from 2.2~pre1 to 2.2.1 to show us what's fixed and why the backport makes more sense than fixing what's in trusty
[00:04] <infinity> ?
[00:05] <doko> well, it works for me without creduce segfaulting anymore since utopic ...
[00:05] <infinity> doko: Sure, that's also a good reason.  I'd just like to see a commit log to get a better feel for it, rather than trying to audit code I don't know.
[00:05] <doko> and honestly, who cares?
[00:06] <infinity> doko: FWIW, that's not me pushing back, that's me saying "yes, this sounds sane, just show me the logs please". :P
[00:07] <doko> well, then don't push back
[00:36] <doko> infinity, please see https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/4814961/+listing-archive-extra
[00:37] <infinity> doko: How does pointing me at a PPA build give me the thing I asked for?
[00:38] <doko> you asked for logs
[00:44] <doko> infinity, afk now. if you want something different, please tell
[00:45] <infinity> doko: I asked for upstream commit logs.
[00:45] <infinity> doko: Twice.
[00:46] <doko> infinity, so you don't have an utility to remove generated files from a diff?
[00:46] <infinity> doko: No, I want an explanation of the changes, is that so much to ask for for an SRU?
[00:46] <doko> infinity, yes, it's to much for the case of creduce
[11:18] <doko> hmm, why is python-click rejected?
[11:20] <doko> cjwatson, infinity: ^^^ any idea about python-click?
[11:24] <cjwatson> doko: I set a message when I rejected it.  You should have mail.
[11:24] <cjwatson> doko: I already removed the same version from Ubuntu previously.  Its binaries conflict with those from click, and so it can't be accepted into Ubuntu.
[11:24] <doko> I see
[11:25] <doko> same module name even?
[11:25] <cjwatson> Don't know, don't care
[11:25] <cjwatson> Overlapping binary package names
[11:30] <doko> yes, and same module name :-/
[11:36] <cjwatson> Nothing we can really do.  IME Mark doesn't care about name conflicts with other bits of free software.
[12:11] <bluesabre> in my excitement to get a working exo, I forgot to make it auto-close bug 1424887
[12:36] <doko> cjwatson, ok, renamed the binary package names. can I keep the source name? easier to follow-up with Debian
[12:36] <cjwatson> doko: Sure
[12:37] <cjwatson> I'll let some other archive admin look though; I didn't do any actual review, just noticed the conflicts in binary NEW some time back
[12:38] <coreycb> arges, hi, would you be able to publish python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today?  bug 1423675
[14:46] <apw> coreycb, i am not sure arges will be about at all today
[14:46] <coreycb> apw, ah, right..
[14:49] <coreycb> bdmurray, would you be able to publish  python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today?
[15:11] <bdmurray> coreycb: done
[15:12] <coreycb> bdmurray, thanks