[00:00] infinity, please could you have a look at the creduce SRU for trusty? [00:04] doko: So, normally I'd say "WTF, why the backport?", but the diff looks pretty small when you remove all the autotools cruft. Can you snag an upstream commit log from 2.2~pre1 to 2.2.1 to show us what's fixed and why the backport makes more sense than fixing what's in trusty [00:04] ? [00:05] well, it works for me without creduce segfaulting anymore since utopic ... [00:05] doko: Sure, that's also a good reason. I'd just like to see a commit log to get a better feel for it, rather than trying to audit code I don't know. [00:05] and honestly, who cares? [00:06] doko: FWIW, that's not me pushing back, that's me saying "yes, this sounds sane, just show me the logs please". :P [00:07] well, then don't push back [00:36] infinity, please see https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/4814961/+listing-archive-extra [00:37] doko: How does pointing me at a PPA build give me the thing I asked for? [00:38] you asked for logs [00:44] infinity, afk now. if you want something different, please tell [00:45] doko: I asked for upstream commit logs. [00:45] doko: Twice. [00:46] infinity, so you don't have an utility to remove generated files from a diff? [00:46] doko: No, I want an explanation of the changes, is that so much to ask for for an SRU? [00:46] infinity, yes, it's to much for the case of creduce === doko_ is now known as doko [11:18] hmm, why is python-click rejected? [11:20] cjwatson, infinity: ^^^ any idea about python-click? [11:24] doko: I set a message when I rejected it. You should have mail. [11:24] doko: I already removed the same version from Ubuntu previously. Its binaries conflict with those from click, and so it can't be accepted into Ubuntu. [11:24] I see [11:25] same module name even? [11:25] Don't know, don't care [11:25] Overlapping binary package names [11:30] yes, and same module name :-/ [11:36] Nothing we can really do. IME Mark doesn't care about name conflicts with other bits of free software. [12:11] in my excitement to get a working exo, I forgot to make it auto-close bug 1424887 [12:11] bug 1424887 in xfce4-settings (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Xfce 4.12 for Vivid" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424887 [12:36] cjwatson, ok, renamed the binary package names. can I keep the source name? easier to follow-up with Debian [12:36] doko: Sure [12:37] I'll let some other archive admin look though; I didn't do any actual review, just noticed the conflicts in binary NEW some time back [12:38] arges, hi, would you be able to publish python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today? bug 1423675 [12:38] bug 1423675 in python-eventlet (Ubuntu) "[SRU] python-eventlet fall back to old behavior if SSLContext is not available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423675 [14:46] coreycb, i am not sure arges will be about at all today [14:46] apw, ah, right.. [14:49] bdmurray, would you be able to publish python-eventlet 0.13.0-1ubuntu3.2 to utopic-updates today? [15:11] coreycb: done [15:12] bdmurray, thanks