[02:05] <imgbot> [03:30] <imgbot> [03:30] <imgbot> [06:55]  * sil2100 needs to drive to his parents place
[06:55] <sil2100> In case trainguard things are required while I'm in mid-drive, if urgent, please poke mvo once he's around
[06:56] <sil2100> I'll be available in ~1.5h
[08:58]  * sil2100_ sighs
[09:30] <ogra_> ugh ... FF crash
[10:41] <sil2100_> dbarth-afk: hey, give us a sign once you're back :)
[11:20] <Laney> hello
[11:20] <Laney> The latest UITK introduced a component-mismatch
[11:21] <Laney> Which is making Ubuntu desktop image builds fail https://launchpadlibrarian.net/199731958/buildlog_ubuntu_vivid_i386_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz
[11:22] <sil2100_> Hey! Oh my, geh
[11:22] <sil2100_> I wonder why it didn't get noticed before publication, let me see what was up
[11:24] <sil2100_> Laney: not sure who signed off the packaging changes, but the publisher was robru
[11:26] <Laney> sil2100_: Well, probably just needs an MIR filed by the lander or their delegate. :)
[11:26] <Laney> (making the assumption that this doesn't drag in loads of universe packages and isn't huge)
[11:27] <sil2100__> ...
[11:28] <sil2100__> Laney: anyway, yeah, need to poke robru which core-dev he poked when signing off the changes
[11:28] <sil2100__> bzoltan_: we need to fix UITK deps
[11:29] <sil2100__> bzoltan_: I see that qml-module-qtquick-layouts which you are now using is in main
[11:32] <Laney> Doesn't look like it has any further universe deps or build-deps - probably a reasonable candidate for MIR
[11:35] <sil2100_> My only concern is how this got into the archive
[11:37] <sil2100_> Laney: indeed, check-mir says it's clean, need to make sure about its maintainability
[11:37] <sil2100_> But it looks safe
[11:38] <sil2100_> Seems like it's from the Qt codebase
[11:38] <sil2100_> popey: \o/ on it
[12:02] <popey> sil2100_: thanks
[12:07] <bzoltan_> sil2100_: ohh... is there anything I should do?
[12:10] <sil2100_> bzoltan_: no no, I'll just make some coffee and I'll prepare some MIR formalities
[12:11] <bzoltan_> sil2100_:  thanks for the coffee, it was not really necessary ... I drink it with milk without sugar please
[12:11] <sil2100_> bzoltan_: ;D
[12:12] <bzoltan_> sil2100_:  CI service has improved big deal :) Only if we were at the same office :D
[12:12] <sil2100_> hah! I'm not CI though, so it's more like foundations service..? Doesn't sound right though ;)
[12:20] <rvr> Is the image server down?
[12:20] <rvr> 2015/03/09 12:19:44 Get https://system-image.ubuntu.com/gpg/image-master.tar.xz: EOF
[13:42] <popey> bfiller: any chance we can get that patch from renato tested more widely and landed in vivid? It fixes the crasher.
[13:43] <bfiller> popey: let me create a silo
[13:43] <popey> thanks
[13:46] <sil2100_> o/
[13:48] <bfiller> popey: building in ubuntu silo 2
[13:48] <popey> k
[13:51] <dbarth> sil2100_: i'm back and on silo-010 now
[13:52] <sil2100_> dbarth: \o/
[13:52] <sil2100_> dbarth: any ETA?
[13:53] <davmor2> sil2100: silo 003 has qa signoff now so what is the process for getting silo001 rebuilt when it lands?
[13:54] <dbarth> sil2100_: within an hour, or tomorrow morning; i'm checking a potential regression for users with many apps / accounts configured
[13:55] <jibel> dbarth, it's the last fix remaining before we can build an image for this week's promotion. Having this silo ready for testing today would be great
[13:55] <pmcgowan> popey, do we plan to release a new weather app? or have we recently?
[13:55] <pmcgowan> hoping for the fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-weather-app/+bug/1404520
[13:56] <popey> pmcgowan: yes, it's on my list.
[13:57] <sil2100_> pmcgowan: right now QA has the new reminders-app on their list
[13:59] <popey> they'll have weather too in a few minutes :)
[14:02] <popey> sil2100_: you have mail :)
[14:03] <sil2100_> popey: something new? :)
[14:03] <popey> weather
[14:03]  * sil2100_ refreshes like crazy
[14:03] <sil2100_> Ah ha!
[14:04] <sil2100_> On it
[14:07] <nerochiaro> greyback: do you have any news on the autopilot issue were looking at last week
[14:08] <greyback> nerochiaro: so I reproduced it Friday, but had to nuke the device to work on something else. Today I've had the test running in a loop for over an hour. It managed to deadlock the shell, which isn't your issue though
[14:08] <greyback> nerochiaro: so no real news yet
[14:09] <nerochiaro> greyback: did you run the test using the process I sent you the other day ? (the same that CI uses)
[14:10] <greyback> nerochiaro: using the "phablet-test-run camera-app" ? If so, yes
[14:11] <nerochiaro> greyback: yes
[14:29] <sil2100_> jibel: just to make sure it's not missed: reminders and weather should now be added on the trello board
[14:30] <nerochiaro> fginther: hi, did you manage to find out about the license problem ?
[14:31] <sil2100_> jibel, davmor2: soonish it would also be nice to have silo 001 for vivid signed-off, since we just landed it for 14.09 today
[14:32] <davmor2> sil2100: did you see my question to you earlier?
[14:32] <rvr> sil2100_: I will test it, but needs to be rebuilt, isn't it?
[14:32] <rvr> (silo 1)
[14:32] <davmor2> davmor2> sil2100: silo 003 has qa signoff now so what is the process for getting silo001 rebuilt when it lands?
[14:32] <nerochiaro> fginther: we were discussing it last week
[14:32] <jibel> sil2100_, reminder and weather are both on the board
[14:33] <fginther> nerochiaro, I have a solution in place now. There was an alternate license check that works for this source (at least it did when I last tested on Friday). I just switched that a moment ago
[14:33] <sil2100_> davmor2: ah, sorry, it seems my notify's aren't working
[14:34] <sil2100_> hm, let me rebuild and ping kenvandine
[14:34] <sil2100_> kenvandine: piing
[14:34] <fginther> nerochiaro, I'll still do some follow-up, but this should work for now
[14:34] <sil2100_> rvr: silo 1 in vivid shouldn't need a rebuild
[14:34] <sil2100_> rvr: I'm talking about vivid ;) Not rtm
[14:34] <rvr> sil2100_: Ah
[14:34] <nerochiaro> fginther: if i have a merge request on which CI fails because of that, can CI be re-run on it ?
[14:34] <sil2100_> Actually, it's rebuilding already
[14:35] <nerochiaro> fginther: https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/refactor-and-fix-editor-tests/+merge/250931
[14:35] <fginther> nerochiaro, sure, one moment
[14:35] <sil2100_> kenvandine is on it it seems :)
[14:36] <fginther> nerochiaro, build in progress
[14:36] <nerochiaro> fginther: thank you
[14:37] <kenvandine> sil2100, yup... i saw it merge so kicked a rebuild
[14:52] <dbarth> sil2100: we're merging a last fix real quick in silo 010; hopefully for good this time
[14:58] <plars> popey: what ever became of calendar app? is it back now?
[14:58] <popey> plars: I'm going to resubmit once https://code.launchpad.net/~renatofilho/qtorganizer5-eds/fix-1423185/+merge/252184 lands
[14:58] <popey> right now QA rejected it for various reasons, all fixed execpt that
[14:58] <plars> popey: cool. No big deal from my end, just wanted to follow up in case we had missed it :)
[15:01] <popey> oh it's very much at the top of my list!
[15:02] <plars> no doubt :)
[15:23] <oSoMoN> robru, hey, can https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/webbrowser-app/no-change-rebuild/+merge/251202 be deleted?
[15:29] <Laney> sil2100: thanks for the MIR - are you chasing people to look at it?
[15:29] <Laney> They'll ask for bug subscribers. ;-)
[15:49] <mzanetti> trainguards: please reconfig silo 0. I've dropped the ui-toolkit branch that landed in trunk by now
[15:51] <sil2100> pstolowski: regarding that rtm silo request - is that a critical/factory/battery fix?
[15:51] <sil2100> mzanetti: on it
[15:51] <mzanetti> ta
[15:52] <sil2100> Laney: I poked on -release ;) But I'll poke around some more
[15:52] <Laney> There's not the biggest of overlap between the MIR and release teams
[15:53] <pstolowski> sil2100, nope..
[15:53] <sil2100> I was actually waiting for mterry_ to pop up, thought I might have his eyeballs looking at it
[15:53] <mvo> sil2100: uh, I just noticed that I was invited for the standup of you guys this morning, should I come tmorrow? what do you want to talk about?
[15:53]  * mterry_ looks up
[15:53] <sil2100> pstolowski: since generally we're slowly moving away from assigning to ubuntu-rtm
[15:54] <sil2100> mterry_: so, a MIR!
[15:54] <sil2100> mterry_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtquickcontrols-opensource-src/+bug/1429836
[15:54] <mterry_> sil2100, which one?  I'm looking at media-hub right now
[15:54] <mterry_> sil2100, huh ok
[15:54] <sil2100> mterry_: this one is actually causing some trouble in the desktop world
[15:55] <sil2100> mvo: hey, uh, I think it was something strange that google did since I didn't change anything in the invitation :)
[15:55] <mterry_> sil2100, desktop uses of the toolkit?  Or for other reasons
[15:55] <sil2100> mterry_: yeah, I guess it's pulled in by webbrowser-app etc.
[15:56] <mterry_> sil2100, ok well I will look at it
[15:56] <mvo> sil2100: aha, ok
[15:56] <pstolowski> sil2100, i see. let me check with pat, he was asking about landing that bug but I think that was just confusion about its importance
[15:56] <mvo> sil2100: even better, then I will claim I knew that and therefore did not show up ;)
[15:56] <pstolowski> s/bug/bugix/
[15:57] <sil2100> mvo: ;)
[15:57] <sil2100> pstolowski: ok, since I think we're only aiming for battery fixes and the u1 fix for the OTA this week
[16:04] <sil2100> bfiller: hey! Apparently the camera-app seems to suffer 7 AP failures on ubuntu-rtm/14.09 - is that something on your team's radar? :)
[16:04] <bfiller> sil2100: yes
[16:05] <bfiller> sil2100: there is a mir issue causing some of the failures that is being worked as well
[16:09] <sil2100> bfiller: ah, ok, so I suppose it's not something that won't be fixed by tomorrow, right?
[16:09] <sil2100> dbarth: hey! How's the fix going? Has it been merged and tested?
[16:10] <bfiller> sil2100: nerochiaro is working on it, some of the issues are already fixed in ubuntu silo 28. hopefully many can be fixed by tomorrow
[16:11] <bfiller> nerochiaro: these are the failures from the nightly smoketests, please make sure they are related to the fixes you are working on http://rtm-dashboard.ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/krillin/252:20150306:20150225-b67e0b6/384/camera_app/
[16:12] <sil2100> bfiller: thanks o/
[16:12] <sil2100> bfiller, nerochiaro: would be grately appreciated, since the dashboard starts looking really nice in overall
[16:14] <sil2100> alex-abreu: hey! Regarding your silo request for rtm - how critical are those fixes? Have they been requested by pmcgowan or anyone from the product team/BQ ?
[16:15] <alex-abreu> sil2100, pmcgowan +1'd them ... (right?)
[16:15] <sil2100> Ok, I see one +1 already
[16:15] <sil2100> ACK, assigning
[16:16] <alex-abreu> sil2100, thx
[16:16] <nerochiaro> sil2100: now that fginther fixed the license problems that prevented camera MR to build, I am waiting to see the results of the test run on this MR https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/refactor-and-fix-editor-tests/+merge/250931
[16:16] <nerochiaro> sil2100: which should fix several of the problems
[16:16] <sil2100> The number of fixes for this release is getting bigger and bigger ;)
[16:17] <nerochiaro> sil2100: greyback_ is working on figuring out what causes a random failure somewhere between upstart-app-run and MIR that prevents all tests following the problem to pass
[16:17] <sil2100> rvr: silo 001 in rtm is ready for a re-test ;)
[16:18] <pmcgowan> sil2100, alex-abreu yes we want those for the china dev contest
[16:18] <nerochiaro> sil2100: and from that dashboard link you sent to me there seems to be a few new ones that were not in my original list of things to fix
[16:18] <rvr> sil2100: Ack
[16:27] <oSoMoN> trainguards: can I have a silo for line 44, please?
[16:27] <sil2100> oSoMoN: on it
[16:29] <ralsina> trainguards: also a silo for like 45 please :-)
[16:29] <dbarth> sil2100: nope, i have had to flash the phone fully, to make sure i test the right things; still on it
[16:31] <ralsina> thanks so much
[16:32] <robru> sil2100: hey do you have the diff handy for that uitk MIR issue? I don't remember who acked it but seeing the diff might jog my memory
[16:34] <sil2100> robru: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-003-2-publish/77/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-ui-toolkit_1.2.1433+15.04.20150306-0ubuntu1.diff
[16:34] <sil2100> robru: the core-dev ACKing that missed checking both new deps with check-mir
[16:35] <sil2100> dbarth: thanks!
[16:37] <robru> sil2100: Laney ah it was acked by ken, sorry I forgot to mark that when I hit publish. https://pastebin.canonical.com/127182/
[16:45] <nerochiaro> fginther: i still see the build failures due to the license issue: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-vivid-amd64/822/console
[16:47] <davmor2> popey: mzanetti : see row 34 \o/
[16:47] <davmor2> sil2100: ^
[16:47] <sil2100> davmor2: Yaay!
[16:47] <sil2100> popey: publish!
[16:49] <mzanetti> davmor2, awesomes :)
[16:49] <davmor2> sil2100:  I found 1 minor issue that mzanetti is aware of and I'll file a bug for it, now I've finished, but it isn't a regression could just do with a fix for the next update to the app :)
[16:49] <mzanetti> didn't know we're doing the train thing with reminders
[16:50] <davmor2> mzanetti: anything that touches rtm needs a check and we needed to make a single process for everything
[16:50] <mzanetti> sure, makes total sense
[16:51] <mzanetti> davmor2, are we releasing that to vivid/the store too?
[16:51] <sil2100> mzanetti: we only have one store, so anything landing from the clicks is essentially on both rtm and vivid
[16:51] <davmor2> mzanetti: as far as I am aware yes, popey can confirm it though
[16:51] <popey> we have only one store, yes.
[16:51] <mzanetti> ack. perfect
[16:51] <mzanetti> wasn't sure if there's a difference between preinstalled on rtm and the store
[16:52] <popey> reminders isn't pre-installed on krillin
[16:52] <popey> only on nexus
[16:52] <mzanetti> ah
[16:52] <popey> (this may change)
[16:52] <mzanetti> +1 for the previous version not being preinstalled :D
[16:52] <popey> So, sil2100 I don't need to run this past pmcgowan ?
[16:52]  * mzanetti food. biab
[16:53] <nerochiaro> cihelp: fginther: plars: i requested to one of you some times ago to have the system where tests are run set up to have python3-wand installed. i was told it was done. but a test ran today still fails because it is missing: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-click-autopilot-runner-mako/812/testReport/junit/unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure.camera_app/tests/test_capture/
[16:53] <popey> mzanetti: well done!
[16:53] <plars> nerochiaro: hmm, let me take a look
[16:53] <mzanetti> popey, thanks :D
[16:55] <plars> nerochiaro: ah, I bet it only ended up in the smoke testing branch, not the one used by that job, one sec and I'll verify that. If so, it will be a really quick fix
[17:00] <sil2100> popey: I think we all agreed on getting this landed
[17:02] <popey> ok
[17:08] <sil2100> alex-abreu: are you building the silo?
[17:08] <alex-abreu> sil2100, now yes
[17:17] <davmor2> sil2100: less sailing more bobby in the water desperate to stay afloat ;)
[17:21] <fginther> nerochiaro, regarding the failure on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-vivid-amd64/822/console... Looks like you did a rebuild of another build. Unfortunately, this will cause it to re-use the same parameters which includes specification of the old license check script. In order to avoid this, the job has to be rebuilt from scratch which I did here: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/camera-app-ci/403/
[17:21] <nerochiaro> fginther: ok, sorry. did not see it built from hours so I launched another rebuild
[17:22] <nerochiaro> fginther: i will wait for that one to finish and check tomorrow
[17:22] <fginther> nerochiaro, also looks like other issue is being addressed, sorry about that oversight
[17:23] <nerochiaro> fginther: np
[17:34] <robru> fginther: hey is the engine mojo spec expected to be deployable in juju-lxc?
[17:34] <fginther> robru, yes
[17:35] <robru> fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127187/
[17:37] <fginther> robru, looking
[17:37] <robru> fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127188/ oops there's a bit more. thanks.
[17:38] <kgunn_> trainguards hi, can we get the ubuntu-ui-toolkit deleted from silo 0 ?
[17:38] <robru> kgunn_: sure one sec
[17:38] <kgunn_> we've got no more MP's for that...but have an old plg
[17:38] <kgunn_> pkg even
[17:38] <kgunn_> thanks!
[17:39] <robru> kgunn_: you're welcome. should be gone in a sec
[17:39] <kgunn_> ta
[17:40] <robru> fginther: oops, just noticed I'm not on the VPN. trying again...
[17:41] <fginther> robru, yeah, two things.  Even for local deployments, you need to have the nova OS_, etc environment variables set (it uses swift to upload the application tarball)
[17:41] <robru> fginther: yeah I set OS_PASSWORD correctly I think, had that one saved in my password manager from the last time I tried to deploy in hpcloud months and months ago
[17:42] <fginther> robru, and make sure you have "cheetah python-apt jinja2 statsd python-neutronclient" dependencies installed on the host
[17:42] <bzoltan_> kgunn_: I was already wondering about that uitoolkit thing :)
[17:42] <robru> fginther: where can I get cheetah and statsd from?
[17:42] <kgunn_> :)
[17:43] <plars> nerochiaro: ok, if you want to retry that job, it should work now
[17:43] <kgunn_> bzoltan_: hey, while you're here...who is the best person to include on grid unit discussion from sdk team?
[17:43] <robru> fginther: you mean python-cheetah and python-statsd?
[17:43] <fginther> robru, oops sorry, yep try those
[17:43] <robru> fginther: k thanks
[17:45] <nerochiaro> fginther: can you please restart the build job one more time after the change plars made ?
[17:45] <plars> nerochiaro: I can do that
[17:46] <nerochiaro> plars: please do then
[17:46] <plars> nerochiaro: I didn't want to do it without taking to you first though, if you are ready for it I'll push it through again though
[17:46] <fginther> plars, in this case, the build has to be entered from scratch because the parameters changed (due to another change in the job config)
[17:46] <nerochiaro> plars: fginther: the MR is ready, so please push a rebuild
[17:47] <plars> fginther: so it's actually https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/camera-app-ci/404/ that has to start over then?
[17:48] <fginther> plars, right, just do a new build of the camera-app-ci job and copy over the landing_candidate, merge_proposal and candidate_revision parameters
[17:48] <plars> fginther: ah, I just hit rebuild on it, which I think should do all we need right?
[17:48] <plars> nerochiaro: it's in progress
[17:50] <fginther> plars, almost, "hooks" has been updated in the new config. So you could do a rebuild, then copy in the new value of hooks from the job configuration
[17:51] <plars> ah, ok
[17:51] <fginther> sorry about that
[17:51] <fginther> it's not the most elegant design
[17:51] <plars> np, I remember seeing that mp now, just forgot it was related to this
[17:51] <plars> timing...
[18:04] <dbarth_> trainguards: can i get a quick reconfig on rtm-010 please?
[18:04] <robru> dbarth_: sure,one sec
[18:04] <dbarth_> this is to wrap the image (hopefully)
[18:06] <robru> dbarth_: ok, good to go. just mind the conflict in rtm1
[18:06] <dbarth_> robru: which conflict?
[18:07] <dbarth_> robru: ah i see
[18:07] <robru> dbarth_: yeah system settings
[18:08] <robru> kenvandine: will you be publishing silo rtm 1 shortly? I see it's approved. dbarth_ has a conflicting silo
[18:08] <dbarth_> robru: hmm, then maybe i can drop the system-settings branch to avoid any mistake
[18:08] <dbarth_> it's "belt & suspenders", whereas the signon fix is the key one
[18:09] <robru> dbarth_: well I'm not sure what the plan is. if ken will publish his you can just rebuild yours afterwards and it'll be fine.
[18:09] <dbarth_> robru: i dropped the uss line, if you can reconfig one last time
[18:09] <robru> dbarth_: ok
[18:11] <davmor2> popey: I think there is a serious bug in the weather app that jibel will be able to attest to.  It say sunny in London that can't be right, it should default to rain surely ;)
[18:11] <popey> lulz
[18:12] <popey> it also is dark!
[18:23] <elopio> ping cihelp: is it ok for you if we make a dep8 test that requires the host to be on vivid?
[18:25] <plars> elopio: the host? can you give me more details?
[18:25] <robru> fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127192/ no such luck I'm afraid, even with deps installed and env vars set
[18:25] <robru> and on the vpn
[18:26] <fginther> robru, looking
[18:26] <robru> thanks
[18:27] <elopio> plars: we have a host and a testbed. On the host, we call adt-run and it executes the dep8 tests in the testbed.
[18:27] <elopio> for this project, we might require the machine that calls adt-run to be on vivid to use the latest packages from ubuntu-system-image.
[18:28] <elopio> plars: so, do we have vivid machines on the lab to execute the tests?
[18:28] <plars> elopio: no, but if it's just a certain version of adt-run that's required, I think it would be easier to make sure we have that version
[18:28] <plars> elopio: what kinds of tests are these?
[18:29] <elopio> plars: what we need is a specific version of system-image-dbus.
[18:29] <fginther> robru, I gave you some missing info, one moment, trying to figure out what else I might have missed
[18:29] <elopio> plars: over the air upgrades.
[18:29] <robru> fginther: yeah I'll have to update the README once I finally get this working
[18:32] <plars> elopio: assuming the thing calling adt-run is on trusty, would it be possible to give us a list of hard dependencies? It would seem that we should easily be able to get a backport of those things if we really need to.  It gets messy really fast if we have to have a different host environment for tests, and much worse if it has to be on a development version.  We need a pretty stable environment or we're likely to hit infrastructure p
[18:32] <plars> roblems
[18:33] <plars> elopio: it sounds like these tests may be special enough to need a story on our side though, have you talked to Ursinha about it?
[18:33] <elopio> plars: I'll ask.
[18:34] <elopio> plars: not yet. We are just defining what the tests are, and how to run them.
[18:34] <elopio> at the end of this week we'll have our requirements better defined.
[18:35] <plars> elopio: anything you can do to reduce special requirements on the host side will surely help with stability of the test environment
[18:35] <plars> something to think about
[18:37] <fginther> robru, sent you an updated email
[18:37] <robru> fginther: thanks
[18:39] <elopio> plars: ack. Thanks for the info. We have plenty of options, so we'll make them adjust to trusty hosts.
[19:11] <rvr> ricmm: Vivid silo 13 is approved
[19:13] <ricmm> rvr: thanks
[19:13] <ricmm> rsalveti: could you publish 13 for me please
[19:15] <rsalveti> ricmm: sure
[19:18] <rsalveti> ricmm: done
[19:19] <ricmm> thanks
[19:29] <davmor2> popey: row 42
[19:35] <popey> davmor2: \o/ sweet! Thank you.
[19:36] <davmor2> popey: no thank you for the etherpad makes it much easier :)
[19:39] <popey> \o/
[19:39] <popey> pmcgowan: weather updated in store.
[19:41] <pmcgowan> popey, yay
[19:44] <popey> \o/ two down, loads to go!
[19:44] <dbarth_> robru, davmor2, whoever can wrap the image; silo 010 is ok for qa now
[19:44] <davmor2> dbarth_: I'm about to EOD so one for ToyKeeper probably
[19:45] <dbarth_> ok, let me know; i'll be around
[19:47] <ToyKeeper> I've got a meeting in a few, but perhaps after that?
[19:53] <robru> dbarth_: yep I'm happy to publish once ToyKeeper qa's it.
[19:59] <dbarth_> perfect; ToyKeeper it's in your hands now ;)
[20:00] <sil2100> dbarth: teh silo is ready? :)
[20:13] <dbarth> sil2100: it is yes
[20:29] <sil2100> \o/
[21:09] <robru> bfiller: failure looks transient, retrying: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-028-1-build/31/console
[21:13] <ToyKeeper> dbarth: Starting now.
[21:19] <dbarth> ToyKeeper: ok
[21:20] <ToyKeeper> Well, that's what I get for being efficient and starting a new flash before finding out what the silo does.  Gotta go reflash again now.  ;P
[21:20] <dbarth> ToyKeeper: i may switch to sleep mode in a bit, but keep me posted
[21:21] <dbarth> ToyKeeper: right, sorry; flash to #16, create u1 account, apply silo; reboot; flash to #18 and check that you still have the u1 account around
[21:21] <ToyKeeper> Yeah, I just should have read it first.  :)
[22:43] <dbarth> ToyKeeper: everything ok ?
[22:44] <ToyKeeper> dbarth: So far, yeah; OTA always takes forever here.
[22:45] <dbarth> ok
[22:58] <ToyKeeper> ... that is, if citrain device-upgrade would stop failing.  This is new...
[23:38] <ToyKeeper> dbarth...  left.  D'oh.
[23:38] <ToyKeeper> Test tools finally stopped failing, and I *still* see no difference at all pre- and post-silo.