[02:05] === IMAGE 127 building (started: 20150309-02:05) === [03:30] === IMAGE 127 DONE (finished: 20150309-03:30) === [03:30] === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/127.changes === [06:55] * sil2100 needs to drive to his parents place [06:55] In case trainguard things are required while I'm in mid-drive, if urgent, please poke mvo once he's around [06:56] I'll be available in ~1.5h === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === dbarth is now known as dbarth-afk [08:58] * sil2100_ sighs [09:30] ugh ... FF crash [10:41] dbarth-afk: hey, give us a sign once you're back :) [11:20] hello [11:20] The latest UITK introduced a component-mismatch [11:21] Which is making Ubuntu desktop image builds fail https://launchpadlibrarian.net/199731958/buildlog_ubuntu_vivid_i386_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz [11:22] Hey! Oh my, geh [11:22] I wonder why it didn't get noticed before publication, let me see what was up [11:24] Laney: not sure who signed off the packaging changes, but the publisher was robru [11:26] sil2100_: Well, probably just needs an MIR filed by the lander or their delegate. :) [11:26] (making the assumption that this doesn't drag in loads of universe packages and isn't huge) [11:27] ... [11:28] Laney: anyway, yeah, need to poke robru which core-dev he poked when signing off the changes [11:28] bzoltan_: we need to fix UITK deps [11:29] bzoltan_: I see that qml-module-qtquick-layouts which you are now using is in main === sil2100__ is now known as sil2100_ [11:32] Doesn't look like it has any further universe deps or build-deps - probably a reasonable candidate for MIR === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [11:35] My only concern is how this got into the archive [11:37] Laney: indeed, check-mir says it's clean, need to make sure about its maintainability [11:37] But it looks safe [11:38] Seems like it's from the Qt codebase [11:38] popey: \o/ on it [12:02] sil2100_: thanks [12:07] sil2100_: ohh... is there anything I should do? [12:10] bzoltan_: no no, I'll just make some coffee and I'll prepare some MIR formalities [12:11] sil2100_: thanks for the coffee, it was not really necessary ... I drink it with milk without sugar please [12:11] bzoltan_: ;D [12:12] sil2100_: CI service has improved big deal :) Only if we were at the same office :D [12:12] hah! I'm not CI though, so it's more like foundations service..? Doesn't sound right though ;) [12:20] Is the image server down? [12:20] 2015/03/09 12:19:44 Get https://system-image.ubuntu.com/gpg/image-master.tar.xz: EOF === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [13:42] bfiller: any chance we can get that patch from renato tested more widely and landed in vivid? It fixes the crasher. [13:43] popey: let me create a silo [13:43] thanks [13:46] o/ [13:48] popey: building in ubuntu silo 2 [13:48] k === dbarth-afk is now known as dbarth [13:51] sil2100_: i'm back and on silo-010 now [13:52] dbarth: \o/ [13:52] dbarth: any ETA? [13:53] sil2100: silo 003 has qa signoff now so what is the process for getting silo001 rebuilt when it lands? [13:54] sil2100_: within an hour, or tomorrow morning; i'm checking a potential regression for users with many apps / accounts configured [13:55] dbarth, it's the last fix remaining before we can build an image for this week's promotion. Having this silo ready for testing today would be great [13:55] popey, do we plan to release a new weather app? or have we recently? [13:55] hoping for the fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-weather-app/+bug/1404520 [13:55] Ubuntu bug 1404520 in Ubuntu Weather App "The link to the weather channel is incorrect" [High,Fix committed] [13:56] pmcgowan: yes, it's on my list. [13:57] pmcgowan: right now QA has the new reminders-app on their list [13:59] they'll have weather too in a few minutes :) [14:02] sil2100_: you have mail :) [14:03] popey: something new? :) [14:03] weather [14:03] * sil2100_ refreshes like crazy [14:03] Ah ha! [14:04] On it [14:07] greyback: do you have any news on the autopilot issue were looking at last week [14:08] nerochiaro: so I reproduced it Friday, but had to nuke the device to work on something else. Today I've had the test running in a loop for over an hour. It managed to deadlock the shell, which isn't your issue though [14:08] nerochiaro: so no real news yet [14:09] greyback: did you run the test using the process I sent you the other day ? (the same that CI uses) [14:10] nerochiaro: using the "phablet-test-run camera-app" ? If so, yes [14:11] greyback: yes [14:29] jibel: just to make sure it's not missed: reminders and weather should now be added on the trello board [14:30] fginther: hi, did you manage to find out about the license problem ? === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [14:31] jibel, davmor2: soonish it would also be nice to have silo 001 for vivid signed-off, since we just landed it for 14.09 today [14:32] sil2100: did you see my question to you earlier? [14:32] sil2100_: I will test it, but needs to be rebuilt, isn't it? [14:32] (silo 1) [14:32] davmor2> sil2100: silo 003 has qa signoff now so what is the process for getting silo001 rebuilt when it lands? [14:32] fginther: we were discussing it last week [14:32] sil2100_, reminder and weather are both on the board [14:33] nerochiaro, I have a solution in place now. There was an alternate license check that works for this source (at least it did when I last tested on Friday). I just switched that a moment ago [14:33] davmor2: ah, sorry, it seems my notify's aren't working [14:34] hm, let me rebuild and ping kenvandine [14:34] kenvandine: piing [14:34] nerochiaro, I'll still do some follow-up, but this should work for now [14:34] rvr: silo 1 in vivid shouldn't need a rebuild [14:34] rvr: I'm talking about vivid ;) Not rtm [14:34] sil2100_: Ah [14:34] fginther: if i have a merge request on which CI fails because of that, can CI be re-run on it ? [14:34] Actually, it's rebuilding already [14:35] fginther: https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/refactor-and-fix-editor-tests/+merge/250931 [14:35] nerochiaro, sure, one moment [14:35] kenvandine is on it it seems :) [14:36] nerochiaro, build in progress [14:36] fginther: thank you === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 [14:37] sil2100, yup... i saw it merge so kicked a rebuild === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow === seb128_ is now known as seb128 [14:52] sil2100: we're merging a last fix real quick in silo 010; hopefully for good this time [14:58] popey: what ever became of calendar app? is it back now? [14:58] plars: I'm going to resubmit once https://code.launchpad.net/~renatofilho/qtorganizer5-eds/fix-1423185/+merge/252184 lands [14:58] right now QA rejected it for various reasons, all fixed execpt that [14:58] popey: cool. No big deal from my end, just wanted to follow up in case we had missed it :) [15:01] oh it's very much at the top of my list! [15:02] no doubt :) [15:23] robru, hey, can https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/webbrowser-app/no-change-rebuild/+merge/251202 be deleted? [15:29] sil2100: thanks for the MIR - are you chasing people to look at it? [15:29] They'll ask for bug subscribers. ;-) [15:49] trainguards: please reconfig silo 0. I've dropped the ui-toolkit branch that landed in trunk by now [15:51] pstolowski: regarding that rtm silo request - is that a critical/factory/battery fix? [15:51] mzanetti: on it [15:51] ta [15:52] Laney: I poked on -release ;) But I'll poke around some more [15:52] There's not the biggest of overlap between the MIR and release teams [15:53] sil2100, nope.. [15:53] I was actually waiting for mterry_ to pop up, thought I might have his eyeballs looking at it [15:53] sil2100: uh, I just noticed that I was invited for the standup of you guys this morning, should I come tmorrow? what do you want to talk about? [15:53] * mterry_ looks up [15:53] pstolowski: since generally we're slowly moving away from assigning to ubuntu-rtm [15:54] mterry_: so, a MIR! [15:54] mterry_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtquickcontrols-opensource-src/+bug/1429836 [15:54] sil2100, which one? I'm looking at media-hub right now [15:54] Ubuntu bug 1429836 in qtquickcontrols-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "[MIR] qtquickcontrols-opensource-src" [Undecided,New] [15:54] sil2100, huh ok [15:54] mterry_: this one is actually causing some trouble in the desktop world [15:55] mvo: hey, uh, I think it was something strange that google did since I didn't change anything in the invitation :) [15:55] sil2100, desktop uses of the toolkit? Or for other reasons [15:55] mterry_: yeah, I guess it's pulled in by webbrowser-app etc. [15:56] sil2100, ok well I will look at it [15:56] sil2100: aha, ok [15:56] sil2100, i see. let me check with pat, he was asking about landing that bug but I think that was just confusion about its importance [15:56] sil2100: even better, then I will claim I knew that and therefore did not show up ;) [15:56] s/bug/bugix/ [15:57] mvo: ;) [15:57] pstolowski: ok, since I think we're only aiming for battery fixes and the u1 fix for the OTA this week [16:04] bfiller: hey! Apparently the camera-app seems to suffer 7 AP failures on ubuntu-rtm/14.09 - is that something on your team's radar? :) [16:04] sil2100: yes [16:05] sil2100: there is a mir issue causing some of the failures that is being worked as well [16:09] bfiller: ah, ok, so I suppose it's not something that won't be fixed by tomorrow, right? [16:09] dbarth: hey! How's the fix going? Has it been merged and tested? [16:10] sil2100: nerochiaro is working on it, some of the issues are already fixed in ubuntu silo 28. hopefully many can be fixed by tomorrow [16:11] nerochiaro: these are the failures from the nightly smoketests, please make sure they are related to the fixes you are working on http://rtm-dashboard.ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/krillin/252:20150306:20150225-b67e0b6/384/camera_app/ [16:12] bfiller: thanks o/ [16:12] bfiller, nerochiaro: would be grately appreciated, since the dashboard starts looking really nice in overall [16:14] alex-abreu: hey! Regarding your silo request for rtm - how critical are those fixes? Have they been requested by pmcgowan or anyone from the product team/BQ ? [16:15] sil2100, pmcgowan +1'd them ... (right?) [16:15] Ok, I see one +1 already [16:15] ACK, assigning [16:16] sil2100, thx [16:16] sil2100: now that fginther fixed the license problems that prevented camera MR to build, I am waiting to see the results of the test run on this MR https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/refactor-and-fix-editor-tests/+merge/250931 [16:16] sil2100: which should fix several of the problems [16:16] The number of fixes for this release is getting bigger and bigger ;) [16:17] sil2100: greyback_ is working on figuring out what causes a random failure somewhere between upstart-app-run and MIR that prevents all tests following the problem to pass [16:17] rvr: silo 001 in rtm is ready for a re-test ;) [16:18] sil2100, alex-abreu yes we want those for the china dev contest [16:18] sil2100: and from that dashboard link you sent to me there seems to be a few new ones that were not in my original list of things to fix [16:18] sil2100: Ack [16:27] trainguards: can I have a silo for line 44, please? [16:27] oSoMoN: on it [16:29] trainguards: also a silo for like 45 please :-) [16:29] sil2100: nope, i have had to flash the phone fully, to make sure i test the right things; still on it [16:31] thanks so much [16:32] sil2100: hey do you have the diff handy for that uitk MIR issue? I don't remember who acked it but seeing the diff might jog my memory [16:34] robru: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-003-2-publish/77/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-ui-toolkit_1.2.1433+15.04.20150306-0ubuntu1.diff [16:34] robru: the core-dev ACKing that missed checking both new deps with check-mir [16:35] dbarth: thanks! [16:37] sil2100: Laney ah it was acked by ken, sorry I forgot to mark that when I hit publish. https://pastebin.canonical.com/127182/ [16:45] fginther: i still see the build failures due to the license issue: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-vivid-amd64/822/console [16:47] popey: mzanetti : see row 34 \o/ [16:47] sil2100: ^ [16:47] davmor2: Yaay! [16:47] popey: publish! [16:49] davmor2, awesomes :) [16:49] sil2100: I found 1 minor issue that mzanetti is aware of and I'll file a bug for it, now I've finished, but it isn't a regression could just do with a fix for the next update to the app :) [16:49] didn't know we're doing the train thing with reminders [16:50] mzanetti: anything that touches rtm needs a check and we needed to make a single process for everything [16:50] sure, makes total sense [16:51] davmor2, are we releasing that to vivid/the store too? [16:51] mzanetti: we only have one store, so anything landing from the clicks is essentially on both rtm and vivid [16:51] mzanetti: as far as I am aware yes, popey can confirm it though [16:51] we have only one store, yes. [16:51] ack. perfect [16:51] wasn't sure if there's a difference between preinstalled on rtm and the store [16:52] reminders isn't pre-installed on krillin [16:52] only on nexus [16:52] ah [16:52] (this may change) [16:52] +1 for the previous version not being preinstalled :D [16:52] So, sil2100 I don't need to run this past pmcgowan ? [16:52] * mzanetti food. biab [16:53] cihelp: fginther: plars: i requested to one of you some times ago to have the system where tests are run set up to have python3-wand installed. i was told it was done. but a test ran today still fails because it is missing: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-click-autopilot-runner-mako/812/testReport/junit/unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure.camera_app/tests/test_capture/ [16:53] mzanetti: well done! [16:53] nerochiaro: hmm, let me take a look [16:53] popey, thanks :D [16:55] nerochiaro: ah, I bet it only ended up in the smoke testing branch, not the one used by that job, one sec and I'll verify that. If so, it will be a really quick fix === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [17:00] popey: I think we all agreed on getting this landed [17:02] ok [17:08] alex-abreu: are you building the silo? [17:08] sil2100, now yes [17:17] sil2100: less sailing more bobby in the water desperate to stay afloat ;) [17:21] nerochiaro, regarding the failure on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-vivid-amd64/822/console... Looks like you did a rebuild of another build. Unfortunately, this will cause it to re-use the same parameters which includes specification of the old license check script. In order to avoid this, the job has to be rebuilt from scratch which I did here: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/camera-app-ci/403/ [17:21] fginther: ok, sorry. did not see it built from hours so I launched another rebuild [17:22] fginther: i will wait for that one to finish and check tomorrow === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [17:22] nerochiaro, also looks like other issue is being addressed, sorry about that oversight [17:23] fginther: np [17:34] fginther: hey is the engine mojo spec expected to be deployable in juju-lxc? [17:34] robru, yes [17:35] fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127187/ [17:37] robru, looking [17:37] fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127188/ oops there's a bit more. thanks. [17:38] trainguards hi, can we get the ubuntu-ui-toolkit deleted from silo 0 ? [17:38] kgunn_: sure one sec [17:38] we've got no more MP's for that...but have an old plg [17:38] pkg even [17:38] thanks! [17:39] kgunn_: you're welcome. should be gone in a sec [17:39] ta [17:40] fginther: oops, just noticed I'm not on the VPN. trying again... [17:41] robru, yeah, two things. Even for local deployments, you need to have the nova OS_, etc environment variables set (it uses swift to upload the application tarball) [17:41] fginther: yeah I set OS_PASSWORD correctly I think, had that one saved in my password manager from the last time I tried to deploy in hpcloud months and months ago [17:42] robru, and make sure you have "cheetah python-apt jinja2 statsd python-neutronclient" dependencies installed on the host [17:42] kgunn_: I was already wondering about that uitoolkit thing :) [17:42] fginther: where can I get cheetah and statsd from? [17:42] :) [17:43] nerochiaro: ok, if you want to retry that job, it should work now [17:43] bzoltan_: hey, while you're here...who is the best person to include on grid unit discussion from sdk team? [17:43] fginther: you mean python-cheetah and python-statsd? [17:43] robru, oops sorry, yep try those [17:43] fginther: k thanks [17:45] fginther: can you please restart the build job one more time after the change plars made ? [17:45] nerochiaro: I can do that [17:46] plars: please do then [17:46] nerochiaro: I didn't want to do it without taking to you first though, if you are ready for it I'll push it through again though [17:46] plars, in this case, the build has to be entered from scratch because the parameters changed (due to another change in the job config) [17:46] plars: fginther: the MR is ready, so please push a rebuild [17:47] fginther: so it's actually https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/camera-app-ci/404/ that has to start over then? [17:48] plars, right, just do a new build of the camera-app-ci job and copy over the landing_candidate, merge_proposal and candidate_revision parameters [17:48] fginther: ah, I just hit rebuild on it, which I think should do all we need right? [17:48] nerochiaro: it's in progress [17:50] plars, almost, "hooks" has been updated in the new config. So you could do a rebuild, then copy in the new value of hooks from the job configuration [17:51] ah, ok [17:51] sorry about that [17:51] it's not the most elegant design [17:51] np, I remember seeing that mp now, just forgot it was related to this [17:51] timing... === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [18:04] trainguards: can i get a quick reconfig on rtm-010 please? [18:04] dbarth_: sure,one sec [18:04] this is to wrap the image (hopefully) [18:06] dbarth_: ok, good to go. just mind the conflict in rtm1 [18:06] robru: which conflict? [18:07] robru: ah i see [18:07] dbarth_: yeah system settings [18:08] kenvandine: will you be publishing silo rtm 1 shortly? I see it's approved. dbarth_ has a conflicting silo [18:08] robru: hmm, then maybe i can drop the system-settings branch to avoid any mistake [18:08] it's "belt & suspenders", whereas the signon fix is the key one [18:09] dbarth_: well I'm not sure what the plan is. if ken will publish his you can just rebuild yours afterwards and it'll be fine. [18:09] robru: i dropped the uss line, if you can reconfig one last time [18:09] dbarth_: ok [18:11] popey: I think there is a serious bug in the weather app that jibel will be able to attest to. It say sunny in London that can't be right, it should default to rain surely ;) [18:11] lulz [18:12] it also is dark! [18:23] ping cihelp: is it ok for you if we make a dep8 test that requires the host to be on vivid? [18:25] elopio: the host? can you give me more details? [18:25] fginther: https://pastebin.canonical.com/127192/ no such luck I'm afraid, even with deps installed and env vars set [18:25] and on the vpn [18:26] robru, looking [18:26] thanks [18:27] plars: we have a host and a testbed. On the host, we call adt-run and it executes the dep8 tests in the testbed. [18:27] for this project, we might require the machine that calls adt-run to be on vivid to use the latest packages from ubuntu-system-image. [18:28] plars: so, do we have vivid machines on the lab to execute the tests? [18:28] elopio: no, but if it's just a certain version of adt-run that's required, I think it would be easier to make sure we have that version [18:28] elopio: what kinds of tests are these? [18:29] plars: what we need is a specific version of system-image-dbus. [18:29] robru, I gave you some missing info, one moment, trying to figure out what else I might have missed [18:29] plars: over the air upgrades. [18:29] fginther: yeah I'll have to update the README once I finally get this working [18:32] elopio: assuming the thing calling adt-run is on trusty, would it be possible to give us a list of hard dependencies? It would seem that we should easily be able to get a backport of those things if we really need to. It gets messy really fast if we have to have a different host environment for tests, and much worse if it has to be on a development version. We need a pretty stable environment or we're likely to hit infrastructure p [18:32] roblems [18:33] elopio: it sounds like these tests may be special enough to need a story on our side though, have you talked to Ursinha about it? [18:33] plars: I'll ask. [18:34] plars: not yet. We are just defining what the tests are, and how to run them. [18:34] at the end of this week we'll have our requirements better defined. [18:35] elopio: anything you can do to reduce special requirements on the host side will surely help with stability of the test environment [18:35] something to think about [18:37] robru, sent you an updated email [18:37] fginther: thanks [18:39] plars: ack. Thanks for the info. We have plenty of options, so we'll make them adjust to trusty hosts. [19:11] ricmm: Vivid silo 13 is approved [19:13] rvr: thanks [19:13] rsalveti: could you publish 13 for me please [19:15] ricmm: sure [19:18] ricmm: done [19:19] thanks [19:29] popey: row 42 [19:35] davmor2: \o/ sweet! Thank you. [19:36] popey: no thank you for the etherpad makes it much easier :) [19:39] \o/ [19:39] pmcgowan: weather updated in store. [19:41] popey, yay [19:44] \o/ two down, loads to go! [19:44] robru, davmor2, whoever can wrap the image; silo 010 is ok for qa now [19:44] dbarth_: I'm about to EOD so one for ToyKeeper probably [19:45] ok, let me know; i'll be around [19:47] I've got a meeting in a few, but perhaps after that? [19:53] dbarth_: yep I'm happy to publish once ToyKeeper qa's it. [19:59] perfect; ToyKeeper it's in your hands now ;) === dbarth_ is now known as dbarth [20:00] dbarth: teh silo is ready? :) [20:13] sil2100: it is yes [20:29] \o/ [21:09] bfiller: failure looks transient, retrying: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-028-1-build/31/console [21:13] dbarth: Starting now. [21:19] ToyKeeper: ok [21:20] Well, that's what I get for being efficient and starting a new flash before finding out what the silo does. Gotta go reflash again now. ;P [21:20] ToyKeeper: i may switch to sleep mode in a bit, but keep me posted [21:21] ToyKeeper: right, sorry; flash to #16, create u1 account, apply silo; reboot; flash to #18 and check that you still have the u1 account around [21:21] Yeah, I just should have read it first. :) [22:43] ToyKeeper: everything ok ? [22:44] dbarth: So far, yeah; OTA always takes forever here. [22:45] ok [22:58] ... that is, if citrain device-upgrade would stop failing. This is new... [23:38] dbarth... left. D'oh. [23:38] Test tools finally stopped failing, and I *still* see no difference at all pre- and post-silo.