[07:46] good morning === dcmorton_ is now known as dcmorton === sil2100__ is now known as sil2100_ [13:01] where/how do I find packages that need upgradation? [13:19] upgradation. [13:19] reversiblean: sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get dist-upgrade [13:22] jpds: no i've checking out the motu developer guide.. I'd like to upgrade this: https://launchpad.net/~kilian/+archive/ubuntu/f.lux from the orginal source https://github.com/Kilian/f.lux-indicator-applet [13:23] the packagage is not available for utopic either. so i'd like to build one [13:29] can anyone help me to build the package froum source? [13:55] reversiblean: it might be as easy as apt-get source && dpkg-buildpackage [13:57] jrwren: apt-get source won't work as there's no source or package available since utopic [13:59] reversiblean: you *could* add utopic source repo, fetch source, remove source repo. Or you could manually get the source from ppa [14:01] jrwren: will i be able to upgrade it from the upstream repo then? [14:02] reversiblean: that depends. maybe just copy over? or do a clean checkout and copy the debian dir into that clean checkout? [14:06] jrwren: upstream has a debian folder aswell [14:08] reversiblean: oh, then just checkout upstream and run dpkg-buildpackage :) [14:11] jrwren: dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no upstream tarball found at ../fluxgui_1.1.8.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz} [14:12] jrwren: i've created that tarball [14:12] reversiblean: are you sure the name matches exactly? _ not - ? [14:15] jrwren: oops, its .orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz} not just .tar [14:21] jrwren: horray! done : ) === jrgifford_ is now known as jrgifford === lasko1 is now known as lasko === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 [15:06] Hi guys [15:06] I made a package for trusty https://launchpad.net/~soniczerops/+archive/ubuntu/repraptor-dev [15:06] Can somebody rewiew it? [15:08] Also it says 404 on my system for some reason [15:31] neothefox: it 404s there because it failed to build [15:31] teward, nope, it just was too early. Not it is ok [15:31] and I've got an email [15:33] ah, nope, I was wrong. 404 is gone, but it still not in the cache [15:43] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/199748934/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-amd64.repraptor_0.3-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz [15:44] so should I target /bin instead of /usr/bin in qmake? [15:44] because on my pc it builds [16:10] uh, PPA is so picky [16:10] bu it helps maintain the quality I guess === lasko1 is now known as lasko === Fantu_ is now known as Fantu [16:25] apt-get source pkg.. does not include a diff.gz file. why is that? [16:43] i'm referring to 'hello' package stated here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJzM2LNOtWU [19:04] So, my packagi is built and in the PPA [19:04] now how do I apply to Ubuntu repos? [19:05] Guide sends me here [23:06] Can I submit a package? [23:10] neothefox: did you read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages at all [23:11] teward, yup, and I have PPA up already. [23:11] neothefox: well, feature freeze is already past [23:11] neothefox: so the approval deadline is past [23:12] i'm not MOTU, but if they hold to that, then you'll probably have to wait for next dev cycle [23:12] teward, so I can apply for the next one when daily cds are up? [23:13] neothefox: i'm not MOTU, i'm only going by that guide [23:13] s/guide/wiki page/ [23:13] teward, ok, on the page there is says about 12.10 deadline [23:13] teward, thx [23:13] neothefox: before that it says FeatureFreeze [23:14] there's always a featurefreeze deadline [23:14] neothefox: you need to start referring to the development cycle timelines - the feature freeze dates are stated on each - and feature freeze for 15.04 was feb 20th iirc [23:14] teward, I got it, but I never got where to find recen deadline. Thanks again! [23:15] neothefox: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule [23:15] neothefox: each new dev cycle the release schedule is released for each [23:16] teward, got it