=== duflu_ is now known as duflu === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa === Malsasa is now known as Guest75447 === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa [08:38] man, i woke up to a 55% packet loss on my router [08:38] thankfully a reboot seems to have fixed it [08:38] let's see if it stays fixed [09:12] tsdgeos, sometimes they ran out of mem and they lose packets [09:19] Cimi: may be that, i also wiggled the cables a bit, i have a huge mess here and they may have recconnected better or something [09:35] Saviq: there's a big patchset for qtdbus that also fixes our deadlock issue [09:35] tsdgeos, ah [09:35] moves handling of stuff more into threads and stuff [09:35] need to pressure thiago into geting it merged [09:36] tsdgeos, yeah, we'd probably like to put it in vivid if possible [09:36] and then we can decide wheter to use my "simple" let's add a lock or backport all that series [09:36] i'm guesing adding the series is a better idea [09:36] so we can find any issue it may have earlier [09:36] but still i'd like it landed upstream [09:37] first [09:37] yeah, we could start preparing for it in a silo or so [09:39] would that help with the other deadlock bug we're fighting? not really since you said it only seems to happen on first boot ever? [09:44] tsdgeos, no, it's the simplest way to repro [09:44] tsdgeos, or well... the only way to repro [09:45] tsdgeos_, it's the only way we know to repro [09:45] tsdgeos_, people have been filing other "unity8 hung" bugs, but looking at traces it's all the same [09:46] Saviq: so a silo won't really help in seeing if it's been fixed or not [09:46] tsdgeos_, true, landing it would, but a silo could help with verifying everything else still works as expected [09:46] tsdgeos_, but Im fine with waiting until it gets upstream [09:50] pstolowski: can you confirm is the scopes shell that resets the deparment on a serach ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-shell/+bug/1429214 [09:50] Ubuntu bug 1429214 in Ubuntu UX "[Scopes] Departments not behaving consistently when navigating too/from a Scope " [Undecided,Triaged] [09:50] i can't find any code in the ui that does it [09:57] Saviq: meh internet doing stoopid things today [09:57] tsdgeos, yeah [09:57] Saviq: still how do we put it in a silo? [09:57] tsdgeos, this is scopes shell [09:58] tsdgeos, i'll comment on the bug; this is as you said working as designed [09:58] pstolowski: thanks [10:00] tsdgeos, let's wait until it gets merged upstream and we'll pull it into our distro patchset [10:02] Saviq: ok [11:10] greyback: going to have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1425593 [11:10] any quick idea/hint what may be the cause? [11:10] Ubuntu bug 1425593 in QtMir "trivial app fails to appear in shell and crashes it on close" [High,Confirmed] [11:12] greyback: going to have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1425593 [11:12] any quick idea/hint what may be the cause? [11:12] Ubuntu bug 1425593 in QtMir "trivial app fails to appear in shell and crashes it on close" [High,Confirmed] [11:13] do you think it can be related to the "first frame drawn" code? [11:13] tsdgeos: would suspect raciness where client is ready to give a frame before qtmir is [11:13] tsdgeos: yeah actually [11:13] k [11:13] will have a look [11:13] great, thanks [11:13] the shutdown crash is hopefully the same bug [11:15] tsdgeos: possible the SurfaceObserver sends a framePosted signal before the MirSurfaceItem is set as a listener === sil2100__ is now known as sil2100_ === james_ is now known as Guest21564 === Facu is now known as |mundo| === |mundo| is now known as Facu === james is now known as Guest73774 [12:33] tsdgeos, for when you have time, I fixed the remaining aspect ratio issue [12:33] with http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cimi/unity8/fix-previewoverlay/revision/1627 [12:43] tsdgeos, you can test using the games previews in the store, like machines vs machines and pathwind [12:43] tsdgeos, before my branch you see the animation is messed up [12:47] hi guys, I've got question regarding hmm dashobard/launcher? I hope it's correct channel if not I'd like to ask someone to please redirect me [12:47] the thing is that when I search for pkg in the dash and click the pkg with rmb there's pkg description and pkg version [12:48] my question is where is that info comming from? [12:50] as I think there's a bug related to that functionality === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [13:11] Hi folks! I have this bug I think is related to Unity shell, any suggestions who I could pass that onto? https://bugs.launchpad.net/libqtelegram/+bug/1428277 [13:11] Ubuntu bug 1428277 in libqtelegram "Icon in notification may be too small" [Undecided,New] [13:11] The icon is svg, so I suppose it should scale up nicely. [13:16] Cimi: cool, will do === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [13:32] karni, small? all the icons in there are that small [13:32] karni, per design [13:33] karni, but agreed with the "not trivial to tap", design folk are working on a refresh of the notification center [13:33] Saviq: hrm.. now that I look at it, I think it's equally 'small' on krillin. [13:33] Saviq: shall I ping them the bug report, or you know these things are in the works now? [13:34] if you know, I'll just comment and mark as invalid [13:34] karni, I've tweaked the bug tasks [13:35] Saviq: ah, cheers! :) === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk === JMulholland_ is now known as JMulholland === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader === seb128_ is now known as seb128 [15:24] mterry_, hey, did we have a bug for bug #1429887? [15:24] bug 1429887 in powerd (Ubuntu) "Pressing power button to resume does not turn on screen" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1429887 [15:24] Saviq, bug 1421455 I guess [15:24] bug 1421455 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Slow wake up time on physical power button pressed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1421455 [15:25] mterry_, yup, thanks [15:25] Saviq, I'm assigned on that one, but not actively investigating [15:26] mterry_, yeah I know, probably best to unassign. [15:26] Saviq, fair, don't want to give wrong impression. unassigned [15:26] I'd be happy to chase it down, but I don't know how to reproduce reliably [15:27] mterry_, yeah, it's one of those that are rather painful to track [15:43] Saviq, for reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-click/+bug/1267184 [15:43] Ubuntu bug 1267184 in unity8 (Ubuntu RTM) "[Apps Scope] apps that are being downloaded/installed are not shown differently from un-installed apps" [Medium,Triaged] [15:46] mzanetti: don't know if you got it, but yes the icon thing has landed in the toolkit [15:47] tsdgeos, yep, got that, thanks [15:48] is that new landing that suddenly made 8 of our unittests fail? [15:49] likely [15:56] pete-woods, ping [15:58] Cimi: hi [15:58] pete-woods, hi pete [15:58] pete-woods, can you have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-click/+bug/1267184 and tell what you guys need? [15:58] Ubuntu bug 1267184 in unity8 (Ubuntu RTM) "[Apps Scope] apps that are being downloaded/installed are not shown differently from un-installed apps" [Medium,Triaged] [15:58] pls [16:00] Cimi: I'd have to direct you to dobey (see #unity-api) for further info [16:00] pete-woods, ok, thx [16:00] the bug looks a bit vague for me to comment on it [16:00] to me it sounds like we need a peristent click installation service [16:01] who can give us info on package installation progress, etc [16:01] without having to worry about the scope closing in the middle [16:01] we also need to do the same for the launcehr [16:01] the launcher will have the apps that are being installed I think [16:01] Saviq, can you confirm that? [16:02] Cimi, yes apps need to get pinned to the launcher on installation [16:02] this doesn't sound to me like a particularly challenging service to implement [16:02] and show the install progress [16:02] and I'd definitely like to see the launcher and click scope using the same service [16:03] Saviq, pete-woods which team can be in charge of this service? [16:06] Cimi: well to me, it sounds like API team should make it. but I guess managers need to fight about it first === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch [16:59] interestingly i can only reproduce 1 of the lots of qmluitests failing in cI === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD