[14:02] <lazyPower> Greetings gui team o/  quick ? - just sounding out some ideas out loud and need to confirm some assumptions.
[14:02] <lazyPower> when the gui has staged a charm, as in "commit" but leave it unassigned - the charm code is still pulled and placed on teh stateserver for deployment when youd ecide to commit a node to it yes? or is this just a placeholder that the gui is offering until you decide to commit to adding the first unit?
[14:04] <rick_h_> lazyPower: so if you commit without placing it, the charm is pulled so that the service is added I believe? a service with 0 units?
[14:05]  * rick_h_ is trying to recall
[14:05] <lazyPower> rick_h_: correct
[14:05] <lazyPower> like if you hit up the gui demo over on jujucharms.com and deploy something, it defaults to being in a transient state
[14:05] <rick_h_> right
[14:05] <rick_h_> I mean if you can juju status the cli and match it up should tell you tbh
[14:06] <lazyPower> which leads me to beleive, there's a way for me to reproduce that scenario with the CLI - having an unplaced charm that i can then say "yo dawg, add-unit --to #" later.
[14:06] <rick_h_> yep, unit=0 or something?
[14:06] <lazyPower> ah i haven't tried that, i was going to lead into "can i do this in the CLI or is this something you gave me being the super awesome gui ppl"
[14:06] <rick_h_> num_units=0
[14:06] <rick_h_> whatever the field is
[14:06] <lazyPower> hah, awesome
[14:06] <lazyPower> allright, ballin. I'm going to derp around with this and come up with something neat
[14:06]  * lazyPower rolls the dice
[14:09] <jrwren> ^^ always scary when lazyPower says this.
[14:10] <lazyPower> i'm just scary in general jrwren. this  much is obvious ;)
[14:10] <jrwren> ha!
[14:10] <lazyPower> blame the fact i just spent the last 2 weeks in juju deploy windows land
[14:10] <lazyPower> I'm itching to get back to posix land
[14:10] <jrwren> that sounds glorious! I'm so jealous.
[14:11] <jrwren> if only every version of windows shipped with its posix layer enabled by default.
[14:11] <lazyPower> wat
[14:11] <lazyPower> what is this "posix layer enablement" you speak of
[14:11] <jrwren> lazyPower: windows is a fully posix compliant OS, if you enable it.
[14:12] <lazyPower> #TIL
[14:12] <jrwren> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Services_for_UNIX#Subsystem_for_UNIX-based_Applications_.28SUA.29_and_separate_NFS
[14:12] <jrwren> oh, my bad, removed from 2012 R2.
[14:12] <jrwren> *grumble*  wrong direction MSFT
[14:13] <lazyPower> http://i.imgur.com/nKXFnZN.jpg <-- pretty much how i feel about that
[14:13] <jrwren> i ain't trolling.
[14:13] <jrwren> TIL - its removed from 2012R2.
[14:14] <lazyPower> i meant about ms removing it
[14:16] <jrwren> Its like they do it just to make me angry :)
[17:00] <hatch> uiteam lf two reviews and a qa on this code removal branch https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/705
[19:39] <hatch> uiteam anyone able to give this branch a review so I can get it landed? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/705