=== arosales_ is now known as arosales === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === urulama_ is now known as urulama_otp === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 [14:02] Greetings gui team o/ quick ? - just sounding out some ideas out loud and need to confirm some assumptions. [14:02] when the gui has staged a charm, as in "commit" but leave it unassigned - the charm code is still pulled and placed on teh stateserver for deployment when youd ecide to commit a node to it yes? or is this just a placeholder that the gui is offering until you decide to commit to adding the first unit? [14:04] lazyPower: so if you commit without placing it, the charm is pulled so that the service is added I believe? a service with 0 units? [14:05] * rick_h_ is trying to recall [14:05] rick_h_: correct [14:05] like if you hit up the gui demo over on jujucharms.com and deploy something, it defaults to being in a transient state [14:05] right [14:05] I mean if you can juju status the cli and match it up should tell you tbh [14:06] which leads me to beleive, there's a way for me to reproduce that scenario with the CLI - having an unplaced charm that i can then say "yo dawg, add-unit --to #" later. [14:06] yep, unit=0 or something? [14:06] ah i haven't tried that, i was going to lead into "can i do this in the CLI or is this something you gave me being the super awesome gui ppl" [14:06] num_units=0 [14:06] whatever the field is [14:06] hah, awesome [14:06] allright, ballin. I'm going to derp around with this and come up with something neat [14:06] * lazyPower rolls the dice [14:09] ^^ always scary when lazyPower says this. [14:10] i'm just scary in general jrwren. this much is obvious ;) [14:10] ha! [14:10] blame the fact i just spent the last 2 weeks in juju deploy windows land [14:10] I'm itching to get back to posix land [14:10] that sounds glorious! I'm so jealous. [14:11] if only every version of windows shipped with its posix layer enabled by default. [14:11] wat [14:11] what is this "posix layer enablement" you speak of [14:11] lazyPower: windows is a fully posix compliant OS, if you enable it. [14:12] #TIL [14:12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Services_for_UNIX#Subsystem_for_UNIX-based_Applications_.28SUA.29_and_separate_NFS [14:12] oh, my bad, removed from 2012 R2. [14:12] *grumble* wrong direction MSFT [14:13] http://i.imgur.com/nKXFnZN.jpg <-- pretty much how i feel about that [14:13] i ain't trolling. [14:13] TIL - its removed from 2012R2. [14:14] i meant about ms removing it [14:16] Its like they do it just to make me angry :) === arosales_ is now known as arosales [17:00] uiteam lf two reviews and a qa on this code removal branch https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/705 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 [19:39] uiteam anyone able to give this branch a review so I can get it landed? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/705 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away