[08:38] <rpadovani> o/ I don't know if it's the right channel where report this, but... I'm trying to login to https://staging.launchpad.net/? to take a look, but the U1 login page says mail/password combination is wrong. I tried a lot of times, but I'm not able to login. Of course, I'm sure credentials are right, I'm able to login to login,ubuntu.com without problems
[08:38] <rpadovani> (and also to main lp site)
[08:39] <wgrant> rpadovani: login.staging.launchpad.net uses a separate account database.
[08:39] <wgrant> You may need to create a new account or request a password reset.
[08:39] <rpadovani> wgrant, I see, thanks
[08:40] <wgrant> (staging.launchpad.net uses login.staging.launchpad.net, while qastaging.launchpad.net uses login.launchpad.net. so you can always use qastaging if staging SSO is broken.)
[08:42] <rpadovani> wgrant, it works, thanks :-) Maybe then is better to link qastaging here? Or report this thing of the different account somewhere?
[08:42] <rpadovani> https://launchpad.net/projects/+new
[08:43] <wgrant> The different account databases are deliberate.
[13:26] <kostja_osipov> hi
[15:52] <nortoboru> hello
[16:19] <desrt> cjwatson: hey.. i was sent to ping you about https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/638498 :)
[16:20] <cjwatson> desrt: well, OK, but not today :)
[16:20] <cjwatson> it's probably not too hard
[16:21] <desrt> ya.  seems more like an oversight than anything else
[16:21] <desrt> but it's putting a cramp in my style for my 'debootstrap jhbuilder chroots' project
[16:22] <desrt> it's not really blocking me per se... i can continue developing it with debian releases in the meantime
[16:23] <desrt> anyway... thanks!
[16:27] <cjwatson> desrt: It's probably as simple as http://paste.ubuntu.com/10616167/ plus tests
[16:28] <cjwatson> desrt: Firing off tests now to see what breaks
[16:30] <desrt> cjwatson: you lied.  you said 'not today' :)
[16:32] <desrt> cjwatson: it seems that ubuntu does Releases files the way that debian used to do them...
[16:32] <cjwatson> desrt: I'm not going to finish this today :)
[16:32] <desrt> ie: one file per dist
[16:33] <cjwatson> Debian still does that
[16:33] <cjwatson> Release files are a per-series object
[16:33] <desrt> they do one file per category/component/etc.
[16:33] <desrt> whatever that is called
[16:33] <desrt> like, main/contrib/non-free, each has its own
[16:34] <cjwatson> Those Release files are a slightly different type of thing, and don't contain checksums
[16:34] <cjwatson> We have them too
[16:34] <desrt> oops.  i'm sorry.  i didn't mean release.  i mean Contents
[16:34] <cjwatson> Ah, yes, we don't have per-component Contents as yet
[16:35] <desrt> probably just as well for my purposes, to be honest.... with debian, everything i want is in main but for ubuntu some of it is in universe...
[16:35] <desrt> i guess eventually i'm going to have to deal with parsing multiple contents files
[16:37] <cjwatson> That's dak b36379705f3f2a52788ad19cf1da339c4edf339d, for my reference
[23:37] <DalekSec> wgrant: Can I gently poke you about lp 907675?
[23:38] <wgrant> DalekSec: That's blocking on https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/5350
[23:39] <DalekSec> wgrant: Awesome, thanks muchly!
[23:40] <DalekSec> Sad, bit dated,