[10:16] <mup> Bug #1433012 was opened: TestAcquireNodeForm.test_storage_with_named_constraints is flaky <tech-debt> <tests> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433012>
[10:55] <voidspace> I'm getting the following maas-django.log (along with an internal server error)
[10:56] <voidspace> ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module maasserver.context_processors.py: "Nomodule named apt_pkg"
[10:56] <voidspace> in maasserver/utils/version.py
[10:56] <voidspace> running from the dev ppa I believe
[10:56] <voidspace> utopic
[10:58] <voidspace> ah, I needed to install python-apt
[13:58] <dimitern> rvba, ping
[17:40] <AskUbuntu_> Landscape openstack juju management | http://askubuntu.com/q/597979
[18:02] <mup> Bug #1433244 was opened: MAAS should handle RAM upgrades without decommissioning / recommissioning existing nodes <openstack> <uosci> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433244>
[19:33] <mup> Bug #1433275 was opened: Connection Errors after "Too many open files" <juju> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433275>
[19:36] <mup> Bug #1433275 changed: Connection Errors after "Too many open files" <juju> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433275>
[19:42] <mup> Bug #1433244 changed: MAAS should handle RAM upgrades without decommissioning / recommissioning existing nodes <openstack> <uosci> <juju-core:New> <MAAS:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433244>
[19:42] <mup> Bug #1433275 was opened: Connection Errors after "Too many open files" <juju> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433275>
[19:48] <mup> Bug #1433244 was opened: MAAS should handle RAM upgrades without decommissioning / recommissioning existing nodes <openstack> <uosci> <juju-core:New> <MAAS:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433244>
[20:02] <arges> roaksoax: fwiw fixed bug 1422457 for you. review whenever you have time, no hurry
[20:03] <mup> Bug #1433244 changed: MAAS should handle RAM upgrades without decommissioning / recommissioning existing nodes <openstack> <uosci> <juju-core:New> <MAAS:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1433244>
[20:06] <roaksoax> bug #1422457
[20:07] <roaksoax> arges: does make format or make lint pass?
[20:08] <arges> roaksoax: running it now
[20:09] <arges> roaksoax: no errors
[20:10] <roaksoax> arges: then land it (change the Needs Review to Approve) and the lander will take care of it
[20:20] <arges> roaksoax: ok
[20:21] <arges> roaksoax: i can't change it to Approve ( I dont think I have the permissions)
[20:21] <arges> for the merge proposal
[20:25] <roaksoax> arges: done
[20:27] <arges> roaksoax: thanks again
[23:04] <bdx> Hows it going everyone? I have a issue concerning booting a node with multiple interfaces....is there a was to have maas provision(commission) a node whos only connected interface is not eth0???
[23:04] <bdx> way(SP)
[23:05] <bdx> ANY insight on this issue would be greatly appreciated........ jamesbeedy@gmail.com ...let me know whats up!!!!
[23:20] <bdx> Hows it going everyone? I have a issue concerning booting a node with multiple interfaces....is there a way to have maas provision(commission) a node whos only connected interface is not eth0???