* ToyKeeper o/ a bit late... | 00:15 | |
ToyKeeper | n | 00:17 |
---|---|---|
ToyKeeper | ... would mean [n]ext song, if I hadn't moved the cursor right before pressing enter. | 00:18 |
knome | well it created nice legs for your smiley. | 00:18 |
ToyKeeper | :) | 00:21 |
elopio | o/ | 00:52 |
elopio | am I too late? | 00:52 |
veebers | elopio: afraid so, your ubuntu\-qa badge has been revoked :-( | 00:53 |
knome | and all the cookies and pizza are gone | 00:53 |
knome | there's only one salty stick left but the dog licked it | 00:54 |
elopio | :'( | 00:54 |
knome | well cheer up, at least it has some natural flavors to it from... nevermind. | 00:54 |
* elopio goes away to cry on the bed, and enjoy the extended nap :) | 00:54 | |
knome | sleep tight elopio | 00:54 |
veebers | elopio: I'll be asking you for a review shortly if you'll be around | 00:59 |
elopio | veebers: I was joking. | 00:59 |
elopio | I'll be around. | 00:59 |
elopio | I can't even go to the gym, today I can't raise my arms higher than the keyboard. | 01:00 |
veebers | elopio: heh, you feeling the burn? | 01:00 |
elopio | yes, I took the wrong class | 01:01 |
veebers | I should have gone today as my gym buddy won't be there tomorrow and the gym is a scary place for a scrawny skinny guy :-| | 01:01 |
veebers | elopio: what did you take? | 01:01 |
elopio | vveebers: it was a kettelbells class. We learned how to hit our forearms and shoulders with iron balls. | 01:03 |
veebers | elopio: holy crap, that does sound intense :-P | 01:07 |
elopio | veebers: when you have some time, can you take a look to the packaging card? I've tested it and +1. It would be nice to get the second approval. | 01:08 |
veebers | elopio: ack, can do. That's actually next on my things to do :-) | 01:13 |
elopio | :) | 01:20 |
elopio | I think I got the dbus upgrade working! | 01:35 |
veebers | elopio: awesome! | 01:41 |
veebers | elopio: hey, I've reviewed the packaging branch, Needs Info, due to the lack of -B in the readme (works for me with -B, I get apt 404s on the device otherwise) | 01:42 |
elopio | veebers: did you phablet-network? | 01:42 |
elopio | veebers: for some reason, -B works for me but fails for barry. without -B it fails for me with a missing fakeroot error, but works for barry. | 01:44 |
elopio | now you are throwing a new error to the mix :( | 01:45 |
veebers | elopio: really odd. Yeah the network is setup, it's that the image is out of date and needs an apt-get update. The problem is that even w/ a fresh image we have seen the apt cache out of date | 01:45 |
elopio | right. I'm all for -B, as that's how we got the sanity working. But without understanding barry's error, I'm not sure which one to recommend. | 01:48 |
elopio | veebers: do you know how to check the version of a py package if it has no __version__ attribute? | 01:52 |
veebers | elopio: no I do not, sorry | 01:58 |
elopio | veebers: that last card for xlib update just requires a top-approval on the autopilot branch, right? | 02:06 |
veebers | elopio: if the packging has been acked, yes. We'll be doing a release tomorrow | 02:09 |
elopio | ok, top-approving then. | 02:10 |
* elopio goes for food | 02:36 | |
elopio | bbs. | 02:36 |
veebers | elopio: if you're still around can you review the reflash MP for me please? | 03:33 |
elopio | veebers: sure. | 03:33 |
veebers | thanks | 03:38 |
elopio | veebers: I think find_adt_test_file_names is complex. What do you think of this: | 03:38 |
elopio | if we put all the upgrade tests in ubuntu_ota_tests.tests, then we can use discover or something like autopilot list to find all of them. | 03:39 |
elopio | then, we can define the Test-Command like python3 -m unittest $TEST_NAME | 03:39 |
veebers | elopio: if we want to use --testname to run a test then flash the device they need to be named in a Tests: stanza, using Test-Command: doesn't work (doesn't have a name) | 03:40 |
elopio | and we could use something like: adt-run --testname command1 --setup-commands "export $TEST_NAME=ubuntu_ota_tests.tests.test_basic_upgrade" ... | 03:40 |
veebers | also, I think it only _looks_ complex, it's not really it's just parsing a text file | 03:41 |
elopio | veebers: Test-Command gets the name command{index} | 03:41 |
veebers | ah right | 03:41 |
elopio | maybe what I'm proposing is more complex. I'm just thinking here. | 03:41 |
veebers | elopio: I like the spitballing. where would we get the name to export in TESTNAME? | 03:42 |
elopio | veebers: we need something like autopilot does when listing the tests. | 03:43 |
elopio | we do a loop over that list, running adt-run once per test. | 03:43 |
veebers | well, find_adt_test_file_names does that kind of, assuming the test is defined in d/t/control :-) | 03:43 |
veebers | sounds like what you're proposing is pretty much what we have there, just actually running them is slightly different | 03:44 |
veebers | i.e. parse what tests are available, and run them individually. | 03:44 |
veebers | As it is currently the tests can be shell scripts or python scripts etc. no restrictions there | 03:44 |
elopio | right. | 03:44 |
veebers | elopio: oh on that note, brendand tells me that the check accounts test needs to be a shellscript (not python) due to some permissions issues he came across | 03:45 |
veebers | so we can't say it _has_ to be a python unittest file | 03:45 |
elopio | ugh, I hate that. | 03:45 |
veebers | yeah, I wonder if a little more investigation we could make it a python script, but for now . . . | 03:46 |
elopio | veebers: so, on your branch we will need to move the basic test out of ubuntu_sanity_tests.tests and put it into debian/tests, right? | 03:46 |
veebers | elopio: hmm, we should be able to keep it there and have a test script that calls python3 -m unittest ub. . . . | 03:47 |
veebers | that sounds like a bit of a work around though | 03:47 |
veebers | hmm, although I'm not to worried about that, it's moved a command from the control file into it's own standalone file which isn't too much of a bad thing | 03:48 |
elopio | veebers: I won't mind about moving it out. I think your branch is right, just not what I had in mind. | 03:48 |
elopio | but it should work, lets give it a try. | 03:48 |
veebers | elopio: aye, fair enough. If you think it should be (and can be) improved lets discuss it. Perhaps its a case of (and I say this a lot ;-)) that we iterate on it | 03:49 |
elopio | veebers: I don't understand this comment: Hmm, apparently the revision argument is no more :-\ | 03:49 |
elopio | I actually like when you say "lets iterate on it" :) | 03:49 |
elopio | veebers: I have latest vivid, and the revision argument is in there. | 03:50 |
veebers | elopio: heh, that's a stale comment. The argument does work | 03:50 |
elopio | cool. | 03:50 |
veebers | its just that it needs to be before 'touch' | 03:50 |
veebers | So that's the 2nd time in as many days that I've been caught out by an agument being position dependant' | 03:50 |
elopio | veebers: so I like the branch, I would like it even better with tests. Like putting it in ubuntu_ota_tests/command_line and make some selftests, like we did for sanity. | 03:51 |
elopio | but the branch is already too big. I would suggest to split it: a first branch which only does one flash and runs adt-run ... | 03:52 |
elopio | this one will work on the current branch, where we have only one test for upgrade. | 03:52 |
elopio | then a second branch which does the test discovery, and puts the flashing in a loop. | 03:52 |
veebers | elopio: I agree that its stupid that it lacks tests. I got a little carried away getting POC up on that branch before actually testing. | 03:59 |
veebers | I disagree with the size, it's not that big and will take a while to take apart to make smaller branches that are all related anyway. | 04:00 |
elopio | veebers: ok. I can help adding the missing tests, I still have a couple of hours before going to bed. | 04:00 |
veebers | if you're really keen on that I can revert to an earlier rev where it's really simple and propose that, but then I would be fixing things in that branch that are already fixed anyway. I guess I'm just being difficult thought :-) | 04:01 |
veebers | elopio: coolio, I'm confident that it's written in a a pretty testable way. Let me move things around a little so we can test it etc. | 04:02 |
veebers | elopio: rats, actually I want to rebase it on barrys branch, but that hasn't landed yet. I don't want merge conflicts wasting our time either | 04:02 |
elopio | veebers: splitting the branch was just a suggestion. If you think there will be no problem adding tests with the branch as is, I'm ok with that. | 04:02 |
elopio | veebers: about barry's branch, I suggest to land it. | 04:03 |
elopio | there's a card about updating the readme, where we can investigate about -B or not -B | 04:03 |
veebers | so on that note I've bottom approved. | 04:03 |
veebers | do you mind if I top . . . you've already suggested that | 04:03 |
elopio | veebers: please, go aheaad. | 04:04 |
veebers | elopio: done. I'm going to grab trunk + barrys branch, merge that all in and move things around to get testing sorted | 04:04 |
elopio | what we can do for now is to pass the -B from your script to adt-run. | 04:04 |
elopio | one more crazy error in here. With v2.5, check_upgrade returns that there is no upgrade available when there is one. | 04:06 |
veebers | ugh, any idea why that is ? | 04:09 |
elopio | veebers: no clue. For now I'll just skip the assertion. | 04:12 |
elopio | actually, I'll let it fail. | 04:12 |
elopio | that's what the suite is for. There is a bug, it must ffail. | 04:13 |
veebers | ah I see, you're saying there is an actual bug, not with the test | 04:13 |
elopio | yes. | 04:14 |
veebers | Well thats good I guess :-) Already being useful | 04:15 |
veebers | elopio: you'll be happy to see* that I've added another 100+ lines to that already big diff :-) | 05:18 |
veebers | (*note you may not actually be happy) | 05:18 |
veebers | elopio: tests added (should have been there from the start, I know) and I'm going to go have tea. I'll be back on later tonight though to clear up anything | 05:19 |
elopio | veebers: I'm happy. | 05:20 |
elopio | I'll take a look. | 05:20 |
elopio | veebers: I found that revision is actually not working for me. | 05:21 |
elopio | I tell it to flash 152, and it flashes 153. | 05:21 |
veebers | oh? ugh hmm | 05:29 |
elopio | veebers: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10625388/ | 05:29 |
elopio | I'm not doing anything stupid, right? | 05:30 |
elopio | might be that it's late. | 05:30 |
elopio | oh, I was doing something stupid. | 05:31 |
elopio | :) | 05:31 |
elopio | I forgot the --. | 05:31 |
elopio | lets blame the hour. | 05:31 |
veebers | elopio: heh, you need to get some rest :-) | 05:32 |
elopio | I really do. I spent like an hour wondering why the fuck it was saying that there were no updates. | 05:33 |
veebers | and it turned out to be a bug? | 05:35 |
elopio | veebers: no, it turned out to be me being stupid for an hour. | 05:35 |
elopio | veebers: your branch looks nice, and I like the tests. But I will leave the detailed review to the EU team. | 05:36 |
elopio | I better go to bed. I'll just try to leave my branch in a decent state, in case one of them can finish it. | 05:36 |
veebers | elopio: sounds good, thanks for your help tonight. See you tomorrow o/ | 05:37 |
veebers | elopio: let me know if there is anything I might be able to do with your branch, I may have some spare cycles this evening | 05:37 |
elopio | veebers: you can give it a review, and give it a try. | 05:40 |
elopio | https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-platform-qa/ubuntu-ota-tests/dbus-upgrade/+merge/253423 | 05:40 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
elopio | no more meetings for... almost one hour. | 14:42 |
elopio | brendand: is there something useful I can do before the meeting? | 14:42 |
brendand | elopio, i wanted to know if you tested barrys packaging changes? | 14:43 |
elopio | brendand: I did. | 14:43 |
brendand | elopio, if you leave out -B it tries to build the package but it fails because of lack of fakeroot on the device | 14:43 |
elopio | brendand: yes. And if you add -B, it fails for barry but works for the rest. | 14:44 |
elopio | brendand: have you tried with -B ? | 14:44 |
brendand | elopio, -B means not to build anything | 14:45 |
elopio | brendand: yes, but the ubuntu_ota_tests do not need to be build | 14:45 |
barry | i have apparently bricked my phone :/ | 14:45 |
elopio | they are on the current working directory. | 14:45 |
brendand | elopio, hmmm. yes but only for the phablet user | 14:46 |
brendand | elopio, it fails for commands run with sudo (the import) | 14:47 |
brendand | elopio, at least when using Tests: (i was using Test-Command:) | 14:47 |
elopio | brendand: this is the command I'm currently using: | 14:49 |
elopio | Test-Command: PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:$(pwd) python3 -m unittest ubuntu_ota_test\ | 14:49 |
elopio | s.tests.test_basic_upgrade | 14:49 |
elopio | once we figure out how to make it work for everybody without -B, exporting patching the python path won't be needed. | 14:49 |
elopio | brendand: for your case, can you patch the pythonpath ? | 14:49 |
barry | right, we really should not need to hack sys.path | 14:50 |
barry | that's kind of the whole point ;) | 14:50 |
brendand | barry, the build doesn't work for me unless i install fakeroot on the device (and specify --gpg-dir) | 14:51 |
elopio | barry: we need to figure out what was special about your device that didn't fail with fakeroot. But now you bricked it :) | 14:51 |
elopio | barry: were you running adt-run while the partition was r/w? | 14:51 |
barry | yeah ;) | 14:51 |
barry | no, i flashed it to -1 on ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed :( | 14:51 |
barry | now i'm trying to find a working revision | 14:52 |
elopio | I'm using 150. Newer ones are bombing in weird ways. | 14:52 |
barry | heh, i skipped over 150, let me try that one | 14:53 |
brendand | elopio, barry - don't go near 153 | 14:54 |
barry | spinny ubuntu symbol isn't spinny | 14:55 |
barry | yeah, even 150 asks for my passphrase but gives me no digits to push | 14:58 |
zsombi | ping ubuntu-qa | 15:00 |
brendand | zsombi, hey | 15:01 |
zsombi | I need some help in creating an autopilot test case for a sample test app which supposed to be an UriHandler | 15:01 |
zsombi | brendand: hello :) | 15:01 |
brendand | zsombi, ok, what problem do you have exactly? | 15:02 |
zsombi | brendand: so, UITK autopilot test, must launch a test app with a given set of URIs | 15:02 |
zsombi | brendand: the test must be an app which url_dispatch can call | 15:02 |
brendand | elopio, i can't rely on PYTHONPATH because i need to use sudo to call the upgrade commands and it's not passing the environment through (even if i use -E) | 15:02 |
zsombi | brendand: the instructions I see here https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/apps/platform/guides/url-dispatcher-guide/ state that I'd need to get 2 JSON files, but these are for clicks, and we all have fake desktop files, without any proper executable line... | 15:03 |
brendand | zsombi, so you need to make a minimal app which can handle url-dispatcher requests? | 15:03 |
brendand | zsombi, ok | 15:04 |
zsombi | brendand: that's the smallest pain, I need to get that app to be registered as URL handler | 15:04 |
zsombi | brendand: the app is fine, we have the QML elements to do the job | 15:04 |
brendand | zsombi, ok. i'm in a bit of a tangle at the moment so i'll get back to you | 15:05 |
brendand | zsombi, but i understand your problem and acknowledge your request | 15:05 |
zsombi | brendand: ok, thx, you might get me on mail eventually, my day is pretty much done :( | 15:05 |
brendand | balloons, issue with this page: https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/apps/platform/guides/url-dispatcher-guide/ | 15:07 |
brendand | balloons, the section on 'temporarily hardcoded urls' is false | 15:07 |
balloons | brendand, looking | 15:09 |
brendand | elopio, thoughts on zsombi's request? | 15:09 |
brendand | balloons, that was reverted i distinctly remember, but confirm with ted | 15:09 |
balloons | brendand, ahh.. so there are no special urls? | 15:09 |
brendand | balloons, support for file:// urls was completely removed | 15:10 |
brendand | balloons, again i'd confirm with ted though | 15:11 |
balloons | right, will do.. thanks | 15:11 |
elopio | brendand: zsombi: we need ted involved in this discussion. How to register a click app as url handler without doing the click install ? | 15:12 |
brendand | elopio, yeah | 15:12 |
tedg | Howdy | 15:13 |
tedg | There is still a hardcoded URL for apps, but not the music or video ones. | 15:13 |
tedg | brendand, ^ | 15:13 |
brendand | tedg, so that page is wrong? | 15:13 |
tedg | Out of date, yes. | 15:13 |
jfunk | ubuntu-qa -- new QA Engineer role is now up | 15:14 |
jfunk | so tell your friends | 15:14 |
brendand | tedg, we also had a question, how would one register an app as a url handler without actually doing the click install? | 15:14 |
balloons | tedg, I'd be happy to help get the page updated. Is there a source for up to date information? | 15:14 |
davmor2 | jfunk: you think we have friends | 15:14 |
brendand | tedg, for test purposes for example | 15:14 |
om26er | davmor2, talk for yourself :p | 15:14 |
brendand | jfunk, all my friends are already QA engineer :) | 15:15 |
brendand | jfunk, or should that be :( | 15:15 |
rvr | davmor2: Silos are very friendly to me ;) | 15:15 |
tedg | brendand, You drop a url-dispatcher file in ~/.config/url-dispatcher/urls/ | 15:15 |
tedg | brendand, The name of the file is $(appid).url-dispatcher | 15:15 |
om26er | davmor2, I have 200 friends on facebook | 15:15 |
tedg | brendand, It should then detect the file and update the DB. | 15:15 |
tedg | brendand, BTW, that feature has a unit test, but I don't think anyone has used it regularly, so there might be bugs. | 15:16 |
davmor2 | om26er: now remove family and people that work at canonical and how many then ;) | 15:16 |
tedg | balloons, No, just delete the "Temporary" section. | 15:16 |
brendand | tedg, where does the appid come from? considering this wouldn't actually be an installed click | 15:16 |
tedg | brendand, From the desktop file for the application. Which would be $(appid).desktop | 15:17 |
brendand | tedg, so as long as it matches the .desktop file that's ok? | 15:17 |
tedg | brendand, That would probably be in ~/.local/share/applications | 15:17 |
elopio | brendand: we are using a temp file for that, so it's like tmp123p1masd.desktop, but it's something we can get. | 15:17 |
elopio | barry, brendand: | 15:17 |
elopio | $ bzr bd | 15:17 |
elopio | $ adt-run --built-tree=. --- ssh -s adb | 15:17 |
elopio | That should work for read-only. | 15:17 |
tedg | brendand, Correct, basically URL dispatcher will pass that to UAL. | 15:17 |
tedg | brendand, So if UAL can launch it, you're good. | 15:18 |
brendand | zsombi, does tedg's comments help? | 15:18 |
barry | elopio: that makes sense i think | 15:19 |
barry | fwiw, i'll need to do a quick reboot in a few minutes | 15:19 |
elopio | tedg: I have doubts about this: https://developer.ubuntu.com/api/qml/sdk-14.10/Ubuntu.Components.UriHandler/ | 15:20 |
elopio | how do you pass those URIs to the app through ual ? | 15:20 |
tedg | elopio, Magic :-) | 15:20 |
tedg | elopio, They replace the %u on the Exec line in the desktop file | 15:20 |
tedg | elopio, Or if the app is running it is sent via dbus. | 15:21 |
elopio | ahhh | 15:21 |
balloons | tedg, brendand section removed ty | 15:21 |
tedg | Awesome, thanks balloons | 15:22 |
elopio | rhuddie: did you work on the noop test, or was it federico? I think it needs to be skipped when there is an update. | 15:22 |
elopio | my phone has just upgraded during selftests. | 15:22 |
brendand | elopio, that didn't work for me | 15:22 |
brendand | elopio, i still get the fakeroot error | 15:22 |
elopio | brendand: with --built-tree? That's not right, it shouldn't build anything. | 15:23 |
rhuddie | elopio, that one was federico's, I saw it upgrader earlier too | 15:23 |
elopio | rhuddie: do you think it's right to skip it? Just like on your test but the opposite? :) | 15:24 |
brendand | elopio, see i look at buil-tree and automatically read unbuilt-tree! | 15:24 |
brendand | which could have been the problem all along... | 15:24 |
rhuddie | elopio, well, given that its a self test it shouldn't be doing the actual update... let me have quick look | 15:24 |
elopio | brendand: the readme currently says unbuilt-tree. So you were right before. | 15:25 |
brendand | elopio, maybe that was a typo | 15:25 |
brendand | elopio, so we update the README too? | 15:25 |
elopio | brendand: no, for some reason it was working for barry. | 15:25 |
elopio | brendand: there's a card for updating the README. But the instructions depend on whether we land veebers branch or don't. | 15:26 |
elopio | at this point, I'm guessing we won't land it. | 15:26 |
brendand | elopio, isn't that card for sanity tests? | 15:26 |
brendand | elopio, who added it? | 15:26 |
elopio | brendand: no, for ota tests. I did, when I noticed the README made no sense with what we have now. | 15:26 |
brendand | elopio, it shouldn't really be extra then | 15:27 |
brendand | elopio, it's related to a story | 15:27 |
elopio | rhuddie: I would like to have fake upgrades for these tests, but that will take some time to write. | 15:27 |
elopio | brendand: it's related to all the cards, but we forgot to edit it in all the cards. | 15:27 |
elopio | so I made a new one so we didn't forget at the end. I will update it. | 15:28 |
rhuddie | elopio, yes, I agree, some local server would be much better. | 15:29 |
elopio | rhuddie: maybe even a dbus mock. If you agree, I will make the skip on this README test, so it makes sense to say that we should start by flashing an old version. | 15:30 |
elopio | s/README test/README branch | 15:31 |
rhuddie | elopio, yes that sounds good to me. | 15:32 |
brendand | elopio, so with that command the existing tests work but that seems to be a coincidence | 15:32 |
brendand | elopio, since i don't think it actually installs python3-ubuntu-ota-tests | 15:32 |
elopio | brendand: it does. At least, that's what I understand from the docs. | 15:32 |
brendand | elopio, unless of course it's specified as a dependency in a test | 15:33 |
brendand | elopio, and when i do that it it says 'E: Unable to locate package python3-ubuntu-ota-tests' | 15:33 |
elopio | I will try that. | 15:34 |
brendand | 'Note that all test dependencies are then satisā | 15:36 |
brendand | fied by archive packages, unless you explicitly specify locally | 15:36 |
brendand | built .debs with --binary.' | 15:36 |
elopio | brendand: where are you getting that from? | 15:37 |
brendand | elopio, from the adt-run manpage | 15:37 |
elopio | I see. brendand and does that work for you? | 15:37 |
brendand | elopio, i'm trying it | 15:38 |
brendand | elopio, it doesn't seem to do anything though | 15:41 |
elopio | brendand: did you pass the --binary before the build-tree? | 15:49 |
brendand | elopio, strange that makes a difference | 15:50 |
brendand | elopio, now it fails because of read-only | 15:51 |
elopio | brendand: well, it gives a different error :) | 15:51 |
elopio | I will report a bug to adt-run, because it should install the binaries in the tmp. | 15:51 |
elopio | brendand: so for your branch, what about cd into the source directory after switching the user? | 15:53 |
brendand | elopio, i don't actually switch the user | 15:54 |
brendand | elopio, that actually breaks adt-run | 15:54 |
brendand | doing sudo -u in a test script causes it to hang | 15:55 |
elopio | brendand: I know, but like: sudo cd /tmp/blah; sh debian/test/upgrade | 15:55 |
brendand | elopio, i could try that | 15:56 |
elopio | brendand: there's also the option to install fakeroot with a setup command, which I presume is the problem without -B. | 15:56 |
brendand | elopio, yeah | 15:56 |
brendand | elopio, it's a 'pity' pitti is not here | 15:57 |
elopio | and anyway, all this would be temp solutions until we get the bug solved. | 15:57 |
elopio | brendand: also, I think you should report a bug for not being able to switch the user. | 15:58 |
elopio | barry: brendand: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1434163 | 16:50 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1434163 in autopkgtest (Ubuntu) "Can't run tests that require build in a readonly testbed" [Undecided,New] | 16:50 |
barry | elopio: i wonder if i wasn't hitting that bug because i made my root fs writable? | 17:56 |
balloons | la_juyis, fyi, the help app is in the store if you want to check it out on your device. I'm curious again about any video content you might have | 17:56 |
elopio | barry: yes, the problem is that with r/o the fakeroot is not properly installed. | 18:06 |
=== daz is now known as Guest10803 | ||
Guest10803 | I submitted my first merge request! | 19:41 |
Guest10803 | https://code.launchpad.net/~darran-kelinske/music-app/lp_bug_1428454/+merge/253566 | 19:41 |
=== Guest10803 is now known as dazza5000 | ||
dazza5000 | thank you to Nicholas Skaggs for the documentation on how to write autopilot tests! | 19:42 |
alesage | balloons ^^ woo! | 19:44 |
dazza5000 | me happy | 19:44 |
dazza5000 | Is anyone running the ubuntu-calendar-app on vivid? | 20:12 |
dazza5000 | When I try to add a calendar I get this in syslog: Mar 19 15:12:36 localhost gnome-session[1833]: gvfs-open: settings:///online-accounts: error opening location: The specified location is not supported | 20:14 |
dobey | dazza5000: url-dispatcher and all that stuff only works on the phone images with mir currently; tried doing it under unity8 preview session instead? | 20:24 |
dazza5000 | not yet | 20:25 |
dazza5000 | haven't run a unity8 preview session before | 20:25 |
dazza5000 | if you have to make changes to a merge request | 20:49 |
balloons | dazza5000, glad you liked the docs | 20:59 |
Letozaf_ | balloons, hey | 21:09 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!