[06:18] <AskUbuntu_> juju can not work with openstack juno ( trying for 10 days ) | http://askubuntu.com/q/598994
[06:42] <AskUbuntu_> A dead lock cycle when using juju "sync-tools" command , any tips? | http://askubuntu.com/q/599003
[07:06] <AskUbuntu_> how to specify the stream for juju when run juju metadata generate-tools command? | http://askubuntu.com/q/599008
[09:02] <AskUbuntu_> Is it possible to manually start Juju hooks? | http://askubuntu.com/q/599048
[09:59] <apuimedo> gnuoy: ping
[09:59] <gnuoy> hi apuimedo, I'm on the phone at the moment.
[10:00] <apuimedo> gnuoy: ping me at your earliest convenience ;-)
[10:00] <gnuoy> will do
[10:00] <apuimedo> thanks
[10:02] <gnuoy> np
[10:54] <gnuoy> apuimedo, hi there, back now
[10:54] <apuimedo> gnuoy: hi!
[10:55] <gnuoy> o/
[10:55] <apuimedo> did you manage to look at the email I sent to the juju list?
[10:55] <apuimedo> about neutron-api integration
[10:57] <gnuoy> apuimedo, no, I missed that
[10:57] <gnuoy> I'll take a look
[10:58] <apuimedo> thanks
[11:05] <gnuoy> apuimedo, I'm confused about what consumes the midonet.ini  ? Where does it need to go ? On the compute hosts, neutron gateway or api server (or all of them) ?
[11:05] <apuimedo> api server
[11:05] <apuimedo> see: https://code.launchpad.net/~celebdor/charm-helpers/midonet
[11:06] <apuimedo> I already added it for review a couple of days ago ;-)
[11:07] <gnuoy> apuimedo, yes, I saw your mp, I'm trying to understand the architecture.
[11:07] <apuimedo> ;-)
[11:07] <apuimedo> setting 'midonet' as a plugin makes neutron-api point to midonet.ini
[11:08] <apuimedo> and the relation (or config in the other version) writes it
[11:08] <apuimedo> so that neutron-server can use the plugin
[11:22] <gnuoy> apuimedo, I'll give it some thought and get back to you
[11:22] <apuimedo> thanks. Looking forward to that a lot :-)
[14:46] <AskUbuntu_> Using juju with maas worked at first but is now giving 503 error gomaasapi | http://askubuntu.com/q/599157
[15:20] <arosales> apuimedo: Hello
[15:20] <apuimedo> arosales: hi
[15:21] <arosales> apuimedo: I missed your ping yesterday, was there something I could assist with?
[15:22] <apuimedo> well, it was to ask about the email I sent
[15:22] <apuimedo> to the mailing list
[15:22] <apuimedo> I pinged gnuoy about it this morning
[15:26] <arosales> ah so I should look at the list for background info
[15:27] <apuimedo> arosales: well, in the ml there's the link to the two approaches
[15:27] <apuimedo> it's basically a patch to neutron-api
[15:27] <apuimedo> or rather two different alternative patches to achieve an end goal
[15:27] <apuimedo> config vs relations
[15:28] <apuimedo> (I favor the latter)
[15:33] <arosales> gnuoy: would be a good person to give feedback on it
[15:33] <arosales> apuimedo: and it sounds like you gave him a ping
[15:33] <arosales> apuimedo: I'll also check the thread and see if we can give some feedback there. Thanks for the reminder ping here though :-)
[15:33] <apuimedo> I did. He told me he'd think about a bit and get back to me
[15:34] <apuimedo> thanks ;-)
[16:03] <gnuoy> apuimedo, In the long term I think a subordinate charm is probably the answer but we need to review the neutron-api  charm and do some refactoring first. So, please go for the simple config option approach (like n1kv) for the moment
[16:07] <apuimedo> gnuoy: okay. Thanks
[16:07] <apuimedo> So I guess I can submit it for review already, right?
[16:10] <gnuoy> apuimedo, have they been tested in oil ?
[16:10] <apuimedo> oil?
[16:10] <gnuoy> http://partners.ubuntu.com/partner-programmes/openstack
[16:11] <apuimedo> gnuoy: first time I see this :P
[16:24] <hatch> is it possible to execute a hook script in the 'hook environment' manually?
[16:38] <schkovich> @hatch https://jujucharms.com/docs/1.20/authors-hook-debug
[17:02] <hatch> schkovich that doesn't allow you to execute them at any time
[17:12] <apuimedo> gnuoy: https://code.launchpad.net/~celebdor/charms/trusty/neutron-api/midonet_resynced
[17:21] <hazmat> hatch: yes
[17:21] <hazmat> hatch: juju-run
[17:22] <hazmat> hatch: on the unit.. or from a client $ juju run .. its not quite solid for  relation hooks but its usable
[17:23] <hatch> hazmat: does that execute it in the 'hook environment' though?
[17:23] <hatch> or just as a normal user
[17:23] <hazmat> hatch: in a hook env
[17:24] <hatch> oh cool I didn't know that - thanks
[17:24] <hazmat> hatch: somebody a script to the list (stub?) that uses it to dump all relation / config data for a unit
[17:26] <hatch> oh interesting