[05:22] Wonderful. So, plymouth-theme-solar also has the problem with entering a password at the plymouth prompt. [05:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1386005 Ah. [05:27] Launchpad bug 1386005 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "Password not accepted graphical boot for encrypted root system" [Critical,Triaged] [07:54] and there's no way to set keyboard layout ... [07:54] sigh [08:04] bluesabre: so something different for beta 2 :p [08:17] first report for beta2 is a fail lol [08:21] and our 32bit image appears to have failed to build http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/xubuntu/vivid/daily-live-20150324.log [09:32] elfy: sobering news that is [09:36] pleia2, knome: so while i'm personally no big fan of white polos in general, the quality etc of the one shipped to me a few days ago is ok (before and after washing) [10:42] elfy: so we're back to busted images again? [10:49] elfy, I won't be able to do any B2 testing [10:49] I'll still be living like the travels man life until tomorrow night :P [10:50] s/like/the === AuAg is now known as AgAu [11:20] probably won't be on again until late tonight, but if there is anything I need to fix/upload for the images, let me know [11:29] yeah, sry, real busy here too :/ [11:37] bluesabre: I'd not even know why they didn't build [11:51] ochosi, right [11:51] ochosi, what i personally thought when i looked at that and the other polos is the quality of the logo [11:51] ochosi, it's a bit... wonky, isn't it? [11:54] knome: dunno, i mean it's recognizable and likely more durable than other (non-stitched) solutions [11:54] but tbh i haven't really had any first-hand experience with other t-shirts we endorse [11:55] well it isn't really comparable [11:55] keyboard issue on images seems to be global [11:55] elfy, :| [11:55] so that's better than the alternative [11:55] yep [11:56] ochosi, if you put 45 euros to that shirt, would you be happy with the stitch quality? [11:57] knome: it costs 45e? [11:57] yeah.. [11:57] wowza [11:57] that's with shipping (for now) [11:57] 45e is quite wonky for a t-shirt in general [11:57] no matter what's on it [11:57] well it's a polo [11:57] the t-shirts are cheaper [11:58] £33 is about £23 more than I'd pay [11:58] oh no wait [11:58] i'm telling lies [11:58] it's 24 eurs... [11:59] gah, again... [11:59] :) [11:59] it was the hoodie that was 45 euros [11:59] right, that makes a lot more sense [11:59] yep.. [11:59] that it does :p [11:59] so really, what i'm thinking is... [11:59] even if the polo itself was ok [11:59] well it's ok, but 1) i don't like polos and 2) i try not to wear branded clothing in general [11:59] and worth 24 euros [11:59] is the xubuntu logo stitching quality good enough to be worth the price [12:00] and is it good enough for us to consider as an "officially endorsed product" [12:01] the xubuntu logo in the shirt represents xubuntu [12:01] which shirt? [12:01] bluesabre, a sample polo shirt simon has from a vendor who wants to start selling xubuntu polos [12:01] gotcha [12:02] * bluesabre waits for an official xubuntu mug [12:02] gotta run, bbl [12:31] bluesabre, I have no solution for the exo startup notify breakage, so, should the commit be reverted in ubuntu? [14:38] is it just me or did something change again, like everytime i open the xfce terminal its not focused...its very annoying. [14:40] nerdistmonk, yes, it's a known regression [14:40] the other peeve thats bugged me for months now is even with firefox set as default browser, everytime i click a link in a program, it opens in links2. [14:41] brainvvash: well at least they know about it, so that means it will get fixed eventually. [14:42] nerdistmonk, which browser does the terminal command "exo-open --launch WebBrowser" open? [14:43] firefox [14:44] and what does "update-alternatives --config x-www-browser" report? [14:44] ah [14:45] just changed it to firefox [14:45] ah, so not Xfce's fault :) [14:46] not my fault either, thats not exactly a command that one sees walking the beaten path [14:46] lol [14:47] hmmm [14:47] the change did not take. [14:47] do i need to run that as root or something? [14:48] yes [14:48] it's a global setting [14:48] ah [14:48] ok [14:48] thanks [14:50] reboot time for nerdy, brb [14:50] you're welcome [14:51] been running "devel" as a daily driver since november of last year, its been very solid so far. (other than wine being its quirky old self, but thats not xubuntu's fault) [14:51] that's great, and feel free to report any bug you encounter on launchpad [14:52] i usually just come in here and yell "hey who turned out the lights!" :D [14:52] nerdistmonk, reporting to launchpad is better. [14:53] indeed, this is just an irc channel and not a bug tracker :) [14:53] yes knome, but i dont always have time to file formal reports on every little quirk, whereas my xchat is open 24/7 on this machine. [14:53] nerdistmonk, reporting a bug doesn't take much longer than ask about it on this channel [14:54] and when bugs are filed, they are actually trackable and easily findable than in a random irc log [14:56] launchpad looks confusing to me, and it requires me to single out a package which may not always be possible for me. [14:59] anyways need to reboot, i shall return. [15:23] micahg: can I take it from those lines in -release that our 32 not build is something we can not worry about? [15:27] elfy: so it seems [15:27] ta [15:31] knome: I use email search filter on my BUGS folder does the same on the whole :D [15:42] davmor2, but that's based on the bugs reported, not irc logs :) [15:43] nerdistmonk, you can always file a bug against xubuntu-desktop if you don't know what the target package is [15:44] knome: I subscribe to a lot of bugs [15:44] davmor2, i'm not disagreeing with you, i'm saying what you are doing different but still requires the bugs to be filed :) [15:45] knome: oh indeed [15:52] bbl [16:23] pleia2: I assume that's what you wanted [16:25] elfy: yes, perfect :) sharing on twitter, fb and g+ now [16:26] cool [16:28] all done, back to conferencing [18:56] slickymaster, i sent a message to dylan about the slideshow translations (mostly for the current release; he merged jack's changes but didn't update the templates so we need to do another upload for that), but also regarding the future; i also mentioned you will be (or have been) in touch with him about it [20:14] brainvvash: Where's the bug for the xfwm4 focus issue? [20:15] Bah, right after asking I see it, 11545. [20:16] Not quite the same, and that version worked for me, but.. [20:17] evening Unit193 [20:18] Howdy. [20:28] Noskcaj: Hrm, looking into parsedatetime still? [20:29] Unit193, What about it? I've missed/forgotten a bunch of stuff recently [20:29] actually having homework from school makes things harder [20:29] Unit193, https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 [20:29] bugzilla.xfce.org bug 11743 in Helpers "exo-open --launch TerminalEmulator inactive window opens" [Normal,New] [20:30] Noskcaj: lp 1302963, there was another bug that pointed out the exact commits that would fix it, but didn't see it. [20:31] Launchpad bug 1302963 in parsedatetime (Ubuntu) "Calendar() class can not be initialized" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1302963 [20:31] Fix released = utopic, "Supported" trusty has no fix. gcalcli depends on that, and I was and have been considering a SRU for that one as well. [20:31] i've got school holidays in 2 weeks, but i'll see if i can get it before then [20:32] Oh heh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parsedatetime/+bug/1302963/comments/9 [20:32] Launchpad bug 1302963 in parsedatetime (Ubuntu) "Calendar() class can not be initialized" [Medium,Fix released] [20:32] Great ,thanks. [20:32] brainvvash: Thank you. [20:33] brainvvash: You helped me, so https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/exo&id=f7c3f8b27e4da2eae5a3fff621ff2095d5b99364 [20:34] Unit193, ubuntu should do the same [20:35] (1408649 being mine.) [21:16] brainwash: was it you who showed me that git commit for xterminal so xubuntu will be able to start byobu (launcher with spaces) from a panel again? [21:17] If so, is there a chance of getting that fix into 15.04? Pretty please ;) [21:19] Or brainvvash ^ [21:32] I don't know, can you find the bugzilla report? [21:33] dkessel, and I guess that a launchpad report is required too, so that a fix can be prepared for ubuntu