[00:00] <cyphermox> camako: no worries, it's really that I got confused for a bit and worried I had approved this a little too quickly
[08:16]  * Mirv notices both GTK3 and GTK2 on our Qt phone and wonders
[08:18] <seb128> sil2100, Mirv, I do ack the 29 packaging changes just mentioned there ^
[08:23] <seb128> Mirv, none is easy to drop
[08:23] <seb128> Mirv, libqt5gui5 depends on gtk2 for some reason, I guess theming/integration?
[08:24] <seb128> gtk3 is coming from e-d-s
[08:24] <seb128> libaccount-plugin-1.0-0 as well
[08:32] <Mirv> seb128: yeah the gtk2 theme plugin could be separated to its own package. yes, I'm looking at those at the moment and updating bug #1436211 as I go.
[08:33] <seb128> Mirv, I can look at gtk3 if you want, that bug is missassigned btw, that's not a seed issue
[08:33] <Mirv> seb128: it's not, I just assigned it as a "generic touch image related thing"
[08:38] <Mirv> seb128: ok I'm done with the bug. it'd look like a long term thing to me but maybe one piece at a time it'd be possible to get closer to the goal.
[08:39] <Mirv> adwaita-icon-theme, libtimezonemap1..
[08:40] <Mirv> I'll file another bug against qtbase to separate the GTK plugin. I was actually inspired by a Linaro guy who mentioned in passing that Qt 5 depends on GTK2 which holds him from removing GTK2 on desktop...
[08:40] <Mirv> he's filing the Debian bug so I can follow up what Lisandro & co think about it
[08:42] <seb128> cool
[08:50] <Mirv> oh, and thanks for the packaging ack
[08:50] <seb128> yw
[08:54] <seb128> Mirv, I'm unsure why e.g libaccount-plugin-google is installed
[08:54] <seb128> we install account-plugin-google
[08:54] <seb128> which
[08:54] <seb128> Depends: libaccount-plugin-google | ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts
[08:54] <seb128> or we install u-s-s-o-a
[08:54] <seb128> which should be good enough?
[08:58] <seb128> ogra_, ^ do you know why?
[08:59] <seb128> sil2100, Mirv, 17 should be ok to land as well btw
[09:04] <ogra_> seb128, thats only good enough if ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts is seeded or otherwise installed before the dep is looked for
[09:05] <seb128> ogra_, it seems seeded?
[09:07] <ogra_> imgbot, status 147 vivid
[09:07] <imgbot> Status: succeeded, Started: 2015-03-24 16:23:18 UTC, Finished: 2015-03-24 17:21:12 UTC
[09:07] <imgbot> Build URL: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-touch/+build/23346
[09:07] <imgbot> Changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/147.changes
[09:07] <ogra_> lets look at the build log then :)
[09:09] <sil2100> Oh
[09:09] <sil2100> imgbot returns the build urls now?
[09:09] <ogra_> seb128, in tasks the "or" deps are resolved in opposite order, might be thats the issue here
[09:09] <ogra_> sil2100, since it knows the status command :)
[09:09] <sil2100> Oh my ;)
[09:10] <seb128> ogra_, hum, unsure what we need to change then?
[09:10] <ogra_> cjwatson yesterday showed me the json api for livefs builds that i hadnt seen before ... i think i'll port imgbot to use that in the future
[09:10] <sil2100> Unapproved merges, but I'm sure Laney know's what he's doing
[09:10]  * sil2100 forces
[09:10] <ogra_> seb128, switching the order in the deps of the package
[09:11] <seb128> ogra_, would that bring the touch stuff on desktop (e.g just inverse the issue)?
[09:11] <seb128> sil2100, oh, I can approve the merges
[09:11] <seb128> sil2100, just let me know which ones
[09:11] <sil2100> seb128: they're merged already :)
[09:11] <ogra_> i dont know ... but if it really is that, you might just reverse the problem yeah
[09:11] <seb128> sil2100, great ;-)
[09:12] <seb128> ogra_, that seems weird though, alternative depends should work and not pull new thing in if the alternative is seeded
[09:13] <ogra_> well, that is the reason why you can end up with different package sets installed depending if you install a task or a matepackage qith apt
[09:13] <ogra_> *with
[09:13] <ogra_> *meta ...
[09:16] <Mirv> we've had multiple of this a | b problems where either touch or desktop gets hurt
[09:17] <ogra_> iirc one way to solve this is to use add_package in livecd-rootfs' live-build config to explicitly pull your dep in ...
[09:17] <Mirv> luckily the signon-ui-x11 could be just removed from images which resolved the previous one
[09:18] <ogra_>         ubuntu-touch)
[09:18] <ogra_>                 add_package install ubuntu-minimal ubuntu-touch systemd-sysv- packagekit
[09:18] <ogra_>                 COMPONENTS='main restricted universe'
[09:18] <ogra_> i.e. like we force systemd-sysv removal in this line
[09:18] <ogra_> and add packaekit
[09:18] <ogra_> *package
[09:20] <ogra_> that should satisfy the dep ahead of the seed
[09:21] <seb128> can we add ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts there and see if that makes some of the not-wanted binaries drop from the image?
[09:25] <ogra_> seb128, yup
[09:25] <seb128> ogra_, thanks
[09:29] <ogra_> seb128, uploaded ... i'll do a build once it landed and we'll see if it helps, else i'll revert again
[09:29] <seb128> ogra_, thanks!
[09:45] <ogra_> seb128, oops, stuck in beta freeze i fear
[09:46] <seb128> ogra_, yeah, let's see if someone let that through or not
[10:39] <sil2100> ogra_: are daily vivid images disabled?
[10:39] <ogra_> not that i know of
[10:39]  * ogra_ checks crontab
[10:40] <sil2100> I just noticed I don't see a changes file (so maybe it's not built) for this night's image
[10:40] <ogra_> nope
[10:40] <ogra_> oh, the bot had a hiccup ... let me check
[10:40] <sil2100> Ah :)
[10:42] <Mirv> so much spreadsheet to fix again..
[10:42] <ogra_> http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/148.changes
[11:20] <seb128> hum
[11:20] <seb128> where can I see what packages are on the bq stable 20 image?
[11:21] <seb128> or what rtm-proposed image it corresponds to?
[11:45] <ogra_> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/daily-preinstalled/20150324/ i think
[11:45] <ogra_> http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/krillin/index.json has the mapping
[11:46] <ogra_> hmm, image 20 actually had 20150312 for which cdimage doesnt have the log anymore
[11:47] <cjwatson> I'm sure it has the log, but perhaps not the image.
[11:47] <cjwatson> We don't delete logs.
[11:47] <ogra_> cjwatson, sorry, i meant the manifest
[11:47] <cjwatson> That'll be on LP.
[11:47] <ogra_> (which we likely have on LP)
[11:47] <ogra_> right
[11:47] <cjwatson> s/likely/certainly/
[11:48] <cjwatson> Follow links from http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/daily-preinstalled-20150324.log
[11:48] <ogra_> seb128, a quick and dirty shell hack to get the mapping: wget -O- -q http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/krillin/index.json|grep description|uniq
[11:48] <cjwatson> Oh, rather 20150312
[11:48] <ogra_> yeah :)
[11:48] <cjwatson> So http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/daily-preinstalled-20150312.log links to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/ubuntu-touch/+build/22403 for armhf and there you have a manifest
[11:49] <ogra_> yeah
[12:41] <bzoltan_> brendand: I have pushed an update to the UITK landing MR (silo12) the changes does not effect the test results
[12:45] <ogra_> seb128, sorry, i was distracted by other stuff, so adam doesnt want to let the livecd-rootfs change in and wants us to check with germinate first ... i cant really find anything there
[12:46] <ogra_> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-touch.vivid/touch definitely doesnt list anything with "libaccount" in the name
[13:02] <Ursinha> fginther: you beat me to it
[13:03] <fginther> Ursinha, sorry
[13:04] <Ursinha> fginther: no problem :)
[13:04] <fginther> that one is better
[13:05] <seb128> ogra_, thanks for the image info
[13:06] <seb128> ogra_, hum, unsure what to do for the libaccount thing then...
[13:06] <ogra_> yeah, he lets it in anyway now
[13:06] <ogra_> (see -release)
[13:14] <bfiller> sil2100: what's the syntax to sync something from vivid to rtm again?
[13:14] <kgunn> trainguards hey there can someone delete platform-api package from vivid silo 0 ?
[13:14] <sil2100> bfiller: hey
[13:15] <Ursinha> robru: sorry for the highlights :P
[13:15] <sil2100> bfiller: it's "sync:ubuntu,vivid package_names_here"
[13:15] <bfiller> sil2100: thanks!
[13:15] <Mirv> kgunn: sure
[13:15] <sil2100> kgunn: on it
[13:15] <sil2100> ...or not
[13:15] <sil2100> ;)
[13:15] <kgunn> thanks guys!
[13:15] <Mirv> kgunn: done
[13:31] <rvr> camako: Approving silo 13 (mir)
[13:40] <camako> rvr thanks
[13:48] <camako> trainguards, with the freeze in effect, how do we proceed now that silo 13 (Mir) is QA approved?
[13:48] <sil2100> camako: hey
[13:49] <sil2100> camako: we can publish it and then poke the release team for an approval
[13:49] <sil2100> camako: it's a bugfix release, yes?
[13:49] <camako> sil2100, hey. Yeah purely bugfix.
[13:49] <camako> sil2100, thanks, lemme know if you need me to do anything
[13:50] <sil2100> camako: then I'm sure we'll be able to get this approved, let me publish it and poke someone from release
[13:51] <camako> sil2100 ok thanks
[13:58] <camako> "mir is in the abyss"... good one
[14:08] <sil2100> It's in the queue, time to do some poking
[14:16] <cyphermox> sil2100: you tell me when you go for lunch or whatnot so I can pick things up while you're away?
[14:31] <sil2100> cyphermox: sure
[14:32] <sil2100> I should be around for the next 3-4 hours though
[14:33] <cyphermox> ok
[14:36] <ogra_> seb128, seems livecd-rootfs migrated now ... if sil2100 doesnt oppose i'll kick a vivid image
[14:36] <seb128> ogra_, nice!
[14:37] <ogra_> kicked
[14:37] <sil2100> No opposition here
[14:45] <imgbot> [14:55] <sil2100> o/
[14:56] <sil2100> camako: anyway, the mir situation might be a bit more complicated - it might need to stay in the queue
[14:56] <sil2100> As it's seeded in all desktop images
[14:59] <camako> sil2100, ack...  curious... what seems to be the issue? Do I need to do anything?
[15:04] <sil2100> camako: not much we can do, it's all up to the release team
[15:19] <brendand_> ogra_, has there been a recent look at the packages getting seeded in vivid?
[15:20] <brendand_> ogra_, i've just been trying to free some space by removing packages (don't ask) and seen a few things that seem superflouous
[15:20] <ogra_> brendand_, what do you need to know ... there were no massive seed changed, but nobody did a specific audit or anything
[15:20] <ogra_> *changes
[15:26]  * brendand_ thought hud was removed...
[15:27] <sil2100> brendand_: I think the seed was never updated to remove it
[15:28] <sil2100> ogra_, davmor2, jibel, popey, rvr: we're skipping the evening meeting due to nothing to discuss, I suppose 1 update per day is more than enough
[15:28] <popey> ok
[15:28] <jibel> sil2100, +1 to cancel evening meetings
[15:28] <ogra_> sil2100, fine with me
[15:29] <davmor2> sil2100: sure
[15:43] <rsalveti> would indeed be nice to do a bit of seeds cleanup
[15:43] <ogra_> yep
[15:43] <ogra_> rsalveti, i'll put a todo card for me on trello
[15:43] <rsalveti> ogra_: great
[15:43] <ogra_> done
[15:48] <dbarth> o/ trainguards, i have a special request on line 61; to release the last stable update of oxide to RTM
[15:48] <dbarth> it takes a ppa copy to rebuild the package; the FFE clearance is via https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/+bug/1425599/comments/2
[15:48] <dbarth> let me know
[15:48] <ogra_> FFe for RTM ?
[15:55] <dbarth> ah no sorry, that's not even needed; 1.5.5 is already in the vivid image
[15:59] <sil2100> dbarth: looking
[15:59] <sil2100> dbarth: on it
[16:03] <sil2100> dbarth: hm
[16:04] <sil2100> dbarth: so it seems you have overwritten an existing landing (probably caused by some spreadsheet issues again)
[16:10] <imgbot> [16:10] <imgbot> [16:12] <ogra_> seb128, ^^^
[16:12] <ogra_> so it worked
[16:12] <seb128> ogra_, \o/
[16:12] <seb128> ogra_, danke
[16:12] <ogra_> will the images still work though ? :)
[16:13] <seb128> Mirv, ^ one step toward no gtk3 :-)
[16:13] <seb128> ogra_, haha, that's a good question
[16:17] <sil2100> dbarth: can you re-enter your request? Since now it's merged with custom tarball stuff
[16:27] <dbarth> sil2100: ah, indeed; i took the first empty line i found; i will re-enter it
[16:28] <sil2100> Thanks :)
[16:28] <sil2100> The spreadsheet probably did something funny
[16:28] <dbarth> sil2100: line 66; i will let you clean up 61 though
[16:28] <sil2100> dbarth: no worries, thanks
[16:29] <sil2100> dbarth: uh, the line 66 looks wrong :) Shouldn't it have oxide-qt in the source list?
[16:29] <sil2100> dbarth: the testplan seems to be for the custom tarball as well
[16:29] <sil2100> (or maybe just my spreadsheet is broken)
[16:35] <dbarth> uh
[16:37] <dbarth> sil2100: should be better now
[16:42] <sil2100> dbarth: ok, this might take a moment for the copy to happen as I need to rewrite the version
[16:43] <dbarth> sil2100: and the source copy will trigger a 4-6h build anyway :/
[16:43] <sil2100> dbarth: actually, I'll do a source sync ;)
[16:44] <sil2100> Since the same version is in vivid now, right?
[17:25] <dobey> so, we can land stuff again tomorrow in vivid right? and will be able to for the next 3 weeks until final freeze?
[17:25] <dobey> trainguards: ^^
[17:25] <sil2100> dobey: touch components shouldn't be affected by the beta freeze anyway, what packages did you want to release?
[17:26] <dobey> well, things that are on the main ubuntu and derived images, are affected by the freeze right?
[17:27] <dobey> sil2100: i'm just trying to get a clear view in my head of what we can land, and how long until we can't land anything :)
[17:51] <infinity> dobey: After tomorrow, things get slightly less frozen, yes.  The queue will still hold anything that's seeded in images (like mir), but the review process will be light for things that obviously have no real effect on the final release.
[17:52] <infinity> dobey: And anything that isn't on images is sliding in already with no human intervention.
[17:57] <dobey> right
[18:16] <kgunn_> trainguards feel free to blow away and reclaim vivid silo 9...no longer needed
[18:26] <dbarth> o/ trainguards, can i have a reconfig on silo 005 (vivid) ?
[18:33] <sil2100> Hey!
[18:33] <sil2100> kgunn_: what happened? ;)
[18:34] <sil2100> dbarth: on it
[18:34] <kgunn_> sil2100: oh , we consolidated into silo 0....so silo 9 just no longer needed
[18:35] <sil2100> kgunn_: ACK
[18:35] <sil2100> kgunn_: thanks for that :)
[18:49] <dbarth> ty !
[21:19] <rsalveti> cyphermox: sil2100: can you guys check the status of line 53
[21:19] <rsalveti> it's tested and so on, but can't make the status to change to require QA
[21:31] <sil2100> rsalveti: looking at it now
[21:45] <sil2100> rsalveti: a formula in the spreadsheet got removed
[21:45] <sil2100> It's on now
[21:46] <rsalveti> sil2100: thanks
[21:46] <rsalveti> awe_: urfkill will finally show up for QA now ^
[21:47] <awe_> thanks, was this another instance of stuck spreadsheet, or did I miss a step?
[21:48] <rsalveti> awe_: stuck spreadsheet
[21:49] <awe_> k, thanks