[01:34] <darkxst> hi LinDol
[01:45] <darkxst> Noskcaj, bug 1437502
[01:45] <ubot5> bug 1437502 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "nautilus lacking 'new document' in context menu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1437502
[01:46] <darkxst> if thats within your coding abilities ;)
[01:46] <Noskcaj> maybe, will try
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
[02:08] <Noskcaj> darkxst, https://code.launchpad.net/~noskcaj/nautilus/new-document-on-all/+merge/254475
[03:20] <darkxst> Noskcaj, yep thats right, thanks
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== uber is now known as Guest69530
=== Guest69530 is now known as over
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
=== KurtKraut is now known as kurtkraut
=== kurtkraut is now known as KurtKraut
[21:22] <Noskcaj> darkxst, Could you please sync gnome-boxes from debian? Drops a unneeded dep
[21:27] <darkxst> Noskcaj, done
[22:12] <smallfoot-> Why is gedit old version 3.10 instead of 3.12 or 3.14?
[22:14] <darkxst> smallfoot-, its blocked on using gtk header bars
[22:17] <smallfoot-> but Nautilus uses GTK header bars too
[22:41] <darkxst> smallfoot-, nautilus was patched to only use header bars under GNOME
[22:42] <darkxst> gedit should have been done this cycle, but seems to have been overlooked
[22:45] <smallfoot-> I see
[23:01] <allenskd> before I spend an hour or two doing this, it's safe to dd that vivid daily iso into the USB and use it to install in a netbook? :o
[23:03] <smallfoot-> Always be careful with 'dd'
[23:03] <smallfoot-> so you don't dd to wrong device or anything
[23:05] <allenskd> yea, I've yet to have the privilege to experience that feelling (hope to keep it that way!). I always check lsblk before doing anything tho...
[23:06] <smallfoot-> So what do you mean by "safe" ?
[23:06] <smallfoot-> if you you dd correctly to your USB device then that is safe, but ALL data on the USB device will be lost
[23:06] <smallfoot-> dd will over ALL data on the USB device
[23:06] <smallfoot-> will overwrite*
[23:06] <allenskd> as in "will it boot?" I've dd isos from opensuse etc, which didn't work for some reason. debian ones have always worked at least
[23:06] <smallfoot-> dd can't really destroy your USB device though, but it will destroy the data on the USB device
[23:07] <allenskd> i guess I shouldn't have used "safe"
[23:07] <smallfoot-> I don't know if it will boot, but I believe it will...
[23:07] <smallfoot-> I run Ubuntu daily on my x86 desktop PC and it works fine
[23:07] <smallfoot-> I don't know anything about no netbook though
[23:07] <smallfoot-> some netbooks are weird, the old netbooks are 32-bit only, not 64-bit
[23:08] <smallfoot-> also some netbooks have broken UEFI implementations that doesn't handle 64-bit well, I believe I heard
[23:08] <allenskd> ah.... I totally forgot about that, better get that 32bit iso then
[23:09] <smallfoot-> yeah, but that may or may not apply to your netbook
[23:09] <smallfoot-> I don't know what your current OS on your netbook is, and I don't know if your current OS is 32-bit or 64-bit
[23:09] <allenskd> it does. this one doesn't have a 64bit capable cpu :/ now that I remember it still has debian jessie 32bit installed
[23:10] <smallfoot-> and I don't know if your netbook is ARM or Intel Atom, and if its Baytrail or which Atom
[23:10] <smallfoot-> yeah, because many netbooks were powered by the old Intel Atom which was 32-bit only
[23:10] <smallfoot-> nowadays the modern Intel Atom are 64-bit
[23:11] <smallfoot-> but now the netbook concept is pretty dead, but now there are Chromebooks though