[09:53] Does ~ubuntu-core-dev having an email address set mean that its members won't get direct email sent to teams that it is a member of? [09:54] This is a question from #ubuntu-ci-eng - can we add ~ubuntu-core-dev to ~ci-train-ppa-service without causing its members to be spammed with messages from the PPAs? [09:57] Laney: Yes, that email address will prevent that spam. [09:57] But why do you want that team membership? [09:57] We could equally just grant upload permissions using edit-acl, although it's less transparent and has to be done per-silo. [09:58] (Another way for silo configs to diverge.) [09:58] Team seems to make sense, policy questions around devirt PPAs notwithstanding [09:58] cjwatson: ArchivePermission holders also get spammed, I believe. [09:59] Ah, I didn't realise that [10:11] The devirt thing is awkward. It violates the letter of the policy. OTOH (a) core-devs are already highly trusted (b) ci-train silos are monitored quite closely (c) the devirt business is likely to go away within the year anyway [10:11] So I have a hard time making a fuss about it [10:14] Yep, as long as they're not uploading to PPAs that aren't watched I'm not concerned. === JanC is now known as Guest51961 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [20:27] cjwatson: ping - is the git on qastaging open for testing from the general public (for testing, not for production use) [22:12] teward: We're not going to advertise it, but you're welcome to try to break it, and indeed probably can. [22:13] heheh [22:14] wgrant: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1032731 <-- last comment posed the question [22:14] Ubuntu bug 1032731 in Launchpad itself "Support for Launchpad-hosted Git repositories" [Low,In progress] [22:14] Ah, I'm not caught up on bugmail this morning yet. [22:16] wgrant: it's in experimental on qastaging hence the question [22:16] cjwatson posted the comment last, hence the question of testing, but meh [22:16] teward: "in experimental"? [22:16] s/in experimental/in an experimental state via qastaging/ [22:16] wgrant: i'm running crazy today :) [22:17] "Launchpad features experimental support for hosting Git repositories" from https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git [22:17] * teward fails at paraphrasing [22:17] qastaging is public, so using it in reasonable ways is totally fair game. [22:17] right [22:17] It's on qastaging exactly so we can get people to try to break it before we go to prod. [22:17] (like testing only) [22:17] Yep [22:17] wgrant: guess it's time to fill up a git repo with random data and upload it. How's 50 text documents of lorem ipsum count xD [22:18] s/count/sound/ [22:18] Sounds smaller than the kernel :) https://code.qastaging.launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/linux [22:22] heheheh [22:23] i might upload ZNC's source code (already present in the repositories) for kicks, just to test, but it's definitely smaller than the kernel xD [22:23] (it's already git but meh xD) [22:23] wgrant: although the 50 files contains 50MB each of lorem ipsum so..... :P [22:23] stresstest! [22:23] :P [22:24] That's a lot of lorem ipsum :) [22:25] Not planning to advertise it very widely, but I felt confident enough to linkify the bug. The help page is clear enough that it's not for permanent data storage. [22:25] cjwatson: indeed [22:26] wgrant: urgh gedit's lagging creating the first file xD [22:26] 328k lines though :) [22:26] I think the only thing that large individual files will stress-test very much is cgit. [22:26] Haven't switched on syntax highlighting there yet. [22:27] cjwatson: thank god this is just text [22:27] It's also running on a rather small instance to see how it goes. [22:27] wgrant: indeed. [22:27] do you mind if i upload this insanely huge lorem ipsum file just to stress test one massive file? [22:27] lol gedit froze saving it xD [22:27] Feel free. [22:28] cjwatson: if it breaks it's my fault but we learn from it :) [22:28] In the unlikely event that it breaks anything more than trivially we can always nuke the repository manually. [22:28] oh wow this is 47MB already xD [22:28] in one file [22:28] I'd expect git to pack that rather heavily. [22:29] we shall see i had to forcekill gedit xD [22:34] lol i had it crash "Broken pipe" on my end xD [22:34] s/crash/fail/ [22:35] teward: Not during the push? [22:36] wgrant: failed during push on my side, but it looks like there may have been something killing it errantly [22:36] * teward shrugs [22:37] oh, looks like it's my side, my network asploded [22:37] nevermind xD [22:37] guess i should fix it [22:42] wgrant: cjwatson: only thing I can't find is how to see new branches and where they end up :/ [22:43] pushed my (48MB) lorem ipsum and can't find it on the web interface; pushed a 10byte file to a nginx testing branch in my own user space, also missing [22:43] but at least it's accepting the uploads, prompting for SSH keys, etc. [22:48] teward: Right, the web UI is very minimal atm. There's no way to list repositories without using the API. [22:48] teward: Where did you push to? [23:01] teward: https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git does mention that problem, under "known bugs that you don't need to tell us about" :-) [23:01] cjwatson: ack - the page only half loaded due to net issues :) [23:02] cjwatson: looks like the system did accept the huge lorem ipsum file though xD [23:02] without crashing :) [23:03] cjwatson: i was going to upload 50 50MB files but that'd be evil on my system xD [23:03] (that and i accidentally removed the directory xD)