[10:43] <jamespage> any AA's around to action https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron-fwaas/+bug/1413152
[10:44] <jamespage> its a refactoring/package split in neutron that needs to be in main for continued fwaas support.
[10:44] <jamespage> so I'm not sure it even needs a MIR team ack - but I've raised and documented anyway
[11:16] <Daviey> jamespage: Although it is pulled out code from another package, i think it could stil benefit from a MIR review for the packaging aspects.
[11:16] <jamespage> Daviey, fine
[11:17] <jamespage> Daviey, there is also a autopkg test failure in the release team review queue for neutron if you have two ticks....
[11:47] <jamespage> Daviey, ta
[16:44] <cjwatson> infinity: Can we set .manifest back to .manifest.full on cdimage?  A mirror operator was asking about that on #ubuntu-mirrors.  (Perhaps there ought to be something in a process doc about this.)
[16:50] <infinity> cjwatson: Oh, yes, we sure can.
[16:50] <infinity> cjwatson: Done.
[16:55] <cjwatson> infinity: Cool, thanks
[17:33] <infinity> stgraber: Is that you who keeps rejecting and reuploading nova-compute-lxd?
[17:33] <infinity> stgraber: Cause I'm happy to not review it for another week if you have more rejects and reuploads to do. :P
[17:36] <bdmurray> Looking at the pending SRUs webkitgtk has been verified, but there is a "regression" with u-r-u which afaict is due to it trying to get quantal.tar.gz. So I'm of the opinion we should just release webkitgtk. Any objections?
[17:37] <infinity> bdmurray: The autopkgtest state isn't in any way clean enough a baseline to gate migration on, only to inform your decisions.
[17:38] <infinity> bdmurray: So, if it's obvious that A isn't causing B, go for it.
[17:38] <Daviey> infinity: it is me rejecting it, and zul uploading it
[17:39] <infinity> Daviey: Ahh.  Well, are you almost done? :)
[17:39] <bdmurray> infinity: roger
[17:39] <Daviey> infinity: 3rd time is a charm.
[21:37] <coreycb> arges, we have an icehouse sru in the proposed queue that needs a review
[21:38] <arges> coreycb: ok. I'll review it tomorrow if that's alright
[21:38] <coreycb> arges, that's fine, appreciate it
[21:59] <SpamapS> So, how frozen are things for vivid? I have a fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urlgrabber/+bug/1200288 that I'd like to get uploaded and SRU'd to trusty.
[22:17] <infinity> SpamapS: Not that frozen.  Bugfixes are always welcome.
[23:33] <SpamapS> infinity: cool ty, dput'ing now :)