=== greyback__ is now known as greyback
[18:27] <hjd> Hi. Could someone please mark bug 1409877 and bug 1409879 as Triaged/High (program doesn't start)? (I didn't mark them as duplicate since at the end of the day it looks like two different packages will need to be patched, and I thought it would be better to keep them separate for this reason. Though, I'm open for other suggestions too :) )
[18:27] <ubot5> bug 1409877 in mttroff (Ubuntu) "mttroff can't be started: dependency libavg dropped gameapp" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1409877
[18:27] <ubot5> bug 1409879 in sponc (Ubuntu) "sponc can't be started: dependency libavg dropped gameapp" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1409879
[18:28] <teward> hjd: you can also make one bug and file it against multiple packages (thereby having multiple package tasks for the bug).
[18:29] <teward> hjd: i assume you mean for mttroff and sponc for that status?
[18:29] <teward> hjd: other than you has anyone else confirmed the bug?
[18:30] <teward> (I'll set importance in the mean time)
[18:30] <teward> oop nevermind i can't read xD
[18:30] <hjd> teward: Yes, I meant for mttroff and sponc.
[18:30] <teward> done
[18:30] <teward> hjd: not sure if it's a bug against libavg though - if they dropped it upstream for good reason, well...
[18:30] <teward> (not my say though)
[18:31] <teward> i've set triaged/high for mttroff and sponc on those bugs, although if the cause is the same then probably one bug against all the packages would work in the future xD
[18:34] <hjd> I see your point on libavg. I intially added it because it looked like something had changed in the dependency ie python-libavg which made the programs fail to start. This was before I found that the file had been removed alltogether from libavg upstream.
[18:34] <teward> hjd: then "Invalid" or "Won't Fix" is my gut feeling on libavg but that's not something i'm going to poke at
[18:40] <hjd> teward: Or I guess I could remove the "also affects libavg" (if I figuered out how)
[18:48] <hjd> teward: Thought about it, and marked the libavg tasks as invalid now. I guess that makes the most sense.
[18:48] <hjd> Thanks for marking them Triaged :)
[18:50] <teward> hjd: i think both those tasks are restricted to bugcontrol and all
[18:50] <teward> hjd: comment as to why you set invalid though
[18:52] <hjd> Yes, I did.
[19:06] <hjd> Another question: anyone have a suggestion for how to proceed with bug 1315678? The issue is fixed in Vivid, but that's because phpunit's dependencies had their dependencies updated, which of course adds up to multiple packages.
[19:06] <ubot5> bug 1315678 in phpunit (Ubuntu) "PHPUnit depends on Apache" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1315678
[19:08] <hjd> I'm mostly thinking about if people would want/request the fix for current releases. I guess SRU is out for not being a minimal patch...
=== meetingology` is now known as meetingology