[01:35] <rick_h_> stokachu: around?
[01:36] <stokachu> rick_h_: hey
[01:37] <rick_h_> stokachu: sorry, wifi acting up and laggy
[01:38] <rick_h_> stokachu: just heads up, will reply to the bug, really intresting 
[01:38] <rick_h_> stokachu: are you or anyone in your area in nuremberg?
[01:38] <stokachu> rick_h_: nah closest is london
[01:38] <rick_h_> stokachu: as it's something I'd like to chat/hash out some more
[01:39] <rick_h_> stokachu: ok, well will start a conversation in the bug but might be worth setting up something more face to face on the whole idea 
[01:39] <rick_h_> more long term
[01:39] <stokachu> rick_h_: ok, whats the bug number again?
[01:39]  * stokachu being lazy
[01:40] <rick_h_> stokachu: 1440228
[01:41] <stokachu> rick_h_: ah yea was talking to david about that earlier
[01:41] <stokachu> rick_h_: though did you mean to mark it invalid?
[01:42] <rick_h_> stokachu: yea, but let me write up my giant reply
[01:42] <stokachu> rick_h_: ok cool
[01:42] <rick_h_> stokachu: basically I was ping'ing to warn "yes I'm marking invalid atm on the juju-gui, but interesting idea and let's start a conversation"
[01:42] <stokachu> rick_h_: cool man sounds good
[01:42] <rick_h_> and curious if I should setup a session in nuremberg on this some more 
[01:42] <rick_h_> or if we should chat via email, a list, or something else
[01:43] <rick_h_> anyway, conversation starting, ty for the bug because it's an important idea. 
[01:43] <stokachu> rick_h_: cool once you reply ill provide some more context where this came up
[01:48] <rick_h_> stokachu: ok, on the way
[01:48] <stokachu> cool thanks
[01:48] <rick_h_> stokachu: feel free to move to an email on the juju or canonical-juju lists if you want to open it up more or just myself if you think I'm nuts
[01:49] <stokachu> haha ok
[01:55] <stokachu> rick_h_: cool i like those approaches
[01:55] <stokachu> rick_h_: i updated the bug with some more information
[01:55] <rick_h_> stokachu: sounds good
[01:55] <stokachu> thanks
[01:56] <rick_h_> stokachu: and we can help file bugs/facilitate tooling updates to charm tools that provides charm get command
[01:56] <rick_h_> stokachu: and we're working with core on bundles in core so we'll bring this into that conversation/specs that are being worked on
[01:56] <stokachu> rick_h_: cool that'll be awesome
[01:56] <stokachu> ill take a look at charm tools while that work is going on
[01:58] <rick_h_> marcoceppi_: https://github.com/juju/charm-tools can't be the latest charm-tools?
[02:01] <rick_h_> stokachu: https://launchpad.net/charm-tools looks later
[02:01] <stokachu> ok looking at that now
[02:02] <rick_h_> stokachu: the interesting part for supporting bundle get is http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~charm-toolers/charm-tools/1.6/view/head:/charmtools/get.py
[12:45] <marcoceppi_> rick_h_: it's not, charm-tools is hosted on lp
[12:47] <marcoceppi_> I guess we should probably move it to lp eventually