/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/04/04/#ubuntu-server.txt

=== mrt333_ is now known as mrt333
=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away
=== markthomas is now known as markthomas|away
zhhuabjhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lhvp2-fbW8rezaipQklk3tzU7mIefH3J2UUFUW5Dv24/edit#02:29
zhhuabjsorry, type error02:30
zhhuabjpls ignore it02:30
sarnoldyou may wish to check the ACLs on your doc to make sure it is properly restricted02:31
=== markthomas|away is now known as markthomas
=== markthomas is now known as markthomas|away
brianw__anyone here use lxc for samba ad dc containers && ctdb/glusterfs samba dfs file servers (containers) ??03:48
=== brianw__ is now known as brianw
brianwmy nick is brianw03:49
brianw:)03:49
=== CripperZ is now known as cripperz
=== zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte
arcskyhello09:40
arcskyi have empty files messages/syslog. what can i do about it?09:40
=== PaulW2U_ is now known as pw2
samba35i am trying to confiugre mail /web server @home ,i am able to send email but i am not sure how pop3/pop3s  to be configure10:57
samba35i am behind a firewall /utm /pop proxy for spam and antivirus and other thing ,if i have to use ssl certificate do i have to use my own certicate  (create with openssl )10:57
=== bilde2910|away is now known as bilde2910
samba35using ubuntu 14.04.211:01
bekkssamba35: "Yes."11:02
samba35bekks: thanks11:12
samba35if i am using  proxy /relay do i have to use that proxy's certificate ?11:12
bekksNo, since you want to configure your own mailserver, not the proxy server.11:13
samba35my ubuntu mail server is behind utm/firewall /proxy11:14
samba35in that case do i have to use that utm/firewall/proxy's certificate ?11:15
samba35or i have to use dovecot's certificate11:15
samba35my mail server use relay to deliver mails11:16
=== pw2 is now known as Paulw2U
pi-I'm seeking to remotely (from my MacBook) modify files in my VFS's /var/www/html.  I'm looking at using sshfs to do a remote mount. I can get it working for mounting ~ but not /var/www/html13:12
pi-sshfs  pi@46.101.38.186:/home/pi  ~/RemoteFS/droplet_home    <-- works, asks me for my remote pi password13:13
pi-sshfs -o allow_other root@46.101.38.186:/var/www/html ~/RemoteFS/droplet_webroot   <-- asks me for my remote root password, but rejects it even though I know I'm typing it in correctly13:13
pi-ah I have disabled remote root access!13:14
pi-d'oh13:14
pi-So what I'm wondering is whether I can move everything from /var/www/html to say ~/web, and symlink13:15
pi-Does this sound sane?13:15
Jareremote root..grrr13:26
Jarechange the file owner/group for that dir+files, just ensure that the webserver has permissions to access the files...13:27
pi-I've just done `sudo mv /var/www/html/wiki ~/web/` -- now I need to do something like `sudo chmod -R u+w ~/web` so that user has write-access. But that doesn't seem to have had any effect.13:30
pi-`ls -l web/`  displays  "drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Apr  3 15:56 wiki"   -- it is failing to set the middle '-' to 'w'.13:31
pi-I'm guessing this is because by doing `sudo`, my 'u' is now going to be root13:32
pi-Just reading up, the owner of that folder is root.  So I think I need to be changing the owner to pi.13:34
pi-`sudo chown -R pi web;  sudo chmod -R u+w web;  ls -l web/`  still prints out "drwxr-xr-x 14 pi root 4096 Apr  3 15:56 wiki"13:36
pi-I do notice everything in ~/web/wiki now has ??w ??? ??? permissions. I've just realised I didn't want to do that. heh. Lucky I took a backup.13:38
sergeyHow to setup mail sever on vps?13:51
VoyageHi14:52
VoyageI have googled a lot and found no answer workable answer to this question: How to downgrade from php 5.5.9 to php 5.4?14:52
tewardVoyage: manual compilation of php 5.4 and removal of the version installed from the repositories, likely15:01
Voyageteward,  if I install php5 manually, it wont be connected to apt-get anymore and I would not be able to install modules and auto integrate them with apache etc?15:01
tewardprobably not, no.15:02
tewardVoyage: why do ou need 5.4 anyways15:02
tewardit's "old"15:02
Voyageya, some app requires it.15:02
teward'some app'15:02
tewardthe app needs updating15:02
Voyageteward,  sugarcrm7.515:02
Voyageok, how about I downgrade/change repository, install php5.4, lock the php5.4 version, change repository to latest again in sources. update?15:03
tewardVoyage: still going to be stuck on bad module versions - the modules would've been updated for the version in the repositories, not the version you've installed15:04
tewardVoyage: i can't believe that sugarcrm doesn't provide an update package for newer PHP, after all they are kinda bound to PHP upstream's versions, soon enough 5.4.x will probably burn15:04
Patrickdkhow did you get php 5.5.9?15:04
Patrickdk14.04 is 5.415:04
Patrickdkor it is 5.5 isn't it?15:04
* Patrickdk is going braindead15:04
tewardPatrickdk: it's 5.515:05
=== cryptodan is now known as cryptodan_laptop
Patrickdkya, so many issues with php 5.5, expectially from zend15:05
Patrickdkit's one thing to have app support for 5.5, it's another when php people can't make support for 5.5 so you can support 5.515:06
Voyageteward,  so is there a proper solution?15:06
Patrickdkvoyage, it's simple15:06
Patrickdkyou just rebuild the 5.4 or 5.3 php packages for your release15:06
Voyagerebuild the 5.4 ?15:07
VoyagePatrickdk,  what do you mean? how?15:07
PatrickdkI am not going go into how15:07
Patrickdkas I don't feel like holding your hand for the next x hours to do it15:07
VoyagePatrickdk,  rebuild manually without apt and repositories?15:07
Patrickdkthat is what google is for and all the webpages that tell you15:07
Patrickdkwhy would you do that?15:07
VoyagePatrickdk,  dont worry, I would do the research. just tell me what do you mean by "rebuild"15:08
PatrickdkI never said not to use apt, or repos15:08
tewardVoyage: the alternative is to rebuild the debian package - get the older version from Debian or the last version in Ubuntu repositories to have 5.4, rebuild.15:08
tewardthe tricky part is a LOT of the php modules in the repositories aren't exactly in the php5 source package15:08
Patrickdkanything that touches php will likely need to be rebuilt15:09
Patrickdkbut likely, you don't use a lot of them15:09
maxbThough, to be fair, for a complex package like PHP, rebuilding a different series package probably isn't something someone who hasn't previously worked with Debian packaging wants to confront15:09
Patrickdkso probably php base, and 2-3 other packages15:09
Patrickdkmaxb, why?15:09
Patrickdkrebuilding php is extreemly simple15:09
tewardPatrickdk: apache might hate it15:09
Patrickdkteward it shouldn't at all15:10
Patrickdkcan't think of a single thing apache would hate about it15:10
tewardPatrickdk: you'd still need to apt-pin the version down - otherwise it'll just overwrite again15:10
tewardrebuilding also requires a build environment for it15:10
Patrickdkno15:10
Patrickdkfor version, just add a 1: infront of the version, done15:11
Patrickdkor pin it, but that can be annoying15:11
tewardrebuilding it as should be done needs the build environment unless you want to install all the build dependencies15:11
Patrickdkrebuilt it in a ppa15:11
Patrickdkno build env needed15:11
VoyagePatrickdk,  teward  what do you both mean by "rebuild" and what involvment would the repos have in it?15:11
tewardPatrickdk: there's probably a reason the person who had the php oldstable PPA stopped after 13.1015:11
tewardi could ask, but i wonder if it's because build deps might be to 'new' or such15:12
PatrickdkI don't know, could look15:12
Patrickdkpersonally I build my own apache and php's15:12
tewardran into the problem for the znc package, in a PPA, as well, older than 14.04 you have to go grab additional PPAs for g++, have to backport things, etc.15:12
Patrickdkbeen a requirement for years15:12
tewardbut the reverse can be true also, build deps drop things that're needed, problems arise, etc.15:12
Patrickdkhttps://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading15:14
Patrickdkbest overview url I can locate :(15:14
Patrickdkbut that is more about uploading15:14
Patrickdknot really rebuilding15:14
tewardPatrickdk: needs a launchpad account, PGP keys uploaded, etc.  -  not for the faint of heart either15:14
Patrickdkseems most people just post how to rebuild locally15:14
Patrickdkheh, that isn't hard15:14
Patrickdkand it makes distribution so much easier15:15
Patrickdkand updating15:15
Patrickdkvs attempting to make your own local repo15:15
tewardPatrickdk: didn't say squat about local repo xD15:15
VoyagePatrickdk,  teward  what do you both mean by "rebuild" and what involvment would the repos have in it?15:22
tarvidinstalling 14.04 on a dell r410 with one 160 gb drive and two 500s. Can install first on the 160 as LVM and then add the 500s?15:24
tarvidmake thar r31015:24
Walextarvid: why not?15:25
Voyagewhat will this do sudo sed -i.bak "s/trusty/precise/g" /etc/apt/sources.list ?15:25
tarvidthe two 500s are now set up (maybe0 with ESXi, can I just blow those away15:25
PatrickdkVoyage, that will cause LOTS of breakage15:26
VoyagePatrickdk,  hm. but what would this do ?15:26
Patrickdkhopefully? nothing, except not let you update/security patch/...15:27
Patrickdkit will attempt to download/install from 12.04 instead of 14.0415:27
VoyagePatrickdk,  you mean, it will change repositories to old ones?15:28
tewardVoyage: lots and lots of damage, it'd set your sources to use Precise instead of Trusty and break a ton of things15:28
VoyagePatrickdk,  how about I use sudo sed -i.bak "s/trusty/precise/g" /etc/apt/sources.list , install php 5.4 old version, lock it, and then change to new repositories?15:29
Voyageteward,  ^15:29
Patrickdkwhy do all that?15:30
Patrickdkwhy not just INSTALL 12.0415:30
Patrickdksince your doing the same thing, but making it much much more broken that way15:30
VoyagePatrickdk,  ya, but I already have a server assembled with latest ubuntu15:31
Voyageubuntu should provide a way.........15:31
Patrickdkit does provide a way15:32
Patrickdkyou can download it, rebuild it, and distribute it15:32
Patrickdkubuntu does will not support it, so there is no point in them doing it15:32
VoyagePatrickdk,  ok. when you say "download it" do you mean downloading a .deb package and installing it???15:32
Patrickdkno15:33
VoyagePatrickdk,  then?15:33
VoyagePatrickdk,  what do you meant? download what?15:34
Voyagerebuild what?15:34
VoyagePatrickdk,  teward  come one people, whats so hard about it? what do you guys actually mean. I am having trouble understanding the terminology here. What is it suggested to be downloaded? if its not a .deb. what is it?15:36
Voyagea .gz.tar?15:36
Voyageare you guys talking about compiling it from source?15:36
maxbEffectively, yes.15:38
maxb"ubuntu should provide a way" you say - well, it'd be more convenient for you, sure, but maintaining multiple versions of software increases the burden of support on Ubuntu quite significantly15:40
maxbIt's easy to see why it's not considered an efficient use of developer and tester time15:41
Patrickdkthis *is* something rhel does15:43
Patrickdkthough, only lately15:43
Voyagemaxb,  hm15:44
Voyageok. I tried this: is it a good way despite error? I tried this but its not working. echo "deb http://php53.dotdeb.org stable all" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list                    Err http://php53.dotdeb.org stable/all i386 Packages              W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/php53.dotdeb.org_dists_stable_all_binary-amd64_Packages  Invalid file format15:44
Voyage why doesnt this works? echo "deb http://php53.dotdeb.org stable all" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list15:46
maxbYou appear to now be using some site's pre-built packages of a different PHP version. The fact that what you've said includes 'stable' rather than any Ubuntu codename strongly suggests you're trying to use something targetting Debian on your Ubuntu system. If it works at all, it'll be more by luck than intention15:47
Voyagemaxb,  hm. ok is there ANY way to install / php 5.4 by a repository and lock the upgrade?15:48
maxbNo, unless you find someone who is specifically building such a repository.15:49
Voyageso  http://php53.dotdeb.org stable all wont work. and what about pool?  http://snapshot.debian.org/package/php5/5.4.39-0%2Bdeb7u2/15:51
Voyagemax?15:52
maxbNow you're just randomly grasping at irrelevant links you happen to find15:52
Voyagebecause I cant find a usefull one15:53
Voyagemaxb,  I really wonder what does the "rebuilding" means when Patrickdk  and teward  say it but do not explain it15:54
maxbThe notion of compiling software?15:54
Voyagefrom source?15:55
Voyagelike in a gz.tar?15:55
Voyagemaxb,  thats what Patrickdk  and teward  dont tell..........15:55
maxbWell, yes, from what else would you build software? That's (by us) assumed to be not worth mentioning.15:57
Voyagewhy I am getting the error? sudo deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150329T213024Z/       sudo: deb: command not found15:58
maxbSorry, it looks like you're looking for something (namely, pre-built packages of a specific version of PHP matched to a specific version of Ubuntu) that doesn't seem to exist because no-one has made that15:58
Voyagemaxb,  hm. so if I installed php 5.4 by dpkg -i .deb or build it from source, I would not have the advantage to manage related modules / integration by repository and apt-get?15:59
maxbYou're getting that error because you typed some meaningless string into a shell16:00
maxbWith sudo at the start, no less. You probably want to be a bit more careful about what you run as root16:00
maxbRight, you don't get the advantages of a supported repository of integrated software if no supported repository of integrated software exists for the combinations of versions you want to use16:01
Voyagehm16:01
Voyagemaxb,  I followed http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17128602/apt-get-identify-all-old-version-numbers-of-a-package           answer 1. I wonder what should be replaced for     "deb http:// ......"16:02
Voyagethis is the correct sudo echo "deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150329T213024Z/ stable all" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list16:07
maxbNo, in so many ways16:08
Voyage..16:08
Voyageit just adds the repo. doesnt it16:08
Voyageto sources.list16:09
maxbSo the first thing which is wrong with it is you're trying to add a Debian package source to an Ubuntu system - which, granted, is something that *might* work *sometimes*, but really if you're resorting to that you should just build from source rather than just hoping for compatibility16:11
maxbThe second thing that is wrong is 'sudo echo' -- why would you bother sudo-ing a command that doesn't require any kind of elevated privileges?16:12
maxbThe third thing which is wrong is that you're trying to use snapshots of the Debian stable release, which is pretty much static anyway, so makes no sense16:13
Voyagehm16:14
Voyagemaxb,  i guess to write inside /etc   would require a root16:15
maxbIn the interests of trying to work this conversation around to a more productive direction, let me summarize: You really want something pre-made. But you've searched for some time and it doesn't seem to exist. It's probably best to accept that and reconsider your direction.16:15
maxbYes but that command isn't writing inside /etc -  which you seem to have partially recognized since you do have the actually relevant sudo before tee16:16
maxbAs far as I can see your options are basically: 1) Use the PHP 5.5 that ships with current Ubuntu releases, or 2) Compile PHP 5.4 from source16:18
Voyagehmm16:18
Voyagemaxb,  the only thing I get afraid is if I install php5.4 by source. many modules like sudo apt-get install php-curl or others  that integrate with apache auto matically will be a big headache for me16:20
Voyagemaxb,  am I correct?16:20
Voyageas a side error: W: Failed to fetch http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150329T213024Z/dists/stable/Release  Unable to find expected entry 'all/binary-amd64/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)16:20
maxbYou won't be able to install modules with apt-get to work with a PHP built from source16:21
maxbThough many modules are shipped as part of the main PHP source tarball, and will build with it if the relevant library dev packages are available.16:24
maxbSome may need additional flags passed to PHP's configure script to enable16:24
Voyagemaxb,  thats the headache16:26
Voyagemaxb,  ok. which ubuntu version ships with php 5.4/16:26
Voyage?16:26
maxbNone which are currently still supported16:26
Voyage12.  something?16:27
Patrickdk12.04 is 5.316:28
Voyagewhats for 5.4?16:29
maxbSome releases between 12.04 and 14.04 shipped with 5.4, however all such releases have passed their End of Life16:29
Voyagemaxb,  its 13 then?16:31
Voyagemaxb,  i see amazon has 64-bit ubuntu/images/ebs/ubuntu-quantal-12.10-amd64-server-20140202 - ami-006a0930        option to launch instance16:32
Patrickdkthat would be unwise16:35
maxbI'm quite deliberately not saying the exact version number because I can't consider deploying something afresh on an OS version that has already reached EOL to be a sensible move16:36
Voyageunwise? why? because its old?16:36
Patrickdkcause it is NOT MAINTAINED16:36
Patrickdkyou will NEVER get securty updates for it16:36
Patrickdkit already has known vulnerabilities16:36
Voyagehm16:36
Voyageso best solution is to compile by source or dpkg -i deb php.5.416:37
VoyageIam going for the later16:37
VoyageI never compiled anything fromsource16:37
Voyageatleast a deb would be installed auto on default locations16:37
VoyageI guess centos maintins versions16:37
Patrickdkcentos doesn't maintain anything16:38
Patrickdkthat is the whole point of centos16:38
Voyagewho does ?16:39
maxbCentOS is an exercise in de-branding and rebuilding mostly unmodified source from RHEL16:39
Voyagemaxb,  am. this resulted in a promising message; add-apt-repository ppa:ondrej/php516:41
Voyagehm16:45
Voyageah. no use. my apt policy is still the same16:54
Voyagehaving 5.916:54
Voyagegoing for db16:54
Voyagedeb16:54
tewardVoyage: php 5.4 is in his oldstable ppa16:57
tewardVoyage: but that isn't updated past 13.1016:57
tewardread: https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/php5-oldstable16:57
tewardVoyage: 12.10 had 5.4, but it's not supported.  12.04 + ondrej's php5-oldstable PPA would give you 5.416:58
tewardbut no guarantees on it having everything you need16:58
tewardI remember 12.10 getting 5.4, 'cause one of my patches made it into Debian's packaging to switch php5-fpm from a TCP listener to a linux socket16:58
tewards/linux socket/unix socket/16:58
Voyageteward,  i see16:59
PatrickdkI just normally change it to socket myself16:59
Patrickdknice the default is that way though16:59
tewardPatrickdk: indeed, it changed with 5.4rc1 iirc16:59
* teward pulls the Debian changelog16:59
Patrickdkthis php 5.5 issue is the ONLY reason I haven't upgraded customer facing machines to 14.04 yet17:00
Patrickdkbut that isn't so much a ubuntu issue, as it is zend/php17:00
Voyageso whats the easiest way to install and maintain 5.4? where to download. source or .deb? where from"?17:00
=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away
tewardPatrickdk: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650204 is the bug where it was changed.  Thanks to Clint Byrum (SpamapS) for helping get that patch up to debian back when I wasn't as fluent as I am now xD17:01
tewards/bug/php5-fpm listener/17:01
tewardPatrickdk: i don't know if they've reversed it... but i could check xD17:01
Patrickdkoh nice, zend JUST released support for php 5.5 a few days ago17:02
Patrickdkthat only took 2+ years17:02
tewardwow my vivid vm is outdated o.o17:03
tewardoh well17:03
tewardPatrickdk: yep, php5-fpm still listens on a socket by default :P17:04
Voyagecan anyone tell where to download (I just want to do it wrong experiments)17:05
Patrickdkand it looks like it has backlog support now17:06
PatrickdkVoyage, there is none17:06
Patrickdkyou have to create it yourself17:06
Patrickdkno one yes has cared enough, to attempt it17:06
Patrickdkor maybe have, but gave up17:06
tewardI may be willing to try and grab Quantal's package and repackage for trusty in a PPA, but I won't go past one attempt17:07
tewardi'm lazy after all xD17:07
Patrickdktried, the configure script is horrible17:07
tewardquantal was the last version to support 5.4 anyways17:07
Patrickdk5.4 configure might be better17:07
tewardPatrickdk: um... i meant the actual 5.4 package17:08
tewardthat was in quantal, try and forward port it17:08
tewardxD17:08
Patrickdkbut there have been new security patches CVE's that need to be ported to it17:08
tewardblah17:09
tewardi hate 5.417:09
tewardwhy can't app devs actually update their things17:09
tewardPatrickdk: i could just pull 5.4.39 from upstream17:09
Patrickdkyep17:10
tewardtry and wrap the 5.4 debian/ around it from quantal17:10
tewardbut still17:10
VoyagePatrickdk,  no I mean, how to install php 5.4 from source? what you call rebuild17:13
Patrickdkthose are two totally different things17:14
Patrickdkinstall from source, just follow php's instructions17:14
VoyagePatrickdk,  which link?17:14
Patrickdkphp.net17:14
tewardPatrickdk: and I give up - there's too much of a delta17:16
teward(half the patches fail17:17
Patrickdk:)17:17
tewardcould try ondrej's source but i'm lazy as i said earlier17:18
tewardooo wait there's build fails there that's why17:19
tewardnevermind17:19
=== shirgall is now known as Guest48450
VoyageI just installed php by source. apache is not displaying my .php files (its showing blank pages ) what can be wrong?     apache does not knows if php is isntalled.I gues19:16
replmanHi! I have a cronjob that executes a backup script as user 'backupchef'. In backupchef's home/.ssh i have id_rsa.pub for ssh. When executing the script manually logged in as backupchef, it works. When cron executes the script i get a password failed from the ssh.19:17
bekksVoyage: You downgraded your php5 installation manually, as OerHeks just told in #ubuntu?19:21
Voyageya.19:21
VoyageI have php 5.419:21
Voyagebut it should run19:21
Voyageas it is a php...19:21
bekksLOL, no :)19:21
Voyageits just not installed by a repository19:21
Voyagethats the only difference19:22
Voyageright?19:22
Voyageor no?19:22
bekksAs it is PHP, it is more a matter of star constellation, water temperature and some voodoo.19:22
bekksIn #ubuntu you just made sure that /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp5.so is missing.19:22
Voyagebekks,  so what do I need to do?19:29
bekksLooks like you need to build the missing modules as well.19:30
bekksCant you just use a more recent php version from the repos?19:30
Voyagenop19:34
Voyagebekks,  which modules? modules on apache side or php side?19:34
bekksVoyage: You are missing the php module for apache.19:35
Voyagehm19:35
Voyageok  how to uninstall php that I installed by source?19:37
bekksPlease keep it in one channel :)19:37
Voyageok19:37
Voyageisnt it the same channel?19:37
Voyageoh. yes. messages dont pass19:38
Voyagerigth19:38
bekksNo. This is #ubuntu-server, while you are in #ubuntu, too :)19:38
Voyageops19:38
replmanok, got my script to work with cron.19:39
r0xHi. I'm configuring a server and for some reason I want that a certain user can only view a particular folder and that can execute only a set of program/commands (e.g.: I don't want that user X can execute ifconfig, ip, ps and even ping). How I can do that?19:51
r0xI have already asked to #ubuntu channel19:51
bekksr0x: The answers are the same as in #ubuntu ;)19:52
r0xok, but after I do chroot a certain user can still execute all the commands available on my system?19:54
r0xsuch trying to ping other hosts on the network19:54
r0xbekks: he can execute only the commands that are available in the bin folder that I create in the chroot environment?19:57
bekksThats what a chroot is for.19:57
bekksBut you cannot hid /proc and /sys from the user. Your chroot will be dysfunctional.19:58
r0xuhm19:58
r0xso i should create a vm?19:58
JanCyou could use containers to get even more protection19:58
JanCwithout needing a VM19:59
bekksr0x: A VM will not help you from hiding /proc and /system.19:59
bekksAnd containers dont, too.19:59
r0xok, but if someone see /proc and /system of the vm I don't care19:59
r0xI only want to hide the configuration of the real machine19:59
r0xJanC: with containers I can do what I asked for?20:00
JanCalso, to prevent people from executing certain applications, you only need to set/revoke permissions?20:01
=== Guest48450 is now known as shirgall
r0xJanC: I don't understood when you said "you only need to set/revoke permission?"20:08
JanCr0x: you can set different permissions depending on the user?20:20
JanCor group20:20
r0xno20:20
JanCetc.20:20
r0xSame for all20:20
JanC?20:20
r0xI don't need that kind of flexibility20:21
JanCeh?20:21
JanCyou were asking for it...20:21
r0xI just have a set of users that have the same permission20:22
JanCthat sounds like a "group"20:22
r0xYes20:22
JanCso use it20:23
r0xI found this on the internet: https://openvz.org/Main_Page20:24
bekksr0x: Seeing /proc and /sys will enable users to find out a lot about the effective configuration of the host.20:24
bekksr0x: openvz are containers - and they still reveal a lot about the configuration of the host.20:24
=== bilde2910 is now known as bilde2910|away
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte
=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!