[01:51] <ircfox> how do I change the default ssh port 22 to another?
[06:32] <verdeP> edit the config file in /etc
[06:33] <verdeP> i dont see the point though
[06:35] <verdeP> then restart the service of course
[08:34] <lordievader> Good morning.
[12:39] <strikov> rbasak: \o/
[16:54] <chanced> I'm setting up a home server for a file server and a dev box but I'm stumped with whether or not my DD-WRT should be the one to handle DNS / DHCP or if it should act as a pass-through to the server.
[17:04] <teward> chanced: dd-wrt is your router that controls data flow to the internet and such?
[17:04] <chanced> teward: yea
[17:04] <teward> chanced: and this isn't behind a NAT interface in a VM, it's on an actual server connected to said router?
[17:05] <chanced> baremetal to said router
[17:05] <teward> it should be handling the DHCP then, unless you set static IP.  as for DNS, either the router can forward it out to the net or you can just let the data pass right outside, although if the server is going to be web facing i'd be careful letting it just pass right out to the net
[17:06] <teward> if it's staying behind NAT/port forwarding then whether it reaches out for DNS to servers its set for or if it goes via your router, not sure if it matters
[17:06] <chanced> it does, thanks
[17:07] <teward> it does what, web facing, or...?
[17:08] <chanced> matters
[17:08] <chanced> i hadn't considered the concerns there; i was tempted to expose a number of the services but I'm second guessing that
[17:08] <teward> mmm
[22:44] <beanbag> I have a bdr solution from datto that uses a ubuntu 10.04 image but uses a 3.0.0 kernel
[22:44] <beanbag> lsi has a sas driver for 3.0.0 kernel but it's for ubuntu 11
[22:44] <beanbag> any reason it wouldn't work
[22:46] <sarnold> beanbag: man, both ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 have been unsupported for ages; is there any reason why you can't run ubuntu 12.04 LTS or 14.04 LTS?
[22:46] <beanbag> yes
[22:46] <beanbag> because that's what datto is using for their backup device os installer
[22:47] <beanbag> im trying to get the lsi kernel module installed on the installer usb stick and when I try to insmod the .ko file I get invaLID MOdule
[22:47] <beanbag> I wasn't sure if you needed something more than kernel version to match
[22:48] <sarnold> modules need to be compiled for the exact kernel configuration / sources used; there's some slight amount of "fuzz" to it, but it's insanely picky. your best bets are either (a) compile the module yourself against the kernel you want to use (b) use the exact kernel that they used when they compiled the module..
[22:49] <sarnold> note that ubuntu 10.04 will no longer be supported in a few weeks; it EOLs very soon..
[22:50] <beanbag> I think once the system is installed they update with a newer image
[22:50] <beanbag> I know how old and outdated it is
[22:51] <beanbag> I guess you can't modprobe .ko files
[22:51] <sarnold> insmod
[22:51] <beanbag> so I can't test before I load the initrd
[22:51] <beanbag> insmod
[22:51] <beanbag> I mean
[22:51] <beanbag> I tried on the defgault one and still got invalid module format
[22:51] <beanbag> so that's not the issue
[22:54] <beanbag> nm it is the issue
[22:54] <beanbag> hmm
[22:54] <beanbag> looks like the installer has a full os on it that can compile
[23:09] <_1_Dre2> yow