[00:35] <KaZeR> hey wgrant
[00:36] <wgrant> KaZeR: Hi
[00:37] <KaZeR> i just got your answer about my translation upload issue. thanks for looking into this
[00:37] <KaZeR> i double-checked with an up to date cookie : 2015-04-10 17:37:07,569 ERROR Template upload failed (error 500, URL https://translations.launchpad.net/navit/trunk/+pots/navit/+upload)
[00:38] <KaZeR> ( my call is ./translations-lp-upload -p navit -e trunk -t navit  /home/navit/github/bin/po/navit.pot -k cookies.sqlite )
[00:39] <wgrant> What's the body of the 500 response?
[00:39] <wgrant> I've not seen this translations-lp-upload tool before.
[00:39] <KaZeR> that's all i get from translations-lp-upload. i can dig a bit
[00:39] <KaZeR> this script comes from : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-l10n-tools
[00:40] <KaZeR> if you know of another one, i'm interested :)
[00:40] <wgrant> I don't know of another one.
[00:40] <KaZeR> ok
[00:41] <KaZeR> i managed to workaround the problem for now by using curl and sending the cookie info in the headers for now
[07:35] <dreamcat4> hello. would it be OK to cross-build an android image on launchpad.net build farm ? it is for a target hardware similar to the rpi2
[07:37] <dreamcat4> not and app, an android image
[07:40] <dreamcat4> or to put it another way, what are the resource limits for SourceBuilds ?
[08:00] <wgrant> dreamcat4: What exactly are you trying to do?
[08:00] <wgrant> (and why do you want to do it on LP?)
[08:21] <grepper> if I have a package that works as is for several Ubuntu releases, can do a depends like:  foo | bar, foo | libbar   ...  where foo is in both releases, but bar and libbar are only in vivid ?
[08:25] <dreamcat4> wgrant: nevermind. i guess i should use a more appropriate service, such as google compute engine
[08:26] <grepper> its actually mplayer | mpv, mplayer | libmpv1 .  There is also a ffmpeg | avconv Depends: but that is okay as they can be installed side by side in Vivid
[08:30] <wgrant> grepper: It's fine as long as at least one can be satisfied everywhere.
[08:31] <grepper> wgrant: awesome, thanks. I did notice that dpkg didn't complain on trusty, but still wasn't sure if it was strictly kosher