=== Guest87529 is now known as mwhudson === tasdomas is now known as domas === domas is now known as tasdomas === tasdomas is now known as domas === domas is now known as tasdomas [21:13] cjwatson: pkgbinarymangler's dpkg-deb is checking for debian/control, but shouldn't it be DEBIAN/control? [21:15] wgrant: It'd have to do something fancier to get the source name in that case. [21:15] dpkg-parsechangelog relies on being in the source directory. [21:15] Oh, right, it assumes it's running in the source dir. [21:16] That is awful! [21:16] We should be able to get that from DEBIAN/control just as well, though. [21:16] But that would be a pitti thing, and we'd have to SRU that ... [21:16] It's not fatal, just noisy. [21:17] I guess we could adjust sbuild to pretend to have a source dir. [21:17] Or we could hack it to set NO_PKG_MANGLE or whatever it is. [21:18] True.Oh, yeah, it does checkit at the top. [21:20] I guess we might as well do that in vivid too? [21:24] wgrant: Possibly. [21:24] wgrant: It feels icky because it's an Ubuntu-specific thing. [21:24] Would be nice to find some other way ... [21:24] (Assuming you mean the sbuild change) [21:24] Yeah [21:24] But how? [21:25] Make pkgbinarymangler get that information from DEBIAN/control instead and not rely on being run from a source directory. [21:25] And either SRU that everywhere or not care about the noise. [21:25] Well, yeah, but SRUs :) [21:25] Right [21:25] Or we could just put this in LP's sbuild. [21:25] Dunno what I think of a one-line fork there. [21:26] It's the only local change we appear to need, apart from the backport bits. [21:26] And it doesn't seem unreasonable to have an Ubuntu-specific change in Ubuntu's sbuild... [21:27] Yeah [21:27] Maybe. But I'd been hoping to be able to sync sbuild once we figured out how to deal with the debfoster thing. [21:27] Which there's a Debian bug about as well, because people want to run sbuild-createchroot for Ubuntu on Debian. [21:28] Fixing pkgbinarymangler is clearly the correct solution. [21:28] And I guess we could just not care about old series. [21:29] NO_PKG_MANGLE is harmless on Debian, I just like to be cautious about introducing Ubuntuisms ... [21:29] Yup. === bigjools_ is now known as bigjools