[13:43] All went well, again, they called us back to check a few things, nothing conclusive : just wait until the fever disappear. -_-" [13:49] great [13:49] * dholbach hugs davidcalle [13:49] dholbach, :) [16:16] dholbach: mhall119 balloons dpm so do you think we should ask IS via an RT for community-team@ubuntu.com? [16:17] community-team@ubuntu.com almost sounds like ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com :) [16:20] :-) [16:23] yeah [16:23] and people may send mail to one by mistake [16:23] making an intentionally private mail to be public [16:35] we can do canonical-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com but that might have the same problem [16:35] or community-team@lists.canonical.com [16:36] i prefer having ubuntu-community-team and canonical-community-team as that's clear (to me at least) which list is which [16:36] yeah, explicit is better than implicit [17:00] can a canonical team be a community team? [17:00] is it not exclusive? [17:00] no [17:01] canonical are part of the community [17:01] canonical-community-team is short for "canonical employed people who work on the community team" [17:01] ah, that makes sense [17:11] inetpro: "Community Team" is our official designation within Canonical's heirarchy [17:11] so the name serves to distinguish us from other parts of Canonical [17:11] rather than us from other parts of the community [17:14] * inetpro gets it now [17:38] mhall119, I forget to ask about the autopilot docs. When will those land on the site? [18:02] balloons: the RT has been filed, hopefully it'll be in staging this week,but I wouldn't bank on it being in production until next week [18:04] jose: respondio Dante o.o [18:27] mhall119, ack.. can you cc me on the rt, along with chris lee? [18:33] hmm... too much CC now :-) [18:53] balloons: it's already sent, but I can keep you updated === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [19:10] mhall119, I believe you can add as as cc after the fact yes? I just want to not have to bug you for status :-) === \b is now known as benonsoftware