[06:14] <Mirv> tvoss: hello. https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/location-service/fix-1441619/+merge/256460 is unapproved so it couldn't be published to the overlay PPA.
[06:14] <tvoss> Mirv, hey there, we are still iterating on the MP, but need the silo for testing purposes
[06:15] <Mirv> tvoss: hmm, it was sent to QA sign-off and QA spent quite many hours with it already?
[06:15] <tvoss> Mirv, very unlikely
[06:15] <Mirv> tvoss: landing-030, that is
[06:16] <Mirv> https://trello.com/c/aB4OnkXF/1406-ubuntu-landing-030-location-service-tvoss testing throughout Friday by alesage
[06:16] <tvoss> Mirv, I for sure did not mark it as tested :)
[06:16] <Mirv> tvoss: someone did
[06:17] <Mirv> tvoss: although, QA should have spotted the num/device/tester fields weren't filled in
[06:17] <Mirv> anyway, unfortunate but that could have been caught by QA because of those missing details
[06:17] <tvoss> Mirv, interesting, I will try to find out what happened
[06:20] <Mirv> I added a comment that it should not be published. if/when you do more changes to the MP, it's best to set the QA Signoff needed back to Required and Tested back to No.
[06:22] <tvoss> Mirv, I'm waiting for final testing in the London office (the bug was originally filed there)
[06:25] <Mirv> tvoss: ok, let's see. it's of course still possible it's good as is and wouldn't need retesting by QA, but let's see.
[06:25] <tvoss> Mirv, yup
[06:52] <alesage> Mirv, tvoss, was the silo approved in error?
[06:54] <tvoss> alesage, yup, I don't know who set it to tested, yet
[06:54] <Mirv> alesage: apparently, although there's a chance it will not need further changes. but there's an error in the QA process - the three bits of info (image #, device, tester) were not filled in, QA process should check those
[06:55] <Mirv> before starting signoff
[07:20] <oSoMoN> ubuntu-qa: good morning, any chance silo 7 can be validated soon for landing in the overlay PPA ? I’ve a got a pile of approved MRs for webbrowser-app to land, and they’re blocked on this one
[07:34] <sil2100> ugh...
[07:34] <sil2100> Hey everyone
[07:35] <sil2100> I think I need to go back to bed for a few more minutes
[07:35] <sil2100> Don't feel too good
[07:35] <sil2100> In case I don't make it for the meeting, feel free to use it as you wish
[08:01] <Mirv> sil2100: happy jetlagging! :) or hopefully just that.
[08:01] <Mirv> and not ubuflu.
[08:56] <Mirv> rsalveti: pleas push your qtmultimedia changes to https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtmultimedia-opensource-src
[08:57] <Mirv> at some point
[09:22] <popey> hmm, my phone has frozen
[09:48] <tvoss> sil2100, ping
[09:48] <davmor2> popey: wasn't that Madonna '00's come back song
[09:54] <Mirv> your phone has frozen, when your kernel's not open
[09:58] <sil2100> ugh, not sure if this is a really bad jetlag or ubuflu, feel really tired and mopped out
[09:58] <sil2100> And sick
[09:59] <sil2100> Mirv: sorry for leaving the train duties mostly on your shoulders today again ;(
[10:00] <Mirv> sil2100: no problem, not much load so far anyway except answering questions
[10:00] <Mirv> I just wonder if I should go for a late lunch or if I should stay home if UPS delivers my Bq
[10:00] <Mirv> eating is overrated
[10:02] <sil2100> ;p
[10:02]  * sil2100 would still be sleeping if not for the UPS delivery man ringing on his door
[10:21] <dbarth> o/ trainguards, could i get a reconfig for silo 6 please (i re-added a merge proposal which was blocking us earlier)
[10:21] <dbarth> the normal reconfigure tool did not accept the addition of a line
[10:22] <sil2100> dbarth: let me try doing that for you
[10:22] <Mirv> sil2100: reconfiguring
[10:22] <Mirv> sil2100: ^
[10:23] <sil2100> Ah ;)
[10:23] <sil2100> Ok
[10:23] <sil2100> Mirv is too fast for me today
[10:26] <Mirv> dbarth: ^
[10:31] <dbarth> thank you
[10:34] <davmor2> sil2100: ha, you need to drink less on ubuntu trips
[11:25] <Mirv> tvoss: please reset the tested fields now that you rebuilt it
[11:28] <tvoss> Mirv, ack
[11:28] <tvoss> Mirv, done
[11:29] <Mirv> thanks
[11:29]  * Mirv got Bq finally!
[11:32] <ogra_> yay
[12:27]  * davmor2 steals Mirv bq not any  more psych
[12:31]  * Mirv quickly tests that machines vs machines works ok also on Bq
[12:33] <ogra_> Mirv, we can only consider that proven if the last level works though
[12:33] <Mirv> right, well just a moment in that case
[12:38] <davmor2> 6 hours later Mirv becomes productive enough to say good night
[12:43] <davmor2> ogra_: it does see my finally completed it post on g+
[12:44] <ogra_> davmor2, that doesnt say anything about Mirv's phone ... this test indeed only works individually
[12:45] <Mirv> you never know when there's a bug lurking
[12:46] <davmor2> Mirv, ogra_ : no I found the bug
[12:46] <davmor2> didn't I mzanetti :D
[12:47] <mzanetti> huh?
[12:47] <ogra_> is that a verb now ?
[12:48] <ogra_> like "I googled..." ?
[12:48] <davmor2> mzanetti: Found the bug in Machines vs Machines
[12:48] <mzanetti> grr... yes... you did
[12:48] <davmor2> Mirv, ogra_: ^ see
[12:48] <mzanetti> and stop reminding me every other day about it... :D
[12:49] <davmor2> mzanetti: you can blame ogra_ and Mirv this time :)
[12:51] <mzanetti> davmor2, just kidding... it just still annoys me that this bug is unfixable
[12:51] <mzanetti> with the given resources, that is
[12:51] <zbenjamin> unfixable bug? oO
[12:52] <mzanetti> zbenjamin, yeah... would require me to verify and tweak all levels again
[12:52] <mzanetti> but there's absolutely no chance I'll do that a second time for free
[12:52] <zbenjamin> mzanetti: is it that annoying?
[12:53] <davmor2> zbenjamin: only to mzanetti
[12:53] <davmor2> zbenjamin: most users will never notice it :)
[14:13] <oSoMoN>  ubuntu-qa: hey guys, any chance silo 7 can be validated soon for landing in the overlay PPA ? I’ve a got a pile of approved MRs for webbrowser-app to land, and they’re blocked on this one
[14:15] <rvr> oSoMoN: Is not the highest priority silo right now :-/
[14:16] <davmor2> oSoMoN: and because of iso testing testers are reduced too
[14:16] <rvr> oSoMoN: How is it tested, anyway?
[14:17] <oSoMoN> rvr, davmor2: I understand that, that’s fair enough. When do you estimate someone could get to it? Tomorrow? The day after? Next week?
[14:18] <oSoMoN> rvr, I need to update the manual test plan (there will be autopilot tests but in a subsequent MR), I haven’t done so until I know for sure when it will actually be tested
[14:24] <rvr> oSoMoN: If US team is fully available, I expect tomorrow or so, but cannot say for sure.
[14:25] <oSoMoN> rvr, ok, thanks
[14:27] <davmor2> oSoMoN: just the wrong week to try and land stuff :D
[14:27] <oSoMoN> you mean the wrong month, right?
[14:34] <vila> fgimenez: nooo, come back !
[14:34] <vila> :)
[14:35] <vila> \o/
[14:36] <vila> fgimenez: so, with the plugin hint, I've found https://github.com/pradels/vagrant-libvirt and https://github.com/fgrehm/vagrant-lxc
[14:36] <vila> Is this what you had in mind /
[14:36] <vila> https://github.com/adrahon/vagrant-kvm is dead according to the project itself
[14:36] <fgimenez> yep, the libvirt one, i'm testing it and seems to work
[14:38] <fgimenez> something like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/10856404/, i haven't see it up yet, but seems to go fine
[14:40]  * vila nods
[14:40] <vila> re-installing vagrant ;)
[15:01] <rvr> charles: Silo 27 approved
[15:04]  * Mirv reconfigures and publishes
[15:06] <Mirv> charles: rvr: how was it missed that powerpc FTBFS:d in the silo 027? if something like that happens, the silos houldn't be set as having been tested. I guess it's flaky and can be fixed at this point, but it should have been done earlier.
[15:06] <rvr> Mirv: ?
[15:07] <Mirv> rvr: so the indicator-location build had failed in that PPA you reviewed. I'm just noting it should not have been set as tested if there's a build failure.
[15:08] <rvr> Mirv: Ahh
[15:09] <charles> wtf
[15:10] <charles> and https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-027/+build/7337699/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-powerpc.indicator-location_13.10.0%2B15.04.20150417-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz has cycled out
[15:10] <charles> I'll start a rebuild so we can see where the FTBFS is
[15:12] <Mirv> charles: stop
[15:13] <charles> Mirv, ack
[15:13] <Mirv> charles: I restarted the powerpc build only, and it succeeded now https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-027/+build/7337699
[15:14] <Mirv> charles: I wouldn't really worry if it's 32-bit powerpc only that's flaky, although at leisure it could be investigated if it could be made more trustworthy
[15:16] <charles> Mirv, dyk if there's still a url for the ftbfs run somewhere?
[15:16] <charles> I'd like to know where it failed
[15:17] <Mirv> charles: rvr: published (to https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+packages) - it seems it didn't pick up my powerpc rebuild yet as a binary copy, so there's a chance the failure can be seen again there.
[15:17] <Mirv> charles: I think it's gone at the moment the single arch rebuild is done
[15:18] <Mirv> charles: it was in tests, anyway, but I just don't have it open anymore
[15:19] <dbarth> o/ trainguards, could you update silo 11 with a newer build of oxide; took too long to validate and now we have 1.6.4 officially stable
[15:20] <elopio> ping fginther: you mentioned last week that the run we see in the dashboard are not completed because the phone dies.
[15:20] <elopio> do you have some time to talk about that?
[15:20] <pmcgowan> dbarth, we should really land that today
[15:21] <dbarth> pmcgowan: that's not the one you want, 1.7.0pre is still building in the phablet ppa
[15:21] <dbarth> the one with the arale fixes
[15:23] <pmcgowan> dbarth, I just want one to land don't care which one :)
[15:23] <pmcgowan> little worried about 1.7 this late
[15:24] <dbarth> 1.7 is 1.6 branched, so not many changes yet
[15:24] <pmcgowan> dbarth, so why is 1.6 in a silo then?
[15:25] <elopio> ping fginther: you mentioned last week that the run we see in the dashboard are not completed because the phone dies.
[15:25] <elopio> do you have some time to talk about that?
[15:28] <fginther> elopio, sure
[15:28] <dbarth> pmcgowan: to release to all releases / models, whereas 1.7.0pre should be for the other image
[15:28] <dbarth> i that works
[15:28] <pmcgowan> I see
[15:28] <elopio> fginther: is there a bug reported for the project that makes the phone die?
[15:29] <pmcgowan> dbarth, when will 1.7 go into a silo? it should be prioritized ahead of the other
[15:29] <fginther> elopio, this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1421009
[15:29] <pmcgowan> dbarth, and does oSoMoN  know this plan?
[15:30] <elopio> thanks fginther. And is that the only problem afecting the runs?
[15:31] <oSoMoN> pmcgowan, landing 1.6 now is the normal process (1.6 was declared stable last week), 1.7 was just branched
[15:31] <dbarth> pmcgowan: as soon as the build works
[15:31] <fginther> elopio, there is an occasional error encountered when ubuntu-device-flash gets an EOF when downloading the image that isn't handled (and I don't think there is a bug for this).
[15:33] <elopio> fginther: great. We are just making a small research to see if some of the errors are caused by our tools or tests. Do you know about something we can do to improve the runs?
[15:37] <fginther> elopio, there are some things on the automation side and assuming more things could fail would help. For example, running each test suite individually would help improve the number of results (but take longer to run).
[15:40] <elopio> fginther: thanks, I'll get back to you if I have more questions. And please let us know if you find another problem.
[15:41] <Mirv> dbarth: from where?
[15:43] <dbarth> Mirv: hang on, we're still figuring that out
[15:50] <Saviq> trainguards, do landing into the PPA go through the QA process just as they did for vivid until now?
[15:51] <Saviq> and please Icanhassilo ↑?
[15:54] <Mirv> Saviq: yes, and yes
[17:12] <om26er> Kaleo, Hi!
[17:12] <Kaleo> om26er: hey
[17:12] <om26er> Kaleo, did you see the autopilot test failure bugs that I reported ?
[17:13] <Kaleo> yep
[17:13] <Kaleo> is it urgent? can it wait until our next sprint?
[17:13] <Kaleo> Monday
[17:14] <om26er> Kaleo, I have one MR to fix a failure, you may review that.
[17:14] <Kaleo> oh right
[17:14] <Kaleo> yep
[17:14] <om26er> Kaleo, also its not urgent but I believe soon the dashboard is going to be an important criteria for image promotion.
[17:15] <Kaleo> ok
[18:30] <kenvandine> renatu, i freed the old syncevolution silos
[18:51] <om26er> kenvandine, Hi!
[19:03] <kenvandine> hey om26er
[19:03] <om26er> kenvandine, re: silo24 the behavior seems to be a bit different from Indicators
[19:04] <kenvandine> how so?
[19:04] <kenvandine> i haven't re-tested since dednick pushed a fix
[19:04] <om26er> kenvandine, if I go to flight mode from the indicator, the switch gets disabled till the toggle finished while in the App I can enable/disable the switch always
[19:05] <kenvandine> is that different than without the silo?
[19:06] <om26er> kenvandine, no, no change visually for both with or without the silo.
[19:06] <kenvandine> om26er, yeah, i suspect there's some special treatment there in the indicator, not sure
[19:07] <kenvandine> om26er, are you testing the latest build, with the fix from today?
[19:07] <om26er> kenvandine, yes.
[19:07] <kenvandine> om26er, awesome!
[19:08] <om26er> kenvandine, the behavior is correct inside wifi panel. The inconsistency is on the main settings page.
[19:08] <kenvandine> oh
[19:09] <kenvandine> yeah, but not related to the silo
[19:10] <kenvandine> but perhaps it could benefit from the same component
[19:10] <om26er> kenvandine, hmm, ok, just wanted to make sure the behavior I am seeing is expected.
[19:12] <kenvandine> om26er, that's expected, but doesn't mean it shouldn't be improved
[19:13] <om26er> kenvandine, hmm how do we proceed, would you fix that first or want the silo to land as-is ?
[19:15] <kenvandine> if it isn't a regression, we should land it
[19:15] <kenvandine> and i think that's what you were saying
[19:16] <om26er> yep, not a regression.
[19:16] <kenvandine> cool
[19:16] <kenvandine> please file a bug about it
[19:16] <kenvandine> there must be some special treatment in the indicator, we could apply the same in settings
[20:15] <robru> kenvandine: https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/ubuntu-system-settings/1390136.laggy-backends/+merge/253395 this MP looks funny (4 Needs Fixing reviews), why did it go for QA?
[20:23] <kenvandine> robru, oh... let me fix that
[20:23] <kenvandine> we found a regression friday
[20:23] <kenvandine> so i bumped it out of approved
[20:23] <kenvandine> he fixed it today
[20:24] <robru> kenvandine: so those reviews are old? i hope the package that QA reviewed is acceptable
[20:24] <kenvandine> it is
[20:24] <kenvandine> i reviewed his fix today
[20:24] <robru> kenvandine: k, will publish
[20:24] <kenvandine> just forgot to ack the MP too
[20:24] <kenvandine> robru, thx
[20:25] <robru> kenvandine: you're welcome!
[20:25] <robru> brb
[20:32] <rsalveti> robru: pmcgowan: was sil around today?
[20:32] <pmcgowan> not that I noticed
[20:32] <rsalveti> wonder if we're good with the new overlay PPA already
[20:32] <pmcgowan> yeah that worked fri for a landing
[20:32] <rsalveti> missing an email with better info/instructions
[20:33] <pmcgowan> I think its all the same and transparent
[20:33] <rsalveti> and if the new images are already published with the overlay
[20:33] <pmcgowan> they shold be afaik
[20:33] <rsalveti> alright, I'm just hoping the vivid landings will go to the overlay ppa by default
[20:33] <rsalveti> if so, good
[20:33] <pmcgowan> didnt steve's email say so?
[20:33] <rsalveti> but would be nice to have an email as well
[20:33] <rsalveti> maybe I missed something
[20:34] <pmcgowan> seems so
[20:34] <pmcgowan> see email from steve on fri
[20:34] <rsalveti> oh, indeed
[20:34] <pmcgowan> actually sat
[20:34] <rsalveti> great, don't know why it got lost in my mailbox
[20:35] <robru> rsalveti: there's an email explaining it on the internal phablet list. Sent by Steve and my reply has more precise instructions.
[20:35] <robru> Heh, yeah
[20:36] <rsalveti> we have 2 emails, on public and one private
[20:36] <rsalveti> but we got a few landings at https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay, so all good
[20:37] <pmcgowan> rsalveti, at least something got done :)
[20:38] <rsalveti> robru: yeah, you said the missing info that I was looking for
[20:38] <rsalveti> the special L column
[20:39] <rsalveti> too many emails
[23:16] <robru> bzoltan_: zbenjamin: please approve your merges: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-2-publish/51/console
[23:20] <robru> zsombi: rather ^