[00:05] <sergio_br22> ergh, something happened to trusty and utopic, weird https://code.launchpad.net/~random-stuff/+recipe/m64py
[00:08] <sergio_br22> built the package, but failed to upload
[00:09] <sarnold> INFO File m64py_0.2.2+r161~5~ubuntu15.04.1.tar.xz already exists in Random Stuff, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors.
[00:09] <sarnold> launchpad is picky about that
[00:12] <sergio_br22> weird, it was the first package, I just pushed a new commit
[00:12] <sergio_br22> ergh, again
[00:13] <sergio_br22> ok, now it was the second time
[00:15] <sergio_br22> If I delete, I can publish later, right?
[00:22] <sergio_br22> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/203876551/upload_7344573_log.txt
[00:23] <sergio_br22> it does not make sense, it was the commit 4 from nest packaging, then I pushed 5, and tried again. Why it's complaining about "files are already published" ?
[00:24] <sergio_br22> "m64py_0.2.2-0_all.deb"
[00:25] <sergio_br22> ergh, why launchpad didn't put it as "m64py_0.2.2+r161~5~ubuntu14.04.1_all.deb" ?
[00:26] <sergio_br22> it ignored my recipe: {debupstream}+r{revno}~{revno:packaging}
[00:39] <sergio_br22> ah, it's the override_dh_gencontrol:
[09:52] <Adri2000> hi
[09:52] <Adri2000> does ubuntu.com email service for ubuntu members implement SRS ?
[09:55] <wgrant> Adri2000: That's not a Launchpad service, but no, it does not.
[09:55] <wgrant> #canonical-sysadmin is the correct channel.
[12:15] <mpt> Huh, TIL there is another Launchpad installation. https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/
[12:19] <wgrant> Yup, that's been around since 2010 or so.
[12:50] <jpds> wgrant: I like their "Careers" link.
[14:03] <Saviq> wgrant, hey, are there plans to have keyboard shortcuts to jump between inline comments (akin to j/k, n/p)?
[14:03] <Saviq> in Merge Proposals, I should've added
[14:05] <cjwatson> I'm inclined to suggest that n/p should stop at inline comments as well as diff hunk boundaries.
[14:05] <cjwatson> Though I thought I heard wgrant bringing something like that up in review as well so maybe there was a reason not to do that ...
[14:15] <wgrant> Saviq, cjwatson: The current vague plan is that we'll introduce comments as a third granularity.
[14:15] <wgrant> There may be a hundred hunks but only two comments, so navigating them together isn't good enough.
[14:15] <Saviq> +1
[14:15] <cjwatson> I guess if my MP has 100 hunks with comments on three of them then I want to be able to skip through those independently ... yes, that.
[14:16] <Saviq> great /me can't wait
[14:16] <wgrant> It's not completely trivial to have a single cursor between those, but it'll get done.