[00:10] <Bluefoxicy> do-release-upgrade -d
[00:14] <Bluefoxicy> no combination of update-manager -d -c works.
[00:57] <psusi> does anyone have any idea why youtube says firefox can't play h264?
[01:00] <brainwash_> psusi: because the required gstreamer packages are not installed and/or firefox is not properly configured
[01:01] <psusi> brainwash_, anything more specific?  what plugins does it require?  and why aren't they installed by default?  I seem to have plenty of gstreamer plugins and totem and chorme can use them to play h264 videos just fine
[01:02] <psusi> I keep reading things online about how the older gstreamer 0.1 version was dropped a few releases back but newer versions of firefox should now use gstreamer1.0
[01:03] <brainwash_> people in #firefox may know
[01:04] <brainwash_> chrome installs its own codec package
[01:06] <Bluefoxicy> the hell?
[01:06] <Bluefoxicy> do-release-upgrade finished?
[01:06] <Bluefoxicy> I blinked and missed it.
[01:06] <Bluefoxicy> I think it finished 15 minutes after it finished downloading.
[01:14] <psusi> Bluefoxicy, eatmydata makes it go MUCH faster ;)
[01:15] <Bluefoxicy> psusi:  video card actually works correctly in this version, instead of flaking out like in 14.10 (it worked in 14.04; the developers are uninterested in fixing the Intel HD graphics regression in 14.10)
[01:18] <Bluefoxicy> oh hold on wait, why is... why is the top left X _ [] +
[01:18] <Bluefoxicy> that belongsi n the top right _ [] X o_O
[01:18] <Bluefoxicy> the close button is RIGHT ABOVE THE LOCALLY INTEGRATED MENUS.
[01:18] <Bluefoxicy> File->save NOPE SORRY YOU JUST HIT CLOSE.
[01:22] <Bluefoxicy> okay so it's not in gnome-tweak-tool or anything.  Gotta bust out regedit to fix it.
[03:31] <ses1984> http://dpaste.com/2PF4V9B
[03:32] <ses1984> installed docker. tried to use docker. The program 'docker' is currently not installed.
[07:10] <tijnix> morning
[07:35] <agronholm> it seems "stat" gives 1 as the number of hard links for every directory now -- is this the correct behavior?
[09:53] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:03] <tijnix> hai
[10:05] <lordievader> o/
[10:05] <vieira_> Hello, I am bit confused. I downloaded a daily build of the 15.04 server ISO but it looks like a netinstall although it has 600+MB
[10:05] <vieira_> I cannot install without internet for instance...
[10:05] <vieira_> and some kernel modules are missing, e.g. aacraid.ko
[10:06] <vieira_> is this a known problem or something? the desktop iso works fine
[10:23] <tijnix> My ubuntu15.04-beta2 iso is 644,9 MB
[10:23] <tijnix> And is not a netinstall :S
[10:25] <tijnix> Read a bug on launchpad about missing some mpath driver
[10:25] <tijnix> But aacraid is pretty standard i guess :S
[11:37] <BluesKaj> Hiyas all
[12:08] <ses1984> i did sudo apt-get install docker, after i install docker and try to use it, the system tells me to install docker
[12:08] <ses1984> http://dpaste.com/2PF4V9B
[13:06] <MonkeyDust> ses1984  and you still can't run it?
[13:09] <MonkeyDust> ses1984  yes, i remember, it now asks to install docker.io, but it's not the same as docker... seen that before
[13:30] <pwuertz> Hi, I'd like to report a somewhat serious regression in 15.04, but I'm kind of puzzeled which package might be responsible.
[13:32] <pwuertz> In 15.04 vlc and totem are both unable to select audio tracks in video files (mkv).
[13:33] <pwuertz> I don't really understand why this affects both vlc and totem alike, as if they both depend on some common library for reading the tracks, yet the mkvinfo command line tool recognizes them just fine
[15:25] <pwuertz> Could someone please try to check if this regression also affects other Ubuntu 15.04 systems?
[15:25] <pwuertz> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1447224
[15:25] <pwuertz> Just play any video with multiple audio or subtitle tracks and try to switch between them.
[17:33] <robse> hi there
[17:34] <lordievader> o/
[17:34] <robse> I can't open the audio settings (under the top-right screen audio icon) .. clicking "Impostazioni audio" (should be "Audio settings" in english) leads to nowhere
[17:34] <robse> nothing appears ... is it a known bug ?
[17:35] <lotuspsychje> !sound | robse
[17:35] <robse> sound preferences window doesn't appear
[17:35] <robse> simple :)
[17:36] <robse> I have to go in Preferences -> Audio to get the configuration screen
[17:37] <lotuspsychje> robse: and your soundcard is installed correctly?
[17:37] <robse> all works, except that the configuration window doesn't appear clicking the volume applet
[17:38] <robse> it appears under system preferences
[17:38] <lotuspsychje> robse: did you check syslog and dmesg for errors?
[17:39] <robse> lotuspsychje, nothing interesting there, but the problem is clearly gui-side, not system wide
[17:39] <robse> again, all works except that the click on the volume applet doesn't
[17:39] <lotuspsychje> robse: or try a tail -f /var/log/dmesg and foold around with sound?
[17:40] <robse> I think my english must be wrong
[17:40] <robse> :D
[17:40] <lotuspsychje> robse: even if its a gui fault, there must be some error to find..
[17:40] <robse> maybe in xsession-errors
[17:41] <robse> but I checked, and there is nothing
[17:42] <lotuspsychje> robse: are you on unity?
[17:43] <robse> lotuspsychje: gnome-flashback
[17:44] <lotuspsychje> robse: did you remove unity manual perhaps?
[17:44] <lotuspsychje> sounds like some missing packages..
[17:44] <robse> I just installed gnome-flashback on a fresh daily build yesterday
[17:44] <robse> nothing removed manually
[17:45] <lotuspsychje> robse: does your problem occur when loading on unity?
[17:45] <robse> lotuspsychje, I have to check that
[17:46] <lotuspsychje> robse: try please
[17:46] <lotuspsychje> robse: http://askubuntu.com/questions/453440/missing-system-settings-after-removing-some-packages
[17:46] <lotuspsychje> maybe this can help
[17:48] <robse> brb
[17:48] <lotuspsychje> kk
[17:51] <lotuspsychje> robse: any luck?
[17:51] <robse> I confirm it's a bug on both compiz and metacity, starting the session with unity makes the sound applet work fine
[17:52] <lotuspsychje> robse: maybe gnome-fallback doesnt load needed files or something?
[17:52] <robse> in the meantime, something happened to the window manager. I noticed that until now the titlebar contained the menu also, which was nice. Now it reverted to the old look of 14.10.  any hint ?
[17:52] <robse> back in 10 minutes.
[17:52] <lotuspsychje> kk
[18:09] <robse> Window Title Bars are  not working anymore for me
[18:09] <robse> mmm
[18:28] <robse> hi
[18:28] <robse> another problem. Does connect to server works at all in vivid now ?
[18:28] <robse> I can't get it work with both ftp and smb
[20:30] <MonkeyDust> topic
[20:31] <MonkeyDust> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[20:31] <MonkeyDust> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[20:38] <Pici> hm?
[20:42] <ig0r_> will there be a 15.04 Release Candidate ??
[20:45] <genii> ig0r_: The name of the iso file there remains constant. It has been the RC version since the 16th
[20:45] <ig0r_> genii: huh?
[20:47] <genii> ig0r_: The image at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ as described in the /topic here IS the Release Candidate. They don't change the name of the image, it always just stays the same.
[20:48] <ig0r_> I see
[20:49] <ig0r_> genii: are the other mirrors other than that link (the download is slow)
[20:52] <genii> Probably, but I'm not sure where you'd find a comprehensive list of them
[20:52] <ig0r_> ok
[20:53] <genii> ig0r_: Keep in mind too, that after you have an iso file downloaded, you can get just the changes to it after that with zsync
[20:53] <genii> ( so that you don't have to keep downloading full iso files every time )
[20:54] <genii> !zsync
[20:54] <ig0r_> thnx but I have a 500Mbit connections so I don't mind downloading it again :)
[20:55] <genii> ig0r_: It also takes the strain off the servers which are feeding the files :)
[21:14] <phpcoder> hello
[21:15] <phpcoder> 15.10 will be released tomorrow?
[21:16] <hyper_ch> hi there, why doesn't  dpkg-reconfigure locales display the selection screen for what lnaguages to install?
[23:49] <nogoodnameslkeft> Hey, I see mate is becoming offically supported. Is MATE suitable for machines without 3d acceleration? I have some lubuntu boxes that cant run unity