[11:29] <faust> hi
[11:29] <faust> I'm trying to find a reliable way to check the gpg sign of the "linux" source package
[11:30] <faust> it seems that the current version (on trusty) is signed by Adam Conrad
[11:30] <faust> shoul I assume that it is always signed by him?
[11:36] <jpds> faust: No.
[11:40] <faust> jpds: verifying against debian-maintainers.gpg will always work?
[11:48] <faust> the answer is "No" I guess...
[11:49] <faust> so how do I fetch all the relevant keys?
[12:01] <infinity> faust: Ideally, the trust path should be Releases.gpg -> Packages/Sources -> .deb/.dsc, which allows you to ignore the sig on the .dsc entirely.
[12:01] <infinity> faust: Otherwise, you'd need to grab every key used to sign every .dsc
[12:04] <faust> infinity: I understand, so I assume that "apt-get source" checks Releases.gpg already and I can ignore its error about missing gpg keys, correct?
[12:04] <infinity> faust: Right.
[12:04] <faust> infinity: thank you very much
[12:04] <faust> jpds: thank you too for your time
[12:05] <infinity> faust: apt-get isn't warning about missing keys (its trust path is sane), it's dpkg-source -x that's whining, because it has no way of knowing how you got the .dsc file.
[12:05] <faust> infinity: thanks for the clarification
[16:57] <luxermin> hi
[16:57] <luxermin> How to install the patch in the new kernel linux-4.0 ??
[16:57] <luxermin> I use "patch -p0 patch-4.0"
[16:57] <luxermin> ?
[17:28] <shudon> hi all :) interesting behavior in 14.04
[17:28] <shudon> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/8831040
[17:44] <shudon> ok i umounted all my bind mounts to dev, dev/pts, and proc, which were bound to my upperdir/foo
[17:44] <shudon> and bind mounted them in the overlay mount point itself instead, and now it works properly :)
[18:29] <strikov> Hi smb! Do you know anything about nested iommu? I'm trying to understand if it's theoretically possible to use iommu-based things like vfio inside the vm or not?
[18:39] <smb> strikov, Not from the top of my head, sorry.
[18:39] <strikov> smb: np, thanks!
[20:12] <nuno> Hello I'm having some doubts related to the tool iperf
[20:14] <nuno> When I issue an iperf command towards a server and both tcp window are very low (2.3kbyte) I get the bandwidth at each second still at 90 Mbps
[20:15] <nuno> I can't 'see' the tcp slow start happening. Is this normal ?