[01:08] <ScottK> rbasak: OK.  Tried to copy it over again.
[03:07] <ScottK> rbasak: Fixed.
[11:06] <peat-psuwit> Do you have any tip for compiling gst-plugins-bad1.0?
[11:06] <peat-psuwit> it says it cannot find mir_toolkit/mir_c
[11:06] <peat-psuwit> lient_library.h
[12:48] <pitti> ev: yes, to verify correct Depends:; but tests can have Restrictions: needs-recommends
[12:49] <pitti> cjwatson_: thanks, will watch out! but I think wgrant disabled them again anyway, until we sort out the binary version issue, right?
[14:21] <wgrant> pitti: Yeah, disaled everywhere now, though there was one set of builds (clamav) in the primary archive that ddeb-retriever should have caught.
[14:21] <wgrant> I haven't checked if it did.
[17:12] <teward> this may sound a little weird, but is it possible to force apt install failure / crash bugs to also include the systemd status command for the individual application that failed?  'Cause https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1447294 shows that it failed to install with error 1, but not actual information about *why* it failed.
[17:12] <teward> my guess is it started nginx but it failed to bind, but apport didn't include that data.
[17:12] <teward> (it only put the DpkgTerminalHistory, which states there was an error and to run additional commands to get status or try and find the problem)
[17:38] <teward> i think maybe its better asked as, "Is it possible to instruct Apport to include additional output from commands for a given package when a bug is filed for it?"
[17:38] <teward> and if so how
[18:22] <cjwatson_> teward: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#Per-package_Apport_Hooks
[18:40] <teward> cjwatson: thanks
[19:07] <brendand_> anyone might know how i ended up with two cursors on the scren after upgrading to the final cut of vivid?
[19:08] <brendand_> one of which doesn't do anything, and is making life extremely difficult right now
[19:08] <brendand_> also lost the ctrl+alt+t terminal short cut - can't remember how to restore that...
[19:09] <brendand_> it is set in keyboard settings...
[19:11] <tnkhanh> hi where do I download the latest ubuntu on dev branch
[22:52] <teward> tnkhanh: Ubuntu 15.04 was released as stable a couple days ago.  W-series isn't open yet, though, so it probably doesn't yet have anything for a 'dev branch'
[22:52] <teward> unless i'm misunderstanding what you're asking
[23:01] <tnkhanh> teward: ok I see
[23:02] <tnkhanh> teward: I just want to be always up-to date ;)
[23:03] <tnkhanh> teward: I installed the dev branch one off 15.04 a month earlier, will it be the same as the released one now?
[23:03] <teward> tnkhanh: you can either do a complete reinstall with the final images, or `sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get dist-upgrade` and get all the updates since then
[23:04] <teward> since the repositories still exist, and they *do* change a lot during dev
[23:04] <tnkhanh> teward: I see, I justt did the sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade thing
[23:05] <teward> in either case the repositories are still the same 'location' - just doing a typical apt-get upgrade (or dist-upgrade to force all the updates) will get you to the current state of the repositories
[23:05] <teward> i'd make sure thoug that you have -updates and -security repositories enabled as well in your sources.list as well
[23:05] <teward> s/will get you/should get you/
[23:06] <tnkhanh> thanks, I see
[23:06] <tnkhanh> er what do you mean by "s/will get you"
[23:06] <teward> tnkhanh: 'sed'
[23:06] <teward> tnkhanh: IRC version of saying "Where I said 'will get you' i meant to say 'should get you'"
[23:07] <teward> but it's ultimately the same thing as I said before
[23:07] <tnkhanh> teward: ohh I see, weird IRC stuff
[23:07] <teward> really it's just shorthand but meh
[23:08] <teward> a short way of saying "Find this in my last statement, and replace it with this because I mistyped"
[23:08] <teward> irrelevant to the ultimate point though
[23:08] <tnkhanh> lol amazing