[01:08] rbasak: OK. Tried to copy it over again. [03:07] rbasak: Fixed. === plars_ is now known as plars === czchen_ is now known as czchen === DrKranz is now known as DktrKranz === ]reed[ is now known as [reed] === henrix_ is now known as henrix === yp is now known as ypwong === czchen_ is now known as czchen === balkamos_ is now known as balkamos [11:06] Do you have any tip for compiling gst-plugins-bad1.0? [11:06] it says it cannot find mir_toolkit/mir_c [11:06] lient_library.h [12:48] ev: yes, to verify correct Depends:; but tests can have Restrictions: needs-recommends [12:49] cjwatson_: thanks, will watch out! but I think wgrant disabled them again anyway, until we sort out the binary version issue, right? [14:21] pitti: Yeah, disaled everywhere now, though there was one set of builds (clamav) in the primary archive that ddeb-retriever should have caught. [14:21] I haven't checked if it did. === mnepton is now known as mneptok === henrix_ is now known as henrix === igniting_ is now known as igniting === mfisch is now known as Guest41550 === pfsmorigo is now known as Guest83237 [17:12] this may sound a little weird, but is it possible to force apt install failure / crash bugs to also include the systemd status command for the individual application that failed? 'Cause https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1447294 shows that it failed to install with error 1, but not actual information about *why* it failed. [17:12] Launchpad bug 1447294 in nginx (Ubuntu Vivid) "package nginx-full 1.6.2-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [High,Incomplete] [17:12] my guess is it started nginx but it failed to bind, but apport didn't include that data. [17:12] (it only put the DpkgTerminalHistory, which states there was an error and to run additional commands to get status or try and find the problem) [17:38] i think maybe its better asked as, "Is it possible to instruct Apport to include additional output from commands for a given package when a bug is filed for it?" [17:38] and if so how === Guest41550 is now known as mfisch === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant [18:22] teward: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#Per-package_Apport_Hooks === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [18:40] cjwatson: thanks === dobey_ is now known as dobey [19:07] anyone might know how i ended up with two cursors on the scren after upgrading to the final cut of vivid? [19:08] one of which doesn't do anything, and is making life extremely difficult right now [19:08] also lost the ctrl+alt+t terminal short cut - can't remember how to restore that... [19:09] it is set in keyboard settings... [19:11] hi where do I download the latest ubuntu on dev branch === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 === soee_ is now known as soee === elmo_ is now known as elmo === kees_ is now known as kees [22:52] tnkhanh: Ubuntu 15.04 was released as stable a couple days ago. W-series isn't open yet, though, so it probably doesn't yet have anything for a 'dev branch' [22:52] unless i'm misunderstanding what you're asking [23:01] teward: ok I see [23:02] teward: I just want to be always up-to date ;) [23:03] teward: I installed the dev branch one off 15.04 a month earlier, will it be the same as the released one now? [23:03] tnkhanh: you can either do a complete reinstall with the final images, or `sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get dist-upgrade` and get all the updates since then [23:04] since the repositories still exist, and they *do* change a lot during dev [23:04] teward: I see, I justt did the sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade thing [23:05] in either case the repositories are still the same 'location' - just doing a typical apt-get upgrade (or dist-upgrade to force all the updates) will get you to the current state of the repositories [23:05] i'd make sure thoug that you have -updates and -security repositories enabled as well in your sources.list as well [23:05] s/will get you/should get you/ [23:06] thanks, I see [23:06] er what do you mean by "s/will get you" [23:06] tnkhanh: 'sed' [23:06] tnkhanh: IRC version of saying "Where I said 'will get you' i meant to say 'should get you'" [23:07] but it's ultimately the same thing as I said before [23:07] teward: ohh I see, weird IRC stuff [23:07] really it's just shorthand but meh [23:08] a short way of saying "Find this in my last statement, and replace it with this because I mistyped" [23:08] irrelevant to the ultimate point though [23:08] lol amazing