[01:31] <ScottK> wgrant, cjwatson, somebody: Rejected: clamav 0.98.6+dfsg-1ubuntu3 in vivid (Cannot copy DDEBs to a primary archive) - that makes releasing an SRU kind of tough
[01:31] <ScottK> Oh, I think I get it.
[01:32] <ScottK> It's still copying to the release pocket, not -updates
[01:40] <ScottK> Well no, same error using copy-package to updates.
[01:40] <ScottK> Sigh.
[01:40] <cjwatson> 19:33 <wgrant> We can fix the clamav situation by either a) reuploading it, b) fixing pkg-create-dbgsym before SRU verification completes, c) removing the primary archive ddebs check since it's obsolete now that publish_debug_symbols is a disableable thing.
[01:41] <cjwatson> (I'm sure wgrant won't mind me leaking that)
[01:42] <cjwatson> Basically we turned on new-style ddebs and then had to revert because that broke gcc; unfortunately clamav was a temporary casualty of this.  If you can wait until Monday-ish then I believe William was intending to do c) then.  Otherwise do a).
[02:18] <ScottK> cjwatson: We're getting a fairly high rate of bug reports over this.  I guess I'll go a.
[02:18] <ScottK> Thanks.
[02:21] <cjwatson> ScottK: Thanks.  Sorry for the inconvenience.
[02:21] <cjwatson> Too much to hope that it would all go smoothly after all the planning ...
[02:22] <ScottK> Well the other frustrating part is we knew about this bug but thought almost no one would hit is, so didn't push uploading a fix.
[02:22] <ScottK> Clearly that analysis was in error.
[02:51] <ScottK> OK.  Released again.  Let's see how that goes.
[03:02] <ScottK> Seems like that worked.
[03:02] <ScottK> Thanks cjwatson and wgrant.
[08:29] <wgrant> ScottK: Sorry, meant to copy what Colin quoted here but got distracted by another crisis. I'll indeed be implementing c) on Monday, but clamav was the only package hit.
[15:18] <ScottK> wgrant: At least we got it sorted.  Thanks.
[20:40] <wxl> hey we going to turn dailies back on?
[20:47] <infinity> wxl: Doesn't make much sense to do so until w-series is open.
[22:42] <Logan> and/or named
[23:33] <wxl> infinity: oh. that makes sense then :)
[23:33] <Ukikie> Also, the name issue.