[06:03] Unit193: has anyone tested the latest core ISO? [06:04] amd64 or i386? Yes to i386, and I'm sure I did live on both, UEFI and BIOS for amd64. [06:05] Unit193: I get a recursive partition table message when I look at the USB stick after dd ing the ISO to it [06:05] 64 bit [06:07] Didn't dd it, but it looks fine.. [06:07] Hmm. [06:07] I have tried two different sticks [06:08] Mmm. [06:10] Maybe I will look at it tomorrow again and try the 32 bit [06:58] Unit193: 32 bit works... boots anyway. disk check shows errors on this one too, but it doesn't hang. [06:59] What errors? [06:59] two of the checksums don't [07:00] (check) [07:01] Sorry it must be late, using the diskcheck on the bootscreen. There are two checksum errors. [07:02] There are two errors for both the 64bit and 32 bit, but the 32 bit boots all the way. The 64 bit hangs with an I can't find this partition to mount kind of error [07:05] Both have partitions that parted doesn't know what to do with. I am using dd if=dist.ISO of=/dev/sdd to write to the USB stick. This seems to work fine with the ubuntustudio ISOs. [07:12] * Unit193 tries something. [07:13] it worked !!! [07:13] Unit193: no slide show :) [07:13] Yep. [07:13] where is this iso then ... [07:16] elfy: it is on ... I can't go look the core ISO has no browser... Unit193's site [07:21] I'll be back in a bit... reboot [07:27] elfy: https://unit193.net/xubuntu/ though, still trying something. [07:29] Unit193: okey doke [07:40] Install of the 32 bit ISO is fine. [07:44] Crap. [07:45] how so? [07:47] Problem with the 64bit right? Lets change something with the 64bit build then test it by building a 32bit iso! Noo. Well, it's (re)starting now, but I need to go as I have an early morning and it's nearly 4am. [07:47] No problem, I have enough to work with. I will play with the 32 bit version for now [07:48] OvenWerks: Checksum issues, one at least should be fixed. [07:48] Other one I may have to change permissions on a file, but would prefer not to of course. [07:49] I will try again tomorrow then. [07:49] (The md5sum file was added to files to check...) === paolo_ is now known as paolo [08:50] On the bright side, the amd64 image looks better. [11:32] good morning folks [11:35] No. [11:42] okthxbai [11:43] "Will 4.12 be coming to Trusty?" [11:43] "No." [11:47] not sure if I should quote that [11:47] bug 1347272 [11:47] bug 1347272 in xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) "Several XFCE applications appear unresponsive after communicating with a daemon" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1347272 [11:50] bluesabre: Hello. [12:29] bluesabre: will you comment on that report? [12:29] not that we want people give hope of backporting any of the fixes === lderan_ is now known as lderan === slickyma1ter is now known as slickymaster [18:59] bluesabre: bug 1441460 [18:59] bug 1441460 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) "[xubuntu] Failing to sleep after inactivity - power manager error?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1441460 [18:59] the reporter claims that one light-locker option is not persistent [22:16] elfy: Not that you're here, but where did it ask for the pass? LightDM was good for me, sudo too, and shutdown. [22:16] (Well, the act of starting to shutdown.) [23:34] hey guys, sorry, internet went outish earlier and then I went out to town [23:37] the official quote that brainwash can use is https://twitter.com/bluesabredavis/status/570387123024433152 [23:38] for bug 1347272, I thought that we had gone through and resolved the issue for every app, need to take a look [23:38] bug 1347272 in xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) "Several XFCE applications appear unresponsive after communicating with a daemon" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1347272 [23:52] Also commented on1441460 [23:52] bug 1441460 [23:53] bug 1441460 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) "[xubuntu] Failing to sleep after inactivity - power manager error?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1441460