=== lan3y is now known as Laney
=== maxb_ is now known as maxb
[18:10] <dkessel> i am having trouble filing a bug. the error page says the load balancer cannot connect to an application server. could this be caused by the planned outage for ppa.launchpad.net ?
[18:12] <dkessel> nevermind, trying a fourth time worked....
[21:39] <antivirtel> hello all! I'm trying to create my first PPA, but I have a bit special situation, so this won't help so much: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/GettingStarted#Packaging -- I have a Raspberry Pi Model B 128 MB RAM, and it has ARMv6l arch (usually it is armhf), but the LP compiler should have build the packages for ARMv7, so it is not compatible... Can I upload my own binaries, or even packages? Thanks!
=== wallyworld_ is now known as wallyworld
[21:58] <cjwatson> antivirtel: No, I'm afraid that's not permitted.  You'll need to use some other system for publishing packages; you could set up something like reprepro locally.
[21:59] <antivirtel> cjwatson but I want to make public on internet
[21:59] <cjwatson> antivirtel: Yes, Launchpad isn't the only solution for that, something like reprepro plus a web server can work too.
[22:00] <antivirtel> ahh this: https://mirrorer.alioth.debian.org/
[22:00] <cjwatson> I mean, in general we like people to use Launchpad but it's not going to be a good fit here.
[22:00] <antivirtel> ok, I'll check on it, if LP won't build a proper one
[22:02] <antivirtel> btw, it is just arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++-4.9 http://paste2.org/I1Hve3wz what I need... isn't it available cjwatson ?
[22:04] <wgrant> Ubuntu's arm-linux-gnueabihf is ARMv7.
[22:04] <wgrant> Even if you could build for ARMv6, Ubuntu's armhf library stack is all ARMv7.
[22:05] <antivirtel> wgrant but I have just ARMv6, and the armhf downloaded debs didn't work
[22:05] <wgrant> Right, Ubuntu does not run on ARMv6.
[22:05] <antivirtel> hmm... that's bad news, but thank you for the info...
[22:05] <wgrant> You'll ned ARMv7-capable hardware (eg. Raspberry Pi 2), or a distro other than Ubuntu.
[22:05] <wgrant> Theoriginal Raspberry Pi was seriously obsolete even at the time it was introduced.
[22:06] <wgrant> Ubuntu dropped support for ARMv6 years earlier.
[22:06] <antivirtel> I just need to distribute the binary, not to buy a new hardware that soon :)
[22:06] <antivirtel> sure it is, but it is just for hobby :) btw... isn't RPi 2 obsolete too?
[22:10] <antivirtel> wgrant ^
[22:12] <wgrant> RPi 2 has a relatively modern CPU that all modern distros can support..
[22:14] <antivirtel> and what about its memory, and others wgrant ? I'd really like to have USB 3.0 on that, but what about its internal speed?
[22:14] <antivirtel> I've an USB 3.0 ext. HDD since 2012, and I can barely use its real speed...
[22:15] <wgrant> The RPi 2's Ethernet and USB aren't ideal, but they're not a fundamental problem for ongoing software support.
[22:15] <wgrant> For actual use cases, sure.
[22:17] <wgrant> But the big problem with the original RPi was that its CPU supports only a very old instruction set, and if Ubuntu built for that there would be serious performance penalties on all modern devices. RPi 2 fixes that.
[22:18] <antivirtel> hmm.. great, but I'm planning to buy an other one only if it has USB 3.0.. what do you think of the internal speed of these devices, can it achive at least 1 Gb/s?
[22:20] <antivirtel> as I remember the peak is 5 Gb/s, but it is just a dream :D
[22:23] <wgrant> RPi 2 can't do 1Gbps on any of its external buses AFAIK.
[22:24] <antivirtel> that's what I was thought... but I meant, if it would have been packed with USB 3.0 wgrant
[23:15] <antivirtel> good night, you may HL me while I'm away!
=== antivirtel is now known as antivAway
[23:33] <FailBit> question: https://code.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/ always shows a banner stating "An upgrade of this branch is in progress." and it never goes away - is this normal?